search
Back to results

Strengthening Care in Collaboration With People With Lived Experience of Psychosis in Uganda (SCAPE-U)

Primary Purpose

Psychosis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Uganda
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Primary care health worker training
Community Health Workers Training
Home visits
Sponsored by
George Washington University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Psychosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Facilitators of the implementation strategy: At least 18 years of age Confirmed diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia) by a psychiatrist or psychiatric clinical officer Completion of the YouBelongHOME (YBH) program Provision of informed consent, Fluency in the local language (Luganda) Good functioning with respect to performance of daily chores,engagement with family members, comprehension and community participation as assessed by the YBH team A supportive family member. Primary care providers: Provides primary care in health facility of Kampala/Wakiso District Selected by facility in-charge Community health workers Provides community based health service in health facility where primary care providers are trained (from Kampala/Wakiso district) Selected by facility in-charge Patients (Primary beneficiaries) Persons diagnosed with psychosis at a primary health care facility in Kampala/Wakiso District; For this study, a diagnosis of psychosis will include the following diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5):schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders [brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, and organic psychosis (i.e., psychosis secondary to a medical condition such as HIV or an alcohol- or substance-use disorder)];bipolar affective disorder and related disorders; Ability of the patient or responsible surrogate to consent to study enrolment and procedures; Persons eligible for outpatient management of psychosis Family members a. Family member or caregiver of the patients above. Exclusion Criteria: Facilitators of the implementation strategy: a. Inability to provide informed consent. Primary care providers: None Community health workers: None Patients Persons diagnosed with psychosis requiring inpatient management/services; and Persons for whom consent for participation in the study cannot be obtained. Patients found to be severely ill beyond the capacity of the health facility to treat. Family members a. Family members who doesn't provide consent for participation

Sites / Locations

  • YouBelong Uganda

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Treatment as usual

Strengthening care in collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis in Uganda

Arm Description

Training primary care workers in diagnosis and treatment; training community health workers in detection and referral.

Trainings done in collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis; as well as additional home visits conducted by people with lived experience of psychosis.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse

Secondary Outcome Measures

World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
Service user collaboration checklist
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
Service user collaboration checklist
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
Service user collaboration checklist
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Social Inclusion Scale
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Social Inclusion Scale
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Social Inclusion Scale
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Hospitalization Record
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Hospitalization Record
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Hospitalization Record
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Community Health Workers: Social Distance Scale
Attitudes of community health workers towards people with psychosis, 12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Community Health Workers: Social Distance Scale
Attitudes of community health workers towards people with psychosis, 12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Community Health Workers: Assessment tool
Accuracy of detection, no score - will check if their detection matches with the gold standard - Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual -V Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, psychosis module
Community Health Workers: Village health team referral
no maximum or minimum, outcome is the number of patients referred by community health workers to the health post
Community Health Workers: Village health team referral with psychosis
no maximum or minimum, outcome is the number of patients diagnosed with psychosis by PCP and referred by community health workers to the health post
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Health Facility Record
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Health Facility Record
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Health Facility Record
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual -V Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, psychosis module
Accuracy of patient diagnosis by study mental health specialist

Full Information

First Posted
April 12, 2023
Last Updated
May 8, 2023
Sponsor
George Washington University
Collaborators
YouBelong Uganda, Butabika National Referral Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05863572
Brief Title
Strengthening Care in Collaboration With People With Lived Experience of Psychosis in Uganda
Acronym
SCAPE-U
Official Title
Strengthening Care in Collaboration With People With Lived Experience of Psychosis in Uganda
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
April 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
George Washington University
Collaborators
YouBelong Uganda, Butabika National Referral Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Mental health services are most effective and equitable when designed, delivered, and evaluated in collaboration with people with lived experience of mental health conditions. Unfortunately, people with lived experience are rarely involved in health systems strengthening or are limited to specific components (e.g., peer helpers) rather than multi-tiered collaboration in the continuum of health services (e.g., ranging from home- to community- to clinic-based services). Moreover, programs that do involve people with lived experience, typically involve people with a history of a substance use conditions or common mental disorders. In contrast, the collaboration of people with lived experience of psychosis is especially rare. A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted in urban and peri-urban areas around Kampala, Uganda, to evaluate the benefits of an implementation strategy for mental health services with engagement of people with lived experience of psychosis throughout the home-to-community-to-clinic care continuum, this is a hybrid type-III implementation-effectiveness pilot focusing on the differences in implementation strategy. This implementation strategy, entitled "Strengthening CAre in collaboration with People with lived Experience of psychosis in Uganda", will include training people with lived experience of psychosis using PhotoVoice and other methods to participate at three levels: in-home services, community engagement, and primary health care facilities. The investigators will compare a standard task-sharing implementation arm using training by mental health specialists with an experimental implementation arm that includes collaboration with people with lived experience. The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this strategy in the context of assuring safety and wellbeing of people with lived experience of psychosis who collaborate in health systems strengthening. By collaborating on health systems strengthening across these multiple levels, we foresee a more in-depth contribution that can lead to rethinking how best to design and deliver care for people with lived experience of psychosis. Successful completion of this pilot will be the foundation for a fully powered trial to evaluate the benefits of multi-level collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis.
Detailed Description
The aim of the current study is to conduct a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial to determine feasibility and acceptability of people with lived experience of psychosis collaborating in training primary care and community health care workers and co-delivering services in the home. This pilot study will consist of two trial arms: - Training- As- Usual vs the experimental arm. It will be implemented across three-tiers - in primary health care, community, and home settings. The pilot will also determine the parameters needed for appropriate design and implementation of a fully-power future cluster randomized controlled trial. Objective 1 - To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the implementation strategy from the perspective of people with lived experience of psychosis, family members and primary and community care providers. Objective 2 - To demonstrate proof-of-concept for the benefit of the implementation strategy for service users (i.e., patients with psychosis receiving primary care services) and their families, including changes in psychosis symptoms, quality of life, frequency of hospitalization and the potential impacts on family members. Objective 3 - To evaluate changes in health systems outcomes in terms of primary care provider knowledge, attitudes, competency in psychosis diagnosis and management, accuracy of diagnosis and fidelity to treatment guidelines in actual care settings as well as trial procedures. Objective 4: To evaluate costing, recruitment and retention, and data collection procedures and protocols to determine the optimal design for a future fully powered cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Objective 5: To establish and demonstrate ethics and safety in collaborating with service users.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psychosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Cluster randomized controlled trial
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants and outcome assessors are masked to study arm.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
132 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment as usual
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Training primary care workers in diagnosis and treatment; training community health workers in detection and referral.
Arm Title
Strengthening care in collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis in Uganda
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Trainings done in collaboration with people with lived experience of psychosis; as well as additional home visits conducted by people with lived experience of psychosis.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Primary care health worker training
Intervention Description
Training primary care workers to detect and treat psychosis.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Community Health Workers Training
Intervention Description
training community health workers in detection and referral
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Home visits
Intervention Description
home visits conducted by people with lived experience of psychosis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Description
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Time Frame
baseline - immediately after enrollment
Title
Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Description
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale
Description
Symptoms of Psychosis, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Description
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Description
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Scale
Description
Brief quality of life scale, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, Higher score refers to better quality of life
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Service user collaboration checklist
Description
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Service user collaboration checklist
Description
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Service user collaboration checklist
Description
Benefits and challenges of service users' collaboration, minimum = 12, maximum = 48, higher number refers to strong collaboration experience
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Description
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Description
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
EuroQuality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level
Description
Quality of Life (for health economics analyses), minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Description
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Description
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Discrimination and Stigma Scale-Brief version
Description
Stigma experienced by persons living with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 33, Higher score refers to higher experience of stigma
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Social Inclusion Scale
Description
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Social Inclusion Scale
Description
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Social Inclusion Scale
Description
Social Inclusion of service users, minimum = 10, maximum = 50, Higher score refers to better experience of social inclusion
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Time Frame
4 months post-enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is total number of days patient was hospitalized during study period
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Description
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Description
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Client Service Receipt Inventory
Description
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total cost for patient to get healthcare
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Description
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Time Frame
immediately after enrollment
Title
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Description
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Time Frame
4 months post enrollment
Title
Family Interview Schedule-Impact on Caregivers
Description
Impact on family members and caregivers of people with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 48, higher score means higher burden on the families
Time Frame
8 months post enrollment
Title
Community Health Workers: Social Distance Scale
Description
Attitudes of community health workers towards people with psychosis, 12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time Frame
pre training
Title
Community Health Workers: Social Distance Scale
Description
Attitudes of community health workers towards people with psychosis, 12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time Frame
immediately after training
Title
Community Health Workers: Assessment tool
Description
Accuracy of detection, no score - will check if their detection matches with the gold standard - Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual -V Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, psychosis module
Time Frame
monthly throughout the study period : average of 8 months, However accuracy check during SCID diagnosis check
Title
Community Health Workers: Village health team referral
Description
no maximum or minimum, outcome is the number of patients referred by community health workers to the health post
Time Frame
monthly throughout the study period (average of 8 months), starts immediately after training
Title
Community Health Workers: Village health team referral with psychosis
Description
no maximum or minimum, outcome is the number of patients diagnosed with psychosis by PCP and referred by community health workers to the health post
Time Frame
monthly throughout the study period (average of 8 months), starts immediately after training
Title
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
Description
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time Frame
pre training
Title
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
Description
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time Frame
immediately after training
Title
Primary care workers: Social Distance Scale
Description
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
Time Frame
final supervision: 8 months post training
Title
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Description
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time Frame
pre training
Title
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Description
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time Frame
immediately after training
Title
Primary care workers: Mental health Gap Action Program Knowledge
Description
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
Time Frame
final supervision: 8 months post training
Title
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Description
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time Frame
pre training
Title
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Description
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time Frame
immediately after training
Title
Primary care workers: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors for Psychosis
Description
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
Time Frame
final supervision - 8 months post training
Title
Health Facility Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Time Frame
pre training
Title
Health Facility Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Time Frame
immediately after training
Title
Health Facility Record
Description
no minimum or maximum, score is the total number of patient diagnosed with psychosis : clinical records reviewed by Research Assistants
Time Frame
final supervision - 8 months post training
Title
Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual -V Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, psychosis module
Description
Accuracy of patient diagnosis by study mental health specialist
Time Frame
3 months post patient enrollment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Facilitators of the implementation strategy: At least 18 years of age Confirmed diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia) by a psychiatrist or psychiatric clinical officer Completion of the YouBelongHOME (YBH) program Provision of informed consent, Fluency in the local language (Luganda) Good functioning with respect to performance of daily chores,engagement with family members, comprehension and community participation as assessed by the YBH team A supportive family member. Primary care providers: Provides primary care in health facility of Kampala/Wakiso District Selected by facility in-charge Community health workers Provides community based health service in health facility where primary care providers are trained (from Kampala/Wakiso district) Selected by facility in-charge Patients (Primary beneficiaries) Persons diagnosed with psychosis at a primary health care facility in Kampala/Wakiso District; For this study, a diagnosis of psychosis will include the following diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5):schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders [brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, and organic psychosis (i.e., psychosis secondary to a medical condition such as HIV or an alcohol- or substance-use disorder)];bipolar affective disorder and related disorders; Ability of the patient or responsible surrogate to consent to study enrolment and procedures; Persons eligible for outpatient management of psychosis Family members a. Family member or caregiver of the patients above. Exclusion Criteria: Facilitators of the implementation strategy: a. Inability to provide informed consent. Primary care providers: None Community health workers: None Patients Persons diagnosed with psychosis requiring inpatient management/services; and Persons for whom consent for participation in the study cannot be obtained. Patients found to be severely ill beyond the capacity of the health facility to treat. Family members a. Family members who doesn't provide consent for participation
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Brandon A Kohrt, MD, PhD
Phone
2027412860
Email
bkohrt@gwu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sauharda Rai, MA,PhD
Phone
2027412860
Email
sauharda@gwu.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brandon Kohrt, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
George Washington University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Byamah Mutamba, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
YouBelong Uganda
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
YouBelong Uganda
City
Kampala
ZIP/Postal Code
99999
Country
Uganda

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is not a plan to make IPD available. No plan for feasibility study.

Learn more about this trial

Strengthening Care in Collaboration With People With Lived Experience of Psychosis in Uganda

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs