search
Back to results

Cerebellar Involvement in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

Primary Purpose

Alcohol Use Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alcohol Use Disorder focused on measuring AUD, heavy drinking, hazardous drinking

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - 55 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: completed at least 8 years of education Exclusion Criteria: Estimated Intelligence Quotient (IQ) < 90 less than 5th grade reading level Left handed Non-native English speaker current drug use disorder other than alcohol (except nicotine and caffeine) and or recent drug use in the last 90 days Positive breath alcohol level at time of MRI scan or discrepancies between alcohol biomarker and self-report that cannot be resolved Exhibiting symptoms of alcohol withdrawal on visit 1 assessment Significant current psychiatric distress and or treatment History of any central nervous system disorder, presence of a seizure disorder, or use of anticonvulsant medication in the past 3 months any serious medical condition detected on assessment or by medical record review; or have liver function tests more than three times normal at screening History of metal implantation that would preclude MRI scanning; or other implants, pumps, pacemakers that would be contraindications for MRI scanning Abnormal MRI scan or history of significant closed head trauma Evidence of dementia For women, pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Cathodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS)

Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS)

Sham cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (stDCS)

Arm Description

For ctDCS, the cathodal (-) electrode will be positioned over the right cerebellum 1 cm below and 3 cm lateral to the inion, and the anodal (+) electrode will be placed on the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2 EEG location).

For atDCS, anode/cathode locations are reversed from those of ctDCS..

For stDCS, the electrodes will be configured randomly as atDCS 50% of the time, and as ctDCS 50% of the time.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Craving for alcohol during the cue reactivity task as assessed by a rating scale
Participants will view blocks of pictures of alcohol and non-alcohol beverages, as well as control pictures and periods of rest. Participant rating of alcohol craving are obtained during the picture presentations using one of 5 buttons placed under their fingers, where 5 (thumb) = Extreme, 4=Severe, 3=Moderate, 2=Mild, 1=None
Resting state functional connectivity during tDCS
Participants will rest quietly during tDCS administration
Brain activation to alcohol cues
Participants will view blocks of pictures of alcohol and non-alcohol beverages, as well as control pictures and periods of rest. Brain activation will be measured from the fMRI signal on alcohol minus non-alcohol conditions.
Brain functional connectivity to alcohol vs non-alcohol cues
A psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis will be used to determine if brain connectivity between the cerebellum and reward areas changes when viewing alcohol versus non-alcohol pictures
Brain activation related to reward prediction during the monetary incentive task
The monetary incentive task is performed during fMRI scanning. Two different cue symbols (dollar sign vs circle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Brain activation during reward prediction will be measured by the post-cue activation on dollar sign versus circle trials.
Brain functional connectivity related to reward prediction during the monetary incentive task
The monetary incentive task is performed during fMRI scanning. Two different cue symbols (dollar sign vs circle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and reward structures during reward prediction will be measured by a PPI analysis that measures post-cue functional connectivity on dollar sign versus circle trials.
Brain activation to reward prediction error during the monetary incentive task
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Brain activation to reward prediction error will be measured from the activation observed after the participant receives feedback on his/her winnings, by contrasting trials in which reward obtained is equal to the amount expected versus not equal to the amount expected.
brain functional connectivity to reward prediction error during the monetary incentive task
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and reward structures to reward prediction error will be measured using a PPI on the connectivity that is observed after the participant receives feedback on his/her winnings, by contrasting trials in which reward obtained is equal to the amount expected versus not equal to the amount expected.
Percentage of trials with a conditioned response during the classical eyeblink conditional task
Eyeblink conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus, e.g. an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), with an air puff to the eye region. This unconditioned stimulus (US) evokes an unconditioned response (UR) that is detected by measuring the eyeblink. After repeated pairings of the CS and US, participants learn to blink in response to the conditioned stimulus and before air puff onset. The CS-US pairing dependent eyeblink that anticipates the onset of the US is referred to as the conditioned response (CR).
Mean time (in milliseconds) at which peak of conditioned response occurs during the classical eyeblink conditional task
Eyeblink conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus, e.g. an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), with an air puff to the eye region. This unconditioned stimulus (US) evokes an unconditioned response (UR) that is detected by measuring the eyeblink. After repeated pairings of the CS and US, participants learn to blink in response to the conditioned stimulus and before air puff onset. The CS-US pairing dependent eyeblink that anticipates the onset of the US is referred to as the conditioned response (CR).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured from a CBF MRI scan
Local increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) that exceed the increase in blood oxygen metabolism (CMRO2) cause a reduction of deoxyhemoglobin leading to a lengthening of the transverse relaxation time T2* and increased MRI signal. CBF is measured as ml/100g tissue/minute.
Behavioral accuracy during the monetary incentive task
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Accuracy will be measured as the percent of trials in which the participant successfully pressed the button only when the X was on the screen

Full Information

First Posted
February 7, 2023
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05732207
Brief Title
Cerebellar Involvement in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
Official Title
Investigation of Cerebellar Involvement in AUD
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 17, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this observational and interventional study is to better understand the involvement of the cerebellum in the brain reward system in persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the nature of cerebellar input to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in the brain reward system, and how is it perturbed in AUD? What is the relationship between measures of cerebellar integrity and magnitude of reward activation to alcohol-related cues in cerebellar, VTA and other brain reward structures? What is the therapeutic potential of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for modulating alcohol cue reactivity, associated alcohol craving, and cerebellar - VTA functional connectivity in the brain reward system? Persons with AUD will be compared with healthy control participants.
Detailed Description
Recent animal studies have provided new evidence that the cerebellum may have a stronger link to the reward system of the brain than was previously recognized. Direct projections from cerebellar deep nuclei (DN) to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) have been identified, and stimulation of these cerebellar afferents to the VTA was found to be rewarding. Such findings raise the possibility that cerebellar dysfunction could contribute substantially to addiction via a cerebellar influence over VTA. Consistent with animal findings, the investigators have found in human functional MRI (fMRI) preliminary data strong cerebellar and VTA activation in response to alcohol cues relative to non-alcohol stimuli in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) compared to controls, and close coupling observed between DN and VTA activation. Studying AUD and control participants, this project will address three important questions. The first is: What is the nature of cerebellar input to the VTA, and how is it perturbed in AUD? A number of investigations have suggested that when a stimulus is presented, the cerebellum generates a prediction of events that will follow based on prior associative learning, and then compares predicted and actual outcomes to generate a prediction error. The investigators hypothesize that these functions are disrupted in AUD. The investigators' preliminary data show that when an expected stimulus does not occur, a strong prediction error signal in the form of increased functional connectivity (FC) between cerebellum and its projection target is observed, and the investigators found an analogous increase in DN-VTA FC, that was abnormal in AUD patients, when alcohol pictures were presented. In Aim 1, using fMRI and a monetary incentive task, the investigators will investigate if DN-VTA FC reflects reward prediction and/or positive or negative reward prediction error. The second question is: Is the amount of activation in brain reward centers that is elicited by alcohol stimuli related to the amount of dysfunction in the cerebellum? In Aim 2 the investigators will investigate 2 measures of cerebellar integrity to determine the relationship with the magnitude of alcohol cue related activation in cerebellar, VTA, and other reward structures, and with DN-VTA FC: (1) The timing of the undershoot of the cerebellar hemodynamic response function (HRF), which has been found to be correlated with number of lifetime drinks; and (2) classical eyeblink conditioning, for which the cerebellum is necessary. The third question is: Can abnormal cerebellar activation and FC, as well as alcohol craving, be reduced by non-invasive cerebellar stimulation? In Aim 3, Using fMRI combined with cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during a cue reactivity task, the investigators hypothesize that in AUD participants cerebellar and VTA activation will be reduced, DN-VTA FC will be normalized, and alcohol craving will be reduced. The investigators will examine, using both resting state fMRI and psychophysiological interaction analysis, the effects of tDCS on FC among important structures of the reward system as well as on DN-VTA FC. These investigations will lead to a better understanding of the involvement of the cerebellum in AUD, as well as the therapeutic potential of cerebellar modulation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
Keywords
AUD, heavy drinking, hazardous drinking

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
AUD and age- and gender matched control participants will be tested under sham, cathodal, and anodal tDCS (in counterbalanced order)
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Electrode location and duration of stimulation will be masked
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
122 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cathodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
For ctDCS, the cathodal (-) electrode will be positioned over the right cerebellum 1 cm below and 3 cm lateral to the inion, and the anodal (+) electrode will be placed on the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2 EEG location).
Arm Title
Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
For atDCS, anode/cathode locations are reversed from those of ctDCS..
Arm Title
Sham cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (stDCS)
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
For stDCS, the electrodes will be configured randomly as atDCS 50% of the time, and as ctDCS 50% of the time.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation
Intervention Description
TDCS is a safe and non-invasive technique for modulating cortical excitability and behavior. TDCS, delivered via surface electrodes, induces an intracerebral current flow sufficient to achieve changes in cortical excitability. Anodal stimulation up-regulates cortical excitability, while cathodal stimulation decreases excitability.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Craving for alcohol during the cue reactivity task as assessed by a rating scale
Description
Participants will view blocks of pictures of alcohol and non-alcohol beverages, as well as control pictures and periods of rest. Participant rating of alcohol craving are obtained during the picture presentations using one of 5 buttons placed under their fingers, where 5 (thumb) = Extreme, 4=Severe, 3=Moderate, 2=Mild, 1=None
Time Frame
28 minutes
Title
Resting state functional connectivity during tDCS
Description
Participants will rest quietly during tDCS administration
Time Frame
28 minutes
Title
Brain activation to alcohol cues
Description
Participants will view blocks of pictures of alcohol and non-alcohol beverages, as well as control pictures and periods of rest. Brain activation will be measured from the fMRI signal on alcohol minus non-alcohol conditions.
Time Frame
28 minutes
Title
Brain functional connectivity to alcohol vs non-alcohol cues
Description
A psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis will be used to determine if brain connectivity between the cerebellum and reward areas changes when viewing alcohol versus non-alcohol pictures
Time Frame
28 minutes
Title
Brain activation related to reward prediction during the monetary incentive task
Description
The monetary incentive task is performed during fMRI scanning. Two different cue symbols (dollar sign vs circle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Brain activation during reward prediction will be measured by the post-cue activation on dollar sign versus circle trials.
Time Frame
18 minutes
Title
Brain functional connectivity related to reward prediction during the monetary incentive task
Description
The monetary incentive task is performed during fMRI scanning. Two different cue symbols (dollar sign vs circle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and reward structures during reward prediction will be measured by a PPI analysis that measures post-cue functional connectivity on dollar sign versus circle trials.
Time Frame
18 minutes
Title
Brain activation to reward prediction error during the monetary incentive task
Description
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Brain activation to reward prediction error will be measured from the activation observed after the participant receives feedback on his/her winnings, by contrasting trials in which reward obtained is equal to the amount expected versus not equal to the amount expected.
Time Frame
18 minutes
Title
brain functional connectivity to reward prediction error during the monetary incentive task
Description
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and reward structures to reward prediction error will be measured using a PPI on the connectivity that is observed after the participant receives feedback on his/her winnings, by contrasting trials in which reward obtained is equal to the amount expected versus not equal to the amount expected.
Time Frame
18 minutes
Title
Percentage of trials with a conditioned response during the classical eyeblink conditional task
Description
Eyeblink conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus, e.g. an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), with an air puff to the eye region. This unconditioned stimulus (US) evokes an unconditioned response (UR) that is detected by measuring the eyeblink. After repeated pairings of the CS and US, participants learn to blink in response to the conditioned stimulus and before air puff onset. The CS-US pairing dependent eyeblink that anticipates the onset of the US is referred to as the conditioned response (CR).
Time Frame
21 minutes
Title
Mean time (in milliseconds) at which peak of conditioned response occurs during the classical eyeblink conditional task
Description
Eyeblink conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus, e.g. an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS), with an air puff to the eye region. This unconditioned stimulus (US) evokes an unconditioned response (UR) that is detected by measuring the eyeblink. After repeated pairings of the CS and US, participants learn to blink in response to the conditioned stimulus and before air puff onset. The CS-US pairing dependent eyeblink that anticipates the onset of the US is referred to as the conditioned response (CR).
Time Frame
21 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured from a CBF MRI scan
Description
Local increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) that exceed the increase in blood oxygen metabolism (CMRO2) cause a reduction of deoxyhemoglobin leading to a lengthening of the transverse relaxation time T2* and increased MRI signal. CBF is measured as ml/100g tissue/minute.
Time Frame
4 minutes and 40 seconds
Title
Behavioral accuracy during the monetary incentive task
Description
Two different symbols (circle vs triangle) will cue participants to expect a $1 or $0 reward shortly after they press a button in response to seeing an "X" on the screen. These expectations will be learned in an initial Learning phase, where one symbol is always rewarded with $1 and the other with $0, and participants will be tested to ensure that they have learned the appropriate expectations. This Learning phase will be followed by a Testing phase in which the amount of reward (on reward trials) can be greater than, less than, or equal to expectation. Accuracy will be measured as the percent of trials in which the participant successfully pressed the button only when the X was on the screen
Time Frame
18 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: completed at least 8 years of education Exclusion Criteria: Estimated Intelligence Quotient (IQ) < 90 less than 5th grade reading level Left handed Non-native English speaker current drug use disorder other than alcohol (except nicotine and caffeine) and or recent drug use in the last 90 days Positive breath alcohol level at time of MRI scan or discrepancies between alcohol biomarker and self-report that cannot be resolved Exhibiting symptoms of alcohol withdrawal on visit 1 assessment Significant current psychiatric distress and or treatment History of any central nervous system disorder, presence of a seizure disorder, or use of anticonvulsant medication in the past 3 months any serious medical condition detected on assessment or by medical record review; or have liver function tests more than three times normal at screening History of metal implantation that would preclude MRI scanning; or other implants, pumps, pacemakers that would be contraindications for MRI scanning Abnormal MRI scan or history of significant closed head trauma Evidence of dementia For women, pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
John E Desmond, PhD
Phone
410-502-3583
Email
jdesmon2@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
JoAnna Mathena
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John E Desmond, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21205
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Desmond, Ph.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Cerebellar Involvement in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs