search
Back to results

Palonosetron vs Ondansetron In PONV Prophylaxis Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients (PONV)

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Scoliosis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Malaysia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Palonosetron
Ondansetron
Sponsored by
University of Malaya
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Scoliosis focused on measuring Antiemetics, Dexamethasone, Ondansetron, Palonosetron, Scoliosis, PONV

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age of 10 years and above American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II Physical Status Exclusion Criteria: History of allergy to serotonin receptor antagonists or dexamethasone Obesity with a body mass index (BMI) of 34 and above Body weight of less than 30kg Active smoker History of gastroesophageal reflux disease/ other gastrointestinal diseases associated with vomiting History of motion sickness History of nausea or vomiting within 24 hours before the surgery Administration of antiemetics/ steroids/ psychoactive medications within 24 hours before the surgery Require mechanical ventilation postoperatively History of cardiac arrhythmias Prolonged QT (QTc is prolonged if > 440ms in men or > 460ms in women

Sites / Locations

  • University MalayaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Arm Description

Group A will receive a stat dose of IV palonosetron 1.5mcg/kg prior to commencement of general anaesthesia.

Group B will receive a stat dose of IV ondansetron 0.15mg/kg at the start of wound closure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Developing Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Requiring Rescue Antiemetic Within 48 hours After Surgery
Any occurrence of severe nausea and retching with visual analogue scale score ≥4; and vomiting of 1 or more episodes will be treated with the rescue drug IV metoclopramide. For adolescent subjects (aged less than 18 years old), IV metoclopramide will be given at 0.2mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 10 mg intravenously up to 3 times per day. For adult patients (18 years old and above), IV metoclopramide 10mg will be given, up to 3 times per day. If there is any further occurrence of PONV within 8 hours of administration of IV metoclopramide, a second line of rescue antiemetic, IV ondansetron 4mg, will be administered to participants in both arms of the study. The administration of any rescue medications will be recorded and taken into account during data processing.
Number of Participants Developing Adverse Effects Related to the Study Drugs.
Such as headache, dizziness and constipation
Degree of patient satisfaction as represented on the Visual Analogue Scale
On a scale of 1 (least satisfied) to 5 (most satisfied)

Full Information

First Posted
May 21, 2023
Last Updated
July 13, 2023
Sponsor
University of Malaya
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05956899
Brief Title
Palonosetron vs Ondansetron In PONV Prophylaxis Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients
Acronym
PONV
Official Title
A Comparison Between Palonosetron And Ondansetron As Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting In Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomised Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Malaya

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two antiemetic drugs, palonosetron and ondansetron, when given alongside dexamethasone as a preventive measure against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The main questions the study aims to answer are: How effective is palonosetron compared to ondansetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in preventing PONV after scoliosis surgery? Are there any differences in the need for rescue antiemetics, occurrence of adverse effects related to the study drugs, and patient satisfaction between the two treatment groups? Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either palonosetron or ondansetron in addition to dexamethasone as part of their anesthesia and antiemetic regimen. The incidence and/ or severity of nausea, vomiting and retching will be assessed at 1 hour, 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND/ JUSTIFICATION Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication following surgery and can cause significant morbidity. It occurs in 20-30% of the general population and up to 75-80% in high-risk groups. Children have a higher incidence of PONV compared to adults. PONV can occur at various timeframes after surgery and has clinical and financial consequences, including wound complications, dehydration, and prolonged hospitalization. Prevention and treatment of PONV are crucial for comprehensive perioperative care. Posterior spinal fusion surgery for idiopathic scoliosis is a complex and painful procedure, increasing the risk of PONV. Various strategies can be employed to mitigate these risks, such as adequate hydration, the use of intravenous antiemetics, avoiding volatile anesthetics, and adopting a multimodal analgesic approach. Dexamethasone and anti-serotonergic drugs like ondansetron are commonly used antiemetics due to their efficacy and safety profiles. Dexamethasone is particularly favored for its long duration of action and pain-reducing effects. Palonosetron, a second-generation anti-serotonergic drug, has a unique pharmacokinetic profile with a prolonged duration of action. It may be more beneficial for patients on prolonged opioid-based analgesic regimens. However, its higher cost and inconsistent study findings limit its widespread use, especially in scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is recommended for high-risk PONV patients, as it reduces the emetogenic effect of volatile anesthetics. Propofol, used in TIVA, is itself an effective antiemetic. TIVA with propofol has been shown to be as effective as giving a single antiemetic and can further reduce the risk of PONV when combined with other prophylactic antiemetics. The standard practice for managing PONV involves the administration of two antiemetics and considering TIVA for high-risk patients. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone in scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion under TIVA. The study will also evaluate the number of rescue antiemetics needed, assess adverse effects, and measure patient satisfaction. The study will be randomized and double-blinded, to be conducted in Universiti Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). The sample size is calculated to be 74 participants. Adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery will be eligible for the study. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or their guardians, and assent will be obtained from adolescent participants. Patients will be randomized to receive either palonosetron or ondansetron along with dexamethasone. The study will follow standard anesthetic techniques, including TIVA with remifentanil and propofol. Intravenous injections of the study drugs or placebo will be given during surgery, and dexamethasone will be administered as a baseline antiemetic. Morphine will be administered before the end of surgery for pain management.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Scoliosis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Keywords
Antiemetics, Dexamethasone, Ondansetron, Palonosetron, Scoliosis, PONV

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
After taking informed consent and recruitment of eligible participants, they will be randomized using a sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelope (SNOSE) method. 74 radio-opaque envelopes will be prepared according to two groups: 37 participants for each Group A, Palonosetron and Group B, Ondansetron. Group A will receive IV palonosetron 1.5mcg/kg prior to commencement of general anaesthesia; while Group B will receive IV ondansetron 0.15mg/kg at the start of wound closure.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
74 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group A will receive a stat dose of IV palonosetron 1.5mcg/kg prior to commencement of general anaesthesia.
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group B will receive a stat dose of IV ondansetron 0.15mg/kg at the start of wound closure.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Palonosetron
Intervention Description
IV palonosetron 1.5mcg/kg prior to commencement of general anaesthesia
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ondansetron
Intervention Description
IV ondansetron 0.15mg/kg at the start of wound closure
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of PONV
Description
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Time Frame
At 1 hour after surgery
Title
Incidence of PONV
Description
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Time Frame
At 4 hours after surgery
Title
Incidence of PONV
Description
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Time Frame
At 12 hours after surgery
Title
Incidence of PONV
Description
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Time Frame
At 24 hours after surgery
Title
Incidence of PONV
Description
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
Time Frame
At 48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Developing Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Requiring Rescue Antiemetic Within 48 hours After Surgery
Description
Any occurrence of severe nausea and retching with visual analogue scale score ≥4; and vomiting of 1 or more episodes will be treated with the rescue drug IV metoclopramide. For adolescent subjects (aged less than 18 years old), IV metoclopramide will be given at 0.2mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 10 mg intravenously up to 3 times per day. For adult patients (18 years old and above), IV metoclopramide 10mg will be given, up to 3 times per day. If there is any further occurrence of PONV within 8 hours of administration of IV metoclopramide, a second line of rescue antiemetic, IV ondansetron 4mg, will be administered to participants in both arms of the study. The administration of any rescue medications will be recorded and taken into account during data processing.
Time Frame
At 1 hour, 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery
Title
Number of Participants Developing Adverse Effects Related to the Study Drugs.
Description
Such as headache, dizziness and constipation
Time Frame
Overall, assessed at 48 hours after surgery
Title
Degree of patient satisfaction as represented on the Visual Analogue Scale
Description
On a scale of 1 (least satisfied) to 5 (most satisfied)
Time Frame
Overall, assessed at 48 hours after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age of 10 years and above American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II Physical Status Exclusion Criteria: History of allergy to serotonin receptor antagonists or dexamethasone Obesity with a body mass index (BMI) of 34 and above Body weight of less than 30kg Active smoker History of gastroesophageal reflux disease/ other gastrointestinal diseases associated with vomiting History of motion sickness History of nausea or vomiting within 24 hours before the surgery Administration of antiemetics/ steroids/ psychoactive medications within 24 hours before the surgery Require mechanical ventilation postoperatively History of cardiac arrhythmias Prolonged QT (QTc is prolonged if > 440ms in men or > 460ms in women
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mohd Shahnaz Bin Hasan, MAnaes, MBBS
Phone
+60192627277
Email
shahnaz@ummc.edu.my
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kenlee Liew, MBBS
Phone
+60195753579
Email
drkenliew@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siti Nadzrah Binti Yunus, MAnaes, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Universiti Malaya
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Malaya
City
Pantai Valley
State/Province
Kuala Lumpur
ZIP/Postal Code
59100
Country
Malaysia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siti Nadzrah Yunus, Postgrduate
Phone
60176975009
Email
nadzrahyunus@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siti Nadzrah Yunus, MAnaes
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenlee Liew, MBBS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, MAnaes

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30443060
Citation
Kumar A, Solanki SL, Gangakhedkar GR, Shylasree TS, Sharma KS. Comparison of palonosetron and dexamethasone with ondansetron and dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting in postchemotherapy ovarian cancer surgeries requiring opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised, double-blind, active controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):773-779. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_437_18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9370838
Citation
Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Valanne J, Jokela R, Mustonen A, Poukkula E. Postoperative symptoms at home following day-case surgery in children: a multicentre survey of 551 children. Anaesthesia. 1997 Oct;52(10):963-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.203-az0338.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12472709
Citation
Villeret I, Laffon M, Duchalais A, Blond MH, Lecuyer AI, Mercier C. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in paediatric ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Oct;12(8):712-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00952.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3195743
Citation
Patel RI, Hannallah RS. Anesthetic complications following pediatric ambulatory surgery: a 3-yr study. Anesthesiology. 1988 Dec;69(6):1009-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198812000-00044. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7158749
Citation
Rowley MP, Brown TC. Postoperative vomiting in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1982 Nov;10(4):309-13. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8201000402.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15141796
Citation
Awad IT, Moore M, Rushe C, Elburki A, O'Brien K, Warde D. Unplanned hospital admission in children undergoing day-case surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 May;21(5):379-83. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504005058.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24057415
Citation
Kovac AL. Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2013 Sep;73(14):1525-47. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0110-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12402719
Citation
Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Sep;89(3):409-23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15947124
Citation
Golembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10730546
Citation
Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2000 Feb;59(2):213-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059020-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10485781
Citation
Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11883387
Citation
Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):234-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.2.234.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32467512
Citation
Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Jin Z, Kovac AL, Meyer TA, Urman RD, Apfel CC, Ayad S, Beagley L, Candiotti K, Englesakis M, Hedrick TL, Kranke P, Lee S, Lipman D, Minkowitz HS, Morton J, Philip BK. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):411-448. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2020 Nov;131(5):e241.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15562045
Citation
Eberhart LHJ, Geldner G, Kranke P, Morin AM, Schauffelen A, Treiber H, Wulf H. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1630-1637. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135639.57715.6C.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21226441
Citation
Palmer GM, Pirakalathanan P, Skinner AV. A multi-centre multi-national survey of anaesthetists regarding the range of anaesthetic and surgical practices for paediatric scoliosis surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Nov;38(6):1077-84. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800619.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21982171
Citation
Ho CM, Wu HL, Ho ST, Wang JJ. Dexamethasone prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting: benefit versus risk. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011 Sep;49(3):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.06.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30765809
Citation
Wakamiya R, Seki H, Ideno S, Ihara N, Minoshima R, Watanabe K, Sato Y, Morisaki H. Effects of prophylactic dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in scoliosis correction surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38764-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19106333
Citation
Kloth DD. New pharmacologic findings for the treatment of PONV and PDNV. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 1;66(1 Suppl 1):S11-8. doi: 10.2146/ashp080462.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Palonosetron vs Ondansetron In PONV Prophylaxis Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs