search
Back to results

Monopolar and Bipolar in Esophageal ESD

Primary Purpose

Esophageal Neoplasm, Esophageal Polyp, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Bipolar electrocautery knife
Sponsored by
Baylor College of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Esophageal Neoplasm

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient is ≥ 18 years old Patient is capable of providing informed consent Patient is referred for ESD procedure of an esophageal neoplastic lesion Exclusion Criteria: Patient is < 18 years old Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent Patient is a pregnant woman Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD (i.e. cap EMR) or a modified ESD technique

Sites / Locations

  • Baylor College of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Monopolar Electrocautery tool

Bipolar Electrocautery tool

Arm Description

Patients randomized into this group will receive the standard of care monopolar tool for their endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure.

Patients randomized into this group will receive the standard of care bipolar tool for their endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Speed of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
The speed of endoscopic submucosal dissection as calculated by cm2/hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

En-bloc resection achieved
Endoscopist removal of entire tissue specimen as a whole
R0 Resection achieved
Margins of tissue specimen deemed by pathologist as completely excised (R0)
Curative Resection achieved
Complete removal of diseased tissue by endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Adverse events
Collection of unanticipated medical occurrences within a 12 month time frame
Rate of esophageal stricturing post-procedure
Calculated as a percentage of patients reported with stricturing with 1-3 days following procedure.

Full Information

First Posted
February 13, 2023
Last Updated
October 11, 2023
Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05736705
Brief Title
Monopolar and Bipolar in Esophageal ESD
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcomes of Monopolar Current Cutting Knife and Bipolar RFA Knife in Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to prospectively document the efficacy and clinical outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection procedure that utilize either a novel Bipolar-Current ESD device or the standard monopolar electrocautery knife.
Detailed Description
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of esophageal lesions or polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of esophageal polyps without resorting to morbid surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion. Traditionally, knifes utilizing monopolar current such as dual knife or hybrid knife were the preferred tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection. These knifes allows accurate dissection and excellent hemostasis. However, due to monopolar current generated heat, post coagulation syndrome can be seen in up to 8 to 40 % of patients. Post coagulation syndrome present with pain, fever and leukocytosis and requires supportive treatment with IV fluid and antibiotics. In addition, for large esophageal lesions, stricturing can occur after resection due to significant scar formation induced by large amounts of energy. Almost all patients with 60% of the esophageal circumference removed via monopolar knives, will develop an esophageal stricture at some point. These patients require serial esophageal dilations, and although easily managed, its development can be quite troublesome to the patient. Nevertheless, ESD is still the preferred modality for removal of these lesions, since it avoids the need for morbid surgery. Recently, a novel bipolar RFA knife were approved by FDA for the performance of ESD. The knife utilizes bipolar RFA current for submucosal dissection which can potentially expedite submucosal dissection and decrease the rates of post polypectomy syndrome and scar formation, by using significantly less energy. This bipolar knife may allow for removal of large esophageal lesions without causing major esophageal stricturing. Our tertiary referral center Baylor St Luke's Medical Center is a center of excellence for ESD procedure and the investigators have previously reported our Esophageal ESD experience using the monopolar current knife. The goal of our protocol is to compare the performance of monopolar current cutting knife and bipolar RFA knife in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophageal Neoplasm, Esophageal Polyp, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Bipolar Electocautery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Two groups with patients randomized into receiving either the standard of care monopolar electrocautery tool or bipolar electrocautery tool.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The patient will not know which electrocautery tool will be used in their procedure.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
65 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Monopolar Electrocautery tool
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized into this group will receive the standard of care monopolar tool for their endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure.
Arm Title
Bipolar Electrocautery tool
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized into this group will receive the standard of care bipolar tool for their endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Other Intervention Name(s)
ESD, Mucosal Resection
Intervention Description
Participants randomized in this arm will have the removal of their esophageal lesion utilizing the monopolar electrocautery knife.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bipolar electrocautery knife
Other Intervention Name(s)
ESD, Mucosal Resection
Intervention Description
Participants randomized in this arm will have the removal of their esophageal lesion utilizing the bipolar electrocautery knife.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Speed of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Description
The speed of endoscopic submucosal dissection as calculated by cm2/hour
Time Frame
Day 1 (procedure day)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
En-bloc resection achieved
Description
Endoscopist removal of entire tissue specimen as a whole
Time Frame
Day 1 (procedure day)
Title
R0 Resection achieved
Description
Margins of tissue specimen deemed by pathologist as completely excised (R0)
Time Frame
1-3 days post-procedure
Title
Curative Resection achieved
Description
Complete removal of diseased tissue by endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Time Frame
1-3 days post-procedure
Title
Adverse events
Description
Collection of unanticipated medical occurrences within a 12 month time frame
Time Frame
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Rate of esophageal stricturing post-procedure
Description
Calculated as a percentage of patients reported with stricturing with 1-3 days following procedure.
Time Frame
1-3 days post-procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient is ≥ 18 years old Patient is capable of providing informed consent Patient is referred for ESD procedure of an esophageal neoplastic lesion Exclusion Criteria: Patient is < 18 years old Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent Patient is a pregnant woman Patients with lesions removed with other techniques besides ESD (i.e. cap EMR) or a modified ESD technique
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Monopolar and Bipolar in Esophageal ESD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs