search
Back to results

Symptom Monitoring in Hemodialysis (SMaRRT-HD)

Primary Purpose

End Stage Kidney Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Symptom Monitoring on Renal Replacement Therapy - Hemodialysis (SMaRRT-HD)
Usual Care
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for End Stage Kidney Disease focused on measuring End stage kidney disease, Kidney, Hemodialysis, Dialysis, Symptom monitoring, Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (ePROM)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Treatment with hemodialysis at a participating dialysis clinic English or Spanish speaking Exclusion Criteria: Not willing to report their symptoms using the SMaRRT-HD platform Not willing to share clinically acquired data with the research team Underlying condition such as dementia that is anticipated to prevent comprehension of the trial information document (fact sheet) Incarceration

Sites / Locations

  • Fresenius Medical CareRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

SMaRRT-HD (Symptom Monitoring on Renal Replacement Therapy - Hemodialysis)

Usual Care

Arm Description

Dialysis clinics randomized to SMaRRT-HD will implement the SMaRRT-HD symptom monitoring system. SMaRRT-HD consists of 1) tablet-based symptom reporting using a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and 2) supported clinician follow-up consisting of symptom alerts, guidances for symptom management, and symptom tracking reports that are shared with patients. For trial participants in SMaRRT-HD clinics, the SMaRRT-HD system will be implemented in addition to the Usual Care approach to symptom monitoring.

Dialysis clinics randomized to Usual Care will not adopt SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical care interactions with participants and by administering a CMS-mandated Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) survey that includes questions about symptoms.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Severity of dialysis-associated symptoms (Effectiveness)
This outcome will be assessed as change in the Dialysis Symptom Index-Severity Score over 12 months (primary endpoint). Participants are asked whether or not they experienced symptoms during the past week. If the response is yes, the participant is asked to indicate "How much did it bother you?". Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Health-related quality of life (Effectiveness)
EuroQOL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Participants are asked about 5 different domains that can affect people's quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression). Participants respond on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula (developed by EuroQol Group) that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Post-dialysis recovery time (Effectiveness)
Recovery time question
Fatigue (Effectiveness)
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Participants are read questions that relate to fatigue and are asked to provide a response based upon the last 7 days. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 52. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Pain interference (Effectiveness)
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Interference Participants are asked how much, during the past week, pain has interfered with different activities. This is typically scored as the mean of the seven items. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Anxiety (Effectiveness)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 Participants are asked to report how often during the past 2 weeks they have had symptoms or experiences. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 21. Higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Depression (Effectiveness)
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 Participants are asked to report how much during the last 2 weeks they have experienced problems. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 24. Higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Patient activation (Effectiveness)
Patient Activation Measure Participants are asked to respond to statements with how much they agree (strongly disagree to strongly agree; or does not apply). Using a scoring algorithm (developed by Insignia Health) produces a PAM Score along an empirical, interval-level scale from 0-100 that correlates to one of four levels of patient activation. PAM Levels 1 and 2 indicate lower patient activation, while PAM Levels 3 and 4 indicate higher patient activation. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Hospitalizations (Effectiveness)
Hospitalization rate
Mortality (Effectiveness)
Mortality rate
Missed dialysis sessions (Effectiveness)
The number of missed dialysis sessions during participation in the the trial.
Shortened dialysis sessions (Effectiveness)
The number of shortened dialysis sessions during participation in the the trial.
Penetration (Implementation)
SMaRRT-HD completion rates collected from the SMaRRT-HD system and KDQOL™-36 completion rates collected from the dialysis medical record
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinical action after PROM use; All Clinics
Evidence in the dialysis medical record of clinician action in response to a reported symptom.
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient-reported clinician follow-up; All Clinics
Patient response to a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview-administered question about the occurrence of clinician follow-up of a reported symptom.
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient/clinician-reported follow-up activities; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the occurrence of clinician follow-up of a reported symptom.
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinician access of symptom guidances; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, evidence in the SMaRRT-HD system of clinician access of symptom guidances within 7 days of each administration of the SMaRRT-HD symptom ePROM.
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinician access of symptom reports; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, evidence in the SMaRRT-HD system of clinician access of symptom reports within 7 days of each administration of the SMaRRT-HD symptom ePROM.
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient-reported receipt of patient-facing symptom report; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient response to a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview-administered question about the receipt of a SMaRRT-HD symptom report.
Acceptability (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the acceptability of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Acceptability (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the acceptability of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Acceptability (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the acceptability of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Acceptability (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the acceptability of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Appropriateness (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the appropriateness of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Appropriateness (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the appropriateness of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Appropriateness (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the appropriateness of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Appropriateness (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the appropriateness of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Feasibility (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about feasibility of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about feasibility of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; Dialysis provider organization corporate leaders
Corporate leader responses to interview questions about the importance, feasibility, and potential for sustainability of regularly administering PROMs in routine dialysis care.
Feasibility (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the feasibility of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the feasibility of the SMaRRT-HD system components.

Full Information

First Posted
January 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 11, 2023
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Duke University, University of New Mexico, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05738330
Brief Title
Symptom Monitoring in Hemodialysis
Acronym
SMaRRT-HD
Official Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Symptom Monitoring in Hemodialysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 24, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Duke University, University of New Mexico, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The SMaRRT-HD trial is a cluster randomized trial of symptom monitoring with supported clinician follow-up using the SMaRRT-HD electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) system versus Usual Care. Approximately 2400 patients at 30 geographically and racially diverse US hemodialysis clinics will be enrolled. The primary trial hypothesis is that regular symptom patient reported outcome measure (PROM) administration with supported clinician follow-up in dialysis care will reduce suffering and improve outcomes by prompting treatment of unrecognized symptoms, and enhancing patient-care team communication. Clinics randomized to the SMaRRT-HD group will adopt the use of SMaRRT-HD for 12 months. SMaRRT-HD is a symptom monitoring system that includes 1) tablet-based symptom reporting using a PROM and 2) supported clinician follow-up consisting of symptom alerts, guidances for symptom management, and symptom tracking reports that are shared with patients. Dialysis clinics randomized to Usual Care will not adopt SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical care interactions with participants and by administering a Health Related Quality of Life survey that includes questions about symptoms.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Kidney Disease
Keywords
End stage kidney disease, Kidney, Hemodialysis, Dialysis, Symptom monitoring, Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (ePROM)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The design is a multi-center cluster-randomized trial with randomization performed at the level of the dialysis clinic. Dialysis clinics will be assigned to either the SMaRRT-HD group (15 clinics) or the Usual Care group (15 clinics). SMaRRT-HD is a symptom monitoring system that includes 1) tablet-based symptom reporting using a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and 2) supported clinician follow-up consisting of symptom alerts, symptom management guidance, and tracking reports to share with patients. Dialysis clinics assigned to Usual Care will not use SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical interactions with participants and by administering a HRQOL survey. The trial uses a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation approach with effectiveness of the intervention assessed with patient-reported outcomes and biomedical outcomes, and implementation assessed with integrated qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SMaRRT-HD (Symptom Monitoring on Renal Replacement Therapy - Hemodialysis)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Dialysis clinics randomized to SMaRRT-HD will implement the SMaRRT-HD symptom monitoring system. SMaRRT-HD consists of 1) tablet-based symptom reporting using a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and 2) supported clinician follow-up consisting of symptom alerts, guidances for symptom management, and symptom tracking reports that are shared with patients. For trial participants in SMaRRT-HD clinics, the SMaRRT-HD system will be implemented in addition to the Usual Care approach to symptom monitoring.
Arm Title
Usual Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Dialysis clinics randomized to Usual Care will not adopt SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical care interactions with participants and by administering a CMS-mandated Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) survey that includes questions about symptoms.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Symptom Monitoring on Renal Replacement Therapy - Hemodialysis (SMaRRT-HD)
Intervention Description
Dialysis clinics randomized to the SMaRRT-HD group will use the SMaRRT-HD system to capture patient-reported symptoms and support clinician follow-up. The online system includes the patient symptom ePROM surveys, clinician real-time email alerts, clinician guidances for symptom management, and patient-facing symptom reports as well as an administrative dashboard supporting management of trial participants at clinics using SMaRRT-HD. Designated clinic personnel (i.e., patient care technicians and nurses) will receive training on how to use the system to administer the symptom ePROM surveys to patients on tablet computers. Designated clinic nurses and medical providers will receive training on how to access guidances for symptom management and patient-facing symptom reports in the SMaRRT-HD system. For trial participants in SMaRRT-HD clinics, the SMaRRT-HD system will be implemented in addition to the Usual Care approach to symptom monitoring.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Care
Intervention Description
Dialysis clinics randomized to Usual Care will not adopt SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical care interactions with participants and by administering a CMS-mandated Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) survey that includes questions about symptoms.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Severity of dialysis-associated symptoms (Effectiveness)
Description
This outcome will be assessed as change in the Dialysis Symptom Index-Severity Score over 12 months (primary endpoint). Participants are asked whether or not they experienced symptoms during the past week. If the response is yes, the participant is asked to indicate "How much did it bother you?". Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health-related quality of life (Effectiveness)
Description
EuroQOL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Participants are asked about 5 different domains that can affect people's quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression). Participants respond on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula (developed by EuroQol Group) that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Post-dialysis recovery time (Effectiveness)
Description
Recovery time question
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Fatigue (Effectiveness)
Description
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Participants are read questions that relate to fatigue and are asked to provide a response based upon the last 7 days. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 52. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Pain interference (Effectiveness)
Description
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Interference Participants are asked how much, during the past week, pain has interfered with different activities. This is typically scored as the mean of the seven items. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Anxiety (Effectiveness)
Description
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 Participants are asked to report how often during the past 2 weeks they have had symptoms or experiences. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 21. Higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Depression (Effectiveness)
Description
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 Participants are asked to report how much during the last 2 weeks they have experienced problems. Lowest score - 0; Highest score - 24. Higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Patient activation (Effectiveness)
Description
Patient Activation Measure Participants are asked to respond to statements with how much they agree (strongly disagree to strongly agree; or does not apply). Using a scoring algorithm (developed by Insignia Health) produces a PAM Score along an empirical, interval-level scale from 0-100 that correlates to one of four levels of patient activation. PAM Levels 1 and 2 indicate lower patient activation, while PAM Levels 3 and 4 indicate higher patient activation. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Hospitalizations (Effectiveness)
Description
Hospitalization rate
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation plus 6 months; 18 months total
Title
Mortality (Effectiveness)
Description
Mortality rate
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation plus 6 months; 18 months total
Title
Missed dialysis sessions (Effectiveness)
Description
The number of missed dialysis sessions during participation in the the trial.
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Shortened dialysis sessions (Effectiveness)
Description
The number of shortened dialysis sessions during participation in the the trial.
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Penetration (Implementation)
Description
SMaRRT-HD completion rates collected from the SMaRRT-HD system and KDQOL™-36 completion rates collected from the dialysis medical record
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinical action after PROM use; All Clinics
Description
Evidence in the dialysis medical record of clinician action in response to a reported symptom.
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient-reported clinician follow-up; All Clinics
Description
Patient response to a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview-administered question about the occurrence of clinician follow-up of a reported symptom.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient/clinician-reported follow-up activities; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the occurrence of clinician follow-up of a reported symptom.
Time Frame
6 months, and 12 months
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinician access of symptom guidances; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, evidence in the SMaRRT-HD system of clinician access of symptom guidances within 7 days of each administration of the SMaRRT-HD symptom ePROM.
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Clinician access of symptom reports; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, evidence in the SMaRRT-HD system of clinician access of symptom reports within 7 days of each administration of the SMaRRT-HD symptom ePROM.
Time Frame
Duration of active 12 month study participation
Title
Fidelity (Implementation); Patient-reported receipt of patient-facing symptom report; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient response to a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview-administered question about the receipt of a SMaRRT-HD symptom report.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Acceptability (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the acceptability of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Acceptability (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the acceptability of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Acceptability (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the acceptability of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Acceptability (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the acceptability of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Appropriateness (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the appropriateness of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Appropriateness (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the appropriateness of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Appropriateness (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the appropriateness of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Appropriateness (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the appropriateness of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Feasibility (Implementation); Surveys; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about feasibility of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; All Clinics
Description
Patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about feasibility of patient-dialysis care team communication about symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; Dialysis provider organization corporate leaders
Description
Corporate leader responses to interview questions about the importance, feasibility, and potential for sustainability of regularly administering PROMs in routine dialysis care.
Time Frame
Interviews will be conducted before the optimization phase and after the end of the trial.
Title
Feasibility (Implementation); Surveys; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to survey questions about the feasibility of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Feasibility (Implementation); Interviews; SMaRRT-HD Clinics
Description
In SMaRRT-HD clinics only, patient, clinic personnel, and medical provider responses to interview questions about the feasibility of the SMaRRT-HD system components.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Quality of patient-clinician communication (Effectiveness)
Description
In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS)- Communication and Caring Domain
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Treatment with hemodialysis at a participating dialysis clinic English or Spanish speaking Exclusion Criteria: Not willing to report their symptoms using the SMaRRT-HD platform Not willing to share clinically acquired data with the research team Underlying condition such as dementia that is anticipated to prevent comprehension of the trial information document (fact sheet) Incarceration
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Flythe, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laura Dember, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fresenius Medical Care
City
Waltham
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02451
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cassandra Bowman, MHA
Phone
919-445-6790
Email
Cassandra_Bowman@unc.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The primary method by which data will be shared with the scientific community will be through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific and professional society meetings. A final report of the research results will be submitted to PCORI for peer review in accordance with the PCORI Peer Review and Findings Release Process. Plain language summaries of the results will be provided to all participating dialysis clinics for distribution to all patients, personnel, and medical providers. Data Sharing will be consistent with PCORI's Policy for Data Management and Data Sharing and as permitted by the project contracts and data use agreements.

Learn more about this trial

Symptom Monitoring in Hemodialysis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs