search
Back to results

Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Oncology

Primary Purpose

Cancer, Breast Cancer, Digestive Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
psychoeduc/self-care/self-hypnosis group
Sponsored by
University of Liege
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cancer focused on measuring cancer, oncology, symptoms, quality of life, hypnosis, self-care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion critera for WP1: Diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer, or digestive cancer (i.e., anal, colorectal, gastric, esophageal, liver, pancreatic cancers). ≥ 18 years old. No history of cancer, and not currently in relapse. Having completed the active treatments (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) for 5 years maximum, based on the methodology and recommendations of studies on symptom clusters in oncology Additional inclusion criteria for WP2: No history of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, dissociative episodes) or substance abuse (to avoid severe dissociation during hypnosis). Score ≥ 4 for the core symptom selected to design the intervention, as suggest by previous interventional studies30,47,51, and measured on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Liège

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention group

Control group

Arm Description

These participants will benefit from an 8-week group intervention combining psychoeducation, self-care learning and hypnosis exercises.

These participants will not benefit from any intervention. After the end of the study, they will have the possibility to participate in the group intervention if they want to.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Fatigue
Assessed with a questionnaire (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; MFI-20). 5 subscales, each with a score comprised between 4 and 20, with a higher score indicating higher fatigue.
Change in pain
Assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) (score range from 0 to 10/10, a higher score indicating a higher pain) and with a questionnaire (McGill Pain Questionnaire).
Change in sleep difficulties
Assessed with a questionnaire (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI). Score range from 0 to 28, with a higher score indicating higher sleep difficulties.
Change in perceived cognitive difficulties
Assessed with a questionnaire (FACT-Cog), investigation 4 dimensions (perceived cognitive impairments, score range 0-72, higher score indicating less impairments ; impact of cognitive impairments on quality of life, score range 0-16, with higher scoe indicating less impact ; Comments from others, score range 0-16 with higher score indicating less comments ; perceived cognitive abilities, score range 0-28, with higher score indicating more cognitive abilities)
Change in emotional distress
Assessed with a questionnaire (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Score range from 0 to 42, with a higher score indicating higher emotional distress

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in quality of life
Assessed with a core questionnaire (EORTC) and specific modules according to the cancer diagnosis (EORTC - ANL27, BR23, CR29, HCC18, OES18, OG25, PAN26, STO22). Score range varies according to the module. Higher score indicates a higher presence of the dimension investigated.
Change in self-compassion
Assessed with a questionnaire (Self-compassion scale). Score range from 26 to 130, with higher score indicating higher self-compassion.
Change in self-care strategies
Assessed with a questionnaire (self-care survey) consisting of a list of 24 strategies. For each of them, the participant indicates its frequency of use (occasionally, fairly often, very often) and its effectiveness to relieve fatigue (occasionally, fairly often, very often).
Change in coping strategies
Assessed with a questionnaire (ways of coping checklist). Divided into 3 dimensions (i.e., problem-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, research of social support) with score ranging from 9 to 36. Higher score indicates a higher use of this kind of coping.
Change in perception about their fatigue
Assessed with a questionnaire (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire) composed of 8 VAS from 0 to 10.

Full Information

First Posted
April 27, 2023
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Sponsor
University of Liege
Collaborators
CHU of Liège, Fonds pour la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05867966
Brief Title
Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Oncology
Official Title
Evolution and Management of a Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Patients Who Had a Breast Cancer or a Digestive Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
July 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Liege
Collaborators
CHU of Liège, Fonds pour la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A psychoneurological symptom cluster is increasingly documented in oncology. It is composed of cancer-related fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, emotional distress, and cognitive difficulties. These symptoms are linked by strong but complex relationships, and reinforce each other, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and survival. The configuration of this cluster (i.e., the relationships between the symptoms) seems different according to the cancer diagnosis or moment in the cancer journey. It has however been very little studied. Network analysis is an innovative method that allows a deeper understanding of the interactions between these symptoms. It also allows to compare patterns of clustering between distinct populations or measurement times. Finally, it allows to determine one core symptom in a cluster (i.e., the one with the strongest associations with the other symptoms), which could represent a target of choice for interventions aiming to improve the whole symptom cluster. This innovative project has then two main goals. First, the investigators will assess the evolution of the psychoneurological symptom cluster in two populations of patients with cancer: women with breast cancer, and patients with digestive cancer, over one year. Second, the investigators will test the feasibility and preliminary benefits of a new mind-body group intervention specifically designed to address the core symptom of the cluster, determined with network analysis in each population. As suggested by many authors, the proposed intervention will be based on the common-sense model of self-regulation developed by Leventhal and focus on cognitive-behavioral, self-care and mind-body (i.e., hypnosis) empowering strategies. The aim is to assess the satisfaction of the participants regarding the intervention, as well as its impact on the symptoms involved in the cluster.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer, Breast Cancer, Digestive Cancer
Keywords
cancer, oncology, symptoms, quality of life, hypnosis, self-care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The WP1 is observational only (N = 440) In the WP2, 60 other participants will be randomized into an intervention group and a control group.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
500 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
These participants will benefit from an 8-week group intervention combining psychoeducation, self-care learning and hypnosis exercises.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
These participants will not benefit from any intervention. After the end of the study, they will have the possibility to participate in the group intervention if they want to.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
psychoeduc/self-care/self-hypnosis group
Intervention Description
See arm description.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Fatigue
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; MFI-20). 5 subscales, each with a score comprised between 4 and 20, with a higher score indicating higher fatigue.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in pain
Description
Assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) (score range from 0 to 10/10, a higher score indicating a higher pain) and with a questionnaire (McGill Pain Questionnaire).
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in sleep difficulties
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI). Score range from 0 to 28, with a higher score indicating higher sleep difficulties.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in perceived cognitive difficulties
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (FACT-Cog), investigation 4 dimensions (perceived cognitive impairments, score range 0-72, higher score indicating less impairments ; impact of cognitive impairments on quality of life, score range 0-16, with higher scoe indicating less impact ; Comments from others, score range 0-16 with higher score indicating less comments ; perceived cognitive abilities, score range 0-28, with higher score indicating more cognitive abilities)
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in emotional distress
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Score range from 0 to 42, with a higher score indicating higher emotional distress
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in quality of life
Description
Assessed with a core questionnaire (EORTC) and specific modules according to the cancer diagnosis (EORTC - ANL27, BR23, CR29, HCC18, OES18, OG25, PAN26, STO22). Score range varies according to the module. Higher score indicates a higher presence of the dimension investigated.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in self-compassion
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (Self-compassion scale). Score range from 26 to 130, with higher score indicating higher self-compassion.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in self-care strategies
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (self-care survey) consisting of a list of 24 strategies. For each of them, the participant indicates its frequency of use (occasionally, fairly often, very often) and its effectiveness to relieve fatigue (occasionally, fairly often, very often).
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in coping strategies
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (ways of coping checklist). Divided into 3 dimensions (i.e., problem-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, research of social support) with score ranging from 9 to 36. Higher score indicates a higher use of this kind of coping.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).
Title
Change in perception about their fatigue
Description
Assessed with a questionnaire (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire) composed of 8 VAS from 0 to 10.
Time Frame
WP1 : at inclusion (T0), then 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) later. WP2 : at inclusion (T0), then after the group sessions (T1, +- 2 months after T0).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion critera for WP1: Diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer, or digestive cancer (i.e., anal, colorectal, gastric, esophageal, liver, pancreatic cancers). ≥ 18 years old. No history of cancer, and not currently in relapse. Having completed the active treatments (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) for 5 years maximum, based on the methodology and recommendations of studies on symptom clusters in oncology Additional inclusion criteria for WP2: No history of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, dissociative episodes) or substance abuse (to avoid severe dissociation during hypnosis). Score ≥ 4 for the core symptom selected to design the intervention, as suggest by previous interventional studies30,47,51, and measured on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Charlotte GREGOIRE, PhD
Phone
+3243662986
Email
ch.gregoire@uliege.be
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte GREGOIRE, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Liege
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Liège
City
Liège
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte Grégoire, PhD
Phone
+3243662986
Email
ch.gregoire@uliege.ne
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte GREGOIRE, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The full protocol and anonymized data will be available upon reasonable request by email.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
When all data has been collected.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
by email (ch.gregoire@uliege.be)

Learn more about this trial

Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Oncology

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs