search
Back to results

Companion Dog Walking for ICU Survivor Health (POOCH)

Primary Purpose

Post Intensive Care Syndrome, Depression, Anxiety

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Companion Dog Walking
Attention Control Group
Sponsored by
University of Missouri, Kansas City
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Post Intensive Care Syndrome focused on measuring Post Intensive Care Syndrome, ICU Survivors, Companion dog, Depression, Anxiety, Quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Adult (≥18 years) ICU survivors (spent ≥24 hours in the ICU) Will be discharged directly home from hospital. Able to speak, read, and understand English Physically capable of dog walking Individuals who have symptoms of depression and/or anxiety Individuals who own a companion dog and walk their dog <10 minutes/week Participants scoring ≤ 20 seconds on the TUG Test Exclusion Criteria: Individuals at high risk for suicide Individuals with severe depression or anxiety Individuals who recently started treatment for depression and/or anxiety Individuals with cognitive impairment Dog walking is deemed unsafe with and for the dog Medical Provider authorization is indicated but not provided Individuals who live outside a 30-mile radius of the hospital.

Sites / Locations

  • Penrose Hospital
  • St. Francis Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention Group

Attention Control Group

Arm Description

Companion dog walking

Educational resources about dog health

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Study Feasibility as assessed by recruitment results, attrition rates, intervention fidelity, and missing data points
Data will be collected to answer the following questions: To what extent does the recruitment procedure produce study participants? How many participants met inclusion and exclusion criteria? What are the obstacles to recruitment? What was the attrition rate of participants? To what extent was fidelity of the intervention maintained by participants? To what extent were measurements completed? What was the extent and patterns of missing data?
Study Acceptability as assessed by participant responses to survey questions regarding the amount of time spent in the study, the measurement tools used, the masking procedure, and the intervention.
Participants will complete an exit survey and will be asked to report on: (1) the acceptability of the time spent in the study and per session, (2) the acceptability of completing the measurement tools, (3) the acceptability of the masking procedure, (4) the acceptability of the intervention, (5) if they intend to continue the intervention after the end of the study, and (6) to report any suggestions for improvement they have.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Depression
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is a 20-item self-report tool that assesses intensity of depression using a 4-point Likert scale. Lower scores indicate milder levels of depression while higher scores indicate more severe depression (potential score 0-60). Clinically meaningful depression is represented by a score of 16 or greater.
Change in Anxiety
The Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory is a 40-item self-report assessment tool using a 4-point Likert scale that assesses both trait and state anxiety. The higher a participant's score (potential score 20-80 on each subscale) the higher the level of anxiety. No/low anxiety = 20-37 points; moderate anxiety= 38-44 points; and high anxiety=45-80 points, with a cut-off point of 39 indicting clinically significant symptoms of anxiety.
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by health related quality of life indicators including physical functioning, physical and emotional limitations, social functioning, bodily pain, general and mental health.
The Short Form 36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire using various ranking questions to measure health related quality of life. The Shot Form 36 examines eight dimensions of health related quality of life (physical functioning, physical and emotional limitations, social functioning, bodily pain, general and mental health). The higher the score (max score =100) the better the health and wellbeing, the lower the score (minimum score=0) the poorer the health and wellbeing.
Change in Serum Cortisol
Peripheral venous blood samples will be obtained from participants or analysis at a laboratory.

Full Information

First Posted
March 28, 2023
Last Updated
April 18, 2023
Sponsor
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Collaborators
SIGMA International Honor Society of Nursing
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05820308
Brief Title
Companion Dog Walking for ICU Survivor Health
Acronym
POOCH
Official Title
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Companion Dog-Walking Intervention to an Attention Control Education Intervention on the Psychological Health of Adult Intensive Care Unit Survivors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Collaborators
SIGMA International Honor Society of Nursing

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial comparing a pet dog walking intervention to an attention control education intervention in adult intensive care unit survivors. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: What is the feasibility of a pet dog-walking intervention compared to an attention control education intervention on depression, anxiety, cortisol, and quality of life for adult ICU survivors. What is the acceptability of a pet dog-walking intervention compared to an attention control education intervention on depression, anxiety, cortisol, and quality of life for adult ICU survivors. The secondary question[s] it aims to answer are: - What are the differences in depression, anxiety, serum cortisol, and quality of life between and within a companion dog walking intervention compared to an attention control education intervention for ICU survivors? Participants in the intervention group will be asked to: Participate in dog walking with their pet dog at least three times per week, for at least 10 minutes each walk, for 8-weeks. Wear an activity monitor and record their dog walks in a diary. Complete surveys to measure depression, anxiety, and quality of life at the start of the study, after week 4, and after week 8. Have blood drawn to measure cortisol levels at the start of the study, after week 4, and after week 8. Participants in the control group will be asked to: Read educational materials about their pet dog's health once every week (education materials are provided by the researchers). Wear an activity monitor and record when they read their education materials in a diary. Complete surveys to measure depression, anxiety, and quality of life at the start of the study, after week 4, and after week 8. Have blood drawn to measure cortisol levels at the start of the study, after week 4, and after week 8. Participants will be assigned to an intervention group or a control group to see if there are differences in depression, anxiety, serum cortisol, and quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Post Intensive Care Syndrome, Depression, Anxiety, Quality of Life
Keywords
Post Intensive Care Syndrome, ICU Survivors, Companion dog, Depression, Anxiety, Quality of life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Participants will be randomly assigned and masked to their group assignment
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Companion dog walking
Arm Title
Attention Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Educational resources about dog health
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Companion Dog Walking
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to walk their dog three times per week, for a minimum of 30 minutes each day of walking, over an 8-week period.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Attention Control Group
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to read educational materials on dog health once per week, over an 8-week period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Study Feasibility as assessed by recruitment results, attrition rates, intervention fidelity, and missing data points
Description
Data will be collected to answer the following questions: To what extent does the recruitment procedure produce study participants? How many participants met inclusion and exclusion criteria? What are the obstacles to recruitment? What was the attrition rate of participants? To what extent was fidelity of the intervention maintained by participants? To what extent were measurements completed? What was the extent and patterns of missing data?
Time Frame
Feasibility data will be collected and analyzed from the time identifying, screening, and recruiting eligible participants begins to the time the final participant completes the study; no more than 12 months.
Title
Study Acceptability as assessed by participant responses to survey questions regarding the amount of time spent in the study, the measurement tools used, the masking procedure, and the intervention.
Description
Participants will complete an exit survey and will be asked to report on: (1) the acceptability of the time spent in the study and per session, (2) the acceptability of completing the measurement tools, (3) the acceptability of the masking procedure, (4) the acceptability of the intervention, (5) if they intend to continue the intervention after the end of the study, and (6) to report any suggestions for improvement they have.
Time Frame
Acceptability will be assessed post-intervention after participants complete the 8-week study period.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Depression
Description
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is a 20-item self-report tool that assesses intensity of depression using a 4-point Likert scale. Lower scores indicate milder levels of depression while higher scores indicate more severe depression (potential score 0-60). Clinically meaningful depression is represented by a score of 16 or greater.
Time Frame
Depression will be measured at baseline, half way through the intervention (at the end of week 4), and post intervention (at the end of week 8).
Title
Change in Anxiety
Description
The Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory is a 40-item self-report assessment tool using a 4-point Likert scale that assesses both trait and state anxiety. The higher a participant's score (potential score 20-80 on each subscale) the higher the level of anxiety. No/low anxiety = 20-37 points; moderate anxiety= 38-44 points; and high anxiety=45-80 points, with a cut-off point of 39 indicting clinically significant symptoms of anxiety.
Time Frame
Anxiety will be measured at baseline, half way through the intervention (at the end of week 4), and post intervention (at the end of week 8).
Title
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by health related quality of life indicators including physical functioning, physical and emotional limitations, social functioning, bodily pain, general and mental health.
Description
The Short Form 36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire using various ranking questions to measure health related quality of life. The Shot Form 36 examines eight dimensions of health related quality of life (physical functioning, physical and emotional limitations, social functioning, bodily pain, general and mental health). The higher the score (max score =100) the better the health and wellbeing, the lower the score (minimum score=0) the poorer the health and wellbeing.
Time Frame
Quality of life will be measured at baseline, half way through the intervention (at the end of week 4), and post intervention (at the end of week 8).
Title
Change in Serum Cortisol
Description
Peripheral venous blood samples will be obtained from participants or analysis at a laboratory.
Time Frame
Serum Cortisol will be measured at baseline, half way through the intervention (at the end of week 4), and post intervention (at the end of week 8).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult (≥18 years) ICU survivors (spent ≥24 hours in the ICU) Will be discharged directly home from hospital. Able to speak, read, and understand English Physically capable of dog walking Individuals who have symptoms of depression and/or anxiety Individuals who own a companion dog and walk their dog <10 minutes/week Participants scoring ≤ 20 seconds on the TUG Test Exclusion Criteria: Individuals at high risk for suicide Individuals with severe depression or anxiety Individuals who recently started treatment for depression and/or anxiety Individuals with cognitive impairment Dog walking is deemed unsafe with and for the dog Medical Provider authorization is indicated but not provided Individuals who live outside a 30-mile radius of the hospital.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lindsey Nelson, MSN, RN
Phone
719-255-4484
Email
lnr2m@mail.umkc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lindsey Nelson, MSN, RN
Organizational Affiliation
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Penrose Hospital
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80907
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Francis Hospital
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80923
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Companion Dog Walking for ICU Survivor Health

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs