search
Back to results

Efficacy and Acceptability of the Luna EMG Rehabilitation Robot on Motor Recovery of the Upper Limb in the Chronic Phase of Stroke (LUNASTROKE)

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LUNA-EMG Robot
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Brest
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Stroke focused on measuring Robot, Joint

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age >= 18 years Hemiparesis after a first stroke with more than 1 year time interval Functional upper limb: ability to do a pointing task at 90% of the hand-acromion distance (free trunk). Spastic hypertonia of the elbow flexors 0-2/4 on the Modified Ashworth scale Patient affiliated with social security Patient having signed a consent to participate in the research Exclusion Criteria: Inability to sign written consent Flexed elbow > 30° during passive mobilization of the upper limb EVA>3 in the upper limb at rest or during mobilization Complete loss of upper limb proprioception Neuro-orthopedic surgery of the upper limb for spasticity: neurotomy, tenotomy, transfer Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

Sites / Locations

  • CHU BrestRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental Scheme : A,B,C

Experimental Scheme : A,C,B

Arm Description

The phase B treatment (1.5 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation and 30mn a day, 5/7 days of treatment with the robot) is scheduled before phase C (2 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation). The duration of phase B is randomized between 6 and 11 evaluations (2 to 3.5 weeks).

The phase C treatment (2 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation) is scheduled before phase B (1.5 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation and 30mn a day, 5/7 days of treatment with the robot). The duration of phase C is randomized between 6 and 11 evaluations (2 to 3.5 weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fluidity of the upper limb
Repeated evaluation of hand movement by the SPARC index during five pointing tasks at 90% of the length of the upper limb at clavicle height, at comfortable speed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain assessment
Use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to evaluate the painful (between 0: no pain to 10: intolerable pain)
Motricity assessment
Use of the Fugl-Meyer index (between 0: no motricity to 66: total member motricity)
Function assessment
ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) measurement to assess specific changes in limb function (from 0 to 57, a low score indicating that the movements cannot be performed, and a high score indicating normal performance)
Duration of movement
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week
Straightness of movement
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week : the trajectory of the hand during pointing movement at a distance normalised by the length of the upper limb will be assessed in motion capture (12 VICONR cameras). The smoothness of the trajectory will be measured by the SPARC (spectral arc length measure) during forward and backward movement.
Average speed of movement
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week : the trajectory of the hand during pointing movement at a distance normalised by the length of the upper limb will be assessed in motion capture (12 VICONR cameras). The spatiotemporal parameters (time, distance, average speed) will be measured between the starting position (in front of the trunc) and the final pointed object during forward and backward movement.
Acceptability of the use of the robot
Score between 0 to 100 (a low score indicate that the robot is not well accepted, and a high score indicate a well acceptability)
Satisfaction of the use of the robot
Score between 0 to 100 (0: not satisfied, 100: very satisfied)
Spasticity
Ashworth scale measured 3 times a week and Nottingham scale measured 1 time at inclusion)

Full Information

First Posted
March 9, 2022
Last Updated
July 7, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest
Collaborators
EGZOTech
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05902910
Brief Title
Efficacy and Acceptability of the Luna EMG Rehabilitation Robot on Motor Recovery of the Upper Limb in the Chronic Phase of Stroke
Acronym
LUNASTROKE
Official Title
Efficacy and Acceptability of the Luna EMG Rehabilitation Robot on Motor Recovery of the Upper Limb in the Chronic Phase of Stroke, Experimental Study in Single Cases.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 12, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest
Collaborators
EGZOTech

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Recent work on large cohorts of chronic stroke (>6 months post-stroke) have shown that intensive training of the upper limb in the chronic stroke patients can lead to substantial motor and functional gains that are maintained at 6 months post intervention. A very prolonged (12 weeks) and very intensive (5 hours daily) training applied to chronic patients after stroke brings a substantial gain both motor and functional which is maintained at 3 months post intervention. Robotic rehabilitation have been shown to be as effective as any other treatment used in rehabilitation. But the methods of implementation remain widely debated. At that time, most robotic therapies have tried to reproduce functional movement mainly pointing objects. We want to demonstrate that analytic movements of the elbow and the shoulder performed with the Luna-EMG robot can replace part of usual physiotherapy treatment with at least the same effectiveness on the recovery of fluid movements of the upper limb after a stroke.
Detailed Description
This is a pilot study following a single case experimental design with multiple baselines across subjects (MBD). People included in the protocol will benefit from 2 hours of daily treatment during 6 to 7.5 weeks. The first 2 weeks will be dedicated to baseline measurement of their upper limb (UL) status with daily treatment for balance and gait control without any treatment of the upper limb. The rest of the time will be dedicated to upper limb treatment exclusively. It will be divided into 2 UL training periods, one of them including a 30mn treatment with the luna EMG robot. The duration of second period will be randomly defined between 2 to 3.5 weeks and the last period will last 2 weeks. The treatment during the first UL treatment period will be randomly allocated to Luna EMG treatment or not. The next period will thus follow the inverse scheme (without if the first contains Luna EMG treatment). The fluidity will be assessed through pointing movements assessed every two days. Evaluation of motor deficiency (Fugl Meyer) and functional status (ARAT score) of the UL will be weekly assessed after the inclusion visit. 3D motion analysis of the UL will also be weekly performed. All patients will benefit from a regular follow-up and from an organized care protocol. The sessions will be intensive, all subjects will be able to benefit from the new treatment (LUNA EMG). We can expect a direct individual benefit from the proposed intensive treatment, at least for precision of UL movements.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
Robot, Joint

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
The multiple-baseline SCED design is a prospective design that allows the intensive study of a few individuals to measure their baseline and condition related to a therapeutic intervention. Each subject is his own control with repeated measurements of the primary endpoint. Randomization in the MBD formats of SCED studies relates to the duration of the phases. The experimental plan includes 3 rehabilitation phases: A (Baseline), B (1.5hours a day 5/7 of conventional rehabilitation and 30mn of training with the Luna robot 5/7) and C (2 hours a day 5/7 of conventional rehabilitation). The duration of phase A is fixed (2 weeks). As the effect of the treatment on the upper limb is unknown in its latency, the duration of the second phase of the study will be randomized (2 to 3.5 weeks). Finally, the duration of the third phase is fixed (2 weeks)
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Assessors will not know what phase the patient is in at the time of assessment or what experimental design the patient was randomized to.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental Scheme : A,B,C
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The phase B treatment (1.5 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation and 30mn a day, 5/7 days of treatment with the robot) is scheduled before phase C (2 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation). The duration of phase B is randomized between 6 and 11 evaluations (2 to 3.5 weeks).
Arm Title
Experimental Scheme : A,C,B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The phase C treatment (2 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation) is scheduled before phase B (1.5 hours a day, 5/7 days of conventional rehabilitation and 30mn a day, 5/7 days of treatment with the robot). The duration of phase C is randomized between 6 and 11 evaluations (2 to 3.5 weeks).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LUNA-EMG Robot
Intervention Description
During phase B, patients will benefit from functional rehabilitation of their upper limbs and from 30mn of training assisted by the LUMA-EMG robot.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fluidity of the upper limb
Description
Repeated evaluation of hand movement by the SPARC index during five pointing tasks at 90% of the length of the upper limb at clavicle height, at comfortable speed.
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain assessment
Description
Use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to evaluate the painful (between 0: no pain to 10: intolerable pain)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Motricity assessment
Description
Use of the Fugl-Meyer index (between 0: no motricity to 66: total member motricity)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Function assessment
Description
ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) measurement to assess specific changes in limb function (from 0 to 57, a low score indicating that the movements cannot be performed, and a high score indicating normal performance)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Duration of movement
Description
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Straightness of movement
Description
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week : the trajectory of the hand during pointing movement at a distance normalised by the length of the upper limb will be assessed in motion capture (12 VICONR cameras). The smoothness of the trajectory will be measured by the SPARC (spectral arc length measure) during forward and backward movement.
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Average speed of movement
Description
Kinematic parameter measured 3 times per week : the trajectory of the hand during pointing movement at a distance normalised by the length of the upper limb will be assessed in motion capture (12 VICONR cameras). The spatiotemporal parameters (time, distance, average speed) will be measured between the starting position (in front of the trunc) and the final pointed object during forward and backward movement.
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Acceptability of the use of the robot
Description
Score between 0 to 100 (a low score indicate that the robot is not well accepted, and a high score indicate a well acceptability)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Satisfaction of the use of the robot
Description
Score between 0 to 100 (0: not satisfied, 100: very satisfied)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks
Title
Spasticity
Description
Ashworth scale measured 3 times a week and Nottingham scale measured 1 time at inclusion)
Time Frame
up to 7.5weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age >= 18 years Hemiparesis after a first stroke with more than 1 year time interval Functional upper limb: ability to do a pointing task at 90% of the hand-acromion distance (free trunk). Spastic hypertonia of the elbow flexors 0-2/4 on the Modified Ashworth scale Patient affiliated with social security Patient having signed a consent to participate in the research Exclusion Criteria: Inability to sign written consent Flexed elbow > 30° during passive mobilization of the upper limb EVA>3 in the upper limb at rest or during mobilization Complete loss of upper limb proprioception Neuro-orthopedic surgery of the upper limb for spasticity: neurotomy, tenotomy, transfer Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Olivier Remy-Neris, PU-PH
Phone
+33 2 98 22 31 52
Email
olivier.remyneris@chu-brest.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gwenaël Cornec, MD
Email
gwenael.cornec@chu-brest.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Remy-Neris, PU-PH
Organizational Affiliation
CHRU Brest
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Brest
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29200
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Remy-Neris, PU-PH
Phone
+332 98 22 31 52
Email
olivier.remyneris@chu-brest.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Remy-Neris, PU-PH

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All collected data that underlie results in a publication
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available beginning five years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Acceptability of the Luna EMG Rehabilitation Robot on Motor Recovery of the Upper Limb in the Chronic Phase of Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs