search
Back to results

Is Intraperitoneal Drainage Necessary Following Distal Pancreatectomy?

Primary Purpose

Cyst of Pancreas, Pancreatectomy, Pancreas Neoplasm

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
19 French Blake Drain
Sponsored by
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cyst of Pancreas focused on measuring Pancreatic neoplasm

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must be undergoing a scheduled distal pancreatectomy (with or without concurrent splenectomy) Age ≥18 years Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: Patients < 18 years old Patients who are pregnant Patients with a history of previous pancreatic surgery Patients with a history of prior gastric resection, gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy Patients with prior cystogastrostomy procedure Patients who have failed prior endoscopic intervention or ultrasound due to esophageal or other gastrointestinal stricture Patients with Type 3 or Type 4 Paraesophageal Hernia noted either on pre-operative imaging or intra-operatively Patients undergoing concurrent resection of organs other than the pancreas or spleen Patients who undergo oversewing of the pancreatic transection margin Patients with unexpected intraoperative bleeding or adhesive disease which deem it unsafe to proceed without an intraabdominal drain Patients who are unable to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Standard of care

Omitting Standard of Care

Arm Description

Intraperitoneal drain will be placed near the pancreatic resection margin, which is the routine standard of care.

No intraperitoneal drain will be placed in the participants, which omits the routine standard of care.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite endpoint comparison
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Grade B POPF
Composite endpoint comparison
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Grade C POPF
Composite endpoint comparison
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes Readmission
Composite endpoint comparison
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Organ Space Surgical Site Infection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rates of endoscopic drainage vs percutaneous drainage of Grade B POPF
Rates of drainage based off of the Grade B Postoperative pancreatic fistula
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Global Health
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Physical Function
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the original Drain Quality of Life scale
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Global Health
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Physical Function
Quality of Life Score
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the original Drain Quality of Life scale
Hospital Length of Stay
Measurement of the difference in Hospital Length-of-Stay based on intraperitoneal drainage after DP
Cost analysis for overall healthcare costs
Cost analysis for overall healthcare costs associated with both methods of postoperative care

Full Information

First Posted
January 27, 2023
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05720338
Brief Title
Is Intraperitoneal Drainage Necessary Following Distal Pancreatectomy?
Official Title
Is Intraperitoneal Drainage Necessary Following Distal Pancreatectomy: A Randomized Control Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 13, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze if intraperitoneal drainage is necessary following distal pancreatectomy. This study aims to determine whether the omission of routine intraperitoneal drainage in the setting of reinforced staple technology is non-inferior to routine intraperitoneal drainage with respect to a composite post-operative complications of Grade B or C Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), readmission, or organ space surgical site infection following a distal pancreatectomy.
Detailed Description
Pancreatic resections are commonly performed across the United States, yet still represent one of the most morbid abdominal operations in the country, with postoperative mortality as high as 7.7%. Distal pancreatectomy (DP) represents one of the most common approaches to pancreatic resection and is typically used for tumors of the pancreatic body or tail. This operation is known to have a high historic morbidity, with reports of overall morbidity between 12-52%. Common complications include intraabdominal abscess and surgical site infection. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) represents the most common complication following partial pancreatic resection, with rates reported with rates as high as 30% in multiple large retrospective studies. Multiple strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic leak following distal pancreatectomy have been studied. One of the outstanding questions that remains is regarding the need for routine intraperitoneal drainage following DP, particularly since the advent of reinforced staple technology. This study aims to determine if intraperitoneal drainage is necessary following DP. This study will compare groups using a composite endpoint of complications.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cyst of Pancreas, Pancreatectomy, Pancreas Neoplasm
Keywords
Pancreatic neoplasm

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
234 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard of care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intraperitoneal drain will be placed near the pancreatic resection margin, which is the routine standard of care.
Arm Title
Omitting Standard of Care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No intraperitoneal drain will be placed in the participants, which omits the routine standard of care.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
19 French Blake Drain
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intraperitoneal drain
Intervention Description
19 French Blake Intraperitoneal Drain will be placed near the pancreatic resection margin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite endpoint comparison
Description
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Grade B POPF
Time Frame
Within 90 days of surgery
Title
Composite endpoint comparison
Description
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Grade C POPF
Time Frame
Within 90 days of surgery
Title
Composite endpoint comparison
Description
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes Readmission
Time Frame
Within 90 days of surgery
Title
Composite endpoint comparison
Description
Comparison between groups using a composite endpoint of complications that includes presence of Organ Space Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame
Within 90 days of surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rates of endoscopic drainage vs percutaneous drainage of Grade B POPF
Description
Rates of drainage based off of the Grade B Postoperative pancreatic fistula
Time Frame
90-day post operative time point
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Global Health
Time Frame
At day 14 postoperative
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Physical Function
Time Frame
At day 14 postoperative
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the original Drain Quality of Life scale
Time Frame
At day 14 postoperative
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Global Health
Time Frame
At day 90 postoperative
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the PROMIS-10 Physical Function
Time Frame
At day 90 postoperative
Title
Quality of Life Score
Description
Post-operative Quality of Life score using the original Drain Quality of Life scale
Time Frame
At day 90 postoperative
Title
Hospital Length of Stay
Description
Measurement of the difference in Hospital Length-of-Stay based on intraperitoneal drainage after DP
Time Frame
90-day post operative time point
Title
Cost analysis for overall healthcare costs
Description
Cost analysis for overall healthcare costs associated with both methods of postoperative care
Time Frame
At day 90 postoperative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must be undergoing a scheduled distal pancreatectomy (with or without concurrent splenectomy) Age ≥18 years Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: Patients < 18 years old Patients who are pregnant Patients with a history of previous pancreatic surgery Patients with a history of prior gastric resection, gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy Patients with prior cystogastrostomy procedure Patients who have failed prior endoscopic intervention or ultrasound due to esophageal or other gastrointestinal stricture Patients with Type 3 or Type 4 Paraesophageal Hernia noted either on pre-operative imaging or intra-operatively Patients undergoing concurrent resection of organs other than the pancreas or spleen Patients who undergo oversewing of the pancreatic transection margin Patients with unexpected intraoperative bleeding or adhesive disease which deem it unsafe to proceed without an intraabdominal drain Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Robert Simon, MD
Phone
1-866-223-8100
Email
TaussigResearch@ccf.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Simon, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Simon, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Is Intraperitoneal Drainage Necessary Following Distal Pancreatectomy?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs