Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - recruitment rate
The average number of participants recruited per month.
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - the proportion of smokers who indicate an interest in participating in the study from each source of recruitment
Sources of recruitment include: the diabetes education unit and the diabetes and endocrine centre [(MOP2) and self-referral (from posters and flyers present at the diabetes out-patients department).
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - consent rate
The proportion of participants who consent to participate to the study out of the number of individuals who initially indicated an interest in participating and meet the eligibility criteria, including reasons for not consenting.
Feasibility (recruitment parameters) - the total time period of recruitment
Total time period (in months).
Feasibility (participation compliance) - participation rate in both groups
The proportion of participants who attend the scheduled sessions per group, with reasons for dropping out.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion of participants from the intervention group who opt not to see the informational video clips
The proportion of participants from the intervention group who opt not to see the informational video clips at their first session, with reasons.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion of participants from the intervention group who opt not to set a Target Quit Date (TQD)
The proportion of participants from the intervention group who opt not to set a TQD at their first session, with reasons.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - the proportion of continuing smokers from the intervention group who opt not to set a subsequent TQD
The proportion of continuing smokers from the intervention group who opt not to set a subsequent TQD at their second session, with reasons.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - reported use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) on the TQD in the intervention group
The proportion of participants who report having used the nicotine patch and/or spray on their TQD (and on the subsequent TQD for continuing smokers), with reasons for not using it.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average percentage of days of NRT use during the first week following the TQD in the intervention group
The average percentage of days the nicotine patch and/or spray were used during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent set TQD among continuing smokers).
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average use of the nicotine spray per day during the first week following the TQD in the intervention group
The average number of times the nicotine spray was used per day during the first week following the TQD (and the subsequent TQD for continuing smokers).
Feasibility (participation compliance) - reported use of NRT during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
The proportion of participants who report having used the nicotine patch and/or spray during their final follow-up period, with reasons for not using it.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average percentage of days of NRT use during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
The average percentage of days the nicotine patch and/or spray were used during the subsequent four weeks following one week from the TQD.
Feasibility (participation compliance) - average use of the nicotine spray per day during the final follow-up period in the intervention group
The average number of times the nicotine spray was used per day during the subsequent four weeks following one week from the TQD.
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average number of sessions provided in both groups
The average number of sessions provided per participant per group.
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average time period taken to provide smoking cessation support in both groups
The average time period (in weeks) per participant per group during which smoking cessation support was provided.
Feasibility (resources utilized) - average time taken to deliver the sessions in the intervention group
The average time (in minutes) taken to deliver the intervention sessions.
Feasibility (resources utilized) - provision of the 5R's intervention in the intervention group
The proportion of participants from the intervention group who were provided with the 5R's intervention.
Feasibility (resources utilized) - provision of NRT in the intervention group
The average amount of NRT provided per participant (taking note of any returned items).
Feasibility - response rate at 12 weeks follow-up
The proportion of participants who attend their 12-week post-intervention evaluation session (in the intervention and control groups). Participants who drop out from the study or are lost to follow-up at 12 weeks will be noted (with reasons).
Feasibility - number of problems (including reported adverse events when using NRT) identified by the nurses (intervention providers) and number of referrals to additional support services (e.g. psychotherapist, diabetologist).
As logged by the nurses in carrying out the intervention. Participants who refuse additional support will be noted (with reasons).
Feasibility - nurses' (intervention providers) perceived challenges and facilitators to implementation (intervention group)
As identified when conducting interviews with the nurses.
Acceptability - intervention group participants' satisfaction with the intervention provided (quantitative assessment)
By analyzing the results from the self-developed satisfaction questionnaire.
Acceptability - intervention group participants' satisfaction with the intervention provided (qualitative assessment)
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
Acceptability - intervention group participants' perceived usefulness of the intervention provided (quantitative assessment)
By analyzing the results from the self-developed perceived usefulness questionnaire.
Acceptability - intervention group participants' perceived usefulness of the intervention provided (qualitative assessment)
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
Acceptability - nurses' (intervention providers) satisfaction with the intervention
As identified when conducting interviews with the nurses.
Group comparison of the satisfaction with the intervention provided
Group comparison of the participants' satisfaction with the smoking cessation support provided as measured by the self-developed satisfaction questionnaire.
Group comparison of the perceived usefulness of the intervention provided
Group comparison of the results obtained from the self-developed questionnaire on the perceived usefulness of the smoking cessation intervention provided.
Preliminary process evaluation - intervention fidelity (intervention group)
A random sample (20%) from all the audio recordings of the sessions provided by each provider will be selected. By using a checklist that outlines the study algorithm's components, the occurrence or non-occurrence of these steps will be scored for calculating the level of adherence. Any deviations from the study protocol will also be taken note of.
Preliminary process evaluation - exploring the intervention's functioning (intervention group)
As identified when conducting interviews with the participants.
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - quit episode
Proportion of participants reporting a quit episode (intentionally have spent ≥24 hours not smoking or using smokeless/alternative products, e.g. electronic cigarettes) during the study period.
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - floating abstinence
A reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (from combustible tobacco products, smokeless tobacco products, and alternative products) at any time during the study period.
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - change in average number of cigarettes smoked per day
The change in the average number of cigarettes smoked per day (amongst continuing smokers) per group at follow-up.
Preliminary evidence of effectiveness - point prevalence smoking abstinence at follow-up
The 7-day point prevalence abstinence (from combustible tobacco products, smokeless tobacco products, and alternative products) at follow-up, validated by measuring exhaled Carbon Monoxide (eCO) and by using a multilevel lateral flow immunoassays urine test strip with a nominal 200 ng/mL cutoff for cotinine levels.