search
Back to results

Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU (PROPOSE)

Primary Purpose

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pressure Ulcers Stage III

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Swimmer Prone Position
Prone position with arms alongside the body
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Tours
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome focused on measuring ARDS, Pressure Sores, Pressure Ulcer, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Prone Position, Swimmer Position

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Intubated patient on invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the BERLIN classification with a P/F ratio < 150, requiring prone position. Express consent of the patient or representative or in the absence of this, emergency inclusion procedure Health insurance coverage Exclusion Criteria: Patient with 2 (or more) Prone position sessions Patient in whom one of the two positions could not be achieved: (Joint limitation; Neck size that would prevent head rotation; Orthopaedic spinal or segmental trauma; BMI greater than 45) Presence of stage 2 or higher pressure ulcers on the anterior parts of the body at screening Presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Patient already included in the study Pregnant or breastfeeding woman Patient under legal protection

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Swimmer Prone Position

    Prone position with arms alongside the body

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure ulcers
    Percentage of patients who acquired at least one stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer between day 1 (randomization) and day 28 according to the revised pressure injury staging system (Edsberg, J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs, 2016). Death and resolution of ARDS will be considered as events in competition with the occurrence of a Stage 3 or higher pressure ulcer.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Mortality at day 28
    Mortality rate at day 28
    Mortality at day 90
    Mortality rate at day 90
    Number of days without mechanical ventilation at D28
    Ventilator Free days at day 28
    Length of stay in intensive care unit (censored at Day 90)
    Length of stay in intensive care unit after randomization (censored at D90)
    Length of hospital stay (censored at D90)
    Length of hospital stay after randomization (censored at D90)
    Presence of ICU acquired weakness at discharge from ICU
    Rate of patients with ICU acquired weakness defined by MRC score less than 48 at ICU discharge
    Occurrence of scapulohumeral joint dislocation during prone period
    Number of patients with at least one radiologically proven scapulohumeral dislocation during a prone position period

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 30, 2023
    Last Updated
    September 19, 2023
    Sponsor
    University Hospital, Tours
    Collaborators
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ORLEANS
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05894291
    Brief Title
    Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU
    Acronym
    PROPOSE
    Official Title
    Evaluation Two Different Prone Position Techniques on the Occurrence of Pressure Sores in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Intensive Care Unit : a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University Hospital, Tours
    Collaborators
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ORLEANS

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse inflammation of the lungs that occurs in a variety of diseases. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by diffuse lung damage in patients with predisposing factors. Understanding the physiology of ARDS has led to improved ventilatory management, which must be protective to ensure adequate oxygenation and CO2 clearance. Prone position (PP) is a technique that can reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS. PP results in a more homogeneous distribution of pulmonary stress and strain, helping to protect the lung against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It also increases the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, improves the pulmonary ventilation-perfusion ratio, decreases PaCO2 and promotes ventilation of the dorsal lung regions. This technique should be offered to all patients with severe ARDS for 16 consecutive hours, to improve survival and weaning success from mechanical ventilation. However, PP has adverse effects. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of pressure sores, possibly linked to generalized acute inflammation associated with significant cytokine discharge and diffuse lesions of the vascular endothelium. PP also increased the risk of obstruction and displacement of the endotracheal tube. Final positioning in PP, (i.e., the position imposed on the patient for the duration of the PP session) varies from one ICU to another, and is rarely described in scientific articles. There are two main variants: prone , with arms alongside the body prone, swimmer's position The aim of our study is to show that the "swimmer" PP reduces the occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure sores, compared with the "arms alongside the body" PP (standard care) at Day 28 post inclusion.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Pressure Ulcers Stage III
    Keywords
    ARDS, Pressure Sores, Pressure Ulcer, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Prone Position, Swimmer Position

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    334 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Swimmer Prone Position
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Prone position with arms alongside the body
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Swimmer Prone Position
    Intervention Description
    Patients will be positioned with the head rotated. This rotation is followed by shoulder elevation/abduction, then 90° elbow flexion for the arm opposite to the head rotation. The hand is placed flat on the bed. A 60° to 90° flexion is performed on the hip homolateral to head rotation, combined with knee flexion. The position is changed to the mirror position every 4 hours.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Prone position with arms alongside the body
    Intervention Description
    The head will be positioned either straight or rotated to one side, depending on ICU habits. The arms are positioned symmetrically along the body, palms up. The lower limbs are positioned symmetrically and parallel, knees extended or slightly flexed if a cushion is used on the front of the feet. Head rotation, if applicable, is performed every 4 hours.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure ulcers
    Description
    Percentage of patients who acquired at least one stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer between day 1 (randomization) and day 28 according to the revised pressure injury staging system (Edsberg, J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs, 2016). Death and resolution of ARDS will be considered as events in competition with the occurrence of a Stage 3 or higher pressure ulcer.
    Time Frame
    Day 28 after randomization
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Mortality at day 28
    Description
    Mortality rate at day 28
    Time Frame
    Day 28 after randomization
    Title
    Mortality at day 90
    Description
    Mortality rate at day 90
    Time Frame
    Day 90 after randomization
    Title
    Number of days without mechanical ventilation at D28
    Description
    Ventilator Free days at day 28
    Time Frame
    Day 28 after randomization
    Title
    Length of stay in intensive care unit (censored at Day 90)
    Description
    Length of stay in intensive care unit after randomization (censored at D90)
    Time Frame
    Day 90 after randomization
    Title
    Length of hospital stay (censored at D90)
    Description
    Length of hospital stay after randomization (censored at D90)
    Time Frame
    Day 90 after randomization
    Title
    Presence of ICU acquired weakness at discharge from ICU
    Description
    Rate of patients with ICU acquired weakness defined by MRC score less than 48 at ICU discharge
    Time Frame
    Day 28 after randomization
    Title
    Occurrence of scapulohumeral joint dislocation during prone period
    Description
    Number of patients with at least one radiologically proven scapulohumeral dislocation during a prone position period
    Time Frame
    Day 28 after randomization

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Intubated patient on invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the BERLIN classification with a P/F ratio < 150, requiring prone position. Express consent of the patient or representative or in the absence of this, emergency inclusion procedure Health insurance coverage Exclusion Criteria: Patient with 2 (or more) Prone position sessions Patient in whom one of the two positions could not be achieved: (Joint limitation; Neck size that would prevent head rotation; Orthopaedic spinal or segmental trauma; BMI greater than 45) Presence of stage 2 or higher pressure ulcers on the anterior parts of the body at screening Presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Patient already included in the study Pregnant or breastfeeding woman Patient under legal protection
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Guillaume FOSSAT
    Phone
    0033238651318
    Ext
    0033
    Email
    guillaume.fossat@chr-orleans.fr
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Yosra DRIDI
    Phone
    0033247479792
    Ext
    0033
    Email
    y.abderrahmen@chu-tours.fr

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    22797452
    Citation
    ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23688302
    Citation
    Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33034686
    Citation
    Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, Calvino-Gunther S, Chaboyer W, Coyer F, Deschepper M, Francois G, Honore PM, Jankovic R, Khanna AK, Llaurado-Serra M, Lin F, Rose L, Rubulotta F, Saager L, Williams G, Blot SI; DecubICUs Study Team; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Trials Group Collaborators. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;47(2):160-169. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9. Epub 2020 Oct 9. Erratum In: Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):503-520.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24352484
    Citation
    Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L, Richard JC, Guerin C; Proseva trial group. The impact of patient positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial on prone positioning. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar;40(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3188-1. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20130832
    Citation
    Sud S, Friedrich JO, Taccone P, Polli F, Adhikari NK, Latini R, Pesenti A, Guerin C, Mancebo J, Curley MA, Fernandez R, Chan MC, Beuret P, Voggenreiter G, Sud M, Tognoni G, Gattinoni L. Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1748-1. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs