search
Back to results

Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids

Primary Purpose

Dental Caries

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dental Loupe
Dental Operation Microscope
Sponsored by
Ataturk University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries focused on measuring dental loupe, restoration success, FDI criteria

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Good oral and dental care of the patient, The need for at least 1 Class II restoration at a depth of D2 in the posterior group teeth, No crowding in the tooth to be restored, tooth contact and antagonist, The relevant tooth is vital, Absence of pain on percussion and palpation of the tooth. Absence of any pathology in the periapical tissues in radiographic evaluation, The patient was informed about the study and accepted the study, Having agreed to attend 1 month, 6 month and 12 month control sessions, The patient has no systemic disease, Exclusion Criteria: Presence of severe periodontal disease, Teeth that cannot be insulated, malposed or overloaded or not loaded at all, Periodontal and endodontic removal of the relevant tooth is healthy, the patient is undergoing orthodontic treatment, Recording of dry mouth is set, Severe bruxism habit, Smoking

Sites / Locations

  • Ataturk University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

with no magnification aid treatment

with x2 dental loupe

with x5 dental loupe

with dental operation microscope

Arm Description

Dental caries treatment with no magnification aid

Dental caries treatment with x2 dental loupe

Dental caries treatment with x5 dental loupe

Dental caries treatment with dental operation microscope

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Evaluation of Restoration Success using FDI Criteria
FDI criteria were categorized into three groups [3]: esthetic (four criteria), functional (three criteria) and biological (one criterion) parameters

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 16, 2023
Last Updated
July 16, 2023
Sponsor
Ataturk University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05959382
Brief Title
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids
Official Title
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ataturk University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aimed to investigate the effect of using a loupe and dental operating microscope with different magnifications on the success of class II direct composite restorations.
Detailed Description
A total of 130 class II, D2 deep caries teeth of 85 patients were randomly distributed to the naked eye, 3x magnification loupe, 5x magnification loupe, 8.5x magnification dental operating microscope (DOM) groups, and direct composite restorations were made with these magnification aids. carried out. Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Clearfil Majesty Posterior composite were used in all restorations. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at 1,6 and 12-month periods, and restorations were scored between 1 and 5 for all criteria.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Caries
Keywords
dental loupe, restoration success, FDI criteria

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
It has 4 groups in total. The treatments were carried out with no magnification aid with x2 loupe with x5 loupe with Dental operation microscope
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
with no magnification aid treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Dental caries treatment with no magnification aid
Arm Title
with x2 dental loupe
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Dental caries treatment with x2 dental loupe
Arm Title
with x5 dental loupe
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Dental caries treatment with x5 dental loupe
Arm Title
with dental operation microscope
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Dental caries treatment with dental operation microscope
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Dental Loupe
Intervention Description
Magnification aid
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Dental Operation Microscope
Intervention Description
Magnification aid
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluation of Restoration Success using FDI Criteria
Description
FDI criteria were categorized into three groups [3]: esthetic (four criteria), functional (three criteria) and biological (one criterion) parameters
Time Frame
a week after dental treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Good oral and dental care of the patient, The need for at least 1 Class II restoration at a depth of D2 in the posterior group teeth, No crowding in the tooth to be restored, tooth contact and antagonist, The relevant tooth is vital, Absence of pain on percussion and palpation of the tooth. Absence of any pathology in the periapical tissues in radiographic evaluation, The patient was informed about the study and accepted the study, Having agreed to attend 1 month, 6 month and 12 month control sessions, The patient has no systemic disease, Exclusion Criteria: Presence of severe periodontal disease, Teeth that cannot be insulated, malposed or overloaded or not loaded at all, Periodontal and endodontic removal of the relevant tooth is healthy, the patient is undergoing orthodontic treatment, Recording of dry mouth is set, Severe bruxism habit, Smoking
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ataturk University
City
Erzurum
ZIP/Postal Code
25080
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs