search
Back to results

The Effects of MLS LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain (MLSLASERlumb)

Primary Purpose

Non-specific Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Multiwave locked system laser therapy
Sham laser therapy
Sponsored by
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-specific Low Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Chronic low back pain (> 3 months) Lack of effectivness of previous conservative therapies for low back pain Body mass index < 30 Preserved cognitive ability to fully understand and observe indications received by medical personnel Ability to understand and give an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Spine surgery Spinal hernia spondylolisthesis Spinal infections Severe spine deformities Neural diseases Rheumatic diseases Diabetes Psychiatric diseases Vascular diseases Cancer Infectious diseases Kidney stones Skin abrasion Pregnancy or breastfeeding Recent injuries Known sensibility to Laser therapy Epilepsy Anticoagulant therapy Pacemaker hemorrhagic diathesis Photosensitizing drugs Kown Photosensibility Low back Tattoos Steroid injections in the previous 3 weeks Antinflammatory or pain drugs HIV positive Neuro-stimulation implanted systems Tissue with ischemia in the low back

Sites / Locations

  • IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Sham laser therapy

Laser therapy

Arm Description

The control group (PL group) is subjected to a laser sham (placebo), employing a device identical to the one under investigation but lacking the laser emission capability, and the same mode of administration in terms of time and place. Both the sham laser and the test device emit visible light of the same color and are not distinguishable in any way.

The MLS group receives MLS synchronized diode laser therapy emitted by the MLS M8 robotic device (ASA, Italy). MLS M8 (ASA, Arcugnano, Italy), a Class IV (high-power) laser approved by the Food Drug Administration (FDA) and CE certified, characterized by a combined, synchronized two-wavelength (CPW) emission: a continuous emission with a wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm. The duration of each session is 5 min 45 sec.seconds, delivering a total energy of 1500 J and an energy dose of 5 J/cm2, for an area of 300 cm2. The robotic device is placed in the lumbar area, oriented on the muscles erector spinae and quadratus lumborum. The target area set on the device is "lumbar area." The parameters set on the device are "Synchronized Emission of Continuous Pulsed Wave (CPW)," "intensity of 100%," "time of 5 minutes and 45 seconds," and "area of 1x300 cm2."

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Low back pain
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Low back pain
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Low back pain
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Disability
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Disability
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Pain and Disability
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Pain and Disability
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Pain and Disability
Oswestry disability questionnaire

Full Information

First Posted
June 27, 2022
Last Updated
May 23, 2023
Sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05870826
Brief Title
The Effects of MLS LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Acronym
MLSLASERlumb
Official Title
Pilot Study on the Effects of MLS (Multiwave Locked System) LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Placebo
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 21, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 21, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 21, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Non-specific cronic low back pain is very common condition affecting 80-85% of adults. The most common therapies for low back pain are: patient education, excercise and physical therapy. High intensity laser therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment to improve sympthoms in patient with non-specific low back pain when combined wth exercise. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a multi-wave locked system laser therapy in patient with non-specif low back pain when administered alone.
Detailed Description
Chronic nonspecific low back pain, given its high prevalence globally and the disability resulting from it, results in significant deterioration in quality of life and substantial both social and economic costs. The determinants are predominantly biological, in particular musculoskeletal alterations of the lumbar region, but psychosocial factors also contribute significantly to the manifestation of the disorder. Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain are characterized by pain intensity sometimes disabling, a reduction in lumbar range of motion (ROM) and the frequent absence of flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP). Both high-power and low-power laser therapy, especially when included in a multidimensional rehabilitation plan, seems effective in improving both pain and function of affected patients. MLS (Multiwave Locked System) laser therapy is an innovative high-power technology characterized by the combined and synchronized emission of laser light at two wavelengths (a continuous emission with a wavelength wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm) and its efficacy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain is still unknown. This work aims to study the effects of MSL laser therapy on pain, disability disability, lumbar ROM and muscle activity in a homogeneous group of patients with from chronic nonspecific low back pain. Although the literature shows that the combination of exercise with laser therapy yields better results in terms of both pain reduction and functional recovery, in this study we chose not to use any combination of treatments, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of MLS laser therapy alone in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. To isolate the specific results of MLS laser therapy, it is intended to compare it with a placebo, represented by a device apparently identical in morphology and behavior to that delivering the laser and emitting visible light of similar appearance, by means of a clinical trial double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. The double-blind design is adhered to because the type of laser therapy employed with the protocol followed, despite the effects tissue biology highlighted in the literature, is not able to make the patient feel any heat sensation during the session. 31 This is the first study in the literature aimed at analyzing the possible effects determined by the use of MLS laser therapy in chronic nonspecific low back pain: this investigation is conducted with an integrated methodology, using standardized and validated measures for pain intensity and disability, combined with kinematic and electromyography of high technological value.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-specific Low Back Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sham laser therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The control group (PL group) is subjected to a laser sham (placebo), employing a device identical to the one under investigation but lacking the laser emission capability, and the same mode of administration in terms of time and place. Both the sham laser and the test device emit visible light of the same color and are not distinguishable in any way.
Arm Title
Laser therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The MLS group receives MLS synchronized diode laser therapy emitted by the MLS M8 robotic device (ASA, Italy). MLS M8 (ASA, Arcugnano, Italy), a Class IV (high-power) laser approved by the Food Drug Administration (FDA) and CE certified, characterized by a combined, synchronized two-wavelength (CPW) emission: a continuous emission with a wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm. The duration of each session is 5 min 45 sec.seconds, delivering a total energy of 1500 J and an energy dose of 5 J/cm2, for an area of 300 cm2. The robotic device is placed in the lumbar area, oriented on the muscles erector spinae and quadratus lumborum. The target area set on the device is "lumbar area." The parameters set on the device are "Synchronized Emission of Continuous Pulsed Wave (CPW)," "intensity of 100%," "time of 5 minutes and 45 seconds," and "area of 1x300 cm2."
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Multiwave locked system laser therapy
Intervention Description
High intensity laser therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sham laser therapy
Intervention Description
Sham laser therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Low back pain
Description
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time Frame
At baseline (T0)
Title
Low back pain
Description
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time Frame
3 weeks (T1)
Title
Low back pain
Description
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time Frame
One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability
Description
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time Frame
At baseline (T0)
Title
Disability
Description
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time Frame
3 weeks (T1)
Title
Disability
Description
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time Frame
One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Title
Pain and Disability
Description
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time Frame
At baseline (T0)
Title
Pain and Disability
Description
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time Frame
3 weeks (T1)
Title
Pain and Disability
Description
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time Frame
One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Trunk kinematics
Description
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time Frame
At baseline (T0)
Title
Trunk kinematics
Description
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time Frame
3 weeks (T1)
Title
Trunk kinematics
Description
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time Frame
One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Title
Low back muscles activation
Description
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Time Frame
At baseline (T0)
Title
Low back muscles activation
Description
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Time Frame
3 weeks (T1)
Title
Low back muscles activation
Description
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Time Frame
One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Chronic low back pain (> 3 months) Lack of effectivness of previous conservative therapies for low back pain Body mass index < 30 Preserved cognitive ability to fully understand and observe indications received by medical personnel Ability to understand and give an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Spine surgery Spinal hernia spondylolisthesis Spinal infections Severe spine deformities Neural diseases Rheumatic diseases Diabetes Psychiatric diseases Vascular diseases Cancer Infectious diseases Kidney stones Skin abrasion Pregnancy or breastfeeding Recent injuries Known sensibility to Laser therapy Epilepsy Anticoagulant therapy Pacemaker hemorrhagic diathesis Photosensitizing drugs Kown Photosensibility Low back Tattoos Steroid injections in the previous 3 weeks Antinflammatory or pain drugs HIV positive Neuro-stimulation implanted systems Tissue with ischemia in the low back
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Grazia Benedetti
Organizational Affiliation
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
City
Bologna
ZIP/Postal Code
40136
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

The Effects of MLS LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs