search
Back to results

FRAGINOC Study: Screening and Geriatric Assessment and Intervention in Older Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (FRAGINOC)

Primary Purpose

Ovarian Cancer, Frailty

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and individualised physical training
Sponsored by
Odense University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - 120 Years (Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed ovarian cancer Capable of understanding written and oral danish Exclusion Criteria: Other active cancers in the preceding 5 years Severe psychiatric disease Patients referred to primary debulking surgery will be followed in a observational design

Sites / Locations

  • Odense University HospitalRecruiting
  • Vejle HospitalRecruiting
  • Zealand University HospitalRecruiting
  • Copenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletRecruiting
  • Herlev and Gentofte HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

NACT and CGA+ physical training intervention

NACT no intervention

Arm Description

Elderly (≥70 years) ovarian cancer patients referred for Neo-adjuvant treatment randomized to comprehensive geriatric assessment and individualised physical training.

Elderly (≥70 years) ovarian cancer patients referred for Neo-adjuvant treatment randomized to standard of care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Interval Debulking Surgery
Proportion of patients referred to interval debulking surgery
Frailty screening questionnaires
Specificity and positive and negative predictive values of Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8 and Clinical Frailty Scale, in predicting impairments in Comprehensive Geriatric assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Completion of chemotherapy treatment
Proportion of patients who complete oncological treatment (≥90% of the intended treatment)
Effect of training: Physical capacity and endurance
Median of score result in meters of Six-Minute-Walk-Test
Effect of training: Physical function and strength
Median of score result of 30 sec Sit-to-Stand Test in number (lower body) and of Hand Grip Strength test in Kg (upper body)
Effect of physical training: Physical function in relation to basic mobility
Median of Timed Up and Go test in seconds
Effect of physical training: Physical function in relation to balance
Median of Guralnik test: score in seconds
Effect of physical training: Clinical reported measurements
Median of Performance status (number 0-4), Clinical Frailty Scale (1-9), G8 ( 0-17) and modified G8 (0-35)
Effect of physical training: Self-reported measurements
Median of ELFI (0-100), Physical fitness (1-5) and FES-1 short (7-28)
Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)
Median of score of quality of life and recovery questionnaires
Frailty screening combined tool
Specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a combination of Handgrip strength test, 30 second-chair stand test and 6 minutes walk tests, as well as serum concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers added to screening questionnaires (G8, mG8 and CFS), in predicting impairments in Comprehensive Geriatric assessment
Postoperative complications
Median of score of Clavien-Dindo of complications within 30 days after surgery
Progression Free-Survival
Median of period of time measured in months without recurrence of ovarian cancer

Full Information

First Posted
August 25, 2021
Last Updated
March 31, 2023
Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Zealand University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05810701
Brief Title
FRAGINOC Study: Screening and Geriatric Assessment and Intervention in Older Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Acronym
FRAGINOC
Official Title
FRAGINOC Study: The Impact of FRAilty Screening and Geriatric Assessment and Intervention in Older Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Zealand University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer death. More than 40% are older than 70 years. The standard treatment is radical surgery combined with chemotherapy. More than 40% of the Danish patients will never undergo surgery. Frail and immunodeficient older patients are at higher risk of complications, and immunomodulating treatment as chemotherapy results in different outcomes in comparable patients. No accurate validated screening tool to identify frail and immunodeficient OC women exists. Optimization through comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and physical training before and during treatment may improve outcomes and decrease associated risks. Aim: Primary endpoints will be to determine whether a CGA and physical training vs standard of care can increase the proportion of patients later on referred to interval debulking surgery, and examine the performance of validated screening tests in predicting impairments in CGA. Other endpoints will be to evaluate if intervention can improve completion of chemotherapy, to examine the association between frailty screening scores and selected biomarkers with treatment outcomes, including complications and quality of life, and ultimately to develop an improved frailty screening tool based on known screening tools, functional tests and biomarkers identifying patients who will benefit from CGA. Method: This is a nationwide, randomized intervention study. Patients ≥70 years diagnosed with primary OC at the Gynecological departments of Rigshospitalet, Odense and Roskilde University Hospitals will be included. In an interdisciplinary collaboration between medical specialists in oncology, gynecology and geriatrics, included patients will be screened for frailty using validated screening tools and functional tests. Specific biomarkers and immunologic profile will be assessed in all patients. Patients selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be randomized to receive CGA or standard of care. Patients selected for primary debulking surgery or palliation will be followed in an observational cohort. Perspective: The development of a validated screening tool for frailty assessment and immunological status will help us identify frail patients who may need optimization before treatment, resulting in more patients getting optimal treatment (either surgery or chemotherapy), prevent post-treatment complications and avoid palliative patients from undergoing a redundant complex treatment.
Detailed Description
Introduction Several studies have shown that a high percentage of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are undertreated due to their age, even in the absence of comorbidity. On the other hand, there seems to exist a group of frail patients unfit for extensive treatment that are over-treated. Therefore, it is of great interest to identify the group of older patients with EOC, who are frail and would benefit of a comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimisation, including individualised physical training. Unfortunately, no specific screening tool can be recommended or discouraged, and none of these tests are validated in patients with EOC. Immunodeficiency and biomarkers regarding nutritional status, strength, and general health are not part of the standard evaluation, although several studies have shown a correlation between these factors and the functional independence of older patients, comorbidity, postoperative complications, tolerance to chemotherapy and quality of life. In oncologic geriatrics a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA - an examination performed by an interdisciplinary geriatric team) can be performed before start of treatment. Unfortunately, a complete CGA is both time and resource consuming, and the impact of interventions in older patients with EOC has never been examined. Hypothesis and purpose Our hypothesis is that frail patients with advanced ovarian cancer can benefit from a geriatric assessment and optimization, including physical training, increasing their chances of referral to surgery and to get full oncological treatment. The investigators believe that it is possible to develop a frailty screening tool with highly improved accuracy by combining known frailty screening tests, functional tests, and relevant biomarkers, which can help us select those patients who will benefit from a geriatric assessment and intervention. The clinical study is parceled out in two working projects, WP1 and WP2, which are anchored at the departments of gynecology, geriatric medicine, and oncology at several centers in Denmark. - WP1: Geriatric assessment and intervention and its impact on treatment outcomes examined in a cohort of older patients with EOC referred to NACT Primary endpoint: To determine whether a CGA and tailored intervention vs. standard of care can increase the proportion of patients referred to IDS. Secondary endpoints are a)to evaluate whether a CGA and tailored intervention can improve completion of chemotherapy, b) to investigate if CGA and a tailored intervention with physical training vs. standard of care improves treatment outcome and quality of life. - WP2: Impact of biomarkers, functional tests and immunological profile in assessing frailty and as predictors of adverse treatment outcomes in a national cohort of older EOC patients. Primary endpoint: to examine the performance of three validated frailty screening tests (G8, mG8, and Clinical Frailty Index (CFI)) in EOC patients in predicting impairments in CGA. Secondary endpoints are a)to examine whether adding functional tests, biomarkers, and the immunological profile can improve the accuracy of the frailty screening tests b) to examine whether the screening tool is predictive of patients achieving radical surgery and completing oncological treatment, as well as predict adverse treatment outcomes Method description The FRAGINOC project is a multicenter study, where WP1 is a clinical randomized trial of screening and intervention in older patients (≥70 years) with a diagnose of advanced EOC (FIGO stage III-IV). WP2 is a prospective observational study, where patients from WP1 will be asked to participate. Furthermore, older patients (≥70 years) referred to PDS or palliation will also be included. Patients will be evaluated at MDT conference, where they will be referred to either PDS and chemotherapy or NACT or palliation. Those referred to NACT will be re-evaluated at a second MDT conference after three cycles of chemotherapy to decide whether they can be referred to IDS. Screening All included patients will be screened for frailty after the MDT conference using a combination of the following tools: Questionnaires (Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8 and clinical frailty scale). Functional tests (hand grip test, 30 second chair test and 6 minutes walk test) Blood samples, which have all been validated previously although in other cancer types. These tests will be repeated after the second MDT conference (after 3rd cycle of chemotherapy or before interval surgery) Randomization and Intervention After the initial frailty screening, patients eligible for primary chemotherapy will be randomized 1:1 to CGA and tailored intervention or standard of care. The intervention group will be evaluated by a geriatric specialist team examining different domains of their health status with the help of different validated questionnaires and tests, and tailored interventions will be made according to identified needs in the assessed health domains following the geriatric evaluation. The intervention will specifically include a tailored-made physiotherapy training program of around 9-12 weeks duration, available in both physical and virtual versions. The program consists on supervised resistance training two days a week, either at hospital appointments or virtually from the patients' own home. Those patients who are not able to make the virtual training will be followed up by phone twice a week by the physiotherapist. Additionally, the training will be supported by a progressive walking program measured with a Garmin Vivofit 4 activity tracker. Patients will be thoroughly assessed by a physiotherapist during the training process. Nutritional supplements and advice on sufficient nutrition will be provided according to current clinical guidelines. Patient-reported outcomes Measures (PROMs) All patients will be asked to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ C-30, QLQ-OV28) and the supplemental Elderly Cancer Patients Module questionnaire (ELD-14), as well as European Quality of Life- 5 dimensions- 5 levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L for cost-utility analysis, at inclusion, after three cycles of chemotherapy, and at the end of treatment. When assessing the quality of recovery, the QoR-15 questionnaire will be used and evaluated before surgery and 72 hours after PDS or IDS. Statistical plan/recruitment consideration According to the literature and clinical experience, increasing the number of patients who receive surgery from the present 57 % to 77 % is clinically relevant and possible. To detect a difference of 20 % and obtain a type I error rate of 5% and a power of 80%, a sample size of 86 patients per study arm will be needed. To account for an expected dropout rate of ~20%, it was decided to increase this number to a group size of 100. Thus, a total of 206 patients referred to NACT will be included in the study (WP1 only). Patients referred to PDS will be followed in an observational design. For the last three years, 130 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria have been treated at RH, OUH, HUH, and SUH each year. Thus, inclusion is expected to run over 2-3 years. Data will be collected prospectively (demographic, clinical, pathologic, and results from frailty screening, functional tests, blood tests, and intervention effects), and recorded in predesigned RedCap. PRO will be completed by the patients either electronically and registered directly in RedCap, by phone calls or delivered in hand to the Ph.D. student or research nurses. Life-long follow-up data on overall survival will be obtained from the Danish Hospital Registry through linkage with a personal identification number. Logistic regression will be used to evaluate change over time in ordinal categorical values. Independent T-tests will be used to evaluate in-group and between-groups differences. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses will be used to analyze Progression Free Survival.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ovarian Cancer, Frailty

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Rancomized clinical trial Combined observational study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NACT and CGA+ physical training intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Elderly (≥70 years) ovarian cancer patients referred for Neo-adjuvant treatment randomized to comprehensive geriatric assessment and individualised physical training.
Arm Title
NACT no intervention
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Elderly (≥70 years) ovarian cancer patients referred for Neo-adjuvant treatment randomized to standard of care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and individualised physical training
Intervention Description
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and relevant intervention (including medical and pharmacological optimisation, nutritional, social and psychological intervention, among others), and individualised physical training
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Interval Debulking Surgery
Description
Proportion of patients referred to interval debulking surgery
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Frailty screening questionnaires
Description
Specificity and positive and negative predictive values of Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8 and Clinical Frailty Scale, in predicting impairments in Comprehensive Geriatric assessment
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Completion of chemotherapy treatment
Description
Proportion of patients who complete oncological treatment (≥90% of the intended treatment)
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of training: Physical capacity and endurance
Description
Median of score result in meters of Six-Minute-Walk-Test
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of training: Physical function and strength
Description
Median of score result of 30 sec Sit-to-Stand Test in number (lower body) and of Hand Grip Strength test in Kg (upper body)
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of physical training: Physical function in relation to basic mobility
Description
Median of Timed Up and Go test in seconds
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of physical training: Physical function in relation to balance
Description
Median of Guralnik test: score in seconds
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of physical training: Clinical reported measurements
Description
Median of Performance status (number 0-4), Clinical Frailty Scale (1-9), G8 ( 0-17) and modified G8 (0-35)
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Effect of physical training: Self-reported measurements
Description
Median of ELFI (0-100), Physical fitness (1-5) and FES-1 short (7-28)
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)
Description
Median of score of quality of life and recovery questionnaires
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Frailty screening combined tool
Description
Specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a combination of Handgrip strength test, 30 second-chair stand test and 6 minutes walk tests, as well as serum concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers added to screening questionnaires (G8, mG8 and CFS), in predicting impairments in Comprehensive Geriatric assessment
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Postoperative complications
Description
Median of score of Clavien-Dindo of complications within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Progression Free-Survival
Description
Median of period of time measured in months without recurrence of ovarian cancer
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Description
Rate of number of intervened domains
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Hospital admissions related to chemotherapy
Description
Rate of number and length of hospital admissions during chemotherapy treatment
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Physical activity in intervention group-walking
Description
Median of daily distance in meters measured by an activity tracker
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Physical activity in intervention group-training
Description
Rate of completion of training intervention
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Radicality of Surgery
Description
Rate of optimal debulking vs suboptimal debulking during surgery
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Inflammatory biomarkers
Description
Median of serum concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, YKL-40 and a panel of 92 proteins)
Time Frame
Up to 8 months
Title
Sarcopenic biomarkers
Description
Median of serum concentrations of GDF-11 and GDF-15
Time Frame
Up to 8 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Women as only women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
120 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed ovarian cancer Capable of understanding written and oral danish Exclusion Criteria: Other active cancers in the preceding 5 years Severe psychiatric disease Patients referred to primary debulking surgery will be followed in a observational design
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tine Henrichsen Schnack, PhD
Phone
+4527284828
Email
tine.henrichsen.schnack@rsyd.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Trine Lembrecht Joergensen, PhD
Email
Trine.Joergensen@rsyd.dk
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Odense University Hospital
City
Odense
State/Province
Region Of South Denmark
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tine Schnack, MD, PhD
Phone
+45 65412336
Email
tine.henrichsen.schnack@rsyd.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristina Daviu Cobian, MD
Phone
+45 47324010
Email
maria.cristina.daviu.cobian@rsyd.dk
Facility Name
Vejle Hospital
City
Vejle
State/Province
Region Of South Denmark
ZIP/Postal Code
7100
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristina Daviu Cobian, MD
Phone
+45 47324010
Email
maria.cristina.daviu.cobian@rsyd.dk
Facility Name
Zealand University Hospital
City
Roskilde
State/Province
Region Zealand
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristina Daviu Cobián, MD
Phone
+45 47324010
Email
maria.cristina.daviu.cobian@rsyd.dk
Facility Name
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
State/Province
The Capital Region Of Denmark
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakob Ohm Oreskov, MD
Phone
+45 38688591
Email
jakob.ohm.oreskov@regionh.dk
Facility Name
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
City
Herlev
State/Province
The Capital Region Of Denmark
ZIP/Postal Code
2730
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakob Ohm Oreskov, MD
Phone
+45 38688591
Email
jakob.ohm.oreskov@regionh.dk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We do plan to make data available to other researchers but have not yet decided how

Learn more about this trial

FRAGINOC Study: Screening and Geriatric Assessment and Intervention in Older Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs