search
Back to results

Probiotics Administration Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in CDAD Patients (CDAD)

Primary Purpose

Diarrhea Infectious

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Probiotics administration
Sponsored by
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diarrhea Infectious focused on measuring Clostridioides difficile colitis

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: patients aged ≥ 20 years who are diagnosed with C. difficile colitis Exclusion Criteria: patients are diagnosed with colitis because of other etiologies, such as intestinal Behçet's disease, amoeba or parasitic colitis, Salmonella colitis, lymphoma, E. coli colitis, cytomegalovirus colitis, ischemic colitis, sigmoid-colon cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, radiation colitis patients who have contraindications for colonoscopy, including declining or refusal to cooperate unstable vital signs a diagnosis or highly suspicion of colon rupture a high-risk situation for colon perforation such as acute diverticulitis toxic megacolon, etc. acute myocardial infarct

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    probiotics-spray (PS) group

    probiotics-oral (PO) group

    Arm Description

    In the PS group, the colonoscopic prescription of 10 grams of probiotics powder is performed once on one of the first three days (D0-D3).

    In the PO group, we will prescribe oral probiotics 2 capsules once per day for 5 days (a total of 10 grams) as adjunctive treatment during the first five days (D0-D4).

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    The percentage of difference in fecal microbiota change, including probiotics, between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral and before and after probiotics use either by colonoscopic probiotics-spray or probiotics-oral
    All patients will be monitored for 30 days after diagnosis of C. difficile colitis. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the perseverance of fecal microbiota and metabolites. We will compare the microbiota by sequencing 16S rRNA, measured as percentage abundance per microbial species and differences in percentage abundance between the PS group and PO group in Day 0 and Day 5. We will also compare the relative abundance of C. difficile and target probiotics between the two study groups, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, or others.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    The rate of resolution of C. difficile colitis
    the resolution time of diarrhea and bloody stool
    Hospitalization length
    the total hospitalization length
    The rate of recurrence of C. difficile colitis
    the recurrence of C. difficile colitis
    The rate of mortality events
    all-cause mortality
    The rate of adverse events
    adverse events from probiotics, including probiotics bacteremia and sepsis

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 5, 2023
    Last Updated
    April 5, 2023
    Sponsor
    National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05770726
    Brief Title
    Probiotics Administration Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in CDAD Patients
    Acronym
    CDAD
    Official Title
    The Comparison of the Adjuvant Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in Patients With Clostridioides Difficile Colitis Receiving Vancomycin Treatment
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    April 21, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) colitis is a common hospital-acquired disease, which increases hospitalization length and the mortality rate. Moreover, refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis is an emerging disease. The tapering course of oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is current standard treatment for refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an alternative one. However, the tapering course of oral vancomycin needs a 6- to 12-week duration, fidaxomicin is expensive, and FMT is not available in every hospital; therefore, it is needed to develop a new treatment. Evidence has shown that the disturbance with reduced diversity of intestinal microbiota may lead to refractory C. difficile colitis. Besides fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics administration can also correct the disturbed intestinal microbiota. However, inconsistent efficacy of probiotic administration was reported, which may be attributed to the interference by the gastric acid. Precise delivery of probiotics into the colon by colonoscopy can avoid the destruction by gastric acid, with which a better treatment efficacy is expected. The best regimen for C. difficile colitis should be the one which succeeds on the first attempt. Therefore, this study is aimed toward validating the efficacy and safety of the colonoscopic probiotics-spray. Patients diagnosed with C. colitis will be enrolled. All patients will accept the standard treatment of oral vancomycin for 14 days. As an adjuvant probiotic administration at the same time, enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to the probiotics-spray (PS) group and the probiotics-oral (PO) group, respectively. The patients in the PS group will receive colonoscopic spray of probiotics once, while the patients in the PO group will receive the same dosage of oral probiotics divided into 5 days. This study will compare the difference in fecal microbiota changes between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray group and the probiotics-oral group. Moreover, this study will evaluate the efficacy and safety between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral in patients with C. difficile colitis.
    Detailed Description
    Refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis is an emerging disease. The tapering course of oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is current standard treatment for refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis.FMT is an alternative treatment. Nevertheless, the tapering course of oral vancomycin needs a 6- to 12-week duration, fidaxomicin is expensive, and FMT is not available in many hospitals. Therefore, we need a method which is effective for patients and available for clinicians. The disturbance with reduced diversity of intestinal microbiota may lead to refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis. Moreover, the probiotics administration can correct the disturbed intestinal microbiota. However, inconsistent efficacy of probiotic administration was reported, which may be attributed to the interference by the gastric acid. There is no exact estimation for the amounts of probiotics in the colon after oral administration. Moreover, there is no study which is conducted to compare the efficiency of probiotics between direct spray via colonoscopy and oral administration. It will be novel to study such issue. If the amounts of probiotics which is delivered directly via colonoscopy and the clinical efficacy are similar to those by FMT, colonoscopic probiotics-spray will replace FMT in clinical practice. FMT can correct the disturbed intestinal microbiota. The estimated bacteria of human wet stool are 1011 per gram. The amount of stool for FMT is ~30 to 100 grams; thus, ~1012 to 1013 bacteria will be transplanted in an FMT procedure. In this project, we will transplant ~2x1011 probiotics into the colon by the colonoscopic spray. Therefore, we believe that colonoscopic spray of probiotics will have similar amounts of bacteria transplanted with FMT but be more efficient than oral probiotics administration. Probiotics use may have adverse events. There are few studies and case reports which recorded that the administered probiotic was isolated from sterile sites, such as bacteremia. Thus, the safety issue of this study will focus on the adverse events, bacteremia and sepsis. It will be novel to conduct the study to compare the efficacy and safety of probiotics which are delivered directly via colonoscopy and oral administration. If it works, colonoscopic probiotics spray will replace FMT in clinical practice.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Diarrhea Infectious
    Keywords
    Clostridioides difficile colitis

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    probiotics-spray (PS) group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    In the PS group, the colonoscopic prescription of 10 grams of probiotics powder is performed once on one of the first three days (D0-D3).
    Arm Title
    probiotics-oral (PO) group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    In the PO group, we will prescribe oral probiotics 2 capsules once per day for 5 days (a total of 10 grams) as adjunctive treatment during the first five days (D0-D4).
    Intervention Type
    Dietary Supplement
    Intervention Name(s)
    Probiotics administration
    Intervention Description
    A total of 10 grams of probiotics was administered in both group, but the routes were different. One group were per colonoscopic spray, and the other was per oral.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The percentage of difference in fecal microbiota change, including probiotics, between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral and before and after probiotics use either by colonoscopic probiotics-spray or probiotics-oral
    Description
    All patients will be monitored for 30 days after diagnosis of C. difficile colitis. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the perseverance of fecal microbiota and metabolites. We will compare the microbiota by sequencing 16S rRNA, measured as percentage abundance per microbial species and differences in percentage abundance between the PS group and PO group in Day 0 and Day 5. We will also compare the relative abundance of C. difficile and target probiotics between the two study groups, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, or others.
    Time Frame
    5 days
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The rate of resolution of C. difficile colitis
    Description
    the resolution time of diarrhea and bloody stool
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    Hospitalization length
    Description
    the total hospitalization length
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    The rate of recurrence of C. difficile colitis
    Description
    the recurrence of C. difficile colitis
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    The rate of mortality events
    Description
    all-cause mortality
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    The rate of adverse events
    Description
    adverse events from probiotics, including probiotics bacteremia and sepsis
    Time Frame
    30 days

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    20 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: patients aged ≥ 20 years who are diagnosed with C. difficile colitis Exclusion Criteria: patients are diagnosed with colitis because of other etiologies, such as intestinal Behçet's disease, amoeba or parasitic colitis, Salmonella colitis, lymphoma, E. coli colitis, cytomegalovirus colitis, ischemic colitis, sigmoid-colon cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, radiation colitis patients who have contraindications for colonoscopy, including declining or refusal to cooperate unstable vital signs a diagnosis or highly suspicion of colon rupture a high-risk situation for colon perforation such as acute diverticulitis toxic megacolon, etc. acute myocardial infarct
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Hsueh-Chien Chiang, M.D.
    Phone
    2353535
    Email
    scion456scion@gmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Ph.D
    Phone
    2353535
    Email
    teishuki@mail.ncku.edu.tw

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    IPD sharing after the study completed and the paper published
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29462280
    Citation
    McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Garey KW, Gould CV, Kelly C, Loo V, Shaklee Sammons J, Sandora TJ, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    25626036
    Citation
    Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    18971494
    Citation
    Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1932-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707500. No abstract available. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 14;363(16):1585.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34003176
    Citation
    Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, LaPlante K, Stewart DB, Limketkai BN, Stollman NH. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278. Erratum In: Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 1;117(2):358.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21198703
    Citation
    Goodhand JR, Alazawi W, Rampton DS. Systematic review: Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;33(4):428-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04548.x. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    18199029
    Citation
    Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, Young VB. Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. doi: 10.1086/525047.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    30154172
    Citation
    Mullish BH, Quraishi MN, Segal JP, McCune VL, Baxter M, Marsden GL, Moore DJ, Colville A, Bhala N, Iqbal TH, Settle C, Kontkowski G, Hart AL, Hawkey PM, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection and other potential indications: joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1920-1941. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    23323867
    Citation
    van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JF, Tijssen JG, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MG, Keller JJ. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):407-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    23320049
    Citation
    Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;6(1):39-51. doi: 10.1177/1756283X12459294.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22570464
    Citation
    Hempel S, Newberry SJ, Maher AR, Wang Z, Miles JN, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Shekelle PG. Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 May 9;307(18):1959-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3507.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34876784
    Citation
    Phanchana M, Harnvoravongchai P, Wongkuna S, Phetruen T, Phothichaisri W, Panturat S, Pipatthana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Janvilisri T. Frontiers in antibiotic alternatives for Clostridioides difficile infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 14;27(42):7210-7232. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i42.7210.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    18254055
    Citation
    Pillai A, Nelson R. Probiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004611.pub2.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15933002
    Citation
    Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3060-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    33791234
    Citation
    Han S, Lu Y, Xie J, Fei Y, Zheng G, Wang Z, Liu J, Lv L, Ling Z, Berglund B, Yao M, Li L. Probiotic Gastrointestinal Transit and Colonization After Oral Administration: A Long Journey. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 10;11:609722. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.609722. eCollection 2021.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    33633264
    Citation
    Staley C, Halaweish H, Graiziger C, Hamilton MJ, Kabage AJ, Galdys AL, Vaughn BP, Vantanasiri K, Suryanarayanan R, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A. Lower endoscopic delivery of freeze-dried intestinal microbiota results in more rapid and efficient engraftment than oral administration. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84152-6.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    19753922
    Citation
    Honda H, Dubberke ER. Clostridium difficile infection: a re-emerging threat. Mo Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;106(4):287-91.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    32169531
    Citation
    Wu KS, Syue LS, Cheng A, Yen TY, Chen HM, Chiu YH, Hsu YL, Chiu CH, Su TY, Tsai WL, Chen WY, Huang CH, Hung HM, Huang LJ, Kuo HJ, Lin PC, Yang CH, Hong PL, Lee SS, Chen YS, Liu YC, Huang LM; Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan; Medical Foundation in Memory of Dr. Deh-Lin Cheng; Foundation of Professor Wei-Chuan Hsieh for Infectious Diseases Research and Education; CY Lee's Research Foundation for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines; 5th Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group. Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Apr;53(2):191-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21502971
    Citation
    Surawicz CM, Alexander J. Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;8(6):330-9. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.59. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    29208562
    Citation
    Chilton CH, Pickering DS, Freeman J. Microbiologic factors affecting Clostridium difficile recurrence. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    32663059
    Citation
    Ma C, Wasti S, Huang S, Zhang Z, Mishra R, Jiang S, You Z, Wu Y, Chang H, Wang Y, Huo D, Li C, Sun Z, Sun Z, Zhang J. The gut microbiome stability is altered by probiotic ingestion and improved by the continuous supplementation of galactooligosaccharide. Gut Microbes. 2020 Nov 9;12(1):1785252. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1785252. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    28764983
    Citation
    Dodoo CC, Wang J, Basit AW, Stapleton P, Gaisford S. Targeted delivery of probiotics to enhance gastrointestinal stability and intestinal colonisation. Int J Pharm. 2017 Sep 15;530(1-2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.068. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    27404502
    Citation
    Bojanova DP, Bordenstein SR. Fecal Transplants: What Is Being Transferred? PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 12;14(7):e1002503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002503. eCollection 2016 Jul.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    16595054
    Citation
    Ledoux D, Labombardi VJ, Karter D. Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteraemia after use of a probiotic in a patient with AIDS and Hodgkin's disease. Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Apr;17(4):280-2. doi: 10.1258/095646206776253507.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34546300
    Citation
    Johnstone J, Meade M, Lauzier F, Marshall J, Duan E, Dionne J, Arabi YM, Heels-Ansdell D, Thabane L, Lamarche D, Surette M, Zytaruk N, Mehta S, Dodek P, McIntyre L, English S, Rochwerg B, Karachi T, Henderson W, Wood G, Ovakim D, Herridge M, Granton J, Wilcox ME, Goffi A, Stelfox HT, Niven D, Muscedere J, Lamontagne F, D'Aragon F, St-Arnaud C, Ball I, Nagpal D, Girard M, Aslanian P, Charbonney E, Williamson D, Sligl W, Friedrich J, Adhikari NK, Marquis F, Archambault P, Khwaja K, Kristof A, Kutsogiannis J, Zarychanski R, Paunovic B, Reeve B, Lellouche F, Hosek P, Tsang J, Binnie A, Trop S, Loubani O, Hall R, Cirone R, Reynolds S, Lysecki P, Golan E, Cartin-Ceba R, Taylor R, Cook D; Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Effect of Probiotics on Incident Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1024-1033. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13355.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    26019620
    Citation
    Georgieva R, Yocheva L, Tserovska L, Zhelezova G, Stefanova N, Atanasova A, Danguleva A, Ivanova G, Karapetkov N, Rumyan N, Karaivanova E. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. intended for use as starter and probiotic cultures. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):84-91. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.987450. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Probiotics Administration Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in CDAD Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs