search
Back to results

A Closed Loop, Doctor to Patient, Mobile Application for Depression in People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS-CATCH)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Sclerosis, MS, Depression

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MS CATCH
Sponsored by
University of California, San Francisco
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring MS, Multiple Sclerosis, Depression, Depressed

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of MS (relapsing or progressive) by 2017 McDonald Criteria18 Ages 18 to 80 PHQ-9 score of 5-19 Any MS therapy, or no treatment California resident to enable clinical telemedicine visits if warranted during the study visit Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive dexterity or visual impairment that, in the opinion of the study neurologist (RB), would put the participant at risk or limit their ability to adhere to the study protocol Inability to provide informed consent Psychotic disorders: bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder

Sites / Locations

  • Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San FranciscoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Arm 1: 12 month MS CATCH tool intervention

Arm 2: 6 month "usual care", 6 month MS CATCH tool intervention

Arm Description

Participants in arm 1 will receive 12 months of use of the MS CATCH tool. This will include in-visit interventions and monthly questionnaires.

Participants in arm 2 will receive 6 months "usual care" followed by 6 months of MS CATCH tool intervention. These first 6 months will be used to assess the definition of "usual care".

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of patients initially using the tool (adoption)
This will be measured by calculating the percentage patients who use the tool during the initial month of the study
Percentage of patients who continue to use the tool (Engagement)
The percentage patients who continued to use the patient-facing tool at least quarterly (used the tool at least once every 3 months)
Percentage of patient-clinician encounters who use the tool during the 12 month visit (Engagement)
The percentage of the clinician-patient dyads in Arm 1 who use the in-visit dashboard at the 12M clinical visit.
Percentage of patients who respond to mental health prompts (Adherence)
The percentage depression-reporting prompts responded to per participant on their patient-facing tool
Percentage of participants who respond to mental health prompts (Adherence)
The percentage participants responding to >75% depression prompts.
Change in clinician screening of depression: Arm 1 vs Arm 2
Percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 1 vs. percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 2. This will be compared in the electronic health record for the baseline visits.
Change in clinician screening of depression: Arm 1 vs Arm 2
Percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 1 vs. percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 2. This will be compared in the electronic health record for the 6 month visits.
Clinician comprehensive depression evaluation
The percentage of depression risk factors evaluated at each patient visit.
Preventative care recommendations
Percentage of visits in which applicable preventative care was recommended
Percentage of patient-clinician encounters that initially use the tool (adoption)
The percentage of patient-clinical dyads who use the tool during the 6 month clinical visit
Percentage patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: first 6 months
The percent of interventions recommended at each visit that were completed by the following 6 month visit. (completed interventions/total interventions recommended *100)
Percentage patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: 6-12 months
The percent of interventions recommended at each visit that were completed by the following 6 month visit. (completed interventions/total interventions recommended *100)
Points of patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: first 6 months
The completion of clinician recommended interventions that were completed by the following 6 month visit, tallied according to this scale: 0 = No interventions recommended, or no follow through by patient = 1 intervention recommended, and follow through on 1 intervention, or 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 1 intervention = 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 2+ interventions
Points of patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: 6-12 months
The completion of clinician recommended interventions that were completed by the following 6 month visit, tallied according to this scale: 0 = No interventions recommended, or no follow through by patient = 1 intervention recommended, and follow through on 1 intervention, or 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 1 intervention = 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 2+ interventions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in HADS-D (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Screener - Depression)
Changes in HADS-D over the first 6 months of the study. The HADS-D questionnaire ranges from 0-21, with a higher score indicating more impairment.
The amount of participants that stay active in the study (trial retention)
The trial retention, or how many participants choose to remain in the study will be observed at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 month timepoints. Final reporting of these measures will be at the end of the 12 month period.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2023
Last Updated
August 10, 2023
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05865405
Brief Title
A Closed Loop, Doctor to Patient, Mobile Application for Depression in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Acronym
MS-CATCH
Official Title
Care Technology to Ascertain, Treat, and Engage the Community to Heal Depression in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Closing the Gaps in Depression Care for People With MS By Closing the Information Loop
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 15, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 15, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The researchers want to find out if an electronic application called MS CATCH can enhance patients' and doctors' experiences during and in between clinical visits. MS CATCH is a smartphone-based tool which allows patients to enter their mood related symptoms at regular intervals, which is then available to their Neurologist in their electronic medical record. The neurologist is also able to view additional information from their medical record, and receives alerts for changes reported by the patient that raise concern for the patient's mental health.
Detailed Description
MS-CATCH (Care technology to Ascertain, Treat, and engage the Community to Heal depression in patients with Multiple Sclerosis) is a behaviorally informed, digital health, closed-loop-intervention that brings longitudinal mood reporting into the point of care. It consists of a simple tool used by the patient to improve mood reporting. This then triggers real-time alerts delivered to the clinician, who can access a comprehensive dashboard featuring risk factors and interventions to be considered, as well as resources local to the patient. This dashboard launches straight from the patient's electronic health record (EHR). MS-CATCH was designed using extensive human-centered design in all phases of development, and HIPAA compliant REDCap for electronic data capture. While the tool requires institutional approvals to launch within the UCSF EHR, the design elements could be readily repurposed using these technologies to support other institutions' requirements. Each individual care component and visualization was then developed and refined using extensive stakeholder engagement and an eye to the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation to change Behavior) principles of behavioral change, in order to promote behaviors likely to improve depression reporting, screening, comprehensive treatment and follow through.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis, MS, Depression
Keywords
MS, Multiple Sclerosis, Depression, Depressed

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Both arm 1 and arm 2 groups of participants will receive at least 6 months of MS CATCH tool intervention, with arm 1 receiving 12 months of intervention
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The statistician will be blinded to what arm participants are a part of.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1: 12 month MS CATCH tool intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in arm 1 will receive 12 months of use of the MS CATCH tool. This will include in-visit interventions and monthly questionnaires.
Arm Title
Arm 2: 6 month "usual care", 6 month MS CATCH tool intervention
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants in arm 2 will receive 6 months "usual care" followed by 6 months of MS CATCH tool intervention. These first 6 months will be used to assess the definition of "usual care".
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
MS CATCH
Intervention Description
Participants will respond to a set of surveys every month to increase communication on mood with their clinician.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of patients initially using the tool (adoption)
Description
This will be measured by calculating the percentage patients who use the tool during the initial month of the study
Time Frame
1st month of study
Title
Percentage of patients who continue to use the tool (Engagement)
Description
The percentage patients who continued to use the patient-facing tool at least quarterly (used the tool at least once every 3 months)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percentage of patient-clinician encounters who use the tool during the 12 month visit (Engagement)
Description
The percentage of the clinician-patient dyads in Arm 1 who use the in-visit dashboard at the 12M clinical visit.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percentage of patients who respond to mental health prompts (Adherence)
Description
The percentage depression-reporting prompts responded to per participant on their patient-facing tool
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percentage of participants who respond to mental health prompts (Adherence)
Description
The percentage participants responding to >75% depression prompts.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in clinician screening of depression: Arm 1 vs Arm 2
Description
Percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 1 vs. percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 2. This will be compared in the electronic health record for the baseline visits.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in clinician screening of depression: Arm 1 vs Arm 2
Description
Percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 1 vs. percent of visits where mood screening was documented by the clinician for arm 2. This will be compared in the electronic health record for the 6 month visits.
Time Frame
6 month
Title
Clinician comprehensive depression evaluation
Description
The percentage of depression risk factors evaluated at each patient visit.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Preventative care recommendations
Description
Percentage of visits in which applicable preventative care was recommended
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percentage of patient-clinician encounters that initially use the tool (adoption)
Description
The percentage of patient-clinical dyads who use the tool during the 6 month clinical visit
Time Frame
6 month visit
Title
Percentage patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: first 6 months
Description
The percent of interventions recommended at each visit that were completed by the following 6 month visit. (completed interventions/total interventions recommended *100)
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Percentage patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: 6-12 months
Description
The percent of interventions recommended at each visit that were completed by the following 6 month visit. (completed interventions/total interventions recommended *100)
Time Frame
6 month and 12 months
Title
Points of patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: first 6 months
Description
The completion of clinician recommended interventions that were completed by the following 6 month visit, tallied according to this scale: 0 = No interventions recommended, or no follow through by patient = 1 intervention recommended, and follow through on 1 intervention, or 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 1 intervention = 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 2+ interventions
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Points of patient follow-through on clinician recommended interventions: 6-12 months
Description
The completion of clinician recommended interventions that were completed by the following 6 month visit, tallied according to this scale: 0 = No interventions recommended, or no follow through by patient = 1 intervention recommended, and follow through on 1 intervention, or 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 1 intervention = 2+ interventions recommended, and patient follow through on 2+ interventions
Time Frame
6 month and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in HADS-D (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Screener - Depression)
Description
Changes in HADS-D over the first 6 months of the study. The HADS-D questionnaire ranges from 0-21, with a higher score indicating more impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
The amount of participants that stay active in the study (trial retention)
Description
The trial retention, or how many participants choose to remain in the study will be observed at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 month timepoints. Final reporting of these measures will be at the end of the 12 month period.
Time Frame
12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Exploratory outcome: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores
Description
Evaluate patient PHQ-9 scores. The PHQ-9 questionnaire ranges from 0-20, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Exploratory outcome: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Scores
Description
Evaluate patient MINI scores. The MINI assesses for 17 of the most common mental health disorders. The MINI is a "yes"/"no" screener, with certain answer choices leading to a most likely diagnosis. A score of 3 or more most likely correlates to depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Exploratory outcome: Changes in user self efficacy arm 1 vs arm 2
Description
Changes in patient reported self efficacy at managing a chronic disease will be quantified between arms 1 and 2. This will be addressed in the final exit interview with participants after the study is completed. Our health literacy expert will generate a questionnaire based on major themes uncovered in Aim 1 along with consultation with psychiatry and inclusion experts.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of MS (relapsing or progressive) by 2017 McDonald Criteria18 Ages 18 to 80 PHQ-9 score of 5-19 Any MS therapy, or no treatment California resident to enable clinical telemedicine visits if warranted during the study visit Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive dexterity or visual impairment that, in the opinion of the study neurologist (RB), would put the participant at risk or limit their ability to adhere to the study protocol Inability to provide informed consent Psychotic disorders: bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Riley Bove, MD
Phone
415.595.2795
Email
riley.bove@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kyra Henderson, BA
Phone
415.353.8053
Email
kyra.henderson@ucsf.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riley Bove, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94158
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kyra Henderson
Phone
415-353-8053
Email
kyra.henderson@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riley Bove, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The deidentified dataset will be shared with qualified collaborators upon request, provision of CITI and other certifications, and data sharing agreement. We will share the results, once the data are complete and analyzed, with the scientific community and patient/clinician participants through abstracts, presentations and manuscripts.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
6 months post trial
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified collaborators upon request, provision of CITI and other certifications, and data sharing agreement

Learn more about this trial

A Closed Loop, Doctor to Patient, Mobile Application for Depression in People With Multiple Sclerosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs