search
Back to results

Myositis Interstitial Lung Disease Nintedanib Trial (MINT)

Primary Purpose

Myositis Associated Interstitial Lund Disease (MA-ILD)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nintedanib
Placebo
Standard of Care
Sponsored by
Rohit Aggarwal, MD
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myositis Associated Interstitial Lund Disease (MA-ILD) focused on measuring Myositis associated interstitial lung disease (Myositis ILD), Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Myositis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subject has provided written informed consent Approval from local treating physician (done at pre-screening only for remote patients as well as for local site patients not actively being managed at the local site). Subject lives in the United States Adult: Age ≥ 18 years Subject can speak, read, and understand English or Spanish Subject is willing and capable of performing all study procedures. Validity/repeatability of home spirometry confirmed by PFT lab technician/MD through telemedicine as per American Thoracic Society guidelines. Men and women of reproductive potential must agree to use 2 reliable methods of birth control during the trial period. Confirmed diagnosis of myositis (2017 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria or presence of one of the following myositis-specific or -associated autoantibodies). Anti-synthetase autoantibody (Anti-Jo-1, -PL-7, -PL-12, -EJ, -OJ, -KS, -Tyr, -Zo) Anti-MDA5, TIF1-gamma, Mi-2, NXP2/MJ, SAE, HMGCR, SRP Anti-PM/Scl, Ku, U1RNP, Ro5,2/60, or SSA (in absence of clinical diagnosis of systemic sclerosis or primary Sjogren syndrome). Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD): HRCT chest within 12 months of screening visit with fibrosing ILD (reticular changes, traction bronchiectasis, and/or honeycombing) No other identifiable cause of fibrosis The following co-existing features are expected and accepted: ground glass opacity, upper lung or peri-bronchovascular predominance, mosaic attenuation, air trapping, consolidation, and centrilobular nodules. Progressive ILD: Defined as meeting ≥1 of the following criteria within 24 months of the screening visit. ≥10% relative decline in FVC% predicted (%pred) ≥5 but <10% relative decline in FVC %pred with worsening dyspnea. ≥5 but <10% relative decline in FVC %pred with worsening chest HRCT fibrotic changes Worsening dyspnea with worsening chest HRCT fibrosis The severity of ILD: FVC > 40% of predicted and ≤ 80% of predicted. Standard of care (SOC) therapy: (See: SOC immunosuppression and washout under section 6.2 for details) Allowable SOC includes a maximum of 2: 1 glucocorticoid (GC) and 1 Non-GC immunosuppressive medication (IS) Or 2 Non-GC immunosuppressive medications. Allowable IS component of SOC regimen must have been started at least 12 weeks prior and be stable for at least 4 weeks before screening visit. Allowable GC component of SOC regimen must have been started at least 4 weeks prior and be stable for at least 2 weeks before screening visit. Allowable IS and GC: Glucocorticoid (maximum dose ≤20 mg/day; prednisone equivalent). Mycophenolate mofetil (max dose 3 gm/day) Mycophenolic acid (max dose 1440 mg/day) Azathioprine (max dose 2.5 mg/kg/day) Methotrexate (max dose 25 mg/week Tacrolimus (max dose 10 mg/day) Cyclosporine (max dose 200 mg/day) Leflunomide (max dose 20 mg/day) Sulfasalazine (max dose 3 gm/day) IVIG (Intravenous immunoglobulin) or SQIG (subcutaneous immunoglobulin) (max dose 2 gm/kg/month) is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy Rituximab (maximum dose 1000 mg x 2 (2 weeks apart) or 375mg/m2 weekly dose x 4, repeated every > 4 months) Hydroxychloroquine is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy. Inhaled medication(s) for lung disease is allowed if started > 4 weeks before screening. Should remain stable throughout the study. Negative pregnancy test Exclusion Criteria: Planned major surgical procedures within the trial period of 24 weeks. Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial. Women of childbearing potential* not willing or able to use at least two highly effective methods of birth control. For females of reproductive potential: use of highly effective contraception for at least 1 month before study drug administration and agreement to use such a method during study participation and for an additional 28 days after the end of study drug administration. For males of reproductive potential**: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with a partner Highly effective contraception examples are: An approved hormonal contraceptive such as oral contraceptives, emergency contraception used as directed, patches, implants, injections, rings, hormonally-impregnated intrauterine device (IUD), or nonhormonal IUD. A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche, and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, tubal occlusion, and bilateral oophorectomy. A man is considered permanently sterile if a vasectomy has been performed. Severe lung disease is defined by the following within the last 6 months before the screening: FVC ≤40 percent predicted DLCO <30% of percent predicted (corrected for Hb) O2 requirement of ≥10 L at rest based on home oxygen prescription. Patient listed for lung transplant or actively going through lung transplant evaluation. Moderate to severe active muscle disease from myositis as per any one of the criteria: Creatine kinase (CK) > 1000 U/mL. Moderate to severe dermatomyositis rashes as per investigator evaluation (if rash present) Moderate to severe arthritis as per investigator evaluation Moderate to severe muscle weakness as per Sit to Stand 30 seconds of < 7. History of or ongoing serious active, chronic, or recurrent infection within 4 weeks of screening Significant Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is defined by any of the following: Previous clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe PH or significant right heart failure. History of echocardiographic evidence of significant right heart failure or moderate to severe PH (TR jet >= 2.9 m/s and signs of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction; or TR jet > 3.4; or an right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) > 40-55 with evidence of RV strain or dysfunction; or RVSP > 55 regardless. History of right heart catheterization showing a cardiac index ≤ 2.2 l/min/m² or severity of pulmonary hypertension (mPAP) >40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) <15mmHg PH requiring oral, IV, or inhaled therapy (such as epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, bosentan, ambrisentan, sildenafil, and tadalafil). Increased bleeding risk, defined by any of the following: Patients who require Fibrinolysis, full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation (e.g. vitamin K antagonists, direct thrombin inhibitors, heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparin) High dose antiplatelet therapy (>325mg acetylsalicylic acid or >75mg clopidogrel). History of hemorrhagic central nervous system (CNS) event within 12 months of screening. Any of the following within 3 months of screening: Hemoptysis or hematuria Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or active GI ulcers. Coagulation parameters: International normalized ratio (INR) >2, prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) by >1.5 x ULN at screening. History of a thrombotic event (including stroke and transient ischemic attack) within 12 months of screening. Severe Cardiovascular disease, any of the following: Severe hypertension, uncontrolled under treatment (≥160/100 mmHg), within 6 months of screening. Myocardial infarction or unstable cardiac angina within 6 months of screening. Patients with underlying chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh A, B, or C hepatic impairment). Known hypersensitivity to the trial medication or its components (i.e. soya lecithin) Other diseases that may interfere with testing procedures or in the judgment of the Investigator may interfere with trial participation (such as significant GI issues like irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, recent abdominal surgery, diverticular disease), or significant other lung diseases (such as severe obstructive lung disease such as severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.) or may put the patient at risk when participating in this trial. Life expectancy for a disease other than ILD < 2.5 years (Investigator assessment). In the opinion of the investigator, any condition precluding participation and completion of the study, including active alcohol and drug abuse or patients not able to understand or follow trial procedures. Other investigational therapy was received within 1 month or 6 half-lives (whichever was greater) before the screening visit. Previous treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone (taken the drug for ≥ 1 month or history of intolerance/side effects) Current or recent use of one or more of the following medications (See: SOC immunosuppression and washout under section 6.2 for details) Cyclophosphamide within 3 months of baseline. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (infliximab, golimumab, or certolizumab) within 8 weeks or adalimumab within 4 weeks, and etanercept within 2 weeks of baseline. Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib, others) within 4 weeks of baseline. Anakinra within 1 week of baseline. Other biological agents such as tocilizumab, abatacept, etc. within 4 weeks of baseline. Safety laboratory abnormality as any one of below Aspartate transferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x ULN at screening, unless deemed due to active myositis, in which case CK is also abnormally elevated and the ratio of AST or ALT by CK levels (adjusted as x ULN) should be < 2.0 and gamma-glutamyl transferase < 2.0 x ULN. Bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN at screening Creatinine clearance <30 mL/min calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula at screening. Hgb < 9.0 Platelet count < 100,000/mm3 White blood cells < 3000/mm3 -

Sites / Locations

  • UCLA Medical Center
  • National Jewish Health
  • University of Florida
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
  • Northwell Health
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of PittsburghRecruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • University of Utah Health Sciences Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo plus Standard of Care, then Nintedanib plus Standard of Care

Nintedanib plus Standard of Care

Arm Description

Placebo twice a day (BID) plus standard of care (SOC) Immunosuppressive Therapy for 12 weeks followed by open-label Nintedanib 150 mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for additional 12 weeks.

Nintedanib 150 mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for 12 weeks followed by open-label Nintedanib 150mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for additional 12 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (L-PF) Dyspnea score
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items). The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis Dyspnea score
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items). The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.
Change in other Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis scores
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) scores will include total score, symptoms, cough, energy and impacts scores. The score range is from 0-100, the higher the score, the greater the impairment.
Change in immunosuppressive (IS) regimen
Proportion of patients requiring an increased dose or a change in their glucocorticoid (GC) / immunosuppression (IS) agent for clinical worsening/flare of MA-ILD
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (mL) from baseline to 12 weeks
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (mL) from baseline to 24 weeks
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity FVC (%) from baseline to week 12
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity FVC (%) from baseline to week 24
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Proportion of patients with a relative decline from baseline in FVC (mL) of ≥10%, ≥7.5%, and ≥ 5%
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (mL) from baseline to week 12
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (mL) from baseline to week 24
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Time to FVC (mL) improvement and decline from baseline by (≥5%, 7.5%, 10%)
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.
Time to progression
Defined as either time for event a, b or c Event a. ≥ 10% decline in FVC (mL) or death or transplant Event b. ILD worsening definition (per protocol) or death or transplant Event c. non-elective hospitalization for ILD worsening/flare or death or lung transplant
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (%) from baseline to week 12
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (%) from baseline to week 24
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Proportion of patients with a relative decline from baseline in FVC (%) of ≥10%, ≥7.5%, and ≥ 5%
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time to FVC (%) improvement and decline from baseline by (≥5%, 7.5%, 10%)
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2023
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Sponsor
Rohit Aggarwal, MD
Collaborators
Boehringer Ingelheim
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05799755
Brief Title
Myositis Interstitial Lung Disease Nintedanib Trial
Acronym
MINT
Official Title
Nintedanib Plus Standard of Care Immunosuppression Versus Standard of Care Immunosuppression Alone in Patients With Progressive Fibrotic Myositis Associated - Interstitial Lung Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Exploratory Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rohit Aggarwal, MD
Collaborators
Boehringer Ingelheim

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This research study will evaluate safety and how well the study drug, nintedanib improve symptoms in participants with myositis associated interstitial lung disease (MA-ILD). Interstitial lung disease is a disorder caused by the abnormal accumulation of cells structures between air sacs of the lungs resulting in thickening, stiffness and scarring of the tissues of the lung. This study will enroll a total of 134 participants across 15 clinical sites located in the United States. A subset of participants will be enrolled remotely via telemedicine utilizing certified mobile home research nurses and various remote monitoring devices. The research visits may include a physical exam, vital signs (such as blood pressure, heart rate, etc.), pulmonary function tests (PFT and/or home spirometry), Computerized Tomography (or CT) scans of the chest, blood draws, wearing a physical activity monitor and completing questionnaires. Some of these events may be done at home, at a local facility or remotely (via telemedicine).
Detailed Description
Participants enrolled in the study will receive either study drug or placebo for 12 weeks plus the participant's normal standard of care medication for the participant's disease. Placebo is an inactive substance that contains no medicine. Following the initial treatment phase, participants will receive the active study drug (nintedanib) for an additional 12-week period. Nintedanib is a drug that is currently used and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and has been shown to slow the rate of decline in pulmonary function among patients with IPF as well as interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with systemic sclerosis or scleroderma. In addition, in March 2020, the FDA approved nintedanib oral capsules to treat patients with chronic fibrosing (scarring) interstitial lung diseases (ILD) with a progressive phenotype (trait).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myositis Associated Interstitial Lund Disease (MA-ILD)
Keywords
Myositis associated interstitial lung disease (Myositis ILD), Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), Myositis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Randomization will be 1:1 for nintedanib: placebo and stratified by underlying immunosuppressive therapy (mycophenolate vs. others). All patients must be on the standard of care (SOC) immunosuppression (IS) at screening as per the protocol and should remain on stable doses throughout the trial. After 12 weeks both arms will receive an additional 12 weeks of nintedanib (150 mg twice a day, maximum dose of 300 mg a day) through week 24 (final study visit).
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Subjects, investigators, and everyone involved in trial conduct or analysis or with any other interest in this double-blind trial will remain blinded with regard to the randomized treatment assignments until after the database lock.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
134 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo plus Standard of Care, then Nintedanib plus Standard of Care
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo twice a day (BID) plus standard of care (SOC) Immunosuppressive Therapy for 12 weeks followed by open-label Nintedanib 150 mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for additional 12 weeks.
Arm Title
Nintedanib plus Standard of Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Nintedanib 150 mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for 12 weeks followed by open-label Nintedanib 150mg BID + SOC Immunosuppressive Therapy for additional 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nintedanib
Other Intervention Name(s)
OFEV
Intervention Description
Nintedanib 150 mg BID
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care
Intervention Description
Maximum of 2 standard of care immunosuppressant (IS) drugs are allowed, one being a glucocorticoid (GC) and the other being a non-GC IS drug OR 2 non-GC IS drugs in the event that the patient is not on a GC). The patient should be on the IS drug(s) for at least 12 weeks (at least 4 weeks or more for GC) before the screening. The doses should be stable for at least 4 weeks (at least 2 weeks for GC) before the screening visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (L-PF) Dyspnea score
Description
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items). The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis Dyspnea score
Description
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items). The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Change in other Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis scores
Description
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) scores will include total score, symptoms, cough, energy and impacts scores. The score range is from 0-100, the higher the score, the greater the impairment.
Time Frame
Week 12 to week 24
Title
Change in immunosuppressive (IS) regimen
Description
Proportion of patients requiring an increased dose or a change in their glucocorticoid (GC) / immunosuppression (IS) agent for clinical worsening/flare of MA-ILD
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) to week 12
Title
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (mL) from baseline to 12 weeks
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 12
Title
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (mL) from baseline to 24 weeks
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity FVC (%) from baseline to week 12
Description
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 12
Title
Absolute and relative change in Forced Vital Capacity FVC (%) from baseline to week 24
Description
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Proportion of patients with a relative decline from baseline in FVC (mL) of ≥10%, ≥7.5%, and ≥ 5%
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time Frame
Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (mL) from baseline to week 12
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Time Frame
baseline (week 0) at week 12
Title
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (mL) from baseline to week 24
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Time Frame
baseline (week 0) at week 24
Title
Time to FVC (mL) improvement and decline from baseline by (≥5%, 7.5%, 10%)
Description
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Time to progression
Description
Defined as either time for event a, b or c Event a. ≥ 10% decline in FVC (mL) or death or transplant Event b. ILD worsening definition (per protocol) or death or transplant Event c. non-elective hospitalization for ILD worsening/flare or death or lung transplant
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (%) from baseline to week 12
Description
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Time Frame
baseline (week 0) at week 12
Title
Proportion of patients with stable (+/- < 5%) or improved FVC (≥ 5, ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10%) (%) from baseline to week 24
Description
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Time Frame
baseline (week 0) at week 24
Title
Proportion of patients with a relative decline from baseline in FVC (%) of ≥10%, ≥7.5%, and ≥ 5%
Description
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time Frame
Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Time to FVC (%) improvement and decline from baseline by (≥5%, 7.5%, 10%)
Description
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Rate of patient recruitment, enrollment, screen failure, and dropout rates between the local sites (average per site) and the remote site
Description
Compare the patient recruitment, enrollment, screen failure and drop out rates between patient recruited through local clinical trial sites vs. remote clinical trial site.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Reliability measure of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in ml measured by home spirometry
Description
Reliability is measured as test (baseline) and re-test (week 1) correlation of FVC in ml using spearman correlation.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Validity of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in ml by home spirometry
Description
Validity of FVC (ml) by home spirometry is measured as spearman correlation with FVC (ml) obtained by gold standard clinic spirometry.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Absolute and relative change in DLCO
Description
DLCO is diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Changes from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Progression free survival
Description
Connective Tissue Disease (CTD)-ILD outcome as per Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT), which is defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death or lung transplant or FVC ≥10% decline or FVC ≥5% decline with DLCO ≥15% decline Clinical worsening is defined as death, lung transplant, or new/worsening O2 requirement at rest (>2L), or non-elective hospitalization for ILD clinical worsening/flare or ILD worsening definition (per protocol) or out of protocol rescue medication for ILD clinical worsening/flare.
Time Frame
weeks 12 and 24
Title
Steroid use (calculated using prednisone dose equivalents)
Description
Comparing change of steroid from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time Frame
Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Change in supplemental oxygen needs from baseline to week 12
Description
Comparing change in oxygen requirement from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Title
Mean change in supplemental oxygen requirement in ml from baseline to week 24
Description
Comparing change in oxygen requirement from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Patient assessment of change
Description
Patient Assessment of Change (also known as Patient Global Impression of Change): Overall Assessment of Change by Patient. Patient overall assessment of change in disease status from baseline, reported as 7-point ordinal scale: no change, minimal, moderate, and major worsening as well as minimal, moderate and major improvement.
Time Frame
Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Physician assessment of change
Description
Physician's overall assessment of change in disease status of the patient from baseline, reported as 7-point ordinal scale: no change, minimal, moderate, and major worsening as well as minimal, moderate and major improvement.
Time Frame
Weeks 12 and 24
Title
Change in Cadence by Physical Activity Monitor at week 12.
Description
Cadence: highest step counts performed in a minute for a given day. Higher value is better. Mean change in cadence from baseline to week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Title
Change in Average Daily Step Count by Physical Activity Monitor at week 12.
Description
Average daily step count measured by mean of daily step count for 7 days, where daily step counts in a day divided by time the device was worn. Higher value is better. Mean change in average daily step count from baseline to week 12
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Title
Change in Cadence by Physical Activity Monitor at week 24.
Description
Cadence: highest step counts performed in a minute for a given day. Higher value is better. Mean change in cadence from baseline to week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Change in Average Daily Step Count by Physical Activity Monitor at week 24.
Description
Average daily step count measured by mean of daily step count for 7 days, where daily step counts in a day divided by time the device was worn. Higher value is better. Mean change in average daily step count from baseline to week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Changes in Sit to Stand test from baseline to week 12
Description
Evaluate the changes in Sit to Stand test score from baseline to follow up , between two treatment arms
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Title
Changes in Sit to Stand test from baseline to week 24
Description
Evaluate the changes in Sit to Stand test score from baseline to follow up , between two treatment arms
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Change in High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) chest from baseline
Description
Change in HRCT will be analyzed using semi-quantitative and quantitative image based scoring. Change from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arm
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Title
Adverse events (AEs) and tolerance
Description
All AEs and tolerance event will be compared between 2 treatment arms Proportion of subjects who discontinue study drug Patients with any AEs Patients with Serious Adverse Event (SAE)s Patients with AEs of special interest (gastrointestinal perforation and hepatic injury)
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Title
Absolute and relative change in FEV1
Description
FEV1 is forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1) derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Changes from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (week 0) to week 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has provided written informed consent Approval from local treating physician (done at pre-screening only for remote patients as well as for local site patients not actively being managed at the local site). Subject lives in the United States Adult: Age ≥ 18 years Subject can speak, read, and understand English or Spanish Subject is willing and capable of performing all study procedures. Validity/repeatability of home spirometry confirmed by PFT lab technician/MD through telemedicine as per American Thoracic Society guidelines. Men and women of reproductive potential must agree to use 2 reliable methods of birth control during the trial period. Confirmed diagnosis of myositis (2017 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria or presence of one of the following myositis-specific or -associated autoantibodies). Anti-synthetase autoantibody (Anti-Jo-1, -PL-7, -PL-12, -EJ, -OJ, -KS, -Tyr, -Zo) Anti-MDA5, TIF1-gamma, Mi-2, NXP2/MJ, SAE, HMGCR, SRP Anti-PM/Scl, Ku, U1RNP, Ro5,2/60, or SSA (in absence of clinical diagnosis of systemic sclerosis or primary Sjogren syndrome). Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD): HRCT chest within 12 months of screening visit with fibrosing ILD (reticular changes, traction bronchiectasis, and/or honeycombing) No other identifiable cause of fibrosis The following co-existing features are expected and accepted: ground glass opacity, upper lung or peri-bronchovascular predominance, mosaic attenuation, air trapping, consolidation, and centrilobular nodules. Progressive ILD: Defined as meeting ≥1 of the following criteria within 24 months of the screening visit. ≥10% relative decline in FVC% predicted (%pred) ≥5 but <10% relative decline in FVC %pred with worsening dyspnea. ≥5 but <10% relative decline in FVC %pred with worsening chest HRCT fibrotic changes Worsening dyspnea with worsening chest HRCT fibrosis The severity of ILD: FVC > 40% of predicted and ≤ 80% of predicted. Standard of care (SOC) therapy: (See: SOC immunosuppression and washout under section 6.2 for details) Allowable SOC includes a maximum of 2: 1 glucocorticoid (GC) and 1 Non-GC immunosuppressive medication (IS) Or 2 Non-GC immunosuppressive medications. Allowable IS component of SOC regimen must have been started at least 12 weeks prior and be stable for at least 4 weeks before screening visit. Allowable GC component of SOC regimen must have been started at least 4 weeks prior and be stable for at least 2 weeks before screening visit. Allowable IS and GC: Glucocorticoid (maximum dose ≤20 mg/day; prednisone equivalent). Mycophenolate mofetil (max dose 3 gm/day) Mycophenolic acid (max dose 1440 mg/day) Azathioprine (max dose 2.5 mg/kg/day) Methotrexate (max dose 25 mg/week Tacrolimus (max dose 10 mg/day) Cyclosporine (max dose 200 mg/day) Leflunomide (max dose 20 mg/day) Sulfasalazine (max dose 3 gm/day) IVIG (Intravenous immunoglobulin) or SQIG (subcutaneous immunoglobulin) (max dose 2 gm/kg/month) is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy Rituximab (maximum dose 1000 mg x 2 (2 weeks apart) or 375mg/m2 weekly dose x 4, repeated every > 4 months) Hydroxychloroquine is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy. Inhaled medication(s) for lung disease is allowed if started > 4 weeks before screening. Should remain stable throughout the study. Negative pregnancy test Exclusion Criteria: Planned major surgical procedures within the trial period of 24 weeks. Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial. Women of childbearing potential* not willing or able to use at least two highly effective methods of birth control. For females of reproductive potential: use of highly effective contraception for at least 1 month before study drug administration and agreement to use such a method during study participation and for an additional 28 days after the end of study drug administration. For males of reproductive potential**: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with a partner Highly effective contraception examples are: An approved hormonal contraceptive such as oral contraceptives, emergency contraception used as directed, patches, implants, injections, rings, hormonally-impregnated intrauterine device (IUD), or nonhormonal IUD. A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche, and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, tubal occlusion, and bilateral oophorectomy. A man is considered permanently sterile if a vasectomy has been performed. Severe lung disease is defined by the following within the last 6 months before the screening: FVC ≤40 percent predicted DLCO <30% of percent predicted (corrected for Hb) O2 requirement of ≥10 L at rest based on home oxygen prescription. Patient listed for lung transplant or actively going through lung transplant evaluation. Moderate to severe active muscle disease from myositis as per any one of the criteria: Creatine kinase (CK) > 1000 U/mL. Moderate to severe dermatomyositis rashes as per investigator evaluation (if rash present) Moderate to severe arthritis as per investigator evaluation Moderate to severe muscle weakness as per Sit to Stand 30 seconds of < 7. History of or ongoing serious active, chronic, or recurrent infection within 4 weeks of screening Significant Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is defined by any of the following: Previous clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe PH or significant right heart failure. History of echocardiographic evidence of significant right heart failure or moderate to severe PH (TR jet >= 2.9 m/s and signs of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction; or TR jet > 3.4; or an right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) > 40-55 with evidence of RV strain or dysfunction; or RVSP > 55 regardless. History of right heart catheterization showing a cardiac index ≤ 2.2 l/min/m² or severity of pulmonary hypertension (mPAP) >40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) <15mmHg PH requiring oral, IV, or inhaled therapy (such as epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, bosentan, ambrisentan, sildenafil, and tadalafil). Increased bleeding risk, defined by any of the following: Patients who require Fibrinolysis, full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation (e.g. vitamin K antagonists, direct thrombin inhibitors, heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparin) High dose antiplatelet therapy (>325mg acetylsalicylic acid or >75mg clopidogrel). History of hemorrhagic central nervous system (CNS) event within 12 months of screening. Any of the following within 3 months of screening: Hemoptysis or hematuria Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or active GI ulcers. Coagulation parameters: International normalized ratio (INR) >2, prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) by >1.5 x ULN at screening. History of a thrombotic event (including stroke and transient ischemic attack) within 12 months of screening. Severe Cardiovascular disease, any of the following: Severe hypertension, uncontrolled under treatment (≥160/100 mmHg), within 6 months of screening. Myocardial infarction or unstable cardiac angina within 6 months of screening. Patients with underlying chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh A, B, or C hepatic impairment). Known hypersensitivity to the trial medication or its components (i.e. soya lecithin) Other diseases that may interfere with testing procedures or in the judgment of the Investigator may interfere with trial participation (such as significant GI issues like irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, recent abdominal surgery, diverticular disease), or significant other lung diseases (such as severe obstructive lung disease such as severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.) or may put the patient at risk when participating in this trial. Life expectancy for a disease other than ILD < 2.5 years (Investigator assessment). In the opinion of the investigator, any condition precluding participation and completion of the study, including active alcohol and drug abuse or patients not able to understand or follow trial procedures. Other investigational therapy was received within 1 month or 6 half-lives (whichever was greater) before the screening visit. Previous treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone (taken the drug for ≥ 1 month or history of intolerance/side effects) Current or recent use of one or more of the following medications (See: SOC immunosuppression and washout under section 6.2 for details) Cyclophosphamide within 3 months of baseline. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (infliximab, golimumab, or certolizumab) within 8 weeks or adalimumab within 4 weeks, and etanercept within 2 weeks of baseline. Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib, others) within 4 weeks of baseline. Anakinra within 1 week of baseline. Other biological agents such as tocilizumab, abatacept, etc. within 4 weeks of baseline. Safety laboratory abnormality as any one of below Aspartate transferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x ULN at screening, unless deemed due to active myositis, in which case CK is also abnormally elevated and the ratio of AST or ALT by CK levels (adjusted as x ULN) should be < 2.0 and gamma-glutamyl transferase < 2.0 x ULN. Bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN at screening Creatinine clearance <30 mL/min calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula at screening. Hgb < 9.0 Platelet count < 100,000/mm3 White blood cells < 3000/mm3 -
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Shreya Sriram
Phone
412-648-4005
Email
SHS595@pitt.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rohit Aggarwal, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCLA Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tiffany DeLeon
Email
TBDeLeon@mednet.ucla.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christina Charles-Schoeman, MD, MS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Weigt, MD, MS
Facility Name
National Jewish Health
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80206
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jami Henriksen
Email
Henriksenj@NJHealth.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joshua Solomon, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeff Swigris, DO
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wendy Duncan
Email
wduncan3@usf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jose Herazo-Maya, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Debabrata Bandyopadhyay, MD
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sudeep Yadav
Email
sudeepyadav@bsd.uchicago.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Iazsmin Bauer Ventura, MD, MSC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Renea Jablonski, MD
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvenie Desire
Email
ydesire@kumc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Hamblin, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mazen Dimachkie, FAAN, FANA
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21224
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Grazyna Purwin
Email
Gpurwin1@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie Paik, MD, MHS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Christopher-Stine, MD, MPH
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mamary Kone
Email
mkone@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Hallowell, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sara Schoenfeld, MD
Facility Name
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Niki Pradhan
Email
np2749@cumc.columbia.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elana Bernstein, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Zhang, MD
Facility Name
Northwell Health
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11021
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Seyedeh Shadafarin Marashi Shoshtari
Email
smarashish@northwell.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Galina Marder, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arunabh Talwar, MD
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ron Wehrmann
Email
wehrmar@ccf.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sameep Sehgal, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aditi Patel, MD
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cheilonda Johnson, MD
Email
Cheilonda.Johnson@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cheilonda Johnson, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael George, MD
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15216
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Bishop
Email
rkc16@pitt.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rohit Aggarwal, MD, MS
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brijesh Patel
Email
brijesh.patel@vumc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erin Wilfong, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Justin Hewlett, MD
Facility Name
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cassie Larsen
Email
Cassie.larsen@hsc.utah.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Beth Scholand, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dorota Odrobina, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Sharing of individual participant data will require written approval from sponsor and steering committee.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data requests will not be accepted prior to final publication of the trial.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
All data requests will require written approval from sponsor and steering committee prior to release of data
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31112379
Citation
Distler O, Highland KB, Gahlemann M, Azuma A, Fischer A, Mayes MD, Raghu G, Sauter W, Girard M, Alves M, Clerisme-Beaty E, Stowasser S, Tetzlaff K, Kuwana M, Maher TM; SENSCIS Trial Investigators. Nintedanib for Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518-2528. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903076. Epub 2019 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31566307
Citation
Flaherty KR, Wells AU, Cottin V, Devaraj A, Walsh SLF, Inoue Y, Richeldi L, Kolb M, Tetzlaff K, Stowasser S, Coeck C, Clerisme-Beaty E, Rosenstock B, Quaresma M, Haeufel T, Goeldner RG, Schlenker-Herceg R, Brown KK; INBUILD Trial Investigators. Nintedanib in Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1718-1727. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908681. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34917177
Citation
Wilfong EM, Aggarwal R. Role of antifibrotics in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy associated interstitial lung disease. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Dec 9;13:1759720X211060907. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211060907. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32851366
Citation
Shen L, Yan Q, Chen X. Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Pirfenidone and Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide for Refractory Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Connective Tissue Disease: A Case-Series of Seven Patients. Arch Rheumatol. 2019 Aug 26;35(2):180-188. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2020.7381. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27615411
Citation
Li T, Guo L, Chen Z, Gu L, Sun F, Tan X, Chen S, Wang X, Ye S. Pirfenidone in patients with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 12;6:33226. doi: 10.1038/srep33226.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25729034
Citation
Khanna D, Mittoo S, Aggarwal R, Proudman SM, Dalbeth N, Matteson EL, Brown K, Flaherty K, Wells AU, Seibold JR, Strand V. Connective Tissue Disease-associated Interstitial Lung Diseases (CTD-ILD) - Report from OMERACT CTD-ILD Working Group. J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2168-71. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141182. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33614683
Citation
Liang J, Cao H, Yang Y, Ke Y, Yu Y, Sun C, Yue L, Lin J. Efficacy and Tolerability of Nintedanib in Idiopathic-Inflammatory-Myopathy-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 3;8:626953. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.626953. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Myositis Interstitial Lung Disease Nintedanib Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs