search
Back to results

BeEAM Versus CEM in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Primary Purpose

Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BEAM Protocol
CEM protocol
Sponsored by
Rehab Werida
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lymphoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria 1. Patients with lymphoma relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with all subtypes. 2. Treat with conventional dose salvage regimens 3. Remission status before HSCT is complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR). 4. Age>18 years. 5. Gender male and female. 6. CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW. Exclusion Criteria Remission status before HSCT is non remission (NR) or progressive disease (PD). CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW CNS lymphoma or solid tumor not included in population. Pregnancy or breast-feeding. Any Psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factor that interfere with patient adherence to medications. History of allergy to any medications in both protocol

Sites / Locations

  • International Medical Center (IMC) Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

BeEAM Regimen

CEM Regimen

Arm Description

BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)

CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of Side Effects.
Side effects of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Concentration of CD34+
CD34+

Full Information

First Posted
March 16, 2023
Last Updated
September 26, 2023
Sponsor
Rehab Werida
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05813132
Brief Title
BeEAM Versus CEM in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Official Title
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 25, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rehab Werida

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The proposed research aims to compare between BeEAM standard regimen and CEM as conditioning regimen in lymphoma patients in safety profile& toxicity, infections (Febrile neutropenia) during transplant, time to engraftment (recovery not neutropenic), Length of stay at hospital, time to relapse, and other complications.
Detailed Description
All patients' history will be confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma subtype under microscope to When an abnormal cell called a Reed-Sternberg cell is present, the lymphoma is classified as Hodgkin if not so it is NHL Which has another subtype by phenotyping. All patient will be confirmed in CR or PR before transplant was assessed by 18-FDG PET-CT imaging. All patients will be mobilized by using G-CSF agent (filgrastim) plerixafor Check cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34+) count as Hematopoietic stem cell (HSCs) graft is mainly determined by the number of CD34+ cells present. the minimal number of CD34+ cells for an autologous transplant (Cutoff point) is <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW. Stem cell collection with target yield of 2-5 x 106 CD34 cells/kg (preferred) (13) Collect HSCs from the patient prior to receipt of high-dose chemotherapy by Leukapheresis through central line on one or two sessions. According to protocol of chemotherapy if BeEAM protocol, cells put in the final product includes 5-10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a cryoprotectant and 0.05-0.25" mL of ACD-A stabilizer solution per ml of transplant. Freezing at a controlled rate of 1-2"°C per minute if CME protocol cells will be mix with ACD and freezing (fresh cells). All enrolled patients (50) will be randomly assigned into two equal arms: Arm A : will receive BeEAM regimen : Bendamustine on day 7 and -6 dose of 160-200 mg/m2/day IV in a 2-h infusion, Etoposide 150-200 mg/m2/day BID infusion on 30 min with 500 ml NaCl 0.9% on days -5 to -2, cytarabine 200 mg/m2/d IV BID in a 30-min infusion with 500 ml NaCl 0.9% on days -5 to -2, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV in a single 1-h 500 ml infusion with 0.9% NaCl on day -1(12) Arm B: will receive CME regimen: Carboplatin 25m/kg for day-2 and -1 in a 1hr infusion, Melphalan 140mg/m2 for day-2 and -1 in a 30 min infusion, Etoposide 30m/kg for day-2 and -1 in 2-3 hr. All patients received granulocyte - colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 5 ug/kg BW. starting from day +4 after AHSCT until absolute neutrophil count reached 1.5 × 109/l for two consecutive days. All patients received antiviral (oral acyclovir), antifungal (Oral fluconazole), and antibacterial (oral levofloxacin) prophylaxis. Since the start of conditioning until patient not neutropenic (Count reached 0.5 × 109/l), hyperuricemia prophylaxis was given (Oral allopurinol 100 mg TID), hepatic veno-occlusive disease prophylaxis enoxaparin sc daily until platelet > 25000/mm3 and ursodeoxycholic acid. transfusion of platelets or red blood cells was given when platelet count was lower than 20 × 109/l or hemoglobin level was lower than 80 g/l, respectively. Monitoring for any possible side effects: Statistical tests appropriate to the study design will be conducted to evaluate the significance of the results.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lymphoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BeEAM Regimen
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)
Arm Title
CEM Regimen
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
BEAM Protocol
Other Intervention Name(s)
(Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan
Intervention Description
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CEM protocol
Other Intervention Name(s)
(Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Intervention Description
CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of Side Effects.
Description
Side effects of treatment
Time Frame
3 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Concentration of CD34+
Description
CD34+
Time Frame
Three Months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria 1. Patients with lymphoma relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with all subtypes. 2. Treat with conventional dose salvage regimens 3. Remission status before HSCT is complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR). 4. Age>18 years. 5. Gender male and female. 6. CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW. Exclusion Criteria Remission status before HSCT is non remission (NR) or progressive disease (PD). CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW CNS lymphoma or solid tumor not included in population. Pregnancy or breast-feeding. Any Psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factor that interfere with patient adherence to medications. History of allergy to any medications in both protocol
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Noha A. El bassiouny, Lecturer
Organizational Affiliation
Damanhour University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
International Medical Center (IMC) Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
City
Cairo
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30150889
Citation
Frankiewicz A, Sadus-Wojciechowska M, Najda J, Czerw T, Mendrek W, Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M, Soska K, Ociepa M, Holowiecki J, Giebel S. Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.77046. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

BeEAM Versus CEM in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs