search
Back to results

e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury

Primary Purpose

Acquired Brain Injury, Fatigue

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
e-COGRAT (a blended eHealth intervention)
Sponsored by
Universiteit Leiden
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acquired Brain Injury focused on measuring Intervention, eHealth, Rehabilitation, Feasibility

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: An ABI diagnosis (stroke and traumatic brain injury) in the chronic phase (≥6 months after injury) Complaints of severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue score ≥ 40) Full comprehension of Dutch language Being cognitive capable of using the internet and having regular internet access. Exclusion Criteria: Having severe cognitive deficits (Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) < borderline) Having major untreated or unstable medical or psychiatric comorbidities (eg, epilepsy, psychosis) Patients with (complaints of) depression are excluded if the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is > 10

Sites / Locations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Daily fatigue
    Primary outcome is the change in severity of fatigue complaints on a daily visual analogue scale (VAS) ("How would you rate your fatigue today?") which will be registered by text messages. Participants can indicate the severity of the experienced fatigue by given themselves a grade between 0 - 4. 0: "I'm not tired"; 1: "I'm a little bit tired"; 2: "tired"; 3: "pretty tired"; "; 4: "seriously tired". These grades will also be used in the intervention.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Fatigue after ABI
    Fatigue after ABI will be assessed with the Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale (DMFS). The DMFS measures 5 aspects of fatigue regarding the four weeks preceding the assessment: Impact of fatigue, Mental fatigue, Signs and Direct consequences of fatigue, Physical fatigue and Coping with fatigue. The DMFS contains 38 items. Questions are answered on a 5-point Likert scale. Subscales of the DMFS showed sufficient to good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70 to 0.91), good convergent validity with an existing fatigue scale, and good divergent validity with measures of mood and self-esteem.
    Fatigue in the general population
    Fatigue in the general population will be assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue (CIS-f). The CIS-f contains 8 questions on fatigue severity regarding the two weeks preceding the assessment. The CIS-f has good reliability and is sensitive to change. Questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7, higher scores represent higher fatigue).
    Emotional distress
    Depression and anxiety symptoms of the last week will be assessed with the Dutch version of the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The reliability of the HADS is good (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.71 to 0.90) as is the test-retest reliability (0.86-0.90) (Spinhoven et al., 1997). Questions are answered on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3): 7 items on the depression subscale (HADS-D) and 7 items of the anxiety subscale (HADS-A). Subscale sumscores are categorized as normal (0-7), mild (8-10), moderate (11-14) or severe (15-21).
    Level of participation
    The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) is a questionnaire to rate objective and subjective participation after rehabilitation. Internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.70-0.91).
    Feasibility of the overall online intervention
    Feasibility will be assessed with structured interviews about overall usability, experienced benefits and difficulties and level of involvement. These interviews, for both participants and therapists, will take place posttreatment and after follow up.
    Feasibility of each specific online session
    After each online session both patients and therapists fill in a questionnaire with questions about their experiences with the specific session concerning usability, content, lay out, potential technical difficulties and other assorted comments.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 14, 2023
    Last Updated
    May 8, 2023
    Sponsor
    Universiteit Leiden
    Collaborators
    Heliomare Revalidatie
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05863897
    Brief Title
    e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury
    Official Title
    e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    September 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    September 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Universiteit Leiden
    Collaborators
    Heliomare Revalidatie

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Fatigue is a common, persistent consequence of acquired brain injury (ABI). Research into treatments that may alleviate post-ABI fatigue is been limited. Pharmacological treatment (methylphenidate) has shown the greatest scientific effects, but is complicated because the risk of adverse side effects and its potential for abuse. COGRAT, an evidence-based treatment combining cognitive therapy (CO) with graded activity training (GRAT), is found to be effective in treating fatigue in patients with acquired brain injury. However, therapist guided internet-based CBT (I-CBT) could offer a more accessible and cheaper alternative to this highly frequent face to face treatment. Moreover, I-CBT is found to be effective in a population with patients with psychiatric and chronic somatic disorders, including chronic fatigue syndrome. Recent studies suggests that I-CBT is effective for people with ABI as well. To obtain optimal benefit from both group delivered face to face therapy and e-health and to combine the available evidence of COGRAT and I-CBT in patients with ABI, we developed a blended e-health cognitive behavioral (group)intervention; e-COGRAT. The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of e-COGRAT to treat fatigue in people with ABI. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is a blended eHealth cognitive behavioral (group)intervention (e-COGRAT) effective as a treatment for fatigue in people with ABI? Is e-COGRAT the blended care variant of COGRAT, a cognitive behavioral group treatment for fatigue afer ABI, comparable to COGRAT in terms of efficacy? Will participants of e-COGRAT improve significant on overall fatigue, emotional well-being and participation? Will it be feasible for at least 80% of the participants to complete the intervention completely?
    Detailed Description
    A single case experimental design (SCED) with AB and follow-up phases across participants will be used. Within this study design, every participant will receive the blended eHealth cognitive behavioral (group)intervention (e-COGRAT). Patients who have given consent to participate in the study will be assigned to a treatment group by random assignment. Each group consists of 4 participants. Due to the group-based intervention all participants of each group will start simultaneously and immediately after baseline phase (2 weeks) with the 12-week intervention phase. Start dates will be predetermined based on the running dates of each group. The follow-up phase, immediately following after intervention phase, will take 24 weeks. The total duration of the study is 37 weeks.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Acquired Brain Injury, Fatigue
    Keywords
    Intervention, eHealth, Rehabilitation, Feasibility

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Model Description
    A single-case experimental design with AB and follow-up phases across participants.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    16 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    e-COGRAT (a blended eHealth intervention)
    Intervention Description
    The blended eHealth intervention for fatigue complaints after ABI, e-COGRAT, is a cognitive behaviorial intervention. It consists of 12 weekly sessions, including 6 individual online sessions, 2 face-to-face group sessions and 4 online group sessions, in 4 groups of 4 patients.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Daily fatigue
    Description
    Primary outcome is the change in severity of fatigue complaints on a daily visual analogue scale (VAS) ("How would you rate your fatigue today?") which will be registered by text messages. Participants can indicate the severity of the experienced fatigue by given themselves a grade between 0 - 4. 0: "I'm not tired"; 1: "I'm a little bit tired"; 2: "tired"; 3: "pretty tired"; "; 4: "seriously tired". These grades will also be used in the intervention.
    Time Frame
    1 year (daily in baseline and intervention phase and daily in the last week of follow-up)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Fatigue after ABI
    Description
    Fatigue after ABI will be assessed with the Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale (DMFS). The DMFS measures 5 aspects of fatigue regarding the four weeks preceding the assessment: Impact of fatigue, Mental fatigue, Signs and Direct consequences of fatigue, Physical fatigue and Coping with fatigue. The DMFS contains 38 items. Questions are answered on a 5-point Likert scale. Subscales of the DMFS showed sufficient to good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70 to 0.91), good convergent validity with an existing fatigue scale, and good divergent validity with measures of mood and self-esteem.
    Time Frame
    1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
    Title
    Fatigue in the general population
    Description
    Fatigue in the general population will be assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue (CIS-f). The CIS-f contains 8 questions on fatigue severity regarding the two weeks preceding the assessment. The CIS-f has good reliability and is sensitive to change. Questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7, higher scores represent higher fatigue).
    Time Frame
    1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
    Title
    Emotional distress
    Description
    Depression and anxiety symptoms of the last week will be assessed with the Dutch version of the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The reliability of the HADS is good (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.71 to 0.90) as is the test-retest reliability (0.86-0.90) (Spinhoven et al., 1997). Questions are answered on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3): 7 items on the depression subscale (HADS-D) and 7 items of the anxiety subscale (HADS-A). Subscale sumscores are categorized as normal (0-7), mild (8-10), moderate (11-14) or severe (15-21).
    Time Frame
    1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
    Title
    Level of participation
    Description
    The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) is a questionnaire to rate objective and subjective participation after rehabilitation. Internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.70-0.91).
    Time Frame
    1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
    Title
    Feasibility of the overall online intervention
    Description
    Feasibility will be assessed with structured interviews about overall usability, experienced benefits and difficulties and level of involvement. These interviews, for both participants and therapists, will take place posttreatment and after follow up.
    Time Frame
    1 year (once in treatment and follow-up)
    Title
    Feasibility of each specific online session
    Description
    After each online session both patients and therapists fill in a questionnaire with questions about their experiences with the specific session concerning usability, content, lay out, potential technical difficulties and other assorted comments.
    Time Frame
    1 year (weekly during treatment and after follow-up)

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: An ABI diagnosis (stroke and traumatic brain injury) in the chronic phase (≥6 months after injury) Complaints of severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue score ≥ 40) Full comprehension of Dutch language Being cognitive capable of using the internet and having regular internet access. Exclusion Criteria: Having severe cognitive deficits (Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) < borderline) Having major untreated or unstable medical or psychiatric comorbidities (eg, epilepsy, psychosis) Patients with (complaints of) depression are excluded if the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is > 10
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Michelle Bertelkamp, MSc
    Phone
    +31 88 9208374
    Email
    m.bertelkamp@heliomare.nl
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Marthe F. Ford, Dr.
    Phone
    +31 88 9208130
    Email
    m.ford@heliomare.nl
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Aglaia M. Zedlitz, Dr.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Leiden University
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    22308241
    Citation
    Zedlitz AM, Rietveld TC, Geurts AC, Fasotti L. Cognitive and graded activity training can alleviate persistent fatigue after stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2012 Apr;43(4):1046-51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632117. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25559057
    Citation
    Visser-Keizer AC, Hogenkamp A, Westerhof-Evers HJ, Egberink IJ, Spikman JM. Dutch multifactor fatigue scale: a new scale to measure the different aspects of fatigue after acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9089829
    Citation
    Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363-70. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004382.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20809057
    Citation
    van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VP, Visser-Meily JM, Post MW. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;42(8):752-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0589.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34354018
    Citation
    Ali A, Morfin J, Mills J, Pasipanodya EC, Maas YJ, Huang E, Dirlikov B, Englander J, Zedlitz A. Fatigue After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;37(4):E249-E257. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000710. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29215315
    Citation
    Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    35641443
    Citation
    Ford ME, Geurtsen GJ, Groet E, Rambaran Mishre RD, Van Bennekom CAM, Van Someren EJW. A blended eHealth intervention for insomnia following acquired brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. J Sleep Res. 2023 Feb;32(1):e13629. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13629. Epub 2022 May 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29072086
    Citation
    Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Dudley M, Vincent N, Feigin V. A pilot randomized controlled trial of on-line interventions to improve sleep quality in adults after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2018 May;32(5):619-629. doi: 10.1177/0269215517736671. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24675372
    Citation
    van Beugen S, Ferwerda M, Hoeve D, Rovers MM, Spillekom-van Koulil S, van Middendorp H, Evers AW. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions: a meta-analytic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 27;16(3):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2777.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29436329
    Citation
    Janse A, Worm-Smeitink M, Bleijenberg G, Donders R, Knoop H. Efficacy of web-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;212(2):112-118. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.22.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs