search
Back to results

Management of Myopia in University Students Using Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses (MoMUS)

Primary Purpose

Myopia, Progressive

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MiSight contact lenses
Proclear contact lenses
Sponsored by
University of Bradford
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia, Progressive

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 21 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Be a myopic students studying at university Be aged 18-21 years at the start of the study Show evidence of recent myopia progression prior to commencement of Stage 2 of the study. Have read the patient information sheet and be happy to sign the consent forms Be willing to adhere to the visit schedule and wearing times described in this protocol Agree to lens wearing times of at least 10 hours per day, 6 days per week Agree to accept either the control or test lens as assigned by the randomisation Have BCVA of +0.10 logMAR or better in each eye Exclusion Criteria: Previous myopia control use (optical or pharmacological) Amblyopia Ocular pathology such as keratoconus or recurrent corneal infections Myopic Rx > 10D Astigmatism >1D Anisometropia >1.75D Binocular Vision anomalies (such as Tropia) Medications that affect pupil size or accommodation A known allergy to fluorescein or tropicamide Biomicroscopic findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear The investigator considers that it is not in the best interest of the subject to participate in the study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    MiSight dual focus contact lens

    Proclear single vision contact lens

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in axial length relative to baseline
    Change in spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction relative to baseline

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 13, 2023
    Last Updated
    July 13, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Bradford
    Collaborators
    University of Huddersfield, Coopervision, Inc.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05955638
    Brief Title
    Management of Myopia in University Students Using Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses
    Acronym
    MoMUS
    Official Title
    Management of Myopia in University Students Using Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    September 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 1, 2028 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    September 1, 2028 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Bradford
    Collaborators
    University of Huddersfield, Coopervision, Inc.

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of the study is to quantify the effectiveness of Coopervision MiSight contact lenses in slowing the rate of myopia progression in university students.
    Detailed Description
    MiSight contact lenses have been shown to be a safe and effective way of managing myopia progression in children aged 8-12 years. However, myopic progression is not limited to children of this age group and MiSight lenses have also been shown to be effective in older children aged 11-16 years. There is evidence that progression also occurs in university students. We are therefore investigating the effectiveness of this intervention in a group of UK-based University students.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Myopia, Progressive

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    84 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    MiSight dual focus contact lens
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Proclear single vision contact lens
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    MiSight contact lenses
    Intervention Description
    Contact lens for myopia management.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Proclear contact lenses
    Intervention Description
    Single vision contact lens as control
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in axial length relative to baseline
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 24 months
    Title
    Change in spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction relative to baseline
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 24 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    21 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Be a myopic students studying at university Be aged 18-21 years at the start of the study Show evidence of recent myopia progression prior to commencement of Stage 2 of the study. Have read the patient information sheet and be happy to sign the consent forms Be willing to adhere to the visit schedule and wearing times described in this protocol Agree to lens wearing times of at least 10 hours per day, 6 days per week Agree to accept either the control or test lens as assigned by the randomisation Have BCVA of +0.10 logMAR or better in each eye Exclusion Criteria: Previous myopia control use (optical or pharmacological) Amblyopia Ocular pathology such as keratoconus or recurrent corneal infections Myopic Rx > 10D Astigmatism >1D Anisometropia >1.75D Binocular Vision anomalies (such as Tropia) Medications that affect pupil size or accommodation A known allergy to fluorescein or tropicamide Biomicroscopic findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear The investigator considers that it is not in the best interest of the subject to participate in the study.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Martin Brinkworth, PhD
    Phone
    +441274233584
    Email
    nhs-ethics@bradford.ac.uk
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kathryn Webber, MOptom
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Bradford
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Matthew Cufflin, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Bradford
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Edward Mallen, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Bradford
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Niall Hynes, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Huddersfield
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    31116165
    Citation
    Bullimore MA, Brennan NA. Myopia Control: Why Each Diopter Matters. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Jun;96(6):463-465. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001367.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31343513
    Citation
    Chamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, Ngo C, Jones D, Young G. A 3-year Randomized Clinical Trial of MiSight Lenses for Myopia Control. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Aug;96(8):556-567. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001410.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    35086120
    Citation
    Chamberlain P, Bradley A, Arumugam B, Hammond D, McNally J, Logan NS, Jones D, Ngo C, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Hunt C, Young G. Long-term Effect of Dual-focus Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: A 6-year Multicenter Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 1;99(3):204-212. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001873.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18385044
    Citation
    Jacobsen N, Jensen H, Goldschmidt E. Does the level of physical activity in university students influence development and progression of myopia?--a 2-year prospective cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Apr;49(4):1322-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1144.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17470242
    Citation
    Jorge J, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Refractive, biometric and topographic changes among Portuguese university science students: a 3-year longitudinal study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 May;27(3):287-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00475.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10634556
    Citation
    Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G, Rystad J. Biometric changes in the eyes of Norwegian university students--a three-year longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999 Dec;77(6):648-52. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770608.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20505205
    Citation
    McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5537-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341. Epub 2010 May 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26783753
    Citation
    McCullough SJ, O'Donoghue L, Saunders KJ. Six Year Refractive Change among White Children and Young Adults: Evidence for Significant Increase in Myopia among White UK Children. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0146332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146332. eCollection 2016.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16447932
    Citation
    Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;22(1):19-27. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-07.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29396662
    Citation
    Ruiz-Pomeda A, Perez-Sanchez B, Valls I, Prieto-Garrido FL, Gutierrez-Ortega R, Villa-Collar C. MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS). A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;256(5):1011-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3906-z. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    36282205
    Citation
    Tilia D, Diec J, Ehrmann K, Falk D, Fedtke C, Conrad F, Wu R, Bakaraju RC. Visual Performance and Binocular/Accommodative Function of S.T.O.P. Contact Lenses Compared With MiSight. Eye Contact Lens. 2023 Feb 1;49(2):63-70. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000950. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30817830
    Citation
    Wolffsohn JS, Kollbaum PS, Berntsen DA, Atchison DA, Benavente A, Bradley A, Buckhurst H, Collins M, Fujikado T, Hiraoka T, Hirota M, Jones D, Logan NS, Lundstrom L, Torii H, Read SA, Naidoo K. IMI - Clinical Myopia Control Trials and Instrumentation Report. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Feb 28;60(3):M132-M160. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25955.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Management of Myopia in University Students Using Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs