search
Back to results

tSCS + EksoGT in SCI Patients

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RGT+ tSCS + conventional physiotherap
RGT+ conventional physiotherapy
Sponsored by
National University Hospital, Singapore
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injury

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Between 6 months to 2 years from the diagnosis of the traumatic SCI and who are not walking independently; Age between 21 to 65 years old; Incomplete spinal cord injury: ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade: B-D; Spinal cord injury level: T1- L1; SCI-TCT Score > 13; Capable of providing an informed consent; Cleared by Neurosurgeons/ Orthopeadic Surgeons for tSCS; Meets prerequisites for Ekso wearable robotic exoskeleton training. Exclusion Criteria: Participant has uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease or cardiac symptoms as determined by the investigator; Participant has any unstable or significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound performance and outcomes like uncontrolled neuropathic pain, depression, severe cognitive impairment; Unstable or uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia; Requires ventilator support; Spasms that limit the ability of the subjects to participate in the study training as determined by the investigator; Skin conditions that limit the application of tSCS electrodes; Active implanted medical devices that may be affected by tSCS; Pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding; Concurrent participation in another drug or device trial that may interfere with this study; Participated in wearable exoskeleton training within the last 3 months prior to enrolment. Peripheral nerve injury or significant Lumbar Radiculopathy

Sites / Locations

  • Alexandra Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

RGT+ conventional physiotherapy

RGT+ tSCS + conventional physiotherapy

Arm Description

16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks

Phase 2: 16 sessions of RGT training + transcutaneous electrical stimulation (tSCS) + functional training in 8-10 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)

Secondary Outcome Measures

EQ5D
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
EQ5D
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
EQ5D
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
Modified Tardieu Scale
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
Modified Tardieu Scale
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
Modified Tardieu Scale
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.

Full Information

First Posted
June 19, 2023
Last Updated
September 5, 2023
Sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Collaborators
Alexandra Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05921175
Brief Title
tSCS + EksoGT in SCI Patients
Official Title
A Pilot Study on the Cumulative Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) With Robotic Gait Training in Trunk Muscle Activity and Walking Index in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Collaborators
Alexandra Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is aimed to evaluate whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) can augment robotic gait training (RGT) to improve functional mobility in participants with chronic paraplegia. It also evaluate the impact of the tSCS+RGT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to RGT alone. This is a prospective single-arm crossover study in participants with incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord paraplegia. 6 subjects will be recruited. The intervention includes Phase 1 of training which consists of 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks, and Phase 2 of training which consists of 16 sessions of RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Outcome measures including mobility function assessment and neuromuscular assessment will be collected at Baseline, Post-Phase 1 and Post-Phase 2. A satisfaction survey on the intervention "RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy" will be performed at week-18 assessment.
Detailed Description
This study is aimed to evaluate whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) can augment robotic gait training (RGT) to improve functional mobility in participants with chronic paraplegia. It also evaluate the impact of the tSCS+RGT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to RGT alone. This is a prospective single-arm crossover study in participants with incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord paraplegia. 6 subjects will be recruited. Once subject is identified to be eligible for the study and is agreeable to participate into the study, he/she will undergo Phase 1 of training which consists of 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. After a 1-week washout period, subject will undergo Phase 2 of training which consists of 16 sessions of RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment. During tSCS, cathodes will be placed on the T11 and L1 spinous process. Reference/Ground electrodes placed over the ASIS It will be on biphasic mode with an overlap frequency of 10kHz, Burst Frequency of 30Hz, Pulse width of 1ms. Stimulation intensity ranges from 5-100 mA and will be adjusted according to the patient's response. The tSCS stimulation duration for each session will be 45 minutes in conjunction with the RGT training. Outcome measures including mobility function assessment and neuromuscular assessment will be collected at Baseline (within 1 week before the starting of Phase 1 of training), Post-Phase 1 (within 1 week after Phase 1 of training) and Post-Phase 2 (within 1 week after Phase 2 of training). A satisfaction survey on the intervention "RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy" will be performed at week-18 assessment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injury

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
This is a prospective single-arm crossover study in participants with incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord paraplegia.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
6 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RGT+ conventional physiotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks
Arm Title
RGT+ tSCS + conventional physiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Phase 2: 16 sessions of RGT training + transcutaneous electrical stimulation (tSCS) + functional training in 8-10 weeks.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RGT+ tSCS + conventional physiotherap
Intervention Description
Subject will undergo 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + tSCS+ conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment. During tSCS, cathodes will be placed on the T11 and L1 spinous process. Reference/Ground electrodes placed over the ASIS It will be on biphasic mode with an overlap frequency of 10kHz, Burst Frequency of 30Hz, Pulse width of 1ms. Stimulation intensity ranges from 5-100 mA and will be adjusted according to the patient's response. The tSCS stimulation duration for each session will be 45 minutes in conjunction with the RGT training.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RGT+ conventional physiotherapy
Intervention Description
Subject will undergo 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
Description
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
Description
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)
Description
It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
Description
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
Description
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)
Description
It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Description
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Description
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Description
It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Description
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Description
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
Central motor conduction time (CMCT)
Description
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
Description
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
Description
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
Description
The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)
Time Frame
Week 17
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EQ5D
Description
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
EQ5D
Description
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
EQ5D
Description
EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
Modified Tardieu Scale
Description
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Modified Tardieu Scale
Description
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
Modified Tardieu Scale
Description
Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change
Time Frame
Week 17
Title
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
Description
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
Description
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)
Description
EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.
Time Frame
Week 17

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Between 6 months to 2 years from the diagnosis of the traumatic SCI and who are not walking independently; Age between 21 to 65 years old; Incomplete spinal cord injury: ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade: B-D; Spinal cord injury level: T1- L1; SCI-TCT Score > 13; Capable of providing an informed consent; Cleared by Neurosurgeons/ Orthopeadic Surgeons for tSCS; Meets prerequisites for Ekso wearable robotic exoskeleton training. Exclusion Criteria: Participant has uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease or cardiac symptoms as determined by the investigator; Participant has any unstable or significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound performance and outcomes like uncontrolled neuropathic pain, depression, severe cognitive impairment; Unstable or uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia; Requires ventilator support; Spasms that limit the ability of the subjects to participate in the study training as determined by the investigator; Skin conditions that limit the application of tSCS electrodes; Active implanted medical devices that may be affected by tSCS; Pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding; Concurrent participation in another drug or device trial that may interfere with this study; Participated in wearable exoskeleton training within the last 3 months prior to enrolment. Peripheral nerve injury or significant Lumbar Radiculopathy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gobinathan Chandran, MBBS
Phone
(65) 94575924
Email
Gobinathan_CHANDRAN@nuhs.edu.sg
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ning Tang, PhD
Email
ning_tang@nuhs.edu.sg
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gobinathan Chandran, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
National University Hospital, Singapore
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Alexandra Hospital
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gobinathan Chandran
Phone
94575924
Email
Gobinathan_CHANDRAN@nuhs.edu.sg

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

tSCS + EksoGT in SCI Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs