Acupuncture for Nasal Congestion in Allergic Rhinitis (ANCAR)

Acupuncture for Nasal Congestion in Allergic Rhinitis: An Open-Label, Randomized, Monocenter Trial (ANCAR Trial)

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a disorder that affects more than 500 million people worldwide. Nasal congestion is one of the most general and bothersome symptoms in rhinitis, which affects the quality of life (QOL). Current medications are undesirable due to their side-effects. Acupuncture for AR in general can be considered as safe and can be seen as a potential remedial blueprint for nasal congestion. Evidence supported that acupuncture is clinically used for signs and symptoms of nose disorders, such as nasal congestion, with effectiveness, but whether acupuncture has immediate, post-treatment and long-term effects on nasal congestion in AR is not verified by strictly designed clinical study. The ANCAR trial uses a standard treatment protocol with a fixed set of acupuncture points - to be as scientific as possible from Western medical viewpoint - to open the nose and affect underlying energetic imbalance and immunity at the same time, to maintain its nose opening effect. This novel acupuncture treatment protocol can be seen as a solid and profound approach from which every AR patient may benefit.

Worldwide more than approximately 500 million people suffer from AR (30% of the Dutch population) and its prevalence is expanding. Nasal congestion (i.e. reversible mucosal congestion/nasal mucosal obstruction) is one of the most general and bothersome symptoms in rhinitis and is associated with other medical conditions such as rhinosinusitis and otitis media. This study is relevant as in addition to the high global occurrence of AR, this disorder has substantial effects on the quality of life (QOL) (e.g. during sleep and work). AR is related to high direct medical costs (mainly prescription of medications and outpatient visits) and indirect economic costs (including productivity decrease). Current medications are undesirable due to their side-effects (such as sedation in the case of intranasal antihistamines (INAH)). Acupuncture for AR in general can be considered as safe and can be seen as a potential remedial blueprint for nasal congestion. Evidence supported that acupuncture is clinically used for signs and symptoms of nose disorders, such as nasal congestion, with effectiveness, but whether acupuncture has immediate, post-treatment and long-term effects on specifically nasal congestion in AR is not verified by strictly designed clinical study. The ANCAR trial aims to evaluate the effects of an acupuncture treatment protocol for nasal congestion in AR compare to azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®). A standard treatment protocol with a fixed set of acupuncture points has been established - to be as scientific as possible from Western medical viewpoint - and this selection of acupuncture points can be seen as a solid and profound approach from which every AR patient may benefit. This standard set opens the nose and affects the underlying energetic imbalance and immunity at the same time to maintain its nose opening effect (i.e. to prevent recurrence of the complaint). The acupuncture protocol concerns 8 treatments during 6 weeks (i.e. 2 treatments per week during the first 2 weeks and 1 treatment per week in the consecutive 4 weeks). The positive effects of this treatment protocol (such as improvement QOL) may result in more confidence in the direct, post-treatment and long-term effects of acupuncture and lead to more acceptance of acupuncture as a solid treatment option for nasal congestion in AR instead of using an INAH spray. Hypothesis: Acupuncture will improve nasal congestion in AR compare to azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®). Objective: To evaluate the effects of an acupuncture treatment protocol for nasal congestion in AR.

Carelastin® (1 mg/ml) azelastine nasal spray, 1 spray puff (0.14 ml) per nostril twice daily (totally 0.56 ml per day)

To compare the effects of acupuncture and azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®) on nasal congestion in AR after 6 weeks of treatments based on VAS score. VAS, 0 = no nasal congestion, and 10 = most severe nasal congestion.

To compare the effects of acupuncture and azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®) on nasal congestion in AR after different visits of treatments based on VAS score. VAS, 0 = no nasal congestion, and 10 = most severe nasal congestion.

At 1st day (visit 1), During 6 weeks of treatments (visit 2-7: Only acupuncture arm), 2 weeks after treatment protocol (visit 9), and 2 months after treatment protocol (visit 10).

To compare the effects of acupuncture and azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®) on nasal congestion in AR after different visits of treatments based on PNIF score (score ranges between 30-370 L/min).

At 1st day (visit 1), After 6 weeks (visit 8), 2 weeks after treatment protocol (visit 9), and 2 months after treatment protocol (visit 10).

To compare the effects of acupuncture and azelastine nasal spray (Carelastin®) on nasal congestion in AR after different visits of treatments based on Adapted NOSE score. NOSE, 0 = no problem, and 4 = severe problem.

To assess the effects of acupuncture on other nasal and ocular signs and symptoms in AR based on VAS score. VAS, 0 = no symptom, and 10 = most severe symptom.

At 1st day (visit 1), During 6 weeks of treatments (visit 2-7: Only acupuncture arm), After 6 weeks (visit 8), 2 weeks after treatment protocol (visit 9), and 2 months after treatment protocol (visit 10).

To assess the effects of acupuncture on general health, concentration and energy level in AR after different visits of treatments based on Adapted NOSE score. NOSE, 0 = excellent, and 4 = poor.

To assess the effects of acupuncture on equalization of middle ear pressure in AR in the case patients fly and/or dive after different visits of treatments based on adapted NOSE score. NOSE, 0 = no problem, 4 = severe problem, and 99 = not applicable.

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosed AR by a physician Have one of the AR types: seasonal (SAR) or perennial (PAR) or mixed (MAR) allergic rhinitis VAS nasal congestion: 3-10 Age: from 18 years Signed Informed Consent Exclusion Criteria: COVID-19 Acute common cold Influenza Fever (38°C or higher) Acute nasal trauma (such as a fracture and epistaxis) Irreversible nasal blockages (such as septum deviation, concha bullosa, polyps and cysts) Nasal and sinus cancer Pregnancy or planning for pregnancy Consumed decongestions, antihistamines, antibiotics or corticosteroids within 2 weeks before the RCT Received acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine or another complementary treatment within 2 weeks before the RCT Received immunotherapy within 2 weeks before the RCT Participants refusing or unable to sign Informed Consent

IPD that underlies the results reported in this article after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendixes) for qualified researchers. Approval of the request is a prerequisite to the sharing of data.

Access to trial IPD can be requested by a qualified researcher engaging in independent scientific research.

Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, Zuberbier T, Baena-Cagnani CE, Canonica GW, van Weel C, Agache I, Ait-Khaled N, Bachert C, Blaiss MS, Bonini S, Boulet LP, Bousquet PJ, Camargos P, Carlsen KH, Chen Y, Custovic A, Dahl R, Demoly P, Douagui H, Durham SR, van Wijk RG, Kalayci O, Kaliner MA, Kim YY, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Le LT, Lemiere C, Li J, Lockey RF, Mavale-Manuel S, Meltzer EO, Mohammad Y, Mullol J, Naclerio R, O'Hehir RE, Ohta K, Ouedraogo S, Palkonen S, Papadopoulos N, Passalacqua G, Pawankar R, Popov TA, Rabe KF, Rosado-Pinto J, Scadding GK, Simons FE, Toskala E, Valovirta E, van Cauwenberge P, Wang DY, Wickman M, Yawn BP, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zar H, Annesi-Maesano I, Bateman ED, Ben Kheder A, Boakye DA, Bouchard J, Burney P, Busse WW, Chan-Yeung M, Chavannes NH, Chuchalin A, Dolen WK, Emuzyte R, Grouse L, Humbert M, Jackson C, Johnston SL, Keith PK, Kemp JP, Klossek JM, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lipworth B, Malo JL, Marshall GD, Naspitz C, Nekam K, Niggemann B, Nizankowska-Mogilnicka E, Okamoto Y, Orru MP, Potter P, Price D, Stoloff SW, Vandenplas O, Viegi G, Williams D; World Health Organization; GA(2)LEN; AllerGen. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008 Apr;63 Suppl 86:8-160. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01620.x. No abstract available.

Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvag SK. Nasal congestion index: A measure for nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009 Aug;119(8):1628-32. doi: 10.1002/lary.20505.

Ichimura K. Mechanism of nasal obstruction in patients with allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;10(1):20-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2010.01151.x.

Lieberman P, Kaliner MA, Wheeler WJ. Open-label evaluation of azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Apr;21(4):611-8. doi: 10.1185/030079905X41408.

Craig TJ, Sherkat A, Safaee S. Congestion and sleep impairment in allergic rhinitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010 Mar;10(2):113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11882-010-0091-5.

Skoner DP. Complications of allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Jun;105(6 Pt 2):S605-9. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.106150.

Bousquet PJ, Demoly P, Devillier P, Mesbah K, Bousquet J. Impact of allergic rhinitis symptoms on quality of life in primary care. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160(4):393-400. doi: 10.1159/000342991. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

Law AW, Reed SD, Sundy JS, Schulman KA. Direct costs of allergic rhinitis in the United States: estimates from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2):296-300. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.68.

Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang DM, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy JM, Randolph CC, Schuller D, Spector SL, Tilles SA; Joint Task Force on Practice; American Academy of Allergy; Asthma & Immunology; American College of Allergy; Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2 Suppl):S1-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.003. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1237.

Sertel S, Bergmann Z, Ratzlaff K, Baumann I, Greten HJ, Plinkert PK. Acupuncture for nasal congestion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical pilot study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):e23-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3380. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

https://www.worldallergy.org/education-and-programs/education/allergic-disease-resource-center/professionals/in-depth-review-of-allergic-rhinitis

Sullivan A, Kushnir N, (Original authors: Scarupa M, Kaliner, MA). World Allergy Organization website. In-Depth Review of Allergic Rhinitis. June, 2005. Updated October 2020. Accessed January 26, 2021.