search
Back to results

Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ECMO - A Feasibility Trial (ROSETTA)

Primary Purpose

Blood Loss Anemia, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Sponsored by
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Blood Loss Anemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients receiving ECMO Age: 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: Contraindication to RBC transfusion (including known patient preference) Limitations of care put in place either through patient wishes or the treating medical teams ECMO treatment for more than 12 hours. The start of ECMO is defined as the time of initiation of extracorporeal blood flow unless ECMO was initiated during a surgical intervention in which case the start is defined as the arrival time into the initial ICU. The treating physician anticipates that ECMO treatment will cease before the end of tomorrow Where the treating physician deems the study is not in the patient's best interest Where the treating physician has concern regarding patient ability to tolerate restrictive or liberal transfusion trigger thresholds Patients actively listed for a solid organ transplant Patients who are suspected or confirmed to be pregnant Previous ECMO treatment during the same hospital admission

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Restrictive Transfusion Trigger Group

    Liberal Transfusion Trigger Group

    Arm Description

    if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L.

    if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Difference in average lowest daily Hb concentration
    Primary Outcome Measure

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Enrolment Rate
    Feasibility Outcome
    Reasons for not entering eligible patients into the study
    Feasibility Outcome
    Mean pre-transfusion Hb concentration immediately prior to an RBC transfusion
    Feasibility Outcome
    Proportion of RBC transfusions given according to allocated trigger
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time from measured Hb trigger value to transfusion
    Feasibility Outcome
    Number of RBC transfusions given prior to randomization
    Feasibility Outcome
    Frequency for not transfusing a patient who has reached a transfusion trigger
    Feasibility Outcome
    Reason/s for not transfusing a patient who has reached a transfusion trigger
    Feasibility Outcome
    Number of protocol deviations
    Feasibility Outcome
    Number and nature of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Total blood products used
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Major bleeding events (defined by ISTH criteria)
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Clinically relevant non-major bleeding events: GI haemorrhage, peripheral cannulation site bleeding, mediastinal cannulation site bleeding, surgical site bleeding
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Venous and arterial thromboembolic events
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    New onset renal replacement therapy (RRT) during ECMO
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    ECMO free days at day 60
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    ICU free days at day 60
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - WHODAS 2.0
    Disability Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - IADL
    Independent Activities of Daily Living Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - ADL
    Activity of Daily Living Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - MoCA BLIND
    Cognitive Function Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - EQ-5D-5L
    Quality of Life Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - mRS
    Degree of Disability Safety and effectiveness outcome

    Full Information

    First Posted
    November 22, 2022
    Last Updated
    April 3, 2023
    Sponsor
    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05814094
    Brief Title
    Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ECMO - A Feasibility Trial
    Acronym
    ROSETTA
    Official Title
    Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ECMO - A Feasibility Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    May 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    August 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive and resource intense treatment used to support critically ill patients who have suffered severe cardiac arrest, cardiac failure or respiratory failure (including severe cases of COVID-19). ECMO acts as a mechanical circulatory support temporarily replacing the function of the heart or lungs by oxygenating blood and removing carbon dioxide, allowing time for these organs to recover. Many critically ill patients, including those on ECMO, have an increased risk of bleeding and reduced production/increased destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). This can lead to anaemia (haemoglobin levels <120 g/l), a condition where the body lacks enough healthy RBCs to carry enough oxygen to the body's tissues. Therefore, patients on ECMO frequently require RBC transfusion, with clinicians having to decide if administering an RBC transfusion (with its associated risks) is higher than tolerating complications of anaemia. ROSETTA is a feasibility study that aims to determine the safety and feasibility of randomizing patients on ECMO to a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy (maintain Hb concentration above 70g/L) or to a more liberal transfusion strategy (maintain Hb concentration above 90g/L). Feasibility is defined as the ability to achieve a mean separation of at least 10g/L between the average lowest daily haemoglobin values in the two study groups.
    Detailed Description
    A recent Cochrane analysis recommended a transfusion strategy that minimises the use of RBC transfusions in critically ill patients (by tolerating anaemia to avoid the adverse effects of an RBC transfusion). However, the analysis acknowledges that the degree of anaemia which can be tolerated by such patients is unknown, especially in patients suffering from conditions that limit oxygen delivery to the organs (like cardiac disease). As a result, the Australian Blood Authority's guidelines recommend an RBC transfusion to a patient at an Hb concentration of less than 70 g/L, while a transfusion at a Hb between 70 and 90 g/L should be based on the need to relieve clinical signs and symptoms of anaemia. However, this range is broad, and many studies in the general critically ill cohort have shown lower transfusion triggers are non-inferior to higher transfusion triggers. No studies have been completed directly evaluating transfusion triggers in the ECMO patient cohort. ECMO patients differ to the general critically ill cohort as they have different physiological requirements, are at higher-risk for poor outcomes, and have an increased requirement for transfusions. Hb is a key driver of oxygen delivery (DO2), and critically ill ECMO patients are more commonly exposed to low DO2 due to low cardiac output and borderline oxygenation. Therefore, studies must be done to evaluate the optimal transfusion trigger/s (as determined by Hb concentration) that optimise mortality and long-term outcomes of ECMO patients.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Blood Loss Anemia, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Health Services Research
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Restrictive Transfusion Trigger Group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L.
    Arm Title
    Liberal Transfusion Trigger Group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Red Blood Cell Transfusion
    Intervention Description
    Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused within 12 hours of the result becoming available. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L. A transfusion above the restrictive threshold of 70g/L is discouraged.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Red Blood Cell Transfusion
    Intervention Description
    Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused in order to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L within 12 hours of the result becoming available. A decision not to transfuse below the threshold of 90g/L is discouraged.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Difference in average lowest daily Hb concentration
    Description
    Primary Outcome Measure
    Time Frame
    Up to 1 year
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Enrolment Rate
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Reasons for not entering eligible patients into the study
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Mean pre-transfusion Hb concentration immediately prior to an RBC transfusion
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Proportion of RBC transfusions given according to allocated trigger
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Time from measured Hb trigger value to transfusion
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Number of RBC transfusions given prior to randomization
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Frequency for not transfusing a patient who has reached a transfusion trigger
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Reason/s for not transfusing a patient who has reached a transfusion trigger
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Number of protocol deviations
    Description
    Feasibility Outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Number and nature of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Total blood products used
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Major bleeding events (defined by ISTH criteria)
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Clinically relevant non-major bleeding events: GI haemorrhage, peripheral cannulation site bleeding, mediastinal cannulation site bleeding, surgical site bleeding
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    Venous and arterial thromboembolic events
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    New onset renal replacement therapy (RRT) during ECMO
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 2 years
    Title
    ECMO free days at day 60
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    60 days
    Title
    ICU free days at day 60
    Description
    Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    60 days
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - WHODAS 2.0
    Description
    Disability Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - IADL
    Description
    Independent Activities of Daily Living Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - ADL
    Description
    Activity of Daily Living Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - MoCA BLIND
    Description
    Cognitive Function Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - EQ-5D-5L
    Description
    Quality of Life Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient Reported Outcome Measure - mRS
    Description
    Degree of Disability Safety and effectiveness outcome
    Time Frame
    6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients receiving ECMO Age: 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: Contraindication to RBC transfusion (including known patient preference) Limitations of care put in place either through patient wishes or the treating medical teams ECMO treatment for more than 12 hours. The start of ECMO is defined as the time of initiation of extracorporeal blood flow unless ECMO was initiated during a surgical intervention in which case the start is defined as the arrival time into the initial ICU. The treating physician anticipates that ECMO treatment will cease before the end of tomorrow Where the treating physician deems the study is not in the patient's best interest Where the treating physician has concern regarding patient ability to tolerate restrictive or liberal transfusion trigger thresholds Patients actively listed for a solid organ transplant Patients who are suspected or confirmed to be pregnant Previous ECMO treatment during the same hospital admission
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Curtis Hopkins
    Phone
    +61 3 9903 0343
    Email
    anzicrc@monash.edu
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Hergen Buscher, MBBS
    Organizational Affiliation
    St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Zoe McQuilten, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Carol Hodgson, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alistair Nichol, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Aidan Burrell, MBBS
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mark Dennis, MBBS
    Organizational Affiliation
    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Timothy Southwood, MBBS
    Organizational Affiliation
    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alisa Higgins, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Sally Newman, Nursing
    Organizational Affiliation
    St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Thao Le, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Monash University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Patient data is de-identified and only aggregate summaries published.

    Learn more about this trial

    Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ECMO - A Feasibility Trial

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs