search
Back to results

Aggression From the Perspective of Patients and Nurses

Primary Purpose

Aggression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Training including aggression and the use of BVC.
Sponsored by
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Aggression focused on measuring aggression, aggression in psychiatry clinics, perception of aggression, risk level of violence

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Volunteering to participate in the research, To have been working in the hospital where the research was conducted for at least 1 year, To have no vision, hearing and speech problems. Exclusion Criteria: To want to withdraw from the research at any stage of the research, Not completing or not being able to complete the research for any reason, To work in the filiation team during the research process.

Sites / Locations

  • Çukurova Üniversitesi

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Taining group

Control group

Arm Description

Nurses in the training group were given training on aggression and the use of BVC.

Nurses in the control group were not trained, till the study ends.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Perception of Aggression Scale
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Broset Violence Checklist
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.
Perception of Aggression Scale
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Broset Violence Checklist
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 23, 2023
Last Updated
July 13, 2023
Sponsor
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05946720
Brief Title
Aggression From the Perspective of Patients and Nurses
Official Title
Aggression From the Perspective of Patients and Nurses: An Integrated Study on the Evaluation of Aggression in Psychiatric Clinics
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 10, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 14, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The research, was planned in a randomized controlled design, aiming to evaluate the effect of the training given to nurses working in psychiatric clinics on the use of aggression and BVC (Broset Violence Checklist) on the nurses' perceptions of aggression and the compliance of the use of BVC, which they evaluated for the patients watched in the videos, with the BVC determined by expert opinion. The study was conducted in Adana Doctor Ekrem Tok Mental Health and Diseases Hospital between July 2021 and April 2022. A total of 97 nurses working in psychiatric clinics, 47 in the training group and 50 in the comparison group, participated in the study. A pre-test was administered to the nurses and nurses in the training group were randomized and given training including aggression and BVC use. After the training, a post-test was administered to all nurses.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aggression
Keywords
aggression, aggression in psychiatry clinics, perception of aggression, risk level of violence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
pre- post test, training and control group, randomise controlled trial
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
97 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Taining group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nurses in the training group were given training on aggression and the use of BVC.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Nurses in the control group were not trained, till the study ends.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Training including aggression and the use of BVC.
Intervention Description
After obtaining verbal consent from the nurses who met the inclusion criteria of the study before the pre-test was applied to the nurses, the nurses who volunteered to participate in the study were randomized within their own clinic using the simple randomization method. For this, after the data collection form was distributed before the pre-test, the nurses were asked to write the letter that came to them on the data collection form and not forget it. In order for nurses to be included in the training or comparison group, the letter A, written on the closed papers in the box prepared for simple randomization, represents the Education group, and the letter B represents the comparison group.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perception of Aggression Scale
Description
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Time Frame
Procedure (one week before the training)
Title
Broset Violence Checklist
Description
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.
Time Frame
Procedure (one week before the training and one day after the training)
Title
Perception of Aggression Scale
Description
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Time Frame
Procedure (one day after the training)
Title
Broset Violence Checklist
Description
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.
Time Frame
Procedure (one day after the training)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Volunteering to participate in the research, To have been working in the hospital where the research was conducted for at least 1 year, To have no vision, hearing and speech problems. Exclusion Criteria: To want to withdraw from the research at any stage of the research, Not completing or not being able to complete the research for any reason, To work in the filiation team during the research process.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Çukurova Üniversitesi
City
Adana
ZIP/Postal Code
01180
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Aggression From the Perspective of Patients and Nurses

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs