search
Back to results

Screening in Primary Care of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD and/or Alcoholic Patients (SOPRANO)

Primary Purpose

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD), Liver Fibrosis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
eLIFT
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Angers
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: NAFLD and/or ALD patient defined by at least 1 of the following criteria: Excessive alcohol consumption: higher than 210 g / week (men), or 140 g / week (women) Type 2 diabetes at least 2 metabolic factors among BMI higher than or equal to 25 kg / m 2; Elevated blood pressure (antihypertensive drug, or systolic blood pressure higher than or equal to 130mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure higher than or equal to 85mmHg), Dyslipidemia (lipid-lowering drug, or HDL cholesterol lower to 40mg/dl (men) / 50mg/dl (women), or triglycerides higher than or equal to150mg/dl); Hyperferritinemia (higher than upper limit of normal from the laboratory) Bright liver at ultrasonography without steatosis-inducing drug(systemic corticosteroids, tamoxifen, amiodarone, methotrexate) Patient's agreement to have a blood sample collected in a local laboratory participating in the study Subjects covered by or having the rights to medical care assurance Written informed consent obtained from subject Exclusion Criteria: Already ongoing specialized follow-up for a chronic liver disease Altered health status with poor short-term prognosis, not compatible with a screening procedure Decompensated cirrhosis (hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome) Acute infection Pregnancy, breastfeeding Persons in detention by judicial or administrative decision Person admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research Person subject to a legal protection measure Person unable to express consent

Sites / Locations

  • ANGERS
  • CHU AngersRecruiting
  • BECON
  • Chalonnes
  • Montreuil
  • SEGRERecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Diagnostic Test: e-LIFT

Arm Description

only one arm because diagnostic study evaluating blood test using elastometry and liver biopsy as reference

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Sensitivity of the eLIFT test for advanced liver fibrosis
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the eLIFT test
Sensitivity of the Fibrometer test for advanced liver fibrosis
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the Fibrometer test

Secondary Outcome Measures

rate of patients referred to the specialist following the screening procedure, with eLIFT test
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8)
rate of patients referred to the specialist following the screening procedure, with FibroMeter test
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46)
Rate of "unnecessary referrals" to the specialist with eLIFT test
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Rate of "unnecessary referrals" to the specialist with Fibrometer test
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Number of hepatocellular carcinoma adetected following the screening procedure, with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (diagnosed on MRI by the recommended radiological criteria: hyperenhancement on the arterial phase and washout on the portal venous phase, or by liver biopsy);
Number of gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding detected following the screening procedure, with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Number of patients with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding (diagnosed by upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy: medium-large varices or small varices with red wall marks)
directs costs by type of disease such as ALF, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Mean direct cost per patient; mean direct cost generated to detect one patient with ALF, one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma, one patient with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding
eLIFT and FibroMeter screening procedures as a function of the cause of the underlying liver disease (NAFLD, ALD, or mixed NAFLD+ALD)
Rate of patient with ALF, positive screening test, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding, and mean cost, with comparison between NAFLD, ALD, and mixed NAFLD+ALD subgroups
the accuracy of a sequential strategy using eLIFT as first-line test and FibroMeter as second-line test
Rate of patients with ALF diagnosed by a stepwise algorithm using eLIFT ≥8 then, if positive, FibroMeter ≥0.46
patient adherence to the screening of advanced liver fibrosis
Rate of patients included in the study who did not achieve the required screening procedures
most relevant risk factor of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care
Risk factors among clinical characteristics, alcohol consumption, metabolic parameters independently associated with ALF diagnosis
specialized blood test ELF for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using the recommended 9.8 threshold for ELF
Camden and Islington pathway (FIB4 then ELF) for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers,
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway
Camden and Islington pathway , with comparison of sequential strategy eLIFT then FibroMeter
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway

Full Information

First Posted
December 28, 2022
Last Updated
May 22, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05699018
Brief Title
Screening in Primary Care of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD and/or Alcoholic Patients
Acronym
SOPRANO
Official Title
Screening in Primary Care of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD and/or Alcoholic Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 13, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 15, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 15, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the SOPRANO study is to compare two blood fibrosis tests, the eLIFT and the FibroMeter, for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers.
Detailed Description
Chronic liver diseases (CLD) are responsible for 17 000 deaths each year in France (cirrhosis: 8 000, liver cancer: 9 000). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) are the two main causes of CLD in France, affecting respectively 25% and 12% of the adult general population. A subset of these patients develops advanced liver fibrosis (ALF), which requires referral to the specialist for specific evaluation and management to avoid the occurrence of cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications. General practitioners (GPs) are the first-line physicians in front of the large population of NAFLD and/or ALD patients. It is very difficult for GPs to identify the patients who develop ALF and require referral to the specialist, as their physical examination, usual biology and ultrasonography remain normal. The non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is now available with elastography devices and blood tests. Elastography is a very accurate method but it is available only in few specialised centers. Specialised blood tests are available to all physicians, but they are quite expensive and not reimbursed with therefore limited use in clinical practice. Consequently, liver fibrosis remains unevaluated in most patients with NAFLD and/or ALD, which explains why a lot are too late diagnosed at the stage of cirrhosis complications with poor short-term survival. The eLIFT isa new blood fibrosis test specifically dedicated for GPs with simple parameters and easy "by head" calculation. The simple eLIFT was compared with the specialised blood test FibroMeter for the diagnosis of ALF in an cohort of 1024 biopsy-proven NAFLD and/or ALD patients. eLIFT was little less accurate than FibroMeter (AUROC: 0.78 vs 0.81). Using the recommended cut-offs (eLIFT ≥8, FibroMeter ≥0.46), eLIFT was more sensitive than FibroMeter (86% vs 77%), whereas FibroMeter was highly more specific (71% vs 51%). These results position eLIFT and FibroMeter as interesting tools for the screening of ALF in large populations. As the preliminary results come from very selected patients, i.e. patients from tertiary centers who underwent a liver biopsy, it's necessary nox to evaluate in the real condition of primary care setting whether the use of eLIFT or FibroMeter will help GPs to screen ALF in their asymptomatic NAFLD and ALD patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD), Liver Fibrosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The SOPRANO study is a multicenter prospective comparative diagnostic study . Evaluation of a simple blood test (e-LIFT) for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis. Reference for advanced liver diagnosis : composite criteria : Elastometry between 8 kPa and 14.9 kPa and histologic evaluation of fibrosis ≥ F3 (NASH CRN ) OR Elastometry ≥ 15 kPa
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1788 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Diagnostic Test: e-LIFT
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
only one arm because diagnostic study evaluating blood test using elastometry and liver biopsy as reference
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
eLIFT
Intervention Description
Diagnostic procedure: elastography devices, blood tests (e-LIFT + Fibrometer), liver biopsy if necessary (elstometry ≥ 8 kPa and < 15 kPa)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity of the eLIFT test for advanced liver fibrosis
Description
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the eLIFT test
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Sensitivity of the Fibrometer test for advanced liver fibrosis
Description
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the Fibrometer test
Time Frame
1 day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
rate of patients referred to the specialist following the screening procedure, with eLIFT test
Description
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8)
Time Frame
1 day
Title
rate of patients referred to the specialist following the screening procedure, with FibroMeter test
Description
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46)
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Rate of "unnecessary referrals" to the specialist with eLIFT test
Description
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of "unnecessary referrals" to the specialist with Fibrometer test
Description
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Number of hepatocellular carcinoma adetected following the screening procedure, with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Description
Number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (diagnosed on MRI by the recommended radiological criteria: hyperenhancement on the arterial phase and washout on the portal venous phase, or by liver biopsy);
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Number of gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding detected following the screening procedure, with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Description
Number of patients with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding (diagnosed by upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy: medium-large varices or small varices with red wall marks)
Time Frame
1 month
Title
directs costs by type of disease such as ALF, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding with comparison between eLIFT and FibroMeter strategies
Description
Mean direct cost per patient; mean direct cost generated to detect one patient with ALF, one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma, one patient with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding
Time Frame
1 month
Title
eLIFT and FibroMeter screening procedures as a function of the cause of the underlying liver disease (NAFLD, ALD, or mixed NAFLD+ALD)
Description
Rate of patient with ALF, positive screening test, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding, and mean cost, with comparison between NAFLD, ALD, and mixed NAFLD+ALD subgroups
Time Frame
1 month
Title
the accuracy of a sequential strategy using eLIFT as first-line test and FibroMeter as second-line test
Description
Rate of patients with ALF diagnosed by a stepwise algorithm using eLIFT ≥8 then, if positive, FibroMeter ≥0.46
Time Frame
1 day
Title
patient adherence to the screening of advanced liver fibrosis
Description
Rate of patients included in the study who did not achieve the required screening procedures
Time Frame
1 month
Title
most relevant risk factor of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care
Description
Risk factors among clinical characteristics, alcohol consumption, metabolic parameters independently associated with ALF diagnosis
Time Frame
1 day
Title
specialized blood test ELF for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers
Description
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using the recommended 9.8 threshold for ELF
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Camden and Islington pathway (FIB4 then ELF) for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers,
Description
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Camden and Islington pathway , with comparison of sequential strategy eLIFT then FibroMeter
Description
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway
Time Frame
1 day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: NAFLD and/or ALD patient defined by at least 1 of the following criteria: Excessive alcohol consumption: higher than 210 g / week (men), or 140 g / week (women) Type 2 diabetes at least 2 metabolic factors among BMI higher than or equal to 25 kg / m 2; Elevated blood pressure (antihypertensive drug, or systolic blood pressure higher than or equal to 130mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure higher than or equal to 85mmHg), Dyslipidemia (lipid-lowering drug, or HDL cholesterol lower to 40mg/dl (men) / 50mg/dl (women), or triglycerides higher than or equal to150mg/dl); Hyperferritinemia (higher than upper limit of normal from the laboratory) Bright liver at ultrasonography without steatosis-inducing drug(systemic corticosteroids, tamoxifen, amiodarone, methotrexate) Patient's agreement to have a blood sample collected in a local laboratory participating in the study Subjects covered by or having the rights to medical care assurance Written informed consent obtained from subject Exclusion Criteria: Already ongoing specialized follow-up for a chronic liver disease Altered health status with poor short-term prognosis, not compatible with a screening procedure Decompensated cirrhosis (hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome) Acute infection Pregnancy, breastfeeding Persons in detention by judicial or administrative decision Person admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research Person subject to a legal protection measure Person unable to express consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
William BELLANGER, PH
Phone
02 41 73 58 10
Ext
+33
Email
william.bellanger@univ-angers.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marc De Saint Loup
Phone
0241357812
Ext
+33
Email
madesaintloup@chu-angers.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ANGERS
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David FORTIER, PHD
Facility Name
CHU Angers
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jérôme BOURSIER, PHD
Facility Name
BECON
City
Bécon-les-Granits
ZIP/Postal Code
49370
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean François MOREUL, PHD
Facility Name
Chalonnes
City
Chalonnes-sur-Loire
ZIP/Postal Code
49290
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mickaël BAUDRY, PHD
Facility Name
Montreuil
City
Montreuil-Bellay
ZIP/Postal Code
49260
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurence GAUDREE, PHD
Facility Name
SEGRE
City
Segré
ZIP/Postal Code
49500
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Héloïse GISLARD, phd

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Screening in Primary Care of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD and/or Alcoholic Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs