search
Back to results

Muscle Recruitment During Neck Flexion and Inspiratory Muscle Training (FLEX)

Primary Purpose

Mechanical Ventilator Weaning, Respiratory Muscle Training

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion
Inspiratory Muscle Training
Sponsored by
Unity Health Toronto
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Mechanical Ventilator Weaning focused on measuring Mechanical Ventilation, Inspiratory Muscle Training, Neck Flexion, Mechanical Ventilator Weaning

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients receiving invasive MV via endotracheal tube who had failed a planned extubation or failed at least three spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) or receiving MV via tracheostomy (who required tracheostomy because of difficult or prolonged weaning, failed extubation and/or prolonged ventilation) and able to spontaneously trigger the ventilator. Over or equal to 16 years of age Tolerating levels of pressure support of 10 cmH2O or lower (or equivalent support in NAVA or PAV+) for at least 15 minutes In stable clinical and hemodynamic conditions and adequate level of oxygenation (cardiac frequency ≤ 140 beats/minute, systolic blood pressure 90-160 mmHg, no or minimal vasopressors, PaO2/FiO2 over or equal to 150 mmHg) Able to understand and follow simple verbal instructions Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a previously diagnosed severe neuromuscular disorder (such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis or spinal cord injury) Patients with chronic respiratory failure already ventilated before ICU admission Patients unable to collaborate or understand instructions

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion

    Inspiratory Muscle Training

    Arm Description

    On minimal mechanical ventilation support (unassisted/assisted spontaneous breathing) via tracheostomy. Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion will be performed during mechanical ventilation. Patients will be asked to minimally lift their head from the pillow generating a quasi-isometric neck contraction. 30% will be the target intensity level for neck flexion. The patient will perform 2 sets of 6-10 quasi-isometric neck flexions.

    Perform 2 sets of 6-10 breaths through a POWERbreathe device, which applies a variable resistance provided by an electronically controlled valve (variable flow resistive load). The training device will be set at 30% of the highest value of three MIP maneuvers. A two-minute rest period with MV support will be provided between each set.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Adherence to the training techniques
    Adherence to neck flexion and inspiratory muscle training techniques (minimum 70% completion), corresponding to the number of training sessions divided by the total number of potential sessions.
    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
    Neck flexion and IMT will be considered well tolerated if < 10% of patients refers dyspnea > 6 on the Borg scale (Borg scale minimum value is 0, which corresponds to no breathlessness at all; maximum value is 10, corresponding to the most severe breathlessness ever experienced or could imagine experiencing), or severe musculoskeletal soreness, during/after the training techniques. Neck flexion and IMT will be considered safe if < 5% of adverse events will be observed during/after the training techniques. Will be considered adverse events: desaturation over 4%, systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or <90 mmHg or increased over or equal to 20%, cardiac arrhythmias, heart rate >140 beats/min or increased over or equal to 20%, respiratory rate >35 breaths/min or increased over or equal to 50%, cyanosis, diaphoresis, dizziness, facial signs of distress, evidence of increasing accessory muscle activity.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles at different levels of ventilatory assistance through surface EMG
    • To compare the level of activation during usual ventilatory setting vs minimal level of assistance/unassisted breathing paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles at different levels of ventilatory assistance through ultrasound
    • To compare the level of activation during usual ventilatory setting vs minimal level of assistance/unassisted breathing paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles during the two training techniques (quasi-isometric neck flexion and IMT) through surface EMG
    • To compare the degree of activation during IMT and neck flexion paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles during the two training techniques (quasi-isometric neck flexion and IMT) through ultrasound
    • To compare the degree of activation during IMT and neck flexion paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 19, 2022
    Last Updated
    January 23, 2023
    Sponsor
    Unity Health Toronto
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05710432
    Brief Title
    Muscle Recruitment During Neck Flexion and Inspiratory Muscle Training
    Acronym
    FLEX
    Official Title
    Muscle Recruitment During Neck Flexion and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Difficult and Prolonged Weaning Patients: a Physiological Study - The FLEX Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    February 9, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    November 15, 2023 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Unity Health Toronto

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Respiratory muscle dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients with prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation and is strongly associated with weaning failure. Efforts to strengthen the respiratory muscles, aimed at reversing or minimizing the impact of respiratory muscle weakness on clinical outcomes, have generally focused on the diaphragm with specific inspiratory muscle training (IMT) exercises. However, the effectiveness of these exercises and impact on clinical outcomes are not current practice in the majority of ICUs, as they are hardly feasible in ICU patients who often cannot be disconnected from the ventilator and cannot fully cooperate. Promising results have been published concerning non-respiratory training techniques, which can also target the accessory muscles, particularly important in the presence of increased load to the respiratory system, as in the case of the weaning phase. These non-respiratory training techniques would have the advantage of not entailing disconnection of the patient from the ventilator. In particular, in healthy subjects, a quasi-isometric neck contraction, called neck flexion, appeared to generate greater or comparable recruitment of some principal and accessory muscles of respiration, when compared to conventional IMT. However, this has not been studied in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, for whom IMT with threshold loading devices remains the primary recommended rehabilitation strategy. Therefore, the primary aim of the investigators is to assess the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of neck flexion and to compare them with IMT technique in patients with difficult and prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation. Secondary aims are: i) to characterize which respiratory muscles are recruited and their level of activation at different levels of ventilatory assistance and ii) to assess which respiratory muscles are recruited and their level of activation during the two techniques and to compare these findings. The hypothesis of the investigators is that neck flexion will be feasible (more than conventional IMT), well tolerated, and safe in patients with difficult and prolonged weaning. The investigators also hypothesize that, reducing the level of assistance and during unassisted breathing, a progressively increasing activation of the diaphragm, neck and trunk respiratory muscles, reflecting increased ventilatory load, will be fund. Finally, the hypothesis of the investigators is that the level of muscle activation/recruitment during neck flexion will be comparable or even greater to that occurring during IMT, as found in healthy subjects. Finding a new and highly feasible rehabilitative technique, able to recruit and train the respiratory muscles (including accessory muscles), will have the potential to promote patients' weaning and improve all related clinical outcomes, and therefore to dramatically shift the paradigm about the role of rehabilitation in ICU.
    Detailed Description
    The investigators will conduct a prospective longitudinal pilot study in patients receiving mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy. The investigators will perform a set of baseline measurements (as early as possible after the patient reaches the ability to spontaneously trigger the ventilator).These measurements include: I) ultrasound measurements (thickness and thickening fraction) of the diaphragm, parasternal intercostals, sternocleidomastoid and of the abdominal muscles; II) surface electromyography (sEMG) of the diaphragm, sternocleidomastoid, scalene, and of the abdominal muscles. Ultrasound and sEMG measurements will be performed during the current level of ventilation (decided by the clinical team), during minimal level of ventilatory support and/or during unassisted breathing; III) maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP); IV) maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of neck flexion. As soon as patients can be disconnected from the ventilator I) IMT maneuvers and II) neck flexion maneuvers, will be started and performed once a week (each time in a randomized order), until patients are successfully weaned or for a maximum of 4 weeks. The investigators will also perform: III) ultrasound measurements; IV) surface electromyography of the muscles above specified during each IMT and neck flexion maneuver; V) MIP and MVC; these latter measurements will be repeated weekly and inspiratory muscle training and neck flexion intensity level targeted accordingly.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Mechanical Ventilator Weaning, Respiratory Muscle Training
    Keywords
    Mechanical Ventilation, Inspiratory Muscle Training, Neck Flexion, Mechanical Ventilator Weaning

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Model Description
    As soon as patients can be disconnected from the ventilator and able to perform IMT, the order of the two training techniques (Quasi-isometric neck flexion exercise and inspiratory muscle training) will be randomized (using sealed opaque envelopes).
    Masking
    Investigator
    Masking Description
    The two training techniques will be randomized using sealed opaque envelopes.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    10 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    On minimal mechanical ventilation support (unassisted/assisted spontaneous breathing) via tracheostomy. Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion will be performed during mechanical ventilation. Patients will be asked to minimally lift their head from the pillow generating a quasi-isometric neck contraction. 30% will be the target intensity level for neck flexion. The patient will perform 2 sets of 6-10 quasi-isometric neck flexions.
    Arm Title
    Inspiratory Muscle Training
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Perform 2 sets of 6-10 breaths through a POWERbreathe device, which applies a variable resistance provided by an electronically controlled valve (variable flow resistive load). The training device will be set at 30% of the highest value of three MIP maneuvers. A two-minute rest period with MV support will be provided between each set.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Quasi-Isometric Neck Flexion
    Intervention Description
    Patients will be asked to minimally lift their head from the pillow generating a quasi-isometric neck contraction (2 sets of 6-10 flexions).
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Inspiratory Muscle Training
    Intervention Description
    Patients will be asked to complete 2 sets of 6-10 breaths through a POWERbreathe device, which applies a variable resistance provided by an electronically controlled valve (variable flow resistive load). During each IMT and neck flexion maneuver ultrasound measurements will be performed (measurements of the diaphragm, sternocleidomastoid, parasternal intercostal, internal oblique [IO], external oblique [EO], transversus abdominis [TrA] and rectus abdominis [RA] will be taken) and, during the entire period, sEMG monitoring of the target muscles (diaphragm, sternocleidomastoid, parasternal intercostal and EO) will be continued.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Adherence to the training techniques
    Description
    Adherence to neck flexion and inspiratory muscle training techniques (minimum 70% completion), corresponding to the number of training sessions divided by the total number of potential sessions.
    Time Frame
    Baseline measurements assessed ≤ 72 hours from admission and once a week until successfully weaned or up to maximum of 4 weeks.
    Title
    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
    Description
    Neck flexion and IMT will be considered well tolerated if < 10% of patients refers dyspnea > 6 on the Borg scale (Borg scale minimum value is 0, which corresponds to no breathlessness at all; maximum value is 10, corresponding to the most severe breathlessness ever experienced or could imagine experiencing), or severe musculoskeletal soreness, during/after the training techniques. Neck flexion and IMT will be considered safe if < 5% of adverse events will be observed during/after the training techniques. Will be considered adverse events: desaturation over 4%, systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or <90 mmHg or increased over or equal to 20%, cardiac arrhythmias, heart rate >140 beats/min or increased over or equal to 20%, respiratory rate >35 breaths/min or increased over or equal to 50%, cyanosis, diaphoresis, dizziness, facial signs of distress, evidence of increasing accessory muscle activity.
    Time Frame
    Baseline measurements assessed ≤ 72 hours from admission and once a week until successfully weaned or up to maximum of 4 weeks.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles at different levels of ventilatory assistance through surface EMG
    Description
    • To compare the level of activation during usual ventilatory setting vs minimal level of assistance/unassisted breathing paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Time Frame
    As early as possible after reaching the ability to spontaneously trigger the ventilator and tolerate a pressure support value of 10 cmH2O or below for at least 15 minutes until successfully weaned or a maximum of 4 weeks
    Title
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles at different levels of ventilatory assistance through ultrasound
    Description
    • To compare the level of activation during usual ventilatory setting vs minimal level of assistance/unassisted breathing paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Time Frame
    As early as possible after reaching the ability to spontaneously trigger the ventilator and tolerate a pressure support value of 10 cmH2O or below for at least 15 minutes until successfully weaned or a maximum of 4 weeks
    Title
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles during the two training techniques (quasi-isometric neck flexion and IMT) through surface EMG
    Description
    • To compare the degree of activation during IMT and neck flexion paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Time Frame
    As early as possible after reaching the ability to spontaneously trigger the ventilator and tolerate a pressure support value of 10 cmH2O or below for at least 15 minutes until successfully weaned or a maximum of 4 weeks
    Title
    Level of activation of the different respiratory muscles during the two training techniques (quasi-isometric neck flexion and IMT) through ultrasound
    Description
    • To compare the degree of activation during IMT and neck flexion paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be performed.
    Time Frame
    As early as possible after reaching the ability to spontaneously trigger the ventilator and tolerate a pressure support value of 10 cmH2O or below for at least 15 minutes until successfully weaned or a maximum of 4 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    16 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients receiving invasive MV via endotracheal tube who had failed a planned extubation or failed at least three spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) or receiving MV via tracheostomy (who required tracheostomy because of difficult or prolonged weaning, failed extubation and/or prolonged ventilation) and able to spontaneously trigger the ventilator. Over or equal to 16 years of age Tolerating levels of pressure support of 10 cmH2O or lower (or equivalent support in NAVA or PAV+) for at least 15 minutes In stable clinical and hemodynamic conditions and adequate level of oxygenation (cardiac frequency ≤ 140 beats/minute, systolic blood pressure 90-160 mmHg, no or minimal vasopressors, PaO2/FiO2 over or equal to 150 mmHg) Able to understand and follow simple verbal instructions Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a previously diagnosed severe neuromuscular disorder (such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis or spinal cord injury) Patients with chronic respiratory failure already ventilated before ICU admission Patients unable to collaborate or understand instructions
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Laurent Brochard, MD, PhD
    Phone
    416-864-5686
    Email
    Laurent.Brochard@unityhealth.to
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Annia Schreiber, MD
    Email
    annia.schreiber@unityhealth.to

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27626706
    Citation
    Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, Piquilloud L, Zogheib E, Jonas M, Grelon F, Runge I, Nicolas Terzi, Grange S, Barberet G, Guitard PG, Frat JP, Constan A, Chretien JM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Richard JM, Brochard L; WIND (Weaning according to a New Definition) Study Group and the REVA (Reseau Europeen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle) Network double dagger. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17470624
    Citation
    Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, Pearl R, Silverman H, Stanchina M, Vieillard-Baron A, Welte T. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00010206.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19541716
    Citation
    Funk GC, Anders S, Breyer MK, Burghuber OC, Edelmann G, Heindl W, Hinterholzer G, Kohansal R, Schuster R, Schwarzmaier-D'Assie A, Valentin A, Hartl S. Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation according to new categories. Eur Respir J. 2010 Jan;35(1):88-94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00056909. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26974173
    Citation
    Herridge MS, Chu LM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Chan L, Thomas C, Friedrich JO, Mehta S, Lamontagne F, Levasseur M, Ferguson ND, Adhikari NK, Rudkowski JC, Meggison H, Skrobik Y, Flannery J, Bayley M, Batt J, Santos CD, Abbey SE, Tan A, Lo V, Mathur S, Parotto M, Morris D, Flockhart L, Fan E, Lee CM, Wilcox ME, Ayas N, Choong K, Fowler R, Scales DC, Sinuff T, Cuthbertson BH, Rose L, Robles P, Burns S, Cypel M, Singer L, Chaparro C, Chow CW, Keshavjee S, Brochard L, Hebert P, Slutsky AS, Marshall JC, Cook D, Cameron JI; RECOVER Program Investigators (Phase 1: towards RECOVER); Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. The RECOVER Program: Disability Risk Groups and 1-Year Outcome after 7 or More Days of Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 1;194(7):831-844. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201512-2343OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20679561
    Citation
    Unroe M, Kahn JM, Carson SS, Govert JA, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray A, Tulsky JA, Cox CE. One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):167-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00007.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26003390
    Citation
    Damuth E, Mitchell JA, Bartock JL, Roberts BW, Trzeciak S. Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jul;3(7):544-53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00150-2. Epub 2015 May 20.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9512849
    Citation
    Claxton AR, Wong DT, Chung F, Fehlings MG. Predictors of hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;45(2):144-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03013253.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27310484
    Citation
    Dres M, Dube BP, Mayaux J, Delemazure J, Reuter D, Brochard L, Similowski T, Demoule A. Coexistence and Impact of Limb Muscle and Diaphragm Weakness at Time of Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):57-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0367OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21705883
    Citation
    Kim WY, Suh HJ, Hong SB, Koh Y, Lim CM. Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2627-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182266408.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26572511
    Citation
    Jung B, Moury PH, Mahul M, de Jong A, Galia F, Prades A, Albaladejo P, Chanques G, Molinari N, Jaber S. Diaphragmatic dysfunction in patients with ICU-acquired weakness and its impact on extubation failure. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4125-2. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28930478
    Citation
    Goligher EC, Dres M, Fan E, Rubenfeld GD, Scales DC, Herridge MS, Vorona S, Sklar MC, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Murray A, Brace D, Urrea C, Reid WD, Tomlinson G, Slutsky AS, Kavanagh BP, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND. Mechanical Ventilation-induced Diaphragm Atrophy Strongly Impacts Clinical Outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 15;197(2):204-213. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0536OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26167730
    Citation
    Goligher EC, Fan E, Herridge MS, Murray A, Vorona S, Brace D, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Tomlinson G, Singh JM, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND. Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation. Impact of Inspiratory Effort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1080-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0620OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28917004
    Citation
    Dres M, Goligher EC, Heunks LMA, Brochard LJ. Critical illness-associated diaphragm weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1441-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4928-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29584447
    Citation
    Vorona S, Sabatini U, Al-Maqbali S, Bertoni M, Dres M, Bissett B, Van Haren F, Martin AD, Urrea C, Brace D, Parotto M, Herridge MS, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E, Melo LT, Reid WD, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND, Goligher EC. Inspiratory Muscle Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jun;15(6):735-744. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201712-961OC.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26092389
    Citation
    Elkins M, Dentice R. Inspiratory muscle training facilitates weaning from mechanical ventilation among patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21385346
    Citation
    Martin AD, Smith BK, Davenport PD, Harman E, Gonzalez-Rothi RJ, Baz M, Layon AJ, Banner MJ, Caruso LJ, Deoghare H, Huang TT, Gabrielli A. Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R84. doi: 10.1186/cc10081. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21282809
    Citation
    Gosselink R, De Vos J, van den Heuvel SP, Segers J, Decramer M, Kwakkel G. Impact of inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD: what is the evidence? Eur Respir J. 2011 Feb;37(2):416-25. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00031810.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29961023
    Citation
    Hoffman M, Van Hollebeke M, Clerckx B, Muller J, Louvaris Z, Gosselink R, Hermans G, Langer D. Can inspiratory muscle training improve weaning outcomes in difficult to wean patients? A protocol for a randomised controlled trial (IMweanT study). BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e021091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021091.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    6238017
    Citation
    De Troyer A, Estenne M. Coordination between rib cage muscles and diaphragm during quiet breathing in humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Sep;57(3):899-906. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.57.3.899.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23733642
    Citation
    De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Compr Physiol. 2011 Jul;1(3):1273-300. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100009.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31236639
    Citation
    Shi ZH, Jonkman A, de Vries H, Jansen D, Ottenheijm C, Girbes A, Spoelstra-de Man A, Zhou JX, Brochard L, Heunks L. Expiratory muscle dysfunction in critically ill patients: towards improved understanding. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Aug;45(8):1061-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05664-4. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24747754
    Citation
    Laghi F, Shaikh HS, Morales D, Sinderby C, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Diaphragmatic neuromechanical coupling and mechanisms of hypercapnia during inspiratory loading. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Jul 1;198:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26396169
    Citation
    Ishida H, Suehiro T, Kurozumi C, Ono K, Watanabe S. Correlation Between Abdominal Muscle Thickness and Maximal Expiratory Pressure. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Nov;34(11):2001-5. doi: 10.7863/ultra.14.12006. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32084029
    Citation
    Dres M, Dube BP, Goligher E, Vorona S, Demiri S, Morawiec E, Mayaux J, Brochard L, Similowski T, Demoule A. Usefulness of Parasternal Intercostal Muscle Ultrasound during Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):1114-1125. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003191.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33711154
    Citation
    Shi ZH, de Vries H, de Grooth HJ, Jonkman AH, Zhang Y, Haaksma M, van de Ven PM, de Man AAME, Girbes A, Tuinman PR, Zhou JX, Ottenheijm C, Heunks L. Changes in Respiratory Muscle Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation: Focus on Expiratory Muscles. Anesthesiology. 2021 May 1;134(5):748-759. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003736.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31094757
    Citation
    Vivier E, Roussey A, Doroszewski F, Rosselli S, Pommier C, Carteaux G, Mekontso Dessap A. Atrophy of Diaphragm and Pectoral Muscles in Critically Ill Patients. Anesthesiology. 2019 Sep;131(3):569-579. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002737.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34090872
    Citation
    Schreiber AF, Bertoni M, Coiffard B, Fard S, Wong J, Reid WD, Brochard LJ, Piva S, Goligher EC. Abdominal Muscle Use During Spontaneous Breathing and Cough in Patients Who Are Mechanically Ventilated: A Bi-center Ultrasound Study. Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1316-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.053. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28504508
    Citation
    Enriquez D, Gomez Traverso R, Brizuela S, Szyld E. [Mistakes in drug prescription during simulated pediatric resuscitations and other urgency procedures]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;115(3):294-299. doi: 10.5546/aap.2017.294. Spanish.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    14514702
    Citation
    DePalo VA, Parker AL, Al-Bilbeisi F, McCool FD. Respiratory muscle strength training with nonrespiratory maneuvers. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Feb;96(2):731-4. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00511.2003. Epub 2003 Sep 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31977643
    Citation
    Derbakova A, Khuu S, Ho K, Lewis C, Ma T, Melo LT, Zabjek KF, Goligher EC, Brochard L, Fregonezi G, Reid WD. Neck and Inspiratory Muscle Recruitment during Inspiratory Loading and Neck Flexion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jul;52(7):1610-1616. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002271.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25693448
    Citation
    Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, Farias P, Murray A, Brace D, Brochard LJ, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Ferguson ND. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):642-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Erratum In: Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):734. Sebastien-Bolz, Steffen [corrected to Bolz, Steffen-Sebastien].
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23344830
    Citation
    Matamis D, Soilemezi E, Tsagourias M, Akoumianaki E, Dimassi S, Boroli F, Richard JC, Brochard L. Sonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients. Technique and clinical applications. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):801-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2823-1. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32894372
    Citation
    Formenti P, Umbrello M, Dres M, Chiumello D. Ultrasonographic assessment of parasternal intercostal muscles during mechanical ventilation. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00735-y.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23605885
    Citation
    Hong BY, Ko YJ, Kim JS, Ok EJ, Hwang Y, Kim HW. Sternocleidomastoid ultrasonography data for muscular torticollis in infants. Muscle Nerve. 2013 Jul;48(1):100-4. doi: 10.1002/mus.23712. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27467513
    Citation
    Kubas C, Chen YW, Echeverri S, McCann SL, Denhoed MJ, Walker CJ, Kennedy CN, Reid WD. Reliability and Validity of Cervical Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Testing. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1087-1096. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001578.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Marini JJ, Smith TC, Lamb V. Estimation of Inspiratory Muscle Strength in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: The Measurement of Maxima Inspiratory Pressure. J Crit Care. 1986;1(1):32-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31807987
    Citation
    de Almeida LB, Trevizan PF, Laterza MC, Hallack Neto AE, Perrone ACASJ, Martinez DG. Safety and feasibility of inspiratory muscle training for hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled study. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3627-3635. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05209-x. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31184516
    Citation
    Fioritto AP, Oliveira CC, Albuquerque VS, Almeida LB, Granger CL, Denehy L, Malaguti C. Individualized in-hospital exercise training program for people undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Feb;43(3):386-392. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1626493. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Muscle Recruitment During Neck Flexion and Inspiratory Muscle Training

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs