search
Back to results

The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up (FOil)

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Oil-based contrast
ExEm Foam
Sponsored by
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring Hysterosalpingography, Hysterosalpingo Foam Sonography, Infertility work-up, Cost-effectiveness, Live birth, Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 42 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count <3x106ml (pre-washed) Known contrast (iodine) allergy Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Tubal flushing during HSG with oil-based contrast

    Tubal flushing HyFoSy

    Arm Description

    Tubal flushing during HSG HSG will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor or nurse according to local protocols. HSG will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HSG is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. After cleaning the vagina and cervix, a vacuum cervix adapter will be applied to the cervix or a Lipiodol resistant balloon catheter or hysterophore will be placed through the cervix. Up to 15ml of Lipiodol Ultra Fluid will be injected into the uterine cavity and its spread directly monitored by fluoroscopy. Six to eight radiographs will be taken and assessed by a gynaecologist or radiologist. The maximum amount of oil-based contrast medium is set at 15ml.

    Tubal flushing during HyFoSy will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor, sonographer or nurse according to local protocols. HyFoSy will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HyFosy is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. During HyFoSy approximately 5-10cc of foam will be introduced through a little cervical balloon-less applicator into the uterine cavity. During infusion of the foam into the uterine cavity, a transvaginal ultrasound will be performed which shows whether the Fallopian tubes are patent. The assessment of the procedure will be done by the one who performed the procedure.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of pregnancies leading to live birth.
    Pregnancy is defined as a positive pregnancy test, increase in human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level or a pregnancy shown on ultrasonographic examination. Live birth is defined as the birth of live baby born beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Time to pregnancy leading to live birth
    Calculated from the day of randomization till the first day of the last menstrual bleeding before a positive pregnancy test.
    Number of clinical pregnancies
    Clinical pregnancy is defined as gestational sac with or without heartbeat visible on ultrasound.
    Number of miscarriages
    Miscarriage is defined as presence of non-vitality on ultrasound or spontaneous loss off pregnancy
    Number of multiple pregnancies
    Multiple pregnancy is defined as two or more vital intrauterine pregnancies at 12 weeks gestation.
    Number of ectopic pregnancies
    Ectopic pregnancy is defined as no intrauterine gestational sac with: an ectopic gestational sac OR HCG concentration >1500 international units per liter (IU/L) with free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound or serum HCG >2000IU/L without free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound
    Number of adverse events
    e.g. infection, intravasation, thyroid dysfunction
    Procedural pain scores
    measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale from 0.0 to 10.0 centimeter immediately after tubal patency testing.
    Number of fertility treatment cycles
    e.g. intra uterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmatic sperm injection
    Number of pregnancy complications
    e.g. pregnancy induced hypertension, fetal growth restriction, still birth.
    Cost-effectiveness
    Comparing the costs (including costs for tubal patency testing and additional fertility treatments) and the effects (chance of live birth)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 5, 2023
    Last Updated
    June 1, 2023
    Sponsor
    Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
    Collaborators
    ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05882188
    Brief Title
    The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up
    Acronym
    FOil
    Official Title
    Is, in Infertile Women Undergoing a Basic Fertility Work-up, Tubal Flushing With Oil-based Contrast Medium During Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Cost-effective Compared to Tubal Flushing by Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography (HyFoSy)?
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    July 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 1, 2026 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 1, 2027 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
    Collaborators
    ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births than tubal flushing during HyFoSy.
    Detailed Description
    Background: The diagnostic work-up for infertility generally includes estimating the risk for tubal pathology and if indicated assessing tubal patency. Traditionally, tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up is performed with hysterosalpingography (HSG). In previous studies it has been demonstrated that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG resulted in more ongoing pregnancies than when HSG is performed with water-based contrast. HyFoSy is a more patient friendly alternative for HSG. Up till now, the fertility enhancing effect of tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy has only been studied in relatively small and observational studies. Objectives:The main objective of this study is to determine whether tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG results into more pregnancies leading to live births when compared to tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy, and whether this approach is cost-effective. In this study the safety of both strategies will also be compared. Rationale: The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births compared to tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy in women with an indication for tubal patency testing. If more live births are achieved, expensive fertility treatments will be less needed, which makes tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG a cost-effective strategy. Study design: This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with an economic analysis alongside it. Women with indication for tubal patency testing will be randomized to tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG and tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Infertility
    Keywords
    Hysterosalpingography, Hysterosalpingo Foam Sonography, Infertility work-up, Cost-effectiveness, Live birth, Randomized controlled trial

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    1102 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Tubal flushing during HSG with oil-based contrast
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Tubal flushing during HSG HSG will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor or nurse according to local protocols. HSG will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HSG is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. After cleaning the vagina and cervix, a vacuum cervix adapter will be applied to the cervix or a Lipiodol resistant balloon catheter or hysterophore will be placed through the cervix. Up to 15ml of Lipiodol Ultra Fluid will be injected into the uterine cavity and its spread directly monitored by fluoroscopy. Six to eight radiographs will be taken and assessed by a gynaecologist or radiologist. The maximum amount of oil-based contrast medium is set at 15ml.
    Arm Title
    Tubal flushing HyFoSy
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Tubal flushing during HyFoSy will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor, sonographer or nurse according to local protocols. HyFoSy will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HyFosy is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. During HyFoSy approximately 5-10cc of foam will be introduced through a little cervical balloon-less applicator into the uterine cavity. During infusion of the foam into the uterine cavity, a transvaginal ultrasound will be performed which shows whether the Fallopian tubes are patent. The assessment of the procedure will be done by the one who performed the procedure.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Oil-based contrast
    Intervention Description
    oil-based contrast fluid, Lipiodol Ultra Fluid. Lipiodol is a solution of iodinated ethyl esters of fatty acids of poppyseed oil. Equivalent to 480 mg iodine per ml. The maximum dosage is 15ml. Lipiodol is produced by Guerbet, France. Lipiodol is FDA approved and registered as contrast agent for HSG.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    ExEm Foam
    Intervention Description
    ExEm Foam which is created by mixing 5ml ExEm-gel and 5ml of purified water. ExEm-gel contains hydroxyethylcellulose and glycerol. The ExEm Foam is distributed by IQ Medical Ventures, the Netherlands. ExEm Foam is FDA approved, CE marked and registered as contrast agent for HyFoSy.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of pregnancies leading to live birth.
    Description
    Pregnancy is defined as a positive pregnancy test, increase in human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level or a pregnancy shown on ultrasonographic examination. Live birth is defined as the birth of live baby born beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Time to pregnancy leading to live birth
    Description
    Calculated from the day of randomization till the first day of the last menstrual bleeding before a positive pregnancy test.
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of clinical pregnancies
    Description
    Clinical pregnancy is defined as gestational sac with or without heartbeat visible on ultrasound.
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of miscarriages
    Description
    Miscarriage is defined as presence of non-vitality on ultrasound or spontaneous loss off pregnancy
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of multiple pregnancies
    Description
    Multiple pregnancy is defined as two or more vital intrauterine pregnancies at 12 weeks gestation.
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of ectopic pregnancies
    Description
    Ectopic pregnancy is defined as no intrauterine gestational sac with: an ectopic gestational sac OR HCG concentration >1500 international units per liter (IU/L) with free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound or serum HCG >2000IU/L without free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of adverse events
    Description
    e.g. infection, intravasation, thyroid dysfunction
    Time Frame
    within one months after tubal patency testing
    Title
    Procedural pain scores
    Description
    measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale from 0.0 to 10.0 centimeter immediately after tubal patency testing.
    Time Frame
    Within 15 minutes after tubal patency testing
    Title
    Number of fertility treatment cycles
    Description
    e.g. intra uterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmatic sperm injection
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Number of pregnancy complications
    Description
    e.g. pregnancy induced hypertension, fetal growth restriction, still birth.
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization
    Title
    Cost-effectiveness
    Description
    Comparing the costs (including costs for tubal patency testing and additional fertility treatments) and the effects (chance of live birth)
    Time Frame
    within six months after randomization

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    42 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count <3x106ml (pre-washed) Known contrast (iodine) allergy Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Danah Kamphuis, Msc
    Phone
    +312044444567
    Email
    FOil@amsterdamumc.nl
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Velja Mijatovic, Prof
    Phone
    +312044444567
    Email
    mijatovic@amsterdamumc.nl

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs