search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Performance of MAgnetic Gastrointestinal Universal Septotome for Treatment of Candy Cane Syndrome (MAGUS-CCS)

Primary Purpose

Blind Loop Syndrome Postoperative, Candy Cane Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MAGUS placement
Sponsored by
Erasme University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Blind Loop Syndrome Postoperative focused on measuring candy cane syndrome, therapeutic endoscopy, steptotomy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient is diagnosed with candy cane syndrome based on clinical and endoscopic and/or radiologic assessment Patient has at least one of this 3 symptoms associated to CCS: pain, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation Patient agrees and is able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: Refractory stenosis of the UGI proximal to the septum Septum height smaller than 2 cm or higher than 8 cm Coagulation disorders. • Previous implantation of a magnetic-sensitive medical device (including active electronic implant, metallic stent, …). Dysphagia related to motility disorder Planned MRI in the following month (30 days) of intervention Condition that could compromise patient safety Patient who went through an abdominal surgery less than 8 weeks before implantation of the magnets Patient pregnant, breastfeeding or incapacitated Patient currently enrolled in another clinical trial

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles - Hôpital ErasmeRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Interventional

Arm Description

The procedure consists in Medical Device (MAGUS) placement by endoscopy under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic control.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety related to the number of adverse event
All adverse events device or procedure related will be captured
Performance on symptoms evolution
Evolution of pain will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)
Performance on symptoms evolution
Evolution of nausea will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)
Performance on symptoms evolution
Evolution of regurgitations/vomiting will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Safety : adverse event at mid and long term
All adverse events will be reported
Safety : unplanned interventions
Number of unplanned interventions
Efficacy : patient's satisfaction with the therapy
Scored by a visual analogue scale from 0 (= not satisfied at all) to 5 (=very satisfied)
Efficacy : change in quality of life
Short-Form-12 score. A higher score indicates a better quality of life
Efficacy : dysphagia evolution
Eckart score from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.
Efficacy : dysphagia evolution
Dysphagia score from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.
Efficacy : weight evolution
Weight measurment in kg

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2023
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
Collaborators
Brussel Medical Device Center (BMDC)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05938439
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Performance of MAgnetic Gastrointestinal Universal Septotome for Treatment of Candy Cane Syndrome
Acronym
MAGUS-CCS
Official Title
Evaluation of the Performance of MAgnetic Gastrointestinal Universal Septotome for Treatment of Candy Cane Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
Collaborators
Brussel Medical Device Center (BMDC)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Candy cane syndrome (CCS) is an adverse event (AE) from gastrectomy or gastric bypass and end-to-side anastomosis to a jejunal loop. It seems to be predominantly mechanical, the afferent blind loop enlarge and becomes preferential passage of food. This food accumulated in the blind loop increase luminal pressure, causing dilatation, early satiety, fullness, pain, reflux, regurgitation, postprandial vomiting, weight loss, and, ultimately, inability to eat, leading to cachexia.Up to now, main treatment is laparoscopic revision which is invasive. Adverse events related this surgical procedure occurred in 13,3% of cases and substantial improvement only in 73.9%. A first clinical study with MAGUS including oesophageal diverticulum (n=2) and CCS (n=14) has been performed to assess safety and feasibility of this new device. MAGUS is an implantable device which is placed endoscopically and which, by using pressure necrosis, entailed the marsupialization of the blind loop in less than 30 days. Substantial improvement was observed in all patient and only 7,1% of patients experience an adverse event possibly related to the device. This study aim therefore to assess the safety and performance of the endoscopic treatment of CCS using a new medical device: MAGUS. This will be a single-center, open-label prospective, safety and performance study on 51 patients with Candy Cane Syndrome (CCS). Patients will be followed for 12 months after the procedure, with an enrolment period of 3 years. After the screening, the following data will be collected and examinations and tests performed : physical Exam, medical history including CCS cause and treatment(s) history, weight, Eckart and dysphagia score, Quality of Life questionnaire (SF 12 and GERD HRQL), Main symptom selection (Nausea, Vomiting/regurgitation or pain), nausea VAS, vomiting, regurgitation VAS, pain VAS, barium swallow X-ray or endoscopic assessment of Candy Cane. Follow-up visits will be performed at 14 days, 28 days, 3 months and 12 months post-procedure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Blind Loop Syndrome Postoperative, Candy Cane Syndrome
Keywords
candy cane syndrome, therapeutic endoscopy, steptotomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
51 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Interventional
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The procedure consists in Medical Device (MAGUS) placement by endoscopy under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic control.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MAGUS placement
Intervention Description
An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation. The delivery system will be placed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy. The main steps are the following: Placement through the endoscope of a soft guidewire through the upper GI tract; Insertion of the MAGUS system on the guidewire; Advancement of the MAGUS system until proximal magnet reach the top of the septum; Release and placement of the proximal magnet at the bottom of the septum, pouch side; Meeting of the distal and proximal magnet on both sides of the septum, by pulling on the delivery system; Release of the distal magnet and activate the retractable wire; Insure that wire is not blocked and unblocked it if applicable. Endoscopy and contrast injection will be performed before and after placement to ensure the correct positioning of the magnets.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety related to the number of adverse event
Description
All adverse events device or procedure related will be captured
Time Frame
During procedure (operative day) ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up
Title
Performance on symptoms evolution
Description
Evolution of pain will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)
Time Frame
At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up
Title
Performance on symptoms evolution
Description
Evolution of nausea will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)
Time Frame
At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up
Title
Performance on symptoms evolution
Description
Evolution of regurgitations/vomiting will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)
Time Frame
At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety : adverse event at mid and long term
Description
All adverse events will be reported
Time Frame
After 3 months of implantation
Title
Safety : unplanned interventions
Description
Number of unplanned interventions
Time Frame
Within the year following device placement
Title
Efficacy : patient's satisfaction with the therapy
Description
Scored by a visual analogue scale from 0 (= not satisfied at all) to 5 (=very satisfied)
Time Frame
At 3 and 12 months of follow-up
Title
Efficacy : change in quality of life
Description
Short-Form-12 score. A higher score indicates a better quality of life
Time Frame
At 28 days, 3 months and 12 months of follow-up
Title
Efficacy : dysphagia evolution
Description
Eckart score from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.
Time Frame
At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up
Title
Efficacy : dysphagia evolution
Description
Dysphagia score from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.
Time Frame
At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up
Title
Efficacy : weight evolution
Description
Weight measurment in kg
Time Frame
At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient is diagnosed with candy cane syndrome based on clinical and endoscopic and/or radiologic assessment Patient has at least one of this 3 symptoms associated to CCS: pain, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation Patient agrees and is able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: Refractory stenosis of the UGI proximal to the septum Septum height smaller than 2 cm or higher than 8 cm Coagulation disorders. • Previous implantation of a magnetic-sensitive medical device (including active electronic implant, metallic stent, …). Dysphagia related to motility disorder Planned MRI in the following month (30 days) of intervention Condition that could compromise patient safety Patient who went through an abdominal surgery less than 8 weeks before implantation of the magnets Patient pregnant, breastfeeding or incapacitated Patient currently enrolled in another clinical trial
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Pauline Van Ouytsel
Phone
025556531
Email
pauline.vanouytsel@hubruxelles.be
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pauline Van Ouytsel, MSc.
Phone
025556531
Email
pauline.vanouytsel@hubruxelles.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Secretariat Gastroenterologie Medicale
Phone
025553712
Email
SecMed.GastroMed@erasme.ulb.ac.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacques Devière

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34979115
Citation
Rio-Tinto R, Huberland F, Van Ouytsel P, Delattre C, Dugardeyn S, Cauche N, Delchambre A, Deviere J, Blero D. Magnet and wire remodeling for the treatment of candy cane syndrome: first case series of a new approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.027. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Performance of MAgnetic Gastrointestinal Universal Septotome for Treatment of Candy Cane Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs