Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep
Primary Purpose
Dental Malocclusion
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Lebanon
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
v-prep combined with RMGIC for bracket bonding
Conventional bracket bonding technique
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Malocclusion focused on measuring resin-modified glass ionomer, surface preparation, orthodontic bracket
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: require full orthodontic treatment of both arches mild or average overbite and crowding no restorations on the buccal surface of the premolars Exclusion Criteria: Patients with required extractions in the treatment plan or with poor oral hygiene
Sites / Locations
- Saint Joseph University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Conventional bracket bonding technique
V-prep combined with RMGIC for bracket bonding
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Bracket bonding survival rate
reports of bracket debonding using one of the two bonding techniques
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05939102
Brief Title
Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep
Official Title
Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep: A Split-mouth RCT
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 10, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 20, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 20, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Saint-Joseph University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate over eighteen months the clinical bonding failure and survival rates of the conventional bonding technique using the Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) and the RMGIC Fuji Ortho LC (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) prepared with the V-prep. Therefore, one operator using the straight-wire technique bonded two hundred metallic brackets to upper and lower premolars of twenty-five patients requiring an orthodontic treatment. The randomized trial was a single-blind design in a split-mouth comparison. Each patient was randomly allocated one of the two bonding systems for each premolar on each side of the mouth. The bonding and rebonding techniques were standardized throughout the trial and bond failure was recorded each month for a period of eighteen months.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Malocclusion
Keywords
resin-modified glass ionomer, surface preparation, orthodontic bracket
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
25 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional bracket bonding technique
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
V-prep combined with RMGIC for bracket bonding
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
v-prep combined with RMGIC for bracket bonding
Intervention Description
prepare the tooth surface with the V-prep, then bond a bracket with the RMGIC
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional bracket bonding technique
Intervention Description
prepare the tooth with acid-etch, then bond a bracket using resin composite
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bracket bonding survival rate
Description
reports of bracket debonding using one of the two bonding techniques
Time Frame
18 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
require full orthodontic treatment of both arches
mild or average overbite and crowding
no restorations on the buccal surface of the premolars
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with required extractions in the treatment plan or with poor oral hygiene
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Victor Ghoubril, Ms
Organizational Affiliation
Saint-Joseph University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Saint Joseph University
City
Beirut
ZIP/Postal Code
17-5208
Country
Lebanon
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36547526
Citation
Ghoubril V, Changotade S, Lutomski D, Ghoubril J, Chakar C, Abboud M, Hardan L, Kharouf N, Khoury E. Cytotoxicity of V-Prep Versus Phosphoric Acid Etchant on Oral Gingival Fibroblasts. J Funct Biomater. 2022 Nov 28;13(4):266. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040266.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31495756
Citation
Ghoubril V, Ghoubril J, Khoury E. A comparison between RMGIC and composite with acid-etch preparation or hypochlorite on the adhesion of a premolar metal bracket by testing SBS and ARI: In vitro study. Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs