search
Back to results

Mechanisms of Neurodynamic Treatments (MONET)

Primary Purpose

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Neurodynamic Treatment, Nerve Mobilisation

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neurodynamic exercises
Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)
Advice
Sponsored by
University of Oxford
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria Patients: Patients who have a diagnosis of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on a clinical assessment and confirmed with nerve conduction studies. Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. Patient is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. Healthy participants: Male or female aged 18 years or above. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. No history of hand or arm symptoms No history of neck pain in the past 3 months No systemic medical condition No strong anticoagulant medication or altered coagulation (e.g., hemophilia) preventing skin biopsies Severe anxiety or depression Participants are required to be age- & sex-matched to patient participants No contraindications for magnetic resonance scanning at 3T Sufficient command of the English language Exclusion Criteria Patients: Patients who already had surgery for their carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or are planning to undergo surgery in the next 6 weeks (patients with unilateral surgery who have unoperated CTS on the other hand are eligible to participate) Patients who had a steroid injection for their CTS in the 6 months prior to the study enrolment or who had already more than 1 steroid injection into the study wrist. Patients who have a diagnosis of severe carpal tunnel syndrome based on a clinical assessment and confirmed with electrodiagnostic testing Electrodiagnostic testing revealing abnormalities other than CTS Any other upper limb or neck problem for which they have sought treatment in the past 3 months History of significant trauma to the upper limb or neck Diabetes Hypothyroidism Severe anxiety or depression Patient who is pregnant, lactating, or planning pregnancy during the study. Patients on strong anticoagulant medication or altered coagulation preventing skin biopsies. Contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (assessed with MRI safety screening questionnaire). Contraindications for steroid injections Insufficient command of the English language

Sites / Locations

  • Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Neurodynamic exercises

Steroid injection Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)

Advice

Arm Description

6-weeks home exercise programme of nerve and tendon gliding exercises

Single steroid injection into Carpal Tunnel (positive control group)

The advice group will receive advice but no additional intervention during the 6 week intervention period (negative control group)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imaging
Fractional anisotropy will be extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve and compared to healthy control group
Change in median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imaging
Change in fractional anisotropy extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve at post-intervention (after 6-weeks) compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data
Change to nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data
Nerve markers on anatomical MRI
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data
Change in nerve markers on anatomical MRI
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data
Median nerve MRI T2 mapping
ms; continuous data
Changes in median nerve MRI T2 mapping
ms; continuous data
Median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)
ratio; continuous data
Changes in median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)
ratio; continuous data
Changes in median nerve conduction velocities from electrodiagnostic studies (m/s)
m/s; continuous data
Changes in median sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs): amplitudes (mV)
mV; continuous data
Thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing - warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limen
Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)
Change in thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limen
Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)
Thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful threshold
Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)
Change in thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful threshold
Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)
Mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean will be calculated
Change in mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean wil be calculated
Mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).
Change in mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).
Mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated
Change in mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated
Dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger
Change in dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger
Wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continous data
Change in wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Change in wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continuous data
Vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)
Change in vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Change in vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)
Pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)
Change in pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Change in pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)
Pinch strength test - maximum isometric strength
Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg
Change in pinch strength test - maximum isometric strength
Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg
Nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)
Evaluation of nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)
Nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic tests
Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms plus when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic tests
Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms and when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'
Symptom severity and limitations in hand function as assessed by the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Patient reported symptoms and limitations on the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Symptom intensity levels on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Patient reported average intensity of pain, paraesthesia and numbness on 10cm visual analogue scales, ranging from no symptoms to worst symptoms ever
Location of symptoms in a body and a hand diagram
Patient reported location of symptoms in a body diagram and a hand diagram.
Presence of central sensitisation as assessed with the Central Sensitisation Inventory
Patient reported central sensitisation on the Central Sensitisation Inventory
Functional deficits- Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Participant reported outcomes on ability to perform activities as per quick DASH questionnaire
Functional deficits- Patient specific functional scale (PSFS)
Participant reported outcomes on the patient specific functional scale
Presence of neuropathic pain - DN4
Patient screened for neuropathic pain using DN4
Presence of neuropathic pain - pain DETECT
Patient screened for neuropathic pain using pain DETECT
Neuropathic pain symptoms - Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Patient reported outcomes on neuropathic pain symptoms as assessed on Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory.
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - The Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale (DAPOS)
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per DAPOS
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per pain catastrophising scale (PCS)
Assessment of quality of life - EQ-5D-5L
Participant reported outcomes on quality of life as per EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Assessment of sleep interference - Insomnia Severity Index
Participant reported outcomes on sleep interference with the Insomnia Severity Index.
Adverse and serious adverse events
Patient self-reported adverse events
Exercise adherence to the neurodynamic home-based intervention - number of sessions
Patient self-reported number of sessions per day throughout the intervention in an exercise diary

Full Information

First Posted
April 20, 2023
Last Updated
May 4, 2023
Sponsor
University of Oxford
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05859412
Brief Title
Mechanisms of Neurodynamic Treatments
Acronym
MONET
Official Title
Mechanisms of Neurodynamic Treatments (MONET)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Oxford
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a relatively common condition caused by compression of one of the main nerves at the wrist, the median nerve. Non-surgical treatments, like steroid injections and physiotherapy, are the first line of treatment for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The investigators have previously shown that specific physiotherapeutic exercises (neurodynamic exercises) can reduce the need for carpal tunnel surgery in some patients. Experimental studies in animal models demonstrate that these exercises have an anti-inflammatory effect and can help the nerve to regenerate. However, the exact mechanisms of action of these exercises are not well understood in patients. A better understanding of the mechanisms of action of physiotherapeutic exercises would help clinicians to better target these treatments to those patients who may benefit from them. AIM: To investigate the mechanisms of action of 6 weeks' neurodynamic treatments on nerve function and structure as well as patient-reported outcome measures in patients with CTS compared to a positive control intervention (routine care steroid injection) and a negative control intervention (advice). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-blind randomised mechanistic trial, patients with confirmed mild to moderate CTS (n=78) and age and gender-matched healthy controls (n=30) will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to a 6-week neurodynamic exercise group, steroid injection, or advice group. Outcome measures will be explored at baseline (patients and controls), post-intervention (patients), and 6-month follow-up (patients). Outcomes include diffusion-weighted and anatomical MRI of the median nerve at the wrist, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction studies, inflammatory markers in blood and skin biopsies, and validated questionnaires for pain, function, and psychological factors. Two-way repeated measures ANCOVAs (factors time and intervention, adjusted for baseline measurements as a continuous covariate) will be performed to identify differences in MRI parameters, clinical assessment, and inflammatory markers between patients in different groups and healthy controls.
Detailed Description
Follow-up at 6 months will only include outcome measures from questionnaires.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Neurodynamic Treatment, Nerve Mobilisation, Diffusion MRI, Physiotherapy, Mechanistic Trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The outcomes assessor and the person responsible for the statistical analysis will be blinded to the participants' allocation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
108 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Neurodynamic exercises
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
6-weeks home exercise programme of nerve and tendon gliding exercises
Arm Title
Steroid injection Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Single steroid injection into Carpal Tunnel (positive control group)
Arm Title
Advice
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The advice group will receive advice but no additional intervention during the 6 week intervention period (negative control group)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Neurodynamic exercises
Intervention Description
The neurodynamic exercises will consist of a home-based exercise programme performed over a period of 6 weeks. Patients will attend a single session with an investigator who will instruct them the home exercise programme consisting of nerve and tendon gliding exercises which will be adjusted with pre-specified progressions over the 6 weeks intervention period. Patients will receive a leaflet and a video link detailing these exercises.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg)
Intervention Description
Steroid injection (Depomedrone 40mg) into the carpal tunnel as per standard practice in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Advice
Intervention Description
Group receiving advice but no additional treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imaging
Description
Fractional anisotropy will be extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve and compared to healthy control group
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in median nerve fractional anisotropy as determined on diffusion weighted imaging
Description
Change in fractional anisotropy extracted from regions-of-interest in the median nerve at post-intervention (after 6-weeks) compared to baseline
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)
Description
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change to nerve markers on diffusion weighted imaging: water diffusivity (mm2/s)
Description
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. mm2/s; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Nerve markers on anatomical MRI
Description
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in nerve markers on anatomical MRI
Description
Measured at the median nerve and cervical dorsal root ganglia. ratio/mm2; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Median nerve MRI T2 mapping
Description
ms; continuous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Changes in median nerve MRI T2 mapping
Description
ms; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)
Description
ratio; continuous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Changes in median nerve MRI magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)
Description
ratio; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Changes in median nerve conduction velocities from electrodiagnostic studies (m/s)
Description
m/s; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Changes in median sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs): amplitudes (mV)
Description
mV; continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing - warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limen
Description
Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in thermal detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold detection threshold; thermal sensory limen
Description
Thermal detection thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is detected)
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful threshold
Description
Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in thermal pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative Sensory testing- warm and cold painful threshold
Description
Pain thermal thresholds will be assessed using a thermode over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger) and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior). Data is measured in degrees celsius (point at which cold or warm is initially detected as painful)
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean will be calculated
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in mechanical detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical detection thresholds will be assessed using a standardised set of von Frey filaments (mN) over the index finger. Geometric mean wil be calculated
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in mechanical pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical pain thresholds will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN). They will be assessed over the index finger and over the contralateral lower limb (tibial anterior).
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in mechanical pain sensitivity as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Mechanical pain sensitivity will be assessed using a series of weighted pin prick stimulators (mN) over the index finger. Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean of all numerical ratings for pinprick stimuli will be calculated
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in dynamic mechanical allodynia as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Pain rating for each stimulus on a 0-100 numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable"). Geometric mean (compound measure) of all numerical ratings across light touch stimulators over the index finger
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in wind-up ratio as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Change in wind-up ration will be assessed using a pin prick (mN) over the index finger (e.g., ventral aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger). Ratio, continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in vibration detection thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Change in vibration detection thresholds will be assessed using a tuning fork (64 Hz, 8/8 scale) over a bony prominence over (e.g., palmar side of the distal end of the second metacarpal)
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in pressure pain thresholds as assessed in Quantitative sensory testing
Description
Change in pressure pain thresholds will be assessed using an algometer (kg) on the thenar eminence and over the contralateral lower limb (tibialis anterior)
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Pinch strength test - maximum isometric strength
Description
Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in pinch strength test - maximum isometric strength
Description
Pinch grip dynamometry. Continuous data, kg
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)
Description
Evaluation of nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity- upper limb neurodynamic test (median nerve)
Description
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity in response to mechanical load (increased tension) applied to the nerve. Range of elbow extension at point of symptoms (degrees)
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic tests
Description
Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms plus when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in nerve mechanosensitivity - positive upper limb neurodynamic tests
Description
Upper limb neurodynamic tests will be assessed to determine the presence of increased mechanosensitivity. The neurodynamic test will be graded as 'positive', when there is at least partial reproduction of symptoms and when symptoms can be modified with structural differentiation. Otherwise, the neurodynamic test will be graded as 'negative'
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Symptom severity and limitations in hand function as assessed by the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Description
Patient reported symptoms and limitations on the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Symptom intensity levels on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
Patient reported average intensity of pain, paraesthesia and numbness on 10cm visual analogue scales, ranging from no symptoms to worst symptoms ever
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Location of symptoms in a body and a hand diagram
Description
Patient reported location of symptoms in a body diagram and a hand diagram.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks)
Title
Presence of central sensitisation as assessed with the Central Sensitisation Inventory
Description
Patient reported central sensitisation on the Central Sensitisation Inventory
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Functional deficits- Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Description
Participant reported outcomes on ability to perform activities as per quick DASH questionnaire
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Functional deficits- Patient specific functional scale (PSFS)
Description
Participant reported outcomes on the patient specific functional scale
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Presence of neuropathic pain - DN4
Description
Patient screened for neuropathic pain using DN4
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Presence of neuropathic pain - pain DETECT
Description
Patient screened for neuropathic pain using pain DETECT
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Neuropathic pain symptoms - Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Description
Patient reported outcomes on neuropathic pain symptoms as assessed on Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - The Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale (DAPOS)
Description
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per DAPOS
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)
Description
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per short-form Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20)
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Presence of psychological co-morbidities - pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)
Description
Participant reported outcomes on depression and anxiety as per pain catastrophising scale (PCS)
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Assessment of quality of life - EQ-5D-5L
Description
Participant reported outcomes on quality of life as per EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Assessment of sleep interference - Insomnia Severity Index
Description
Participant reported outcomes on sleep interference with the Insomnia Severity Index.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (after 6 weeks), 6-months follow up
Title
Adverse and serious adverse events
Description
Patient self-reported adverse events
Time Frame
From start of intervention until end of intervention (6 weeks)
Title
Exercise adherence to the neurodynamic home-based intervention - number of sessions
Description
Patient self-reported number of sessions per day throughout the intervention in an exercise diary
Time Frame
From start of intervention until end of intervention (6 weeks)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Blood samples - DNA
Description
Blood samples coupled with detailed phenotype data will investigate potential gene associations in CTS and recovery
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in blood samples - DNA
Description
Change in blood samples coupled with detailed phenotype data will investigate potential gene associations in CTS and recovery
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Concentration of serum inflammatory markers - metabolomics
Description
Concentrations of inflammatory markers in serum
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in the concentration of serum inflammatory markers - metabolomics
Description
Change in the concentrations of inflammatory markers in serum
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels
Description
Proinflammatory cytokine assay (pg/ml); continuous data
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels
Description
Change in proinflammatory cytokine assay (pg/ml); continuous data
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)
Title
Concentration of inflammatory markers in serial skin biopsies
Description
Concentration of inflammatory markers in skin biopsies. Baseline biopsy will be performed in the most distal part of the ventrolateral side of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. The 6-weeks biopsy will be performed proximally, avoiding the primary biopsy site
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in concentration of inflammatory markers in serial skin biopsies
Description
Change in concentration of inflammatory markers in skin biopsies. Baseline biopsy will be performed in the most distal part of the ventrolateral side of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. The 6-weeks biopsy will be performed proximally, avoiding the primary biopsy site
Time Frame
From baseline to post-intervention (after 6-weeks)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Patients: Patients who have a diagnosis of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on a clinical assessment and confirmed with nerve conduction studies. Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. Patient is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. Healthy participants: Male or female aged 18 years or above. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. No history of hand or arm symptoms No history of neck pain in the past 3 months No systemic medical condition No strong anticoagulant medication or altered coagulation (e.g., hemophilia) preventing skin biopsies Severe anxiety or depression Participants are required to be age- & sex-matched to patient participants No contraindications for magnetic resonance scanning at 3T Sufficient command of the English language Exclusion Criteria Patients: Patients who already had surgery for their carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or are planning to undergo surgery in the next 6 weeks (patients with unilateral surgery who have unoperated CTS on the other hand are eligible to participate) Patients who had a steroid injection for their CTS in the 6 months prior to the study enrolment or who had already more than 1 steroid injection into the study wrist. Patients who have a diagnosis of severe carpal tunnel syndrome based on a clinical assessment and confirmed with electrodiagnostic testing Electrodiagnostic testing revealing abnormalities other than CTS Any other upper limb or neck problem for which they have sought treatment in the past 3 months History of significant trauma to the upper limb or neck Diabetes Hypothyroidism Severe anxiety or depression Patient who is pregnant, lactating, or planning pregnancy during the study. Patients on strong anticoagulant medication or altered coagulation preventing skin biopsies. Contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (assessed with MRI safety screening questionnaire). Contraindications for steroid injections Insufficient command of the English language
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Annina Schmid, PhD
Phone
+44 (0) 1865 223254
Email
annina.schmid@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Eva Sierra-Silvestre, PhD
Phone
+44 (0) 1865 234821
Email
eva.sierra@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eva Sierra-Silvestre, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Oxford
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford
City
Oxford
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 9DU
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eva Sierra-Silvestre, PhD
Phone
+44 (0) 1865 234821
Email
eva.sierra@ndcn.ox.ac.uk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All IPDs that underlie results in a publication.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD that underlie results of a publication will be shared upon the final publication of the main manuscripts of this study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD will be shared upon reasonable request and in line with ethical approval with authors contacting the study investigators.

Learn more about this trial

Mechanisms of Neurodynamic Treatments

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs