search
Back to results

The Effects of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy in People With Parkinson's Disease (MIND-PD)

Primary Purpose

Parkinson's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MBCT
Sponsored by
Radboud University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson's Disease focused on measuring Parkinson's Disease, Mindfulness, Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, Disease progression

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: A diagnosis of idiopathic PD made by a movement disorders specialist. PD disease duration is ≤7 years, defined as time since diagnosis made by a neurologist. Mild-moderate symptoms of psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score >10 points). Subject can read and understand the Dutch language. Exclusion Criteria: Severe neurological or psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g. psychosis or suicidality). Contraindications for MRI (e.g. brain surgery in medical history, claustrophobia, an active implant, epilepsy, pregnancy, and/or metal objects in the upper body that are incompatible with MRI). Moderate to severe head tremor (to avoid artifacts caused by extensive head motion during scanning). Cognitive dysfunction (clinical diagnosis of dementia, or a score of 20 or lower on the MoCA, which will be measured at T0). Previous participation in MBSR or MBCT (>4 sessions).

Sites / Locations

  • Donders Centre for Cognitive NeuroimagingRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT)

Treatment as usual (TAU)

Arm Description

62 patients will receive a mindfulness based intervention.

62 patients will receive treatment as usual, this will form a (passive) control group to the MBCT group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Psychological distress post-intervention (as assessed by HADS [0-42])
Our primary outcome will be psychological distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms), measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at T1 (post-intervention). The HADS is a validated self-report questionnaire consisting of anxiety and depression subscales, scores can range from 0-42 points. Lower scores mean less stress, i.e. better outcome. It was previously used as primary outcome measure in an MBCT-RCT in cancer, it was used as outcome measure in the largest MBI-RCT to date in PD, and it has been validated in PD. The effect on HADS will all be analyzed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The dependent variable will be the HADS score at T1; group allocation will serve as fixed factors, and age at T0, sex and the HADS score at T0 will serve as covariates.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in psychological distress (as assessed by HADS [0-42])
HADS [0-42] (lower score = better (less stress), see also primary outcome.
Disease severity (as assessed by MDS-UPDRS [0-199])
MDS-UPDRS [0-199] (higher score = worse (more disability)). We will assess overall symptom severity as a function of time T0/T1/T2 and group (MBCT vs. TAU).
Cognitive function (as assessed by MoCA [0-30])
Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA [0-30] (higher score = better (less disability)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Tremor severity (indicated by tremor power [log(µV2)])
We will compare tremor severity as measured with accelerometry during rest, mental arithmetic (coco), posturing and action. We will perform a 2x2x2 ANOVA with between-subjects factor GROUP (MBCT vs. control), and within-subjects factors TIME (T0 vs. T2) and CONDITION (coco vs. rest, posture vs. rest, action vs. rest).
Hair cortisol
Hair cortisol levels will be established by means of a hair sample and hair cortisol concentration of the previous 2 months will be assessed and compared between T0/T1/T2 and between groups (MBCT/TAU)
Bradykinesia severity (indicated by average keys per second on key tapping test)
We will measure bradykinesia severity by means of a keyboard finger tapping test. Average keys pressed per seconds will be used as dependent variable. More keys per second = less disability. We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Inflammatory tone (as assessed by serum C-reactive protein)
We will be assessing inflammatory tone by means of serum C-reactie protein (CRP) levels. Higher CRP = more inflammation.
Quality of life questionnaire (as assessed by PDQ-39 [0-100])
Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39; PDQ-39 [0 - 100] (higher score = worse (more disability)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Perceived stress (as assessed by PSS [0-40])
Perceived Stress Scale; PSS [0 - 40] (higher score = worse (more perceived stress)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Rumination (as assessed by RRS [26-104])
Ruminative Response Scale; RRS [26-104] (higher score = worse (more ruminative thoughts)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Mindfulness skills (as assessed by FFMQ [39-195])
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form; FFMQ [39-195] (higher score = better (more mindfulness skills)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Self-compassion as assessed by SCS [12-84])
Self-Compassion Short Form; SCS [12-84] (higher score = better (more self compassion)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Self-efficacy (as assessed by GSES [10-40])
General Self-Efficacy Scale; GSES [10-40] (higher score = better (more self efficacy)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Positive appraisal (as assessed by PASS)
Positive Appraisal Style Scale; PASS [for each coping style: 2-10, for humor: 1-8] We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Decision making task
Patients will perform a neuropsychological task designed to track individual decision making and learning processes. Computational modeling will be used to model response patters according to an actor model and a spectator model. Response patterns will be compared as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T1/ T2).
Salivary cortisol
Acute cortisol levels will be assessed via saliva samples during socially evaluated cold pressure test as a function of group (MBCT/TAU), time (T0/T2), and SECPT time points (pre/post/30mpost/45mpost).
Resting state network reactivity to a stressor (fMRI)
Resting-state network connectivity will be assessed based on resting state fMRI before and after the socially evaluated cold pressure test (SECPT). In specific, this will be evaluated as a function of group (MBCT / TAU), time (T0 / T2), and SECPT (before / after). Resting state networks of interest include the salience network, central executive network, and default mode network.
Grey matter volume of stress-related regions (MRI)
By means of a structural T1 scan, we will compare structural changes in stress-related brain regions, e.g. amygdala, hippocampus. Specifically, grey matter volume will be compared as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2). This measure will help us distinguish between structural changes versus network adaptations as a response to the intervention.
Structural integrity of substantia nigra and locus coeruleus (LC)
To further evaluate structural integrity of the substantia nigra and LC, signal intensity on neuromelanin sensitive MRI scans, as well as diffusion MRI will be determined before and one year after the MBI. Structural integrity will be analysed as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2).
Functional integrity of nigro-striatal dopamine system
To quantify the functional integrity of the nigro-striatal dopamine system, we will use resting-state fMRI to calculate gradients of cortico-striatal connectivity. This fMRI measure is sensitive to compensatory changes: in PD, cortico-striatal connectivity shifts from more-affected (posterior) to less-affected (anterior) portions of the striatum. To investigate this, functional connectivity profiles of the posterior and anterior putamen specifically will be determined and analysed as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2).

Full Information

First Posted
January 12, 2023
Last Updated
June 5, 2023
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05779137
Brief Title
The Effects of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy in People With Parkinson's Disease
Acronym
MIND-PD
Official Title
The Effect of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy on Psychological Distress in People With Parkinson's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 17, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder occurring in 7 million patients worldwide. PD is caused by progressive loss of nigro-striatal dopamine cells, which causes motor symptoms such as slowness of movement and tremor, and non-motor symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction. Converging clinical evidence indicates that PD patients are very sensitive to the effects of psychological stress. There is a high prevalence of stressrelated neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD: 30-40% of patients experience depression and 25-30% have anxiety. Furthermore, stress worsens many motor symptoms, e.g. tremor, freezing of gait, and dyskinesia. In addition to these immediate negative effects, chronic stress may also have detrimental long-term consequences, and specifically by accelerating disease progression, as suggested by animal models. However, this hypothesis remains to be confirmed in humans. Better evidence about the impact of stress on PD would have major treatment consequences: novel stress-reducing interventions may have symptomatic effects, and perhaps also disease-modifying effects. The aim of this study is to test whether a stress-reducing intervention improves clinical symptoms, slows neurodegeneration, and/or enhances neuroplasticity in PD. In a randomized controlled trial, the investigators will compare a stress-reducing mindfulness-based intervention group (MBI; one year) to a treatment as usual (TAU) group on clinical symptoms, cerebral markers of nigro-striatal dysfunction and stressor-reactivity (MRI), and inflammatory markers (serum).
Detailed Description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common and fast-growing neurological disease, clinically characterized by motor slowing (bradykinesia), stiffness (rigidity) and resting tremor. The pathological hallmark of PD is nigro-striatal dopamine depletion, but the noradrenergic (stress) system is also affected. Indeed, the prevalence of stress-related neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD is high and many PD patients suffer from reduced health-related quality of life. Also, (chronic) stress worsens many motor symptoms and may have detrimental long-term consequences by accelerating disease progression, as suggested by animal models. There is no cure for PD, and currently no treatments to slow down disease progression. Therefore, the development of new and effective treatments is crucial. Given the large role of stress on PD symptoms, stress reduction might improve motor as well as non-motor symptoms. Intriguingly, recent evidence suggests that mindfulness training, where mindfulness is the trainable capacity to experience the present moment on purpose and without judgment, is an effective way to achieve such stress reduction. In fact, the effects of mindfulness practice have gained much interest as a topic of scientific research and clinical practise recently, where Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is one of the most commonly applied interventions, shown to be effective for a variety of somatic and psychiatric disorders. Importantly, previous trials investigating the effect of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on clinical symptoms in PD showed positive effects on depression in 6/8 trials, on anxiety in 4/7 trials and on motor symptoms in 2/3 studies. Also, a large online survey on patients' experiences with stress and mindfulness showed that on one hand, patients experienced considerably more stress than controls, and significant stress-related worsening of PD symptoms; on the other, PD mindfulness users reported positive effects of mindfulness on anxiety and depression. In summary, current evidence suggests a positive effect of MBIs on psychological distress in PD, but clinical evidence is inconclusive. Also, to date, there is no research on the (cerebral) mechanisms underlying the (positive) effects of mindfulness in PD. Insight to the cerebral mechanisms of MBIs can pave the way for developing new, mechanism-based interventions, and can help to uncover the nature of the effects of stress on Parkinson's disease. Specifically, a mechanism based approach allows us to disentangle the symptomatic (stress as an amplifying factor on motor dysfunction) as opposed to neurodegenerative (nigro-striatal cell loss) effects of stress. In this study, the investigators will test the effect of MBCT on the clinical (symptomatic) and neurodegenerative course of PD. If proven to be effective, MBCT can be applied as a new and cost-effective therapy to PD patients. The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial with MBCT as intervention and a treatment as usual (TAU) control group. The investigators will evaluate whether a MBCT mindfulness course can lead to clinically relevant reductions in psychological distress (measured with the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scale) in PD patients with mild to moderate symptoms of psychological distress. Also, the investigators will evaluate the effects of a MBCT mindfulness course on other PD symptoms (e.g. motor dysfunction), cerebral markers of neurodegeneration, and neuroplasticity, and explore whether the intervention lowers systemic inflammatory tone in PD. The total duration of data acquisition per participant will be 12 months, consisting of a baseline measurement (T0), an intervention period of 2 months followed by a post-measurement (T1), and a final measurement (T2) that takes place 12 months after T0.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson's Disease
Keywords
Parkinson's Disease, Mindfulness, Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, Disease progression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The involved researchers will not be blinded to the treatment allocation, because this would not be feasible with the current design. Patients receiving MBCT need to be allocated to a specific treatment group, which requires extensive communication between the patient, mindfulness center and researcher. Also, patients receiving the treatment will perform different questionnaires in the course of the study, which makes it impossible for the researcher to be blinded for group allocation. We do not expect any bias on our primary outcome measure (self-report questionnaire). Secondary outcome measures (MRI, blood serum, hair cortisol) are unlikely to be biased by the researcher. UPDRS-III performance will be video recorded to allow blinded ratings by independent researchers after collecting the data (hence blinded outcome assessor). Patients will be informed about their intervention after randomization.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
124 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
62 patients will receive a mindfulness based intervention.
Arm Title
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
62 patients will receive treatment as usual, this will form a (passive) control group to the MBCT group.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
MBCT
Intervention Description
Patients will join a mindfulness-based cognitive therapy course at the Radboudumc Center for Mindfulness. The course consists of eight weekly sessions of 2.5-hour and one 6-hour silence day between the 6th and 7th session. The sessions include meditation exercises (body-scan, sitting meditation, gentle movement exercises, three-minute breathing space, daily activities with attention), psychoeducation and group discussion. Psychoeducation includes information on cognitive techniques, like monitoring and scheduling of events and identification of negative automatic thoughts. In addition, all participants will be encouraged to perform daily practice assignments at home for about 30-45 minutes per day, mainly consisting of meditation exercises.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Psychological distress post-intervention (as assessed by HADS [0-42])
Description
Our primary outcome will be psychological distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms), measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at T1 (post-intervention). The HADS is a validated self-report questionnaire consisting of anxiety and depression subscales, scores can range from 0-42 points. Lower scores mean less stress, i.e. better outcome. It was previously used as primary outcome measure in an MBCT-RCT in cancer, it was used as outcome measure in the largest MBI-RCT to date in PD, and it has been validated in PD. The effect on HADS will all be analyzed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The dependent variable will be the HADS score at T1; group allocation will serve as fixed factors, and age at T0, sex and the HADS score at T0 will serve as covariates.
Time Frame
Month 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in psychological distress (as assessed by HADS [0-42])
Description
HADS [0-42] (lower score = better (less stress), see also primary outcome.
Time Frame
Month 12. Change relative to baseline.
Title
Disease severity (as assessed by MDS-UPDRS [0-199])
Description
MDS-UPDRS [0-199] (higher score = worse (more disability)). We will assess overall symptom severity as a function of time T0/T1/T2 and group (MBCT vs. TAU).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Cognitive function (as assessed by MoCA [0-30])
Description
Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA [0-30] (higher score = better (less disability)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Tremor severity (indicated by tremor power [log(µV2)])
Description
We will compare tremor severity as measured with accelerometry during rest, mental arithmetic (coco), posturing and action. We will perform a 2x2x2 ANOVA with between-subjects factor GROUP (MBCT vs. control), and within-subjects factors TIME (T0 vs. T2) and CONDITION (coco vs. rest, posture vs. rest, action vs. rest).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Hair cortisol
Description
Hair cortisol levels will be established by means of a hair sample and hair cortisol concentration of the previous 2 months will be assessed and compared between T0/T1/T2 and between groups (MBCT/TAU)
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Bradykinesia severity (indicated by average keys per second on key tapping test)
Description
We will measure bradykinesia severity by means of a keyboard finger tapping test. Average keys pressed per seconds will be used as dependent variable. More keys per second = less disability. We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Inflammatory tone (as assessed by serum C-reactive protein)
Description
We will be assessing inflammatory tone by means of serum C-reactie protein (CRP) levels. Higher CRP = more inflammation.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Quality of life questionnaire (as assessed by PDQ-39 [0-100])
Description
Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39; PDQ-39 [0 - 100] (higher score = worse (more disability)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Perceived stress (as assessed by PSS [0-40])
Description
Perceived Stress Scale; PSS [0 - 40] (higher score = worse (more perceived stress)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Rumination (as assessed by RRS [26-104])
Description
Ruminative Response Scale; RRS [26-104] (higher score = worse (more ruminative thoughts)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Mindfulness skills (as assessed by FFMQ [39-195])
Description
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form; FFMQ [39-195] (higher score = better (more mindfulness skills)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Self-compassion as assessed by SCS [12-84])
Description
Self-Compassion Short Form; SCS [12-84] (higher score = better (more self compassion)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Self-efficacy (as assessed by GSES [10-40])
Description
General Self-Efficacy Scale; GSES [10-40] (higher score = better (more self efficacy)) We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Positive appraisal (as assessed by PASS)
Description
Positive Appraisal Style Scale; PASS [for each coping style: 2-10, for humor: 1-8] We will test whether clinical scores change significantly between T0, T1 and T2 using mixed models.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 6, month 12.
Title
Decision making task
Description
Patients will perform a neuropsychological task designed to track individual decision making and learning processes. Computational modeling will be used to model response patters according to an actor model and a spectator model. Response patterns will be compared as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T1/ T2).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 2, month 12.
Title
Salivary cortisol
Description
Acute cortisol levels will be assessed via saliva samples during socially evaluated cold pressure test as a function of group (MBCT/TAU), time (T0/T2), and SECPT time points (pre/post/30mpost/45mpost).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 12.
Title
Resting state network reactivity to a stressor (fMRI)
Description
Resting-state network connectivity will be assessed based on resting state fMRI before and after the socially evaluated cold pressure test (SECPT). In specific, this will be evaluated as a function of group (MBCT / TAU), time (T0 / T2), and SECPT (before / after). Resting state networks of interest include the salience network, central executive network, and default mode network.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 12.
Title
Grey matter volume of stress-related regions (MRI)
Description
By means of a structural T1 scan, we will compare structural changes in stress-related brain regions, e.g. amygdala, hippocampus. Specifically, grey matter volume will be compared as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2). This measure will help us distinguish between structural changes versus network adaptations as a response to the intervention.
Time Frame
Month 0, month 12.
Title
Structural integrity of substantia nigra and locus coeruleus (LC)
Description
To further evaluate structural integrity of the substantia nigra and LC, signal intensity on neuromelanin sensitive MRI scans, as well as diffusion MRI will be determined before and one year after the MBI. Structural integrity will be analysed as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 12.
Title
Functional integrity of nigro-striatal dopamine system
Description
To quantify the functional integrity of the nigro-striatal dopamine system, we will use resting-state fMRI to calculate gradients of cortico-striatal connectivity. This fMRI measure is sensitive to compensatory changes: in PD, cortico-striatal connectivity shifts from more-affected (posterior) to less-affected (anterior) portions of the striatum. To investigate this, functional connectivity profiles of the posterior and anterior putamen specifically will be determined and analysed as a function of group (MBCT / TAU) and time (T0 / T2).
Time Frame
Month 0, month 12.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A diagnosis of idiopathic PD made by a movement disorders specialist. PD disease duration is ≤7 years, defined as time since diagnosis made by a neurologist. Mild-moderate symptoms of psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score >10 points). Subject can read and understand the Dutch language. Exclusion Criteria: Severe neurological or psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g. psychosis or suicidality). Contraindications for MRI (e.g. brain surgery in medical history, claustrophobia, an active implant, epilepsy, pregnancy, and/or metal objects in the upper body that are incompatible with MRI). Moderate to severe head tremor (to avoid artifacts caused by extensive head motion during scanning). Cognitive dysfunction (clinical diagnosis of dementia, or a score of 20 or lower on the MoCA, which will be measured at T0). Previous participation in MBSR or MBCT (>4 sessions).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anouk van der Heide, MSc
Phone
+31628856881
Email
anouk.vanderheide@donders.ru.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Franziska Goltz, MSc
Email
franziska.goltz@donders.ru.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rick Helmich, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Centre; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 EN
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anouk van der Heide
Email
anouk.vanderheide@donders.ru.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Franziska Goltz
Email
franziska.goltz@donders.ru.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33275908
Citation
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Erratum In: Lancet. 2020 Dec 4;:
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3352672
Citation
Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O. Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Pathophysiologic and clinical implications. N Engl J Med. 1988 Apr 7;318(14):876-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198804073181402.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22001159
Citation
Hemmerle AM, Herman JP, Seroogy KB. Stress, depression and Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2012 Jan;233(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.035. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33462213
Citation
van der Heide A, Speckens AEM, Meinders MJ, Rosenthal LS, Bloem BR, Helmich RC. Stress and mindfulness in Parkinson's disease - a survey in 5000 patients. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021 Jan 18;7(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-00152-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24565378
Citation
de Pablos RM, Herrera AJ, Espinosa-Oliva AM, Sarmiento M, Munoz MF, Machado A, Venero JL. Chronic stress enhances microglia activation and exacerbates death of nigral dopaminergic neurons under conditions of inflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Feb 24;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-34.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31585362
Citation
Burtscher J, Copin JC, Rodrigues J, Kumar ST, Chiki A, Guillot de Suduiraut I, Sandi C, Lashuel HA. Chronic corticosterone aggravates behavioral and neuronal symptomatology in a mouse model of alpha-synuclein pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Nov;83:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33094858
Citation
van der Heide A, Meinders MJ, Speckens AEM, Peerbolte TF, Bloem BR, Helmich RC. Stress and Mindfulness in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Effects and Potential Underlying Mechanisms. Mov Disord. 2021 Jan;36(1):64-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.28345. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Baer, R. A. Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical psychology: Science and practice 10, 125-143, doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 (2003).
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Effects of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy in People With Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs