search
Back to results

Transforming Adolescent Mental Health Through Accessible, Scalable, Technology-supported Small-group Instruction

Primary Purpose

Anxiety Depression, Suicidal Ideation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PeerLearning.net
Sponsored by
University of Oregon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Anxiety Depression

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 65 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: All students and teachers in target grades in participating schools. Exclusion Criteria: None.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Implementation of PeerLearning.net

    Pre-Intervention

    Arm Description

    Teachers in implementation schools will be given access to training and resources to implement PeerLearning.net as a core component of instruction. We will not create specific requirements of teachers but will ask that they deliver lessons with PeerLearning.net at least four times per month. We will monitor all teacher usage and thus will be able to promote greater usage by (1) publicly acknowledging teachers that are using it frequently and experiencing success, and (2) targeting teachers who use it infrequently with additional resources and support to encourage more frequent use.

    Teachers in pre-intervention schools will continue with business as usual (i.e., typical instruction). Based upon previous experience in conducting research in school settings, we anticipate that teachers in pre-intervention schools will use CL very infrequently, and without the benefit of technology support.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Classroom Life Scale
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    School Attendance
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Substance use
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 20, 2023
    Last Updated
    May 31, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Oregon
    Collaborators
    Arizona State University, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Oregon Research Institute
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05860257
    Brief Title
    Transforming Adolescent Mental Health Through Accessible, Scalable, Technology-supported Small-group Instruction
    Official Title
    Transforming Adolescent Mental Health Through Accessible, Scalable, Technology-supported Small-group Instruction
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    September 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 15, 2027 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 15, 2027 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Oregon
    Collaborators
    Arizona State University, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Oregon Research Institute

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Adolescence is a developmental period of significant risk for anxiety, depressive symptoms, and suicidality, and the investigators propose to target key peer-based risk and protective factors using Cooperative Learning (CL). CL is a small-group instructional approach that can enhance peer relations and reduce peer-related risks, as well as promote academic engagement and achievement and reduce racial disparities. CL will be delivered with the aid of technology that automates the design and delivery of CL lessons, promoting rapid implementation, scalability, high fidelity, accessibility, and sustainability.
    Detailed Description
    Internalizing symptoms (i.e., anxiety, depressive symptoms, suicidality) are alarmingly common among adolescents. In 2019, nearly 37% of high school students reported feeling anxious, sad, or hopeless, representing an increase from 2017 (i.e., 31%), and nearly 19% seriously considered suicide1, an increase from 2017 (17%). The coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated this problem, with research finding that social isolation resulting from the pandemic was linked to higher levels of stress, fear, loneliness, anxiety, depression, and suicide ideation among adolescents2-3. Importantly, ethnic/racial disparities have been documented in internalizing symptoms, with more negative outcomes for Latinas and Black males39-45. Current universal school-based approaches to prevention have reported uneven or limited effects, or no effects at all6-12. Questions have also been raised regarding cost and accessibility49-59. Despite the uneven track record of universal school-based (Tier 1) approaches, which has led some to recommend an emphasis on targeted (Tier 2) approaches48, Tier 1 programs possess several advantages. First, given the demographic heterogeneity in risk factors, as well as disparate access to high-quality, culturally-sensitive health care23, schools remain attractive as Tier 1 programs can ensure equitable access to primary prevention services. Second, universal programs avoid the difficulty of identifying adolescents at risk12, and third, Tier 1 programs minimize the risk of stigmatizing adolescents who seek out or are referred to services20-22. In this project, submitted to the Transformative Research Award initiative, the investigators will use cooperative learning (CL) as a universal (Tier 1) school-based prevention program to target malleable peer-based risk factors and subsequently evaluate how change in these mechanisms can reduce adolescent internalizing symptoms. CL targets various forms of maladaptive peer relations that create stress and comprise a significant risk factor for internalizing symptoms in adolescence; CL also promotes peer protective factors that can reduce the likelihood of internalizing symptoms (e.g., peer acceptance)27-34. CL has also been found to promote more cross-race interaction and interracial attraction, greater cross-ethnic academic support, and more frequent cross-ethnic friendships95-97. To support teachers in implementing CL, the investigators will use a Web-based software platform that provides an accessible, high-fidelity mechanism to deliver CL lessons. The investigators will not only test for intervention effects, but will also evaluate the relative strength of specific, theoretically-derived change mechanisms, and uncover key issues/barriers related to implementation that will allow the investigators to dynamically adjust our implementation approach to achieve maximum impact during subsequent scale-up. This project is designed to establish feasibility with teachers and schools and counter potential threats to implementation fidelity while also creating a roadmap to enhanced scalability and sustained implementation. Significant results from this project could inspire broad uptake of this approach in educational contexts, potentially addressing a significant public health need during a time of crisis due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Anxiety Depression, Suicidal Ideation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Model Description
    We will allocate 24 high schools to intervention wave using a stepped-wedge design. All 24 schools will begin in the control state at baseline (Fall 2022), and each fall one wave (N = 8 schools) will cross over until all schools have received the intervention. Students will be in 9th grade in the first year, and we will follow them into 10th, 11th, and then 12th grade, so in total we will be working in each school for four years.
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    5720 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Implementation of PeerLearning.net
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Teachers in implementation schools will be given access to training and resources to implement PeerLearning.net as a core component of instruction. We will not create specific requirements of teachers but will ask that they deliver lessons with PeerLearning.net at least four times per month. We will monitor all teacher usage and thus will be able to promote greater usage by (1) publicly acknowledging teachers that are using it frequently and experiencing success, and (2) targeting teachers who use it infrequently with additional resources and support to encourage more frequent use.
    Arm Title
    Pre-Intervention
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Teachers in pre-intervention schools will continue with business as usual (i.e., typical instruction). Based upon previous experience in conducting research in school settings, we anticipate that teachers in pre-intervention schools will use CL very infrequently, and without the benefit of technology support.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    PeerLearning.net
    Intervention Description
    PeerLearning.net provides an easy-to-use, scalable, and widely accessible means to support teachers in effectively designing and delivering high-fidelity Cooperative Learning (CL) lessons and, in turn, it has the potential to amplify the positive effects of CL found in previous research. Using PeerLearning.net, teachers design their lesson by selecting from among a set of typical CL lesson templates (e.g., jigsaw, peer tutoring, group projects) which they can customize and populate with their own curriculum and materials. These design templates represent the optimal, high-fidelity design that is required in order for CL to be successful. During lesson delivery, PeerLearning.net manages membership in learning groups, distributes instructional materials, directs student activities according to a pre-specified timetable, supports teacher observations of student behavior, and delivers post-lesson group activities and reviews.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
    Description
    Anxiety (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire
    Description
    Depressive symptoms (scores zero to 3, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Youth Risk and Behavior Survey
    Description
    Suicide ideation (scores zero to 6, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents
    Description
    Service utilization (scores zero to 20, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Everyday Discrimination Scale
    Description
    Discrimination (scores zero to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    University of Illinois Bully Scale
    Description
    Bullying and victimization (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Child Peer Social Skills Scale
    Description
    Peer acceptance (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale
    Description
    Stress (scores 0 to 4, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Adolescent Stress Questionnaire
    Description
    Social stress (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply worse outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Classroom Life Scale
    Description
    Peer academic support (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    School Attendance
    Description
    Degree of truancy (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Reasons for Non-Attendance
    Description
    Social issues causing non-attendance (scores 0 to 4, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    UCLA Loneliness Scale
    Description
    Loneliness (scores 1 to 3, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Secondary School Readiness Inventory
    Description
    School engagement (scores 1 to 5, higher scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 1
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 1
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 2
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 2
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 3
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 3
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Fall of Year 4
    Title
    Substance use
    Description
    Use of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana (scores 1 to 5, lower scores imply better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Spring of Year 4

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    14 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: All students and teachers in target grades in participating schools. Exclusion Criteria: None.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Mark Van Ryzin
    Phone
    8015581677
    Email
    markv@uoregon.edu

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    We will ensure that project data is submitted according to the NIH Data Sharing Regimen (i.e., descriptive/raw data will be submitted semi-annually, and submission of all other data will occur at the time of publication, or prior to the end of the grant, whichever occurs first). Consent forms will reflect this submission of data to be shared. We will store study data as Excel datasets. Research staff will document the study protocol and datasets on a publicly accessible website that will include surveys, names and labels for all variables and values, and calculations for composite scores. We will remove personal identifiers from datasets and replace them with randomly assigned identifiers.
    IPD Sharing Time Frame
    As noted above, descriptive/raw data will be submitted semi-annually, and submission of all other data will occur at the time of publication, or prior to the end of the grant, whichever occurs first.
    IPD Sharing Access Criteria
    There is no criteria.

    Learn more about this trial

    Transforming Adolescent Mental Health Through Accessible, Scalable, Technology-supported Small-group Instruction

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs