search
Back to results

Light Therapy for Depression in Adolescent Outpatients

Primary Purpose

Depression, Adolescent - Emotional Problem

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
light box (Carex DayLight Classic Model)
Sponsored by
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring light therapy

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Participants with depression and elevated scores on youth screening measures, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 (≥ 9) or PHQ-2 (≥ 3). English-speaking primary caregiver legally able to provide consent and who could contribute weekly mood ratings. Exclusion Criteria: Current or past diagnoses of bipolar disorder, moderate to severe autism, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder, or intellectual disability; a major medical illness or ocular condition (e.g. glaucoma, retinal disease, macular degeneration) that would interfere with participation in the study; significant and imminent risk to self or to others; concurrent Recent (<4 months) medication or new (< 3 months) psychotherapy treatment for depression Current use of melatonin, beta-blockers, chloroquine, or regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or St. John's Wort.

Sites / Locations

  • Rachel Ballard

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Bright light therapy

Arm Description

Eligible participants were provided a light box and an actigraphy wrist-watch and given instructions on the use of each. The light therapy dosing protocol was planned as follows: Weeks 0-2, 50 lux dim red light (DRL) x 15 30 minutes/day; weeks 3-4, 10,000 lux x 15 minutes/day; weeks 5-6, 10,000 lux x 30 minutes/day; weeks 6-8, 10,000 lux x 45 minutes/day. At week 2, the study coordinator dispensed the 10,000 lux BLT unit (and picked up the DRL box) and the actigraphy watch. Participants and their parent/guardian met with 2 study clinicians at the end of each 2-week period. One study clinician, who was blinded to the participant's light box use, conducted a brief interview regarding mood, safety and functioning and side effects. The other study clinician subsequently met with the participant to review safety, side effects and response and made recommendations on duration and timing of light box use based on level of improvement and any barriers to use.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Adherence to BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adherence to prescribed daily light box use measured by days used as a percentage of days prescribed.
Change in depression severity with dim red light (BLT placebo)
Depression severity measured by child- and parent-report Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (score ranges from 0-26, with higher scores indicating worse outcome).
Change in depression severity with BLT
Depression severity measured by child- and parent-report Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (score ranges from 0-26, with higher score indicating worse outcome).
Treatment emergent mania with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the parent-reported Child Mania Rating Scale (score range 0-30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Treatment emergent mania with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the parent-reported Child Mania Rating Scale (score range 0-30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Treatment emergent suicidality with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the patient-reported Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (3 questions; any "yes" answer indicates need for further clinical assessment).
Treatment emergent suicidality with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the patient-reported Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (3 questions; any "yes" answer indicates need for further clinical assessment).
Treatment emergent adverse events with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the and patient-reported Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Effects (SAFTEE, modified, 26 items; range for any item 1-5 with 5 indicating worse outcome).
Treatment emergent adverse events with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the and patient-reported Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Effects (SAFTEE, modified, 26 items; range for any item 1-5 with 5 indicating worse outcome).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in anxiety with BLT
Anxiety severity measure by child- and parent-report Scale of Child Anxiety Related Disorders scale (score ranges from 0-82, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency with changing dose of BLT
sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency measured by actigraphy

Full Information

First Posted
March 27, 2023
Last Updated
April 21, 2023
Sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05823090
Brief Title
Light Therapy for Depression in Adolescent Outpatients
Official Title
Light Therapy for Depression in Adolescent Outpatients: A Placebo lead-in Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 21, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 8, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 8, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this placebo lead-in clinical trial was to test bright light therapy (BLT) in adolescents with depression. The main question[s] it aimed to answer were: characterize and define facilitators/barriers to treatment with BLT in adolescents); evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of outpatient BLT in a dose titration protocol; establish an effective, safe and tolerable light dose.
Detailed Description
This outpatient study was performed at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. The Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of Lurie Children's Hospital and Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine approved the protocol. Participants were recruited through partnering community pediatric practices (namely Lake Forest Pediatrics). Primary care pediatricians referred potential participants with depression and elevated scores on youth screening measures, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (≥ 9) or PHQ-2 (≥ 3), without endorsed suicidality. Light Therapy Protocol with Placebo Lead-in. Eligible participants were provided a light box and an actigraphy wrist watch and given instructions on the use of each. The active light box (Carex DayLight Classic Model) is a white fluorescent 4000 Kelvin unit that emits 10,000 lux and measures 33cm x 40cm. The placebo box emits 50 lux dim red light and appears identical to the active unit. Dim red light was selected because the illumination is a plausible placebo in clinical trials of BLT for depressive disorders and produces negligible effects on circadian rhythms and mood responses. Subjects were instructed to position themselves 30-36 cm from the box with their faces fully exposed to the light. The actigraphy device is a Philips Spectrum Plus actigraphy watch which collects activity level and sleep information along with multiple light measurements and wearer adherence. The light therapy dosing protocol was planned as follows: Weeks 0-2, 50 lux dim red light (DRL) x 30 minutes/day; weeks 3-4, 10,000 lux x 15 minutes/day; weeks 5-6, 10,000 lux x 30 minutes/day; weeks 6-8, 10,000 lux x 45 minutes/day. At week 2, the study coordinator (KJ) dispensed the 10,000 lux BLT unit (and picked up the dim red light box) and the actigraph watch. Participants and their parent/guardian met with 2 study clinicians at the end of each 2-week period. One study clinician (RB or JP), who was blinded to the participant's light box use, conducted a brief interview regarding mood, safety and functioning, and assigned a Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S). The other study clinician (DKS) subsequently met with the participant to review safety, side effects and response and made recommendations on duration and timing of light box use based on level of improvement and any barriers to use. Thus, some patients did not receive the above dosing schedule. After the 8-week active study period, participants who had symptom remission were given the option to keep the light box and continue use. A treatment summary and ongoing treatment recommendations were provided to all participant's primary care clinicians. Adherence. The study coordinator made weekly calls/texts to participants to inquire about their daily exposure times and to encourage proper adherence. The constraints imposed upon adolescents by schools (early morning start times by 8:00 AM), bus commutes (pick up by 7:30 AM), after school activities and part-time jobs (landscaping etc.) are considerable. Knowing this and to avoid forcing adolescents to wake earlier than preferred (which can produce detrimental effects on adolescent sleep and mood) to use the study light box, participants agreed to initiate BLT exposure in the morning at awakening in accordance to the dosing protocol. At follow up visits, the non-blind clinician systematically explored whether morning use remained feasible and acceptable. If not, the clinician made informed clinical recommendations and recorded adjustments to the time-of-day of use (midday or afternoon) to ensure participants were able to consistently use the box. This strategy informed investigators and participants of the optimal timing of light exposure, increased adherence and strengthened the reliability of detecting response. Actigraphic Assessments. Actigraphy using a wrist actigraph with a light sensor (Actiwatch Spectrum, Philips Respironics Healthcare, Bend, OR, USA) was used to measure a number of actigraphic-derived sleep, circadian, activity and light variables during the placebo and active light treatment phases.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression, Adolescent - Emotional Problem
Keywords
light therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
placebo lead-in open trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Participants were blinded as to the type of light they received from the BLT device. Participants were assessed by both a blinded and non-blinded investigator. The blinded investigator assigned the Clinical Global Impressions Severity and Improvement Scales. The non-blinded investigator made clinical decisions regarding the BLT dose.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
9 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Bright light therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eligible participants were provided a light box and an actigraphy wrist-watch and given instructions on the use of each. The light therapy dosing protocol was planned as follows: Weeks 0-2, 50 lux dim red light (DRL) x 15 30 minutes/day; weeks 3-4, 10,000 lux x 15 minutes/day; weeks 5-6, 10,000 lux x 30 minutes/day; weeks 6-8, 10,000 lux x 45 minutes/day. At week 2, the study coordinator dispensed the 10,000 lux BLT unit (and picked up the DRL box) and the actigraphy watch. Participants and their parent/guardian met with 2 study clinicians at the end of each 2-week period. One study clinician, who was blinded to the participant's light box use, conducted a brief interview regarding mood, safety and functioning and side effects. The other study clinician subsequently met with the participant to review safety, side effects and response and made recommendations on duration and timing of light box use based on level of improvement and any barriers to use.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
light box (Carex DayLight Classic Model)
Intervention Description
The active light box is a white fluorescent 4000 Kelvin unit that emits 10,000 lux and measures 33cm x 40cm. The placebo box emits 50 lux dim red light and appears identical to the active unit. Subjects were instructed to position themselves 30-36 cm from the box with their faces fully exposed to the light. The actigraphy device is a Phillips Spectrum Plus Actigraphy watch which collects activity level and sleep information along with multiple light measurements and wearer adherence.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adherence to BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adherence to prescribed daily light box use measured by days used as a percentage of days prescribed.
Time Frame
8 week study period
Title
Change in depression severity with dim red light (BLT placebo)
Description
Depression severity measured by child- and parent-report Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (score ranges from 0-26, with higher scores indicating worse outcome).
Time Frame
Baseline to study week 2
Title
Change in depression severity with BLT
Description
Depression severity measured by child- and parent-report Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (score ranges from 0-26, with higher score indicating worse outcome).
Time Frame
Study week 2 to study week 8
Title
Treatment emergent mania with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the parent-reported Child Mania Rating Scale (score range 0-30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Time Frame
Baseline to study week 2
Title
Treatment emergent mania with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the parent-reported Child Mania Rating Scale (score range 0-30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Time Frame
Study week 2 to study week 8
Title
Treatment emergent suicidality with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the patient-reported Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (3 questions; any "yes" answer indicates need for further clinical assessment).
Time Frame
Baseline to study week 2
Title
Treatment emergent suicidality with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the patient-reported Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (3 questions; any "yes" answer indicates need for further clinical assessment).
Time Frame
Study week 2 to study week 8
Title
Treatment emergent adverse events with dim red light (BLT placebo) in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during placebo phase as monitored by the and patient-reported Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Effects (SAFTEE, modified, 26 items; range for any item 1-5 with 5 indicating worse outcome).
Time Frame
Baseline to study week 2
Title
Treatment emergent adverse events with BLT in adolescent outpatients with depression
Description
Adverse event occurring during BLT as monitored by the and patient-reported Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Effects (SAFTEE, modified, 26 items; range for any item 1-5 with 5 indicating worse outcome).
Time Frame
Study week 2 to study week 8
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in anxiety with BLT
Description
Anxiety severity measure by child- and parent-report Scale of Child Anxiety Related Disorders scale (score ranges from 0-82, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes).
Time Frame
Baseline to study week 8
Title
Sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency with changing dose of BLT
Description
sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency measured by actigraphy
Time Frame
Continuously through the 8-week study period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants with depression and elevated scores on youth screening measures, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 (≥ 9) or PHQ-2 (≥ 3). English-speaking primary caregiver legally able to provide consent and who could contribute weekly mood ratings. Exclusion Criteria: Current or past diagnoses of bipolar disorder, moderate to severe autism, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder, or intellectual disability; a major medical illness or ocular condition (e.g. glaucoma, retinal disease, macular degeneration) that would interfere with participation in the study; significant and imminent risk to self or to others; concurrent Recent (<4 months) medication or new (< 3 months) psychotherapy treatment for depression Current use of melatonin, beta-blockers, chloroquine, or regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or St. John's Wort.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rachel Ballard
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The investigators do not plan to share individual participant data with other researchers.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
2006698
Citation
Oren DA, Brainard GC, Johnston SH, Joseph-Vanderpool JR, Sorek E, Rosenthal NE. Treatment of seasonal affective disorder with green light and red light. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;148(4):509-11. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.4.509.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28969438
Citation
Sit DK, McGowan J, Wiltrout C, Diler RS, Dills JJ, Luther J, Yang A, Ciolino JD, Seltman H, Wisniewski SR, Terman M, Wisner KL. Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy for Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):131-139. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101200. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21535997
Citation
Wirz-Justice A, Bader A, Frisch U, Stieglitz RD, Alder J, Bitzer J, Hosli I, Jazbec S, Benedetti F, Terman M, Wisner KL, Riecher-Rossler A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of light therapy for antepartum depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):986-93. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06188blu. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35876837
Citation
Garbazza C, Cirignotta F, D'Agostino A, Cicolin A, Hackethal S, Wirz-Justice A, Cajochen C, Manconi M; "Life-ON" study group. Sustained remission from perinatal depression after bright light therapy: A pilot randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Oct;146(4):350-356. doi: 10.1111/acps.13482. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11556941
Citation
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Light Therapy for Depression in Adolescent Outpatients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs