search
Back to results

Utility and Acceptability of a Molecular Test in the Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Uganda (ASTRHA)

Primary Purpose

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
nuclear acid amplification tests
Clinical Syndromic Approach
Sponsored by
Riccardo Serraino
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Sexually Transmitted Diseases focused on measuring Sexually transmitted diseases, STDs, Low-Middle Income Country, Molecular Test, NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST, NAAT, Clinical Syndromic Approach, LMIC

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Adult males and females with UDS, AVD and GUD diagnosed as per the current National STD Management Guidelines 201616, who have given informed, written, and signed consent. Exclusion Criteria: All patients presenting with UDS, AVD and GUD who decline informed and written consent. All patients living farther than a 20 km radius from Mulago National Referral Hospital All patients presenting with any syndromes not listed above. Female patients in their menstrual period. Pregnant patients. Patients with a previous infection presenting with recurrence or relapse.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    ARM A Molecular test

    ARM B Clinical Syndromic Approach

    Arm Description

    Patients randomized to Arm "A" will be subjected to a microbiological test (either swabs or urine testing by NAAT). After having obtained the result of the molecular test, patients will be prescribed a targeted treatment

    Patients randomized to Arm "B" will be subjected to a molecular test, but they will be treated according to the current guidelines and the best practice using the clinical syndromic approach. So, patients randomized to Arm "B" and their physician also will be blinded to the results of the molecular test

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Clinical Usefulness
    Proportion of patients with appropriate therapy in each arm. Appropriate therapy will be defined (either as study intervention during consultation in Arm "A" or post-hoc in Arm "B") as the use of a recommended drug or drug combinations which are recommended against the pathogen(s) diagnosed by the molecular test.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Microbiological and clinical cure
    Microbiological cure measured as the percentage of patients who will achieve success at the test of cure performed after two-three weeks from the end of therapy in both arms. For the clinical outcome, we will consider the percentage of patients who will recover from signs and symptoms of the STDs in both arms at the same time-point.
    Concordance
    Percentage of concordant results between the syndromic approach and the NAAT. The diagnosis is considered concordant when at least one pathogen responsible for a specific syndrome (Table 1) diagnosed through the syndromic approach is detected by a molecular testing. The diagnosis is considered not concordant when one or more pathogens responsible for syndromes other than those identified by the syndromic approach, are detected by molecular testing.
    Acceptability
    Percentage of patients who will be sent home the same day with the treatment prescribed according to the molecular test result (Arm "A") or with the treatment according to the syndromic approach (Arm "B"). Patients will not be able to wait for the result of the test and for the targeted therapy will be considered as failure for the primary endpoint. In addition, patients who will drop out from the study will be considered as failure. Percentage of patients who will be sent home the same day with the treatment prescribed according to the molecular test result (Arm "A") or with the treatment according to the syndromic approach (Arm "B"). Patients will not be able to wait for the result of the test and for the targeted therapy will be considered as failure for the primary endpoint. In addition, patients who will drop out from the study will be considered as failure.
    Prevalence
    Prevalence of detected pathogens' genome at the molecular test (overall population).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 6, 2023
    Last Updated
    August 12, 2023
    Sponsor
    Riccardo Serraino
    Collaborators
    Societa' Italiana Di Malattie Infettive E Tropicali
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05994495
    Brief Title
    Utility and Acceptability of a Molecular Test in the Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Uganda
    Acronym
    ASTRHA
    Official Title
    Utility, Acceptability and Applicability of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) in Comparison With Syndromic Approach in the Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    September 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2023 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Riccardo Serraino
    Collaborators
    Societa' Italiana Di Malattie Infettive E Tropicali

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The goal of this clinical trial is to assess utility and acceptability of a molecular test in comparison with clinical syndromic approach in the management of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) at STD clinic of Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does new molecular test improve appropriateness of therapy compared with the clinical syndromic approach without or with limited laboratory tests in the management of STDs? Are new molecular tests both clinically useful and acceptable in a Low-Middle Income Country for the management of STDs? Participants will be put into two groups ("A" or "B"): Participants in group "A" will have a pus swab collected from urethra or vagina or a urine sample. After the result of the test, patients will be prescribed a specific drug. Participants in group "B" will have a pus swab collected from urethra or vagina or a urine sample, but participants in group "B" and their doctor will not know the results of the test. So, participants in group "B" will be given treatment in the standard way, according to the current clinical practice.
    Detailed Description
    Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are a major cause of long-term disability. Urethral discharge syndrome (UDS), abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) and genital ulcer disease (GUD) are very common syndromes in low- and middle-income countries where, due to lack of resources, these syndromes are managed according to a syndromic approach. Appropriate STD diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent the transmission and sequelae. No randomized trials have been conducted so far to evaluate clinical usefulness and acceptability of microbiological diagnosis using NAAT in comparison with syndromic approach. The aims of the study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a NAAT in terms of appropriateness of therapy, clinical and microbiological outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and acceptability in comparison with syndromic approach and to explore whether this test could replace the syndromic approach in the management of STDs at a National Referral Hospital in Uganda. At last, to estimate the actual prevalence of causative agents of STDs in this setting. In summary final aim is that the results could inform diagnostic guidelines since they may suggest an update of the current recommendations. Investigators speculate that the change in approach would allow a significant improvement in terms of appropriateness of therapy, reduction of the collateral damage, toxicity, and pharmacoeconomics costs. This is an operational, randomized, open-label trial. Patients will be randomized (using block computerized method) into two Arms ("A" or "B"). Patients randomized to Arm "A" will be subjected to a microbiological test (either swabs or urine testing by NAAT). After having obtained the result of the molecular test, patients will be prescribed a targeted treatment. Patients randomized to Arm "B" will be subjected to a molecular test, but they will be treated according to the current guidelines and the best practice using the clinical syndromic approach. So, patients randomized to Arm "B" and their physician also will be blinded to the results of the molecular test. All the patients randomized to Arm "A" or to Arm "B" will be asked to return after two-three weeks for a control visit. The NAAT test will be performed with Bosch Vivalytic Sexually Transmitted Infection test. STUDY POPULATION Adults aged 18 years and above presenting with signs and symptoms of STDs at the Mulago Hospital STDs clinic during the study period, who provide written consent to the participation to the study and are diagnosed with UDS, AVD and GUD. Persons belonging to special populations (i.e., female sex workers, MSM) will be analyzed separately. SAMPLE SIZE Eighty-seven patients (rounded to 90) in each treatment arm are necessary for demonstrating a difference of 0.20 by means of the Fisher's exact test carried out at a significance level of 0.05 (two tailed). The sample size will be increased to 110 patients in each treatment arm for allowing a drop- out rate of about 20%. SAMPLING METHOD Two groups will be created by a random process and a blinded intervention. The intended sample will be composed by all sequential patients presenting with signs or symptoms suggestive for STDs at the time of screening for inclusion into the trial. Only patients who will satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized after signing the informed consent. The randomization process will be carried out according to a complete block model. In addition, randomization will be stratified by gender. Any efforts will be put into improving the internal and external validity of the trial. Data will be collected in an anonymized form: an Identification number will be assigned to each patients. Data will be analyzed by statistical team which will be led by a senior statistician

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases
    Keywords
    Sexually transmitted diseases, STDs, Low-Middle Income Country, Molecular Test, NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST, NAAT, Clinical Syndromic Approach, LMIC

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    This is an operational, randomized, open-label trial to assess appropriateness of therapy, diagnostic accuracy, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and acceptability of an etiology approach using a molecular test (NAAT) versus a clinical syndromic approach for the management of STDs in patients followed by a STD clinic of a National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    240 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    ARM A Molecular test
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients randomized to Arm "A" will be subjected to a microbiological test (either swabs or urine testing by NAAT). After having obtained the result of the molecular test, patients will be prescribed a targeted treatment
    Arm Title
    ARM B Clinical Syndromic Approach
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients randomized to Arm "B" will be subjected to a molecular test, but they will be treated according to the current guidelines and the best practice using the clinical syndromic approach. So, patients randomized to Arm "B" and their physician also will be blinded to the results of the molecular test
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    nuclear acid amplification tests
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Bosch Vivalytic STI test
    Intervention Description
    The NAAT test will be performed with Bosch Vivalytic STI test. It is a qualitative Polymerase Chain Reaction-based assay for simultaneous detection of 10 common sexually transmitted pathogens: Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV 1)- Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV 2)- Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) - Haemophilus ducreyi (HD)- Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) - Mycoplasma hominis (MH) - Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) - Treponema pallidum (TP)- Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) - Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Clinical Syndromic Approach
    Intervention Description
    Physical examination
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Clinical Usefulness
    Description
    Proportion of patients with appropriate therapy in each arm. Appropriate therapy will be defined (either as study intervention during consultation in Arm "A" or post-hoc in Arm "B") as the use of a recommended drug or drug combinations which are recommended against the pathogen(s) diagnosed by the molecular test.
    Time Frame
    minutes 210
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Microbiological and clinical cure
    Description
    Microbiological cure measured as the percentage of patients who will achieve success at the test of cure performed after two-three weeks from the end of therapy in both arms. For the clinical outcome, we will consider the percentage of patients who will recover from signs and symptoms of the STDs in both arms at the same time-point.
    Time Frame
    weeks 3
    Title
    Concordance
    Description
    Percentage of concordant results between the syndromic approach and the NAAT. The diagnosis is considered concordant when at least one pathogen responsible for a specific syndrome (Table 1) diagnosed through the syndromic approach is detected by a molecular testing. The diagnosis is considered not concordant when one or more pathogens responsible for syndromes other than those identified by the syndromic approach, are detected by molecular testing.
    Time Frame
    Minutes 210
    Title
    Acceptability
    Description
    Percentage of patients who will be sent home the same day with the treatment prescribed according to the molecular test result (Arm "A") or with the treatment according to the syndromic approach (Arm "B"). Patients will not be able to wait for the result of the test and for the targeted therapy will be considered as failure for the primary endpoint. In addition, patients who will drop out from the study will be considered as failure. Percentage of patients who will be sent home the same day with the treatment prescribed according to the molecular test result (Arm "A") or with the treatment according to the syndromic approach (Arm "B"). Patients will not be able to wait for the result of the test and for the targeted therapy will be considered as failure for the primary endpoint. In addition, patients who will drop out from the study will be considered as failure.
    Time Frame
    Minutes 210
    Title
    Prevalence
    Description
    Prevalence of detected pathogens' genome at the molecular test (overall population).
    Time Frame
    Months 2

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adult males and females with UDS, AVD and GUD diagnosed as per the current National STD Management Guidelines 201616, who have given informed, written, and signed consent. Exclusion Criteria: All patients presenting with UDS, AVD and GUD who decline informed and written consent. All patients living farther than a 20 km radius from Mulago National Referral Hospital All patients presenting with any syndromes not listed above. Female patients in their menstrual period. Pregnant patients. Patients with a previous infection presenting with recurrence or relapse.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Riccardo Serraino
    Phone
    +39 3338468913
    Email
    r.serraino1@gmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Carlo Torti
    Phone
    +39 3394706981
    Email
    torti@unicz.it
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Carlo Torti
    Organizational Affiliation
    Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Patrick Musinguzi
    Organizational Affiliation
    Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Utility and Acceptability of a Molecular Test in the Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Uganda

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs