search
Back to results

Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation as a Potential Intervention for Cognitive Decline

Primary Purpose

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sham TBS
Closed-loop TBS
Open-loop TBS
Sponsored by
University of Texas at Austin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mild Cognitive Impairment focused on measuring MCI, Older adults, Cognitive control, Memory impairment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Cognitively normal younger adults Ages between 18 to 35 years Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Cognitively normal older adults Ages between 60 to 90 years Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a brief formal cognitive screening test, which is used to indicate absence of cognitive impairment Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Ages between 60 to 90 years Diagnosis of MCI according to the National Institute on Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Exclusion Criteria: Neurological or psychiatric diseases (e.g., personal history of epilepsy/seizure brain damage, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, etc.). Current use of psychotropic medications with cognitive side effects (e.g., benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, etc.) Current use of cognitive enhancing medications (e.g., Adderall, Memantine, etc.) Factors hindering EEG acquisition and TMS delivery (e.g., skin infection, wounds, dermatitis, etc.) Factors hindering MRI acquisition (e.g., implants, metallic tattoos, etc.)

Sites / Locations

  • Health Discovery BuildingRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Sham TBS

Closed-Loop TBS

Open-Loop TBS

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Behavioral performance of the video game task
The behavioral performance, pressing or not pressing a button, reflects the level of cognitive control performance of the subjects. It measures whether the participants made a correct decision, and their response time, in a given trial.
Accuracy of the BCI classifier output
The BCI classifier output reflects the presence or absence of the cognitive EEG patterns elicited during the cognitive videogame tasks. For each participant, the BCI outputs will be compared to their behavioral responses (pressing or not pressing a button).
Cognitive assessment I: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Telephone version, Score range: 0 - 22* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment II: Hopkins Adult Reading Test
Score range: 70 - 131* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment III: Multilingual Naming Test
Score range: 0 - 32* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment IV: Animal Naming
Score range: 0 - 40* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment V: Number Span
Forward, Score range: 0 - 14* (Units on a Scale) Backward, Score range: 0 - 14* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment VI: Trail Making Test
Parts A and B, Score range: 10 - 300** (Units on a Scale) (** high scores = worse)
Cognitive assessment VII: Southwestern Assessment of Processing Speed
Score range: 0 - 75* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment VIII: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
Immediate Total, Score range: 0 - 36* (Units on a Scale) Delayed Recall, Score range:0 - 12* (Units on a Scale) Percent Retention, Score range:0 - 100* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment IX: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised
Immediate Total, Score range: 0 - 36* (Units on a Scale) Delayed Recall, Score range:0 - 12* (Units on a Scale) Percent Retention, Score range:0 - 100* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment X: Controlled Oral Word Association Test
Score range: 0 - 80* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Cognitive assessment XI: Stroop Color and Word Test
Word, Score range: 0 - 140* (Units on a Scale) Color, Score range:0 - 120* (Units on a Scale) Color-Word, Score range:0 - 80* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 7, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05907343
Brief Title
Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation as a Potential Intervention for Cognitive Decline
Official Title
Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation as a Potential Intervention for Cognitive Decline
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 31, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to investigate the effectiveness of non-invasive stimulation to enhance cognitive control abilities in cognitively healthy adults and older adults diagnosed with mild cognitive disorder (MCI). The main questions it aims to answer are: whether it is possible to restore various cognitive functions in older adults diagnosed with MCI by delivering theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation, and whether closed-loop TBS is able to induce therapeutic benefits that outperform open-loop TBS. Participants play a cognitive video game while a brain-computer interface (BCI) analyzes their electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and decodes the presence or absence of the contingent negative variation (CNV) potential, a marker of cognitive control. The BCI triggers TBS when its outputs indicate that the participant is not engaged properly in the video game. Researchers will compare the effects of sham, closed-loop, and open-loop TBS using the outcome metrics described below to see how much cognitive restorations is achievable with each stimulation modality.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Keywords
MCI, Older adults, Cognitive control, Memory impairment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sham TBS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Closed-Loop TBS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Open-Loop TBS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham TBS
Intervention Description
A BCI records and analyzes the participant's EEG as they perform cognitively demanding video game tasks. The BCI delivers TBS with a sham coil when its output indicates that the participant is not properly engaged in the video game.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Closed-loop TBS
Intervention Description
A BCI records and analyzes the participant's EEG as they perform cognitively demanding video game tasks. The BCI delivers TBS with a real coil when its output indicates that the participant is not properly engaged in the video game.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Open-loop TBS
Intervention Description
A BCI records and analyzes the participant's EEG as they perform cognitively demanding video game tasks. TBS with the real coil is delivered irrelevant of the BCI decoder output.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Behavioral performance of the video game task
Description
The behavioral performance, pressing or not pressing a button, reflects the level of cognitive control performance of the subjects. It measures whether the participants made a correct decision, and their response time, in a given trial.
Time Frame
Up to 1 hour after intervention
Title
Accuracy of the BCI classifier output
Description
The BCI classifier output reflects the presence or absence of the cognitive EEG patterns elicited during the cognitive videogame tasks. For each participant, the BCI outputs will be compared to their behavioral responses (pressing or not pressing a button).
Time Frame
Up to 1 hour after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment I: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Description
Telephone version, Score range: 0 - 22* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment II: Hopkins Adult Reading Test
Description
Score range: 70 - 131* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment III: Multilingual Naming Test
Description
Score range: 0 - 32* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment IV: Animal Naming
Description
Score range: 0 - 40* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment V: Number Span
Description
Forward, Score range: 0 - 14* (Units on a Scale) Backward, Score range: 0 - 14* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment VI: Trail Making Test
Description
Parts A and B, Score range: 10 - 300** (Units on a Scale) (** high scores = worse)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment VII: Southwestern Assessment of Processing Speed
Description
Score range: 0 - 75* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment VIII: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
Description
Immediate Total, Score range: 0 - 36* (Units on a Scale) Delayed Recall, Score range:0 - 12* (Units on a Scale) Percent Retention, Score range:0 - 100* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment IX: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised
Description
Immediate Total, Score range: 0 - 36* (Units on a Scale) Delayed Recall, Score range:0 - 12* (Units on a Scale) Percent Retention, Score range:0 - 100* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment X: Controlled Oral Word Association Test
Description
Score range: 0 - 80* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention
Title
Cognitive assessment XI: Stroop Color and Word Test
Description
Word, Score range: 0 - 140* (Units on a Scale) Color, Score range:0 - 120* (Units on a Scale) Color-Word, Score range:0 - 80* (Units on a Scale) (* high scores = better)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks after intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cognitively normal younger adults Ages between 18 to 35 years Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Cognitively normal older adults Ages between 60 to 90 years Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a brief formal cognitive screening test, which is used to indicate absence of cognitive impairment Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Ages between 60 to 90 years Diagnosis of MCI according to the National Institute on Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria Good general health Normal or corrected vision Completed elementary school education or able to understand middle school level experiment instructions Exclusion Criteria: Neurological or psychiatric diseases (e.g., personal history of epilepsy/seizure brain damage, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, etc.). Current use of psychotropic medications with cognitive side effects (e.g., benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, etc.) Current use of cognitive enhancing medications (e.g., Adderall, Memantine, etc.) Factors hindering EEG acquisition and TMS delivery (e.g., skin infection, wounds, dermatitis, etc.) Factors hindering MRI acquisition (e.g., implants, metallic tattoos, etc.)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
José del R. Millán, PhD
Phone
512-232-8111
Email
jose.millan@austin.utexas.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Minsu Zhang
Phone
512-840-9310
Email
minsuzhang@utexas.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
José del R. Millán, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Texas at Austin
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robin Hilsabeck, PhD, ABPP
Organizational Affiliation
University of Texas at Austin
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Health Discovery Building
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78712
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick Escamilla
Phone
512-495-5246
Email
pescamilla@austin.utexas.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All anonymized data will be made available by the online publication date. These data will be placed in public servers for any interested researcher to access it.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become permanently available by the online publication date.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Any interested researcher will have access.

Learn more about this trial

Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation as a Potential Intervention for Cognitive Decline

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs