search
Back to results

Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RAPID-HCC)

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RAPID procedure
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring liver transplantation, split, auxiliary transplantation, Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 68 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria (RAPID receiver) 18 years ≤ age ≤ 68 years Indication of LT for HCC validated in multidisciplinary meeting AFP score ≤ 2 (15) Body mass index < 30 kg/m2 MELD score ≤ 15, without access to prioritization PET CT-choline and PET CT-FDG without sign of extra-hepatic localizaton Patient having been informed and able to give written consent to participate in the RAPID-HCC study Validation of the patient's inclusion in the RAPID-HCC protocol by the scientific committee Exclusion criteria History of, liver transplant, surgical or radiological portocaval anastomosis History of major abdominal surgery (including hepatectomy) History of abdominal radiotherapy (extrahepatic) History of acute/chronic pancreatitis Expected combined transplant HCC located 1 cm away from the transection line required by the first stage hepatectomy Portal or arterial thrombosis patient with a pre-graft hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥ 20mmHg Ascites (clinical or radiological) less than 5 years ago Hepatitis C viral load + Acute or chronic hepatitis B (not cured) HIV + serology Severe comorbidities, in particular severe cardiovascular or respiratory or renal pathology (at the discretion of the medical-surgical team) Patient on anticoagulant treatment Patient who has received (or is due to receive) preoperative treatment with radioembolization on the right side, hepatectomy or radiotherapy near the hilum Patient who received (or should receive) preoperative treatment with anti-tyrosine kinase (TKI) less than three months ago Patients receiving or having received immunotherapy Donor selection criteria: Brain-dead donor (no living donor) 18 years ≤ age ≤ 65 years Hepatic, vascular and biliary anatomy compatible with performing a split. Analysis entrusted to the team that will carry out the split, and based on the scanner of the donor (to be available on the Biomedicine Agency website) Biological and hepatic assessment compatible with the realization of a split, in particular transaminases < 4 times the normal Graft not assigned to a protocol requiring machine infusion. Serology: anti-HBc negative, anti-HCV negative

Sites / Locations

  • AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Liver transplantation with the RAPID procedure

Comparator group with standard liver transplantation (whole graft)

Arm Description

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the RAPID protocol. This protocol is an auxiliary liver transplantation of a partial graft with total hepatectomy in two stages (2 successive operations).

Orthotopic liver transplantation with whole organ from deceased donor for hepatocellular carcinoma. Data will be provided by Biomedicine Agency, following pairing rules.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patient with successful RAPID procedure
Success of the procedure will be assessed as a patient : who complete the 2 steps of the procedure, who had no graft resection and who is still alive 4 months later.
Tolerance of the RAPID procedure
Tolerance will be assessed with Adverse events related to the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of grafts in place
Number of patients with a graft in place at 4 months after the first surgical step
Survival of grafts at 2 years from liver transplantation (LT)
Survival RAPID grafts considered in the event of a graft still in place Non-survival in the event of the patient's death or new LT
Survival of patient at 2 year after their registration on the waiting list of transplantation
whatever the cause of death
Survival of patient at 2 year after LT
Incidence of rejection after RAPID
Identification of histologically proven rejections within 2 years after the first stage of RAPID.
Waiting time between listing on the waiting list and LT according to RAPID
Time between registration the waiting list and TH according to RAPID (1st step)
Gain of grafts
Number of left lobes transplanted according to RAPID protocol - the number of retransplantations = organ gain obtained. Will be also analysed, the number of right livers generated and transplanted, as well as the number of complete RAPID procedures (native liver excision) will also be analyzed.
Comparison of the drop-out rate between RAPID group and control group
Drop out will be estimated by exclusion from the LT program, whatever the cause : death, worsening, transplant refusal, etc.
Comparison of the waiting time between registration on the transplantation list and LT between RAPID group and control group
Patients who completed the 1st RAPID phase compared to the control group
Comparison of the graft survival at 2 years after LT between RAPID group and control group

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
July 24, 2023
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05971628
Brief Title
Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Acronym
RAPID-HCC
Official Title
Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2029 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a national, non-randomized, multicentric trial evaluating the feasibility and the tolerance of the RAPID procedure in patients with HCC with preserved liver function requiring a liver transplantation.
Detailed Description
In France, the liver transplant allocation is based on the severity of liver failure, but patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually do not have hepatocellular failure, resulting in reduced access to liver transplantation. Two years after registration on the LT list, only 66% of those registered are transplanted due to tumor progression. This observation leads to the paradoxical conclusion that better access to transplantation is an absolute priority, but remains limited by the shortage of grafts. The split surgical of one graft into two grafts is the most effective way to increase the number of transplantable organs. This technique is performed daily as part of pediatric TH where the child receives the left lobe/liver, adapted to his morphology. However, in adults, transplantation of the left lobe (segments 2+3) or of the left liver (segments 2+3+4) associated with complete excision of the native liver generates a high rate of complications (small-for-size syndrome) and compromises graft and recipient survival. For these reasons, this type of procedure has been almost abandoned in France. One of the ways to increase the organ pool without risking liver failure is therefore to perform an auxiliary transplant with a partial graft from an organ harvested in its entirety and then shared. The investigators therefore wish to evaluate the feasibility and tolerance, the results and the "gain" of grafts after a standardized RAPID procedure ( Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation with Delayed Hepatectomy) allowing to transplant an adult with a left lobe (very small graft) from a shared whole graft (deceased donor in brain death) , and to compare the results with standard management (orthotopic HT with whole organ for HCC). The population is 50 major patients (in order to realize the RAPID procedure for 34 patients) with HCC requiring LT according to the usual transplantability criteria, with preserved liver function. The study lasts a maximum of 70 months (24 months of inclusion period, 6 months between selection and inclusion, <12 months between inclusion and the 1st RAPID time, 4 months maximum between the 2 RAPID Steps, 24 months of patient follow-up post 2nd step of RAPID). The study will proceed as described below : Pre-selection, information and consent of the patient by the local team. After validation by the scientific committee of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the patient will be prioritized with the Biomedicine Agency (800 points at 6 months) If necessary, he will receive a waiting treatment for the CHC Step 1 of RAPID : During the first operation, he will have a left hepatectomy and then LT with a left lobe/liver in an orthotopic position. During this operation, a treatment (resection/destruction) of a possible HCC of the right liver can be proposed in order to not to leave active nodule(s). Step 2 of RAPID : Within a maximum of 4 months, after graft hypertrophy, right hepatectomy of the remaining native liver will be realized. The oncological and post-LT follow-up will then be no different from a standard out-of-protocol patient. Standard immunosuppression At the end of the study, a comparative analysis will be made with the control group, the anonymous data of which will be transmitted by the ABM. The expected benefits for participants are : Rapid access to LT thanks to prioritization by the Biomedicine Agency at 6 months. Moreover, prioritization on the list could make it possible to limit the use of waiting treatments (surgery, radiation therapy, chemoembolization, immunotherapy, etc.) with non-negligible side effects/morbidity (e.g. arterial dissection jeopardizing the future graft) and high costs. reduction in the risk of leaving the list, of death on the list, access to an excellent quality graft (strict donor selection criteria) while patients with HCC frequently receive marginal organs, known as "out of turn", in an attempt to reduce their wait, possible improvement in intention-to-treat survival. The expected benefits for society are : Overall increase in the organ pool = partial response to the shortage of organs from which all recipients will be able to benefit (reduction of waiting time), reduction of costs related to waiting treatments in CHCs (patients registered on the list), reduction of costs related to hospitalization in the event of acute decompensation of chronic liver disease (ACLF). The risks added by research : The main risk is that caused by two successive interventions, close together. The international literature on orthotopic auxiliary grafting using a small graft shows that the morbidity is real but the medium and long-term results are good (4 postoperative deaths reported only). The risk of small for size syndrome is not ruled out in the RAPID protocol but will be limited to a minimum by appropriate portal modulation measures, a surgical technique refined and implemented by the experience of each center + literature, and finally postoperative follow-up close.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
liver transplantation, split, auxiliary transplantation, Hepatocellular Carcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Liver transplantation with the RAPID procedure
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma according to the RAPID protocol. This protocol is an auxiliary liver transplantation of a partial graft with total hepatectomy in two stages (2 successive operations).
Arm Title
Comparator group with standard liver transplantation (whole graft)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Orthotopic liver transplantation with whole organ from deceased donor for hepatocellular carcinoma. Data will be provided by Biomedicine Agency, following pairing rules.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RAPID procedure
Intervention Description
RAPID procedure stands for Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation with Delayed Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patient with successful RAPID procedure
Description
Success of the procedure will be assessed as a patient : who complete the 2 steps of the procedure, who had no graft resection and who is still alive 4 months later.
Time Frame
4 months after the second RAPID step
Title
Tolerance of the RAPID procedure
Description
Tolerance will be assessed with Adverse events related to the procedure
Time Frame
from first stage of the surgical protocol and until 90 days after the second stage
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of grafts in place
Description
Number of patients with a graft in place at 4 months after the first surgical step
Time Frame
4 months after the first surgical step
Title
Survival of grafts at 2 years from liver transplantation (LT)
Description
Survival RAPID grafts considered in the event of a graft still in place Non-survival in the event of the patient's death or new LT
Time Frame
at 2 Years from LT
Title
Survival of patient at 2 year after their registration on the waiting list of transplantation
Description
whatever the cause of death
Time Frame
at 2 year after their registration on the waiting list of transplantation
Title
Survival of patient at 2 year after LT
Time Frame
at 2 year after LT
Title
Incidence of rejection after RAPID
Description
Identification of histologically proven rejections within 2 years after the first stage of RAPID.
Time Frame
at 2 years after the first stage of RAPID
Title
Waiting time between listing on the waiting list and LT according to RAPID
Description
Time between registration the waiting list and TH according to RAPID (1st step)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Gain of grafts
Description
Number of left lobes transplanted according to RAPID protocol - the number of retransplantations = organ gain obtained. Will be also analysed, the number of right livers generated and transplanted, as well as the number of complete RAPID procedures (native liver excision) will also be analyzed.
Time Frame
70 months
Title
Comparison of the drop-out rate between RAPID group and control group
Description
Drop out will be estimated by exclusion from the LT program, whatever the cause : death, worsening, transplant refusal, etc.
Time Frame
18 months
Title
Comparison of the waiting time between registration on the transplantation list and LT between RAPID group and control group
Description
Patients who completed the 1st RAPID phase compared to the control group
Time Frame
up to 18 months
Title
Comparison of the graft survival at 2 years after LT between RAPID group and control group
Time Frame
at 2 years after 1rst stage of RAPID

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
68 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria (RAPID receiver) 18 years ≤ age ≤ 68 years Indication of LT for HCC validated in multidisciplinary meeting AFP score ≤ 2 (15) Body mass index < 30 kg/m2 MELD score ≤ 15, without access to prioritization PET CT-choline and PET CT-FDG without sign of extra-hepatic localizaton Patient having been informed and able to give written consent to participate in the RAPID-HCC study Validation of the patient's inclusion in the RAPID-HCC protocol by the scientific committee Exclusion criteria History of, liver transplant, surgical or radiological portocaval anastomosis History of major abdominal surgery (including hepatectomy) History of abdominal radiotherapy (extrahepatic) History of acute/chronic pancreatitis Expected combined transplant HCC located 1 cm away from the transection line required by the first stage hepatectomy Portal or arterial thrombosis patient with a pre-graft hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥ 20mmHg Ascites (clinical or radiological) less than 5 years ago Hepatitis C viral load + Acute or chronic hepatitis B (not cured) HIV + serology Severe comorbidities, in particular severe cardiovascular or respiratory or renal pathology (at the discretion of the medical-surgical team) Patient on anticoagulant treatment Patient who has received (or is due to receive) preoperative treatment with radioembolization on the right side, hepatectomy or radiotherapy near the hilum Patient who received (or should receive) preoperative treatment with anti-tyrosine kinase (TKI) less than three months ago Patients receiving or having received immunotherapy Donor selection criteria: Brain-dead donor (no living donor) 18 years ≤ age ≤ 65 years Hepatic, vascular and biliary anatomy compatible with performing a split. Analysis entrusted to the team that will carry out the split, and based on the scanner of the donor (to be available on the Biomedicine Agency website) Biological and hepatic assessment compatible with the realization of a split, in particular transaminases < 4 times the normal Graft not assigned to a protocol requiring machine infusion. Serology: anti-HBc negative, anti-HCV negative
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Nicolas GOLSE, Doctor
Phone
3306 71 28 24 03
Email
nicolas.golse@aphp.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas GOLSE, Doctor
Organizational Affiliation
APHP, Paul Brousse Hospital, villejuif, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AP-HP, Paul Brousse Hospital
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94800
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas GOLSE, Doctor
Email
nicolas.golse@aphp.fr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Resection And Partial LIver Transplantation With Delayed Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs