search
Back to results

The Effect of Prophylactic TPO Combined With BMS-IMRT to Esophageal Cancer Patients

Primary Purpose

Esophageal Cancer, Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy, Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rhTPO
Sponsored by
JIANYANG WANG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Esophageal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age greater than 18 years and less than or equal to 75 years Histopathologically confirmed esophageal squamous/adenocarcinoma, clinical stage I-IV A (according to the 7th edition of AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (≥45Gy) was planned (regardless of whether the patient had received induction adjuvant chemotherapy). Karnofsky performance status score ≥80 ·; Life expectancy >6 months; Meet the following laboratory diagnostic criteria: Hemoglobin ≥120g/L, white blood cell ≥4.0×109/L, Neutrophil ≥2.0×109/L, platelet ≥100×109/L; Participators had not used granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and thrombopoietin within 3 weeks before enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: A history of malignancy at other sites, excluding curable non-melanotic skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ; Previous radiotherapy to the chest; Patients with existing or suspected (thoracolumbar and pelvic) bone marrow or bone metastases, or a history of bone trauma in this region within 4 weeks; Allergy to Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Patients with active infection, or combined with rheumatic immune disease, long-term chronic infection, acute infection, etc., so that the body is in an inflammatory state; Blood system diseases with hematopoietic dysfunction;

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

prophylactic TPO

Arm Description

Prophylactic TPO combined with BMS-IMRT in the esophageal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The highest grade of thrombocytopenia (CTCAE 4.0) during the radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.
For esophageal cancer patients, Grade 1-4 thrombocytopenia is considered as endpoints.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Physical dosimetry of active bone marrow in BMS radiotherapy plan.
Low dose volume, the volume of active BM receiving 5,10,20,30 and 40 Gy
Conformity of BMS IMRT/VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy,VMAT) plan
Conformity Index (CI)was used to evaluate the conformity of IMRT/VMAT plan.
Homogeneity of IMRT/VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy,VMAT) plan
Homogeneity Index (HI) was used to evaluate the homogeneity of BMS IMRT plan.
The highest grade of leukopenia, neutropenia,anemia (CTCAE 4.0) during the radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.
For esophageal cancer patients, Grade 1-4 leukopenia, neutropenia and anemia are considered as endpoints.

Full Information

First Posted
June 2, 2023
Last Updated
July 12, 2023
Sponsor
JIANYANG WANG
Collaborators
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05944809
Brief Title
The Effect of Prophylactic TPO Combined With BMS-IMRT to Esophageal Cancer Patients
Official Title
A Prospective Phase II Study of Prophylactic TPO Combined With Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy to Reduce Platelet Inhibition in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
July 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
JIANYANG WANG
Collaborators
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional study is to explore the protective effect of prophylactic TPO combined with bone marrow sparing (BMS)-IMRT in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The main purpose is to reduce the incidence of all grades of thrombocytopenia from 35% to less than 10% by the intervention of study. Participants will initiate concurrent chemoradiotherapy within 2 weeks after enrollment,and they will receive subcutaneous injection of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) 15000U once a week during the radiotherapy.
Detailed Description
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is one of the standard treatments to the patients who initiate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radical radiotherapy. Previous large phase III trials of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy (Dt 40-60Gy) in esophageal cancer have shown rates of platelet inhibition (grade 1-4) of 25-54%. Concurrent chemotherapy has been associated with a significant increase in acute hematologic toxicity (HT) associated with radiation therapy, increasing the risk of infections, blood transfusions, colony-stimulating factors, and length of hospital stay. More importantly, severe myelosuppression also delays or interrupts the delivery of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, potentially reducing efficacy. In addition, the efficacy of locally advanced patients is still not optimistic, and the intensity of treatment may need to be increased. Therefore, if hematologic toxicity can be reduced, it may lead to more intensive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the hope of further improving the efficacy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has an absolute advantage over conventional radiotherapy in increasing the dose to the target volume and reducing the dose to normal tissues. Previous studies have shown a significant association between the volume of 10Gy (V10) and the volume received 20Gy (V20) of the pelvic and lumbosacral bone marrow and the development of acute HT when pelvic tumors are treated with IMRT. Thus, reducing the volume of bone marrow receiving low-dose radiotherapy may reduce the occurrence and severity of HT. Therefore, using the dosimetric advantages of IMRT, quantitative study of BMS-IMRT to reduce the toxic effects of concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a research hotspot at present. Thrombopoietin (TPO) promotes the proliferation and survival of hematopoietic stem cells and all hematopoietic progenitor cells, accelerates the entry of stem cells into the cell cycle, and subsequently promotes the mitosis and polyploidy formation of megakaryocytes, increases the volume and number of megakaryocytes, and works with other cytokines to regulate megakaryocyte maturation. It is a commonly used drug for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in clinic. The aim of this study is to explore the protective effect of prophylactic use of TPO on platelet inhibition in concurrent chemoradiotherapy using BMS-IMRT for esophageal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophageal Cancer, Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy, Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy, Thrombocytopenia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
All patients are planned to receive concurrent BMS thoracic radiotherapy (>45Gy, 1.8Gy per fraction), chemotherapy (five cycles of weekly intravenous paclitaxel [50 mg/m²] and cisplatin/nedaplatin [25 mg/m²], or two cycles of intravenous paclitaxel [135-175 mg/m²] and cisplatin/nedaplatin [80 mg/m²]) , and rhTPO,15000U ih. qw(during the radiotherapy)
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
27 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
prophylactic TPO
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Prophylactic TPO combined with BMS-IMRT in the esophageal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
rhTPO
Other Intervention Name(s)
BMS-IMRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Intervention Description
Standard treatment options: Radiotherapy: 95% planning target volume (planning target volume,PTV) ≥45Gy(without simultaneous boost). Concurrent chemotherapy: Weekly regimen: paclitaxel 50mg/m2 d1, nedaplatin/cisplatin 25 mg/m2d1, a total of 5 cycles. Three weeks regimen: paclitaxel 135-175mg/m2 d1, nedaplatin/cisplatin 80mg/m2, a total of 2 cycles. The active bone marrow was determined by magnetic resonance(magnetic resonance,MR), and the dose limits are: V5<95%,V10<85%,V20<60%,V30<40%;95%PTV>45Gy. rhTPO,15000U ih. qw(during the radiotherapy course)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The highest grade of thrombocytopenia (CTCAE 4.0) during the radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.
Description
For esophageal cancer patients, Grade 1-4 thrombocytopenia is considered as endpoints.
Time Frame
From start of radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Physical dosimetry of active bone marrow in BMS radiotherapy plan.
Description
Low dose volume, the volume of active BM receiving 5,10,20,30 and 40 Gy
Time Frame
The first day of radiotherapy.
Title
Conformity of BMS IMRT/VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy,VMAT) plan
Description
Conformity Index (CI)was used to evaluate the conformity of IMRT/VMAT plan.
Time Frame
The first day of radiotherapy.
Title
Homogeneity of IMRT/VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy,VMAT) plan
Description
Homogeneity Index (HI) was used to evaluate the homogeneity of BMS IMRT plan.
Time Frame
The first day of radiotherapy.
Title
The highest grade of leukopenia, neutropenia,anemia (CTCAE 4.0) during the radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.
Description
For esophageal cancer patients, Grade 1-4 leukopenia, neutropenia and anemia are considered as endpoints.
Time Frame
From start of radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age greater than 18 years and less than or equal to 75 years Histopathologically confirmed esophageal squamous/adenocarcinoma, clinical stage I-IV A (according to the 7th edition of AJCC(American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (≥45Gy) was planned (regardless of whether the patient had received induction adjuvant chemotherapy). Karnofsky performance status score ≥80 ·; Life expectancy >6 months; Meet the following laboratory diagnostic criteria: Hemoglobin ≥120g/L, white blood cell ≥4.0×109/L, Neutrophil ≥2.0×109/L, platelet ≥100×109/L; Participators had not used granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and thrombopoietin within 3 weeks before enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: A history of malignancy at other sites, excluding curable non-melanotic skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ; Previous radiotherapy to the chest; Patients with existing or suspected (thoracolumbar and pelvic) bone marrow or bone metastases, or a history of bone trauma in this region within 4 weeks; Allergy to Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Patients with active infection, or combined with rheumatic immune disease, long-term chronic infection, acute infection, etc., so that the body is in an inflammatory state; Blood system diseases with hematopoietic dysfunction;
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jianyang Wang, MD
Phone
+86-13810095191
Email
pkucell@163.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianyang Wang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100021
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianyang Wang, MD
Phone
+86-13810095191
Email
pkucell@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22646630
Citation
van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30089078
Citation
Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, Zhu C, Fang W, Yu Z, Mao W, Xiang J, Han Y, Chen Z, Yang H, Wang J, Pang Q, Zheng X, Yang H, Li T, Lordick F, D'Journo XB, Cerfolio RJ, Korst RJ, Novoa NM, Swanson SJ, Brunelli A, Ismail M, Fernando HC, Zhang X, Li Q, Wang G, Chen B, Mao T, Kong M, Guo X, Lin T, Liu M, Fu J; AME Thoracic Surgery Collaborative Group. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30920880
Citation
Chen Y, Ye J, Zhu Z, Zhao W, Zhou J, Wu C, Tang H, Fan M, Li L, Lin Q, Xia Y, Li Y, Li J, Jia H, Lu S, Zhang Z, Zhao K. Comparing Paclitaxel Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1695-1703. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02122. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34351356
Citation
Ji Y, Du X, Zhu W, Yang Y, Ma J, Zhang L, Li J, Tao H, Xia J, Yang H, Huang J, Bao Y, Du D, Liu D, Wang X, Li C, Yang X, Zeng M, Liu Z, Zheng W, Pu J, Chen J, Hu W, Li P, Wang J, Xu Y, Zheng X, Chen J, Wang W, Tao G, Cai J, Zhao J, Zhu J, Jiang M, Yan Y, Xu G, Bu S, Song B, Xie K, Huang S, Zheng Y, Sheng L, Lai X, Chen Y, Cheng L, Hu X, Ji W, Fang M, Kong Y, Yu X, Li H, Li R, Shi L, Shen W, Zhu C, Lv J, Huang R, He H, Chen M. Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 vs Radiotherapy Alone for Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1459-1466. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2705.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33949784
Citation
Li C, Tan L, Liu X, Wang X, Zhou Z, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Lv J, Wang X, Bi N, Deng L, Wang W, Zhang T, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Gao L, Wang S, Xiao Z. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2021 Jun;12(12):1831-1840. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13971. Epub 2021 May 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35419831
Citation
Liu Y, Zheng Z, Li M, Zhang Y, Zhao F, Gong H, Lin H, Huang W, Chen X, Xu Z, Li X, Liu W, Cui Y, Zheng A, Li B. Comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer in elderly patients: A randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2022 Aug 15;151(4):607-615. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34030. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11277656
Citation
Abu-Rustum NR, Lee S, Correa A, Massad LS. Compliance with and acute hematologic toxic effects of chemoradiation in indigent women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Apr;81(1):88-91. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6109.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11564482
Citation
Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, Symonds P, Fresco L, Collingwood M, Williams CJ. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):781-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05965-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17869451
Citation
Torres MA, Jhingran A, Thames HD Jr, Levenback CF, Bodurka DC, Ramondetta LM, Eifel PJ. Comparison of treatment tolerance and outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a prospective randomized trial or with standard treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.028. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10202165
Citation
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 1999 Aug 26;341(9):708.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19896180
Citation
Nugent EK, Case AS, Hoff JT, Zighelboim I, DeWitt LL, Trinkhaus K, Mutch DG, Thaker PH, Massad LS, Rader JS. Chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: an analysis of cisplatin dosing and other clinical prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):438-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.045. Epub 2009 Nov 5. Erratum In: Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jul;118(1):99.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12459361
Citation
Brixey CJ, Roeske JC, Lujan AE, Yamada SD, Rotmensch J, Mundt AJ. Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute hematologic toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Dec 1;54(5):1388-96. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03801-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11121668
Citation
Roeske JC, Lujan A, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, Yamada D, Mundt AJ. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1613-21. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00771-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11955746
Citation
Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, Yamada SD, Fleming G, Roeske JC. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Apr 1;52(5):1330-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02785-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10660197
Citation
Gershkevitsh E, Rosenberg I, Dearnaley DP, Trott KR. Bone marrow doses and leukaemia risk in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Dec;53(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00145-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16757127
Citation
Mell LK, Kochanski JD, Roeske JC, Haslam JJ, Mehta N, Yamada SD, Hurteau JA, Collins YC, Lengyel E, Mundt AJ. Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Dec 1;66(5):1356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.018. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17996390
Citation
Mell LK, Schomas DA, Salama JK, Devisetty K, Aydogan B, Miller RC, Jani AB, Kindler HL, Mundt AJ, Roeske JC, Chmura SJ. Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Apr 1;70(5):1431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.074. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10506610
Citation
Lhomme C, Fumoleau P, Fargeot P, Krakowski Y, Dieras V, Chauvergne J, Vennin P, Rebattu P, Roche H, Misset JL, Lentz MA, Van Glabbeke M, Matthieu-Boue A, Mignard D, Chevallier B. Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;17(10):3136-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3136.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11230468
Citation
Curtin JP, Blessing JA, Webster KD, Rose PG, Mayer AR, Fowler WC Jr, Malfetano JH, Alvarez RD. Paclitaxel, an active agent in nonsquamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1275-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1275.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9731092
Citation
Kaushansky K. Thrombopoietin. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 10;339(11):746-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809103391107. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of Prophylactic TPO Combined With BMS-IMRT to Esophageal Cancer Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs