search
Back to results

Liquid Biopsy Based NGS in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC (iNUDGE)

Primary Purpose

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic, Newly Diagnosed NSCLC, Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Neoplasm of Lung

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
iNUDGE
Sponsored by
Charu Aggarwal
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic focused on measuring Next Generation Sequencing, Liquid biopsy, Newly diagnosed, Molecular testing, Plasma based next generation sequencing, Electronic health record, Nudge intervention, Targeted therapy, Behavioral economics

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Participants with a histological, or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Participants must be seen at Lancaster General Health (LGH), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC), Penn Medicine Cherry Hill (PMCH), Penn Medicine Princeton Health (PMPH), Penn Medicine Voorhees (PMV) or Penn Medicine Washington Township (PMWT) for mNSq NSCLC. Exclusion Criteria: Participants with incomplete staging information. Children, pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, or prisoners are not included in this research study.

Sites / Locations

  • Penn Medicine Cherry HillRecruiting
  • Penn Medicine Princeton HealthRecruiting
  • Penn Medicine Washington TownshipRecruiting
  • Penn Medicine VoorheesRecruiting
  • Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Other

Other

Other

Arm Label

Penn Medicine New Jersey

Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Arm Description

All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.

All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.

All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Availability of comprehensive molecular test results prior to first line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC
Were comprehensive molecular test results available prior to initiation of 1L therapy? (Yes/No)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Successful EHR based nudge delivery
Amongst eligible patients, calculate the proportion of patients for whom the EHR nudge fired successfully (Yes/No). Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Turnaround time of delivery of provider focused alerts
Reported as number of days, median. Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Completion of comprehensive molecular testing & modality used
Relative and absolute change in completion of comprehensive testing by tissue and plasma, plasma alone, or tissue alone will be tabulated.
Reasons for failure to complete comprehensive molecular testing:
Summarize reasons for failure of completion of testing i. Tissue related (QNS) ii. Patient related factors (unable to biopsy, patient declined biopsy etc.) iii. Assay related factors (plasma assay does not detect mutations) iv. Other
Time to molecularly informed treatment initiation
i. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of diagnosis of Stage IV disease (date of biopsy) ii. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of first new patient visit with medical oncology
Type of therapy received
i. Targeted therapy ii. Chemo-immunotherapy iii. Immunotherapy iv. Clinical trial or n v. None
Overall survival
i. Time from initial diagnosis to date of death or last follow up. ii. 1 year and 2-year overall survival rates will be calculated for the intervention group, and compared to baseline.

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2023
Last Updated
July 4, 2023
Sponsor
Charu Aggarwal
Collaborators
Loxo Oncology, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05853887
Brief Title
Liquid Biopsy Based NGS in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC
Acronym
iNUDGE
Official Title
iNUDGE: INtegration of liqUiD Biopsy Based Next Generation Gene sEquencing in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC - A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 15, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Charu Aggarwal
Collaborators
Loxo Oncology, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study expands the application of an electronic health record (EHR) "nudge" used to prompt physicians' clinical practice to order molecular testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with specific types of advanced lung cancer. The primary goal is to have these test results available prior to starting treatment so that physicians can make molecularly-informed treatment decisions. The second goal is to better understand factors that contribute to whether or not the EHR-nudge implementation is successful.
Detailed Description
At the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), a behavioral economics (BE) informed "nudge" strategy was piloted to guide physicians' clinical practice to include concurrent use of plasma and tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These findings have demonstrated that behavioral, electronic health record (EHR)-based nudges are feasible and can promote guideline concordant diagnostic testing at both community and academic sites. The overarching goal of this current trial is to expand the application of this BE informed nudge approach, which has been operationalized within Epic, the EHR used at UPHS, to six satellite hospitals. Our central hypothesis is that this approach will dramatically increase adoption of comprehensive molecular testing and enhance the delivery of molecularly informed 1L therapy in patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC. Molecular testing will be defined as i) comprehensive: EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, and NTRK testing, ii) incomplete: <6 genes tested, and iii) no testing performed. Clinically actionable mutations will be defined as an alteration in one of the seven genes on the comprehensive gene list with an FDA approved targeted therapy in the 1L setting, plus KRAS G12C, EGFR exon 20 insertion, and ErbB2 mutations. Molecularly informed first line therapy will be defined as one that is informed by results of NGS, obtained by plasma, tissue or both. Intervention An EHR-based nudge intervention that allows for default placement of a plasma based molecular genotyping order at time of the first new patient visit will be implemented. Subsequently, results detected on the default plasma NGS order will be conveyed to providers in the form of an electronic clinical decision support notification. As part of the downstream EHR-based nudge intervention workflow, an electronic clinical decision support (e-CDS) system for alterations detected on plasma genotyping will be created and implemented into the EHR as a "Research (non-chargeable) Encounter" to alert the provider team caring for the patient. This support program will be created to notify clinicians of targetable mutations, as well as absence of mutations detected on plasma testing as a means of improving the timely delivery of molecularly informed therapy. Study Design Objective 1: In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC, test the effectiveness of a behavioral economics (BE) informed EHR nudge intervention to increase timely receipt of comprehensive molecular test results before 1L therapy by integration of concurrent tissue and plasma molecular testing. The design of this trial will include 3 clusters, representing 6 community hospitals. There will be an initial period in which no clusters are exposed to the intervention. Subsequently, at regular intervals (the "steps") one cluster (or a group of clusters) will be randomized to cross from the control to the intervention under evaluation. This process will continue until all clusters have crossed over to be exposed to the intervention. At the end of the study there will be a period when all clusters are exposed. Data collection will continue throughout the study, so that each cluster will contribute observations under both control and intervention observation periods. Two years of baseline data will be obtained from all study sites for comparison. Objective 2: Evaluate contextual mechanisms contributing to the adoption, reach, and effectiveness of EHR nudge interventions with a lens for health equity. Using rigorous approaches proven successful in our prior work, the investigators will recruit 10-15 patient and clinician participants from each site (estimated 40-60 participants total) to complete semi-structured interviews following the active trial period. The goal of this objective is to understand contextual mechanisms (e.g., patient, clinician, clinic, structural factors) shaping adoption, reach, and effectiveness of each intervention and identify how response may differ by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and other key social determinants of health. These data will be analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis, a mixed method approach well suited to identify mechanisms in pragmatic trials with smaller sample sizes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic, Newly Diagnosed NSCLC, Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Neoplasm of Lung
Keywords
Next Generation Sequencing, Liquid biopsy, Newly diagnosed, Molecular testing, Plasma based next generation sequencing, Electronic health record, Nudge intervention, Targeted therapy, Behavioral economics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
This study employs a stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial design. Randomization will occur at the group (site) level. Sites will be turned on according to the stepped-wedge cluster randomized design but will run in parallel.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
This intervention is directed towards physicians. Individuals will not be randomized.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
360 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Penn Medicine New Jersey
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
Arm Title
Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
Arm Title
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time. Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
iNUDGE
Intervention Description
Electronic health record nudge which prompts physicians to order plasma-based NGS testing for eligible patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Availability of comprehensive molecular test results prior to first line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC
Description
Were comprehensive molecular test results available prior to initiation of 1L therapy? (Yes/No)
Time Frame
Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Successful EHR based nudge delivery
Description
Amongst eligible patients, calculate the proportion of patients for whom the EHR nudge fired successfully (Yes/No). Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Time Frame
Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
Title
Turnaround time of delivery of provider focused alerts
Description
Reported as number of days, median. Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
Time Frame
Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
Title
Completion of comprehensive molecular testing & modality used
Description
Relative and absolute change in completion of comprehensive testing by tissue and plasma, plasma alone, or tissue alone will be tabulated.
Time Frame
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
Title
Reasons for failure to complete comprehensive molecular testing:
Description
Summarize reasons for failure of completion of testing i. Tissue related (QNS) ii. Patient related factors (unable to biopsy, patient declined biopsy etc.) iii. Assay related factors (plasma assay does not detect mutations) iv. Other
Time Frame
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
Title
Time to molecularly informed treatment initiation
Description
i. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of diagnosis of Stage IV disease (date of biopsy) ii. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of first new patient visit with medical oncology
Time Frame
Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
Title
Type of therapy received
Description
i. Targeted therapy ii. Chemo-immunotherapy iii. Immunotherapy iv. Clinical trial or n v. None
Time Frame
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
Title
Overall survival
Description
i. Time from initial diagnosis to date of death or last follow up. ii. 1 year and 2-year overall survival rates will be calculated for the intervention group, and compared to baseline.
Time Frame
Measured up to 1 year from the time of randomization to death from any cause

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants with a histological, or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Participants must be seen at Lancaster General Health (LGH), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC), Penn Medicine Cherry Hill (PMCH), Penn Medicine Princeton Health (PMPH), Penn Medicine Voorhees (PMV) or Penn Medicine Washington Township (PMWT) for mNSq NSCLC. Exclusion Criteria: Participants with incomplete staging information. Children, pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, or prisoners are not included in this research study.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Meagan Hume, MPH
Phone
267-734-5455
Email
Meagan.Hume@PennMedicine.upenn.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Penn Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Penn Medicine Cherry Hill
City
Cherry Hill
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shayma Kazmi, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shayma Kazmi, MD
Facility Name
Penn Medicine Princeton Health
City
Plainsboro
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08536
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ramy Sedhom, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ramy Sedhom, MD
Facility Name
Penn Medicine Washington Township
City
Sewell
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08080
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shayma Kazmi, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shayma Kazmi, MD
Facility Name
Penn Medicine Voorhees
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shayma Kazmi, MD
Facility Name
Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17602
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel J Kerr, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel J Kerr, MD
Facility Name
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher A D'Avella, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine Ciunci, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher A D'Avella, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
A Clinical Study Report will be made available to the study sponsor.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32918064
Citation
Aggarwal C, Rolfo CD, Oxnard GR, Gray JE, Sholl LM, Gandara DR. Strategies for the successful implementation of plasma-based NSCLC genotyping in clinical practice. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0423-x. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34246791
Citation
Rolfo C, Mack P, Scagliotti GV, Aggarwal C, Arcila ME, Barlesi F, Bivona T, Diehn M, Dive C, Dziadziuszko R, Leighl N, Malapelle U, Mok T, Peled N, Raez LE, Sequist L, Sholl L, Swanton C, Abbosh C, Tan D, Wakelee H, Wistuba I, Bunn R, Freeman-Daily J, Wynes M, Belani C, Mitsudomi T, Gandara D. Liquid Biopsy for Advanced NSCLC: A Consensus Statement From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Oct;16(10):1647-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30964529
Citation
Singal G, Miller PG, Agarwala V, Li G, Kaushik G, Backenroth D, Gossai A, Frampton GM, Torres AZ, Lehnert EM, Bourque D, O'Connell C, Bowser B, Caron T, Baydur E, Seidl-Rathkopf K, Ivanov I, Alpha-Cobb G, Guria A, He J, Frank S, Nunnally AC, Bailey M, Jaskiw A, Feuchtbaum D, Nussbaum N, Abernethy AP, Miller VA. Association of Patient Characteristics and Tumor Genomics With Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Clinicogenomic Database. JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1391-1399. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3241. Erratum In: JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):480.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35313244
Citation
Robert NJ, Espirito JL, Chen L, Nwokeji E, Karhade M, Evangelist M, Spira A, Neubauer M, Bullock S, Walberg J, Cheng SK, Coleman RL. Biomarker testing and tissue journey among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line therapy in The US Oncology Network. Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27601595
Citation
Thompson JC, Yee SS, Troxel AB, Savitch SL, Fan R, Balli D, Lieberman DB, Morrissette JD, Evans TL, Bauml J, Aggarwal C, Kosteva JA, Alley E, Ciunci C, Cohen RB, Bagley S, Stonehouse-Lee S, Sherry VE, Gilbert E, Langer C, Vachani A, Carpenter EL. Detection of Therapeutically Targetable Driver and Resistance Mutations in Lung Cancer Patients by Next-Generation Sequencing of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5772-5782. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1231. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30988079
Citation
Leighl NB, Page RD, Raymond VM, Daniel DB, Divers SG, Reckamp KL, Villalona-Calero MA, Dix D, Odegaard JI, Lanman RB, Papadimitrakopoulou VA. Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Cell-free DNA Analysis to Identify Genomic Biomarkers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 1;25(15):4691-4700. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0624. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30325992
Citation
Aggarwal C, Thompson JC, Black TA, Katz SI, Fan R, Yee SS, Chien AL, Evans TL, Bauml JM, Alley EW, Ciunci CA, Berman AT, Cohen RB, Lieberman DB, Majmundar KS, Savitch SL, Morrissette JJD, Hwang WT, Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ, Langer CJ, Carpenter EL. Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):173-180. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4305.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32478025
Citation
Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time. Front Public Health. 2020 May 12;8:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31462482
Citation
Rendle KA, Abramson CM, Garrett SB, Halley MC, Dohan D. Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e030123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24904704
Citation
Kane H, Lewis MA, Williams PA, Kahwati LC. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Jun;4(2):201-8. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33308250
Citation
Whitaker RG, Sperber N, Baumgartner M, Thiem A, Cragun D, Damschroder L, Miech EJ, Slade A, Birken S. Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3. Erratum In: Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):11.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Liquid Biopsy Based NGS in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs