search
Back to results

Post-operative Electrical Muscle Stimulation to Stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis in Humans (PoEMS)

Primary Purpose

Skeletal Muscle Atrophy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0
Sponsored by
University of Nottingham
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy focused on measuring Muscle, Protein Synthesis, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Muscle blood flow

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Aged 60-85 y Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study Exclusion Criteria: BMI <18.5 or >35kg/m2 Participation in any regular, structured RET within the past 6 months Musculoskeletal disorders Severe respiratory disease: COPD Pulmonary hypertension Neurological disorders: Cerebrovascular disease (cerebral haemorrhage; cerebral ischemic stroke) Intracranial space-occupying lesion Epilepsy Metabolic disease: Hyper and hypo parathyroidism Untreated hyper and hypothyroidism Cushing's disease Type 1 or 2 diabetes Active cardiovascular problems: Uncontrolled hypertension (BP>160/100mmHg) Recent cardiac event Heart failure (Class III/IV) Arrhythmia Angina Blood clotting disorders Active inflammatory bowel or renal disease Recent malignancy (in previous 3 years) Recent steroid treatment within 6 months or hormone replacement therapy Family history of early (<55yrs) death from cardiovascular disease Known sensitivity to Sonovue

Sites / Locations

  • University of NottinghamRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

30Hz (low-intensity)

100Hz (higher-intensity)

30Hz (low-intensity, 3:1)

Arm Description

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 100Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 3 seconds "on" and 1 second "off"

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis
A primed continuous infusion of a stable isotope tracer (1,2 13C2] leucine) will be initiated (Prime: 0.7 mg/kg; Constant: 1.0 mg/kg/h) at time 0h. After 60 min of stable isotope infusion, a single muscle biopsy will be taken from one leg. Another biopsy from the same leg will be taken 120 min later, and a third 240 min after the second to provide rates of muscle protein synthesis in the rested condition and in response to NMES, respectively. The fractional synthetic rate (FSR) of the myofibrillar fraction was calculated from the incorporation of [1,2 13C2] leucine, using venous plasma labelling between muscle biopsies to represent the immediate precursor for protein synthesis. This will give a rate (%/hour) of muscle protein synthesis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Signalling
Total and phosphorylation of established anabolic proteins in human skeletal muscle will be quantified via Western Blotting.
Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) measurements will be made 60 min before the NMES and 30 min after. To achieve this, a custom-made probe holder will be placed on the leg to be stimulated at the start of the study. For each measurement, Sonovue will be infused at 2ml/min for 1 minute and then 1ml/min for 30 sec to achieve systemic steady state, with a continued infusion at 1ml/min for the duration of the measurements. Each measurement will include three, 30-second capture-flash cycles which will form a Sonovue replenishment curve for the portion of vastus lateralis muscle (VL) under the probe. blood flow will be calculated by measuring the reperfusion rate of the microbubbles in the muscle microvasculature following destruction with a high mechanical index flash, given the infusion of contrast is continuous.

Full Information

First Posted
August 10, 2023
Last Updated
August 17, 2023
Sponsor
University of Nottingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05997095
Brief Title
Post-operative Electrical Muscle Stimulation to Stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis in Humans
Acronym
PoEMS
Official Title
Optimisation of Post-operative Electrical Muscle Stimulation (PoEMS) to Stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis in Humans
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 22, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 28, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Nottingham

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Skeletal muscle accounts for approximately 45-55% of total body mass in healthy adults and plays a pivotal role in whole-body metabolic health, locomotion and physical independence. Undesirable loss of skeletal muscle mass (atrophy) is, however, a common feature of many communicable and non-communicable diseases including ageing, bed-rest/immobilisation, cancer and physical inactivity. As such, the design of optimal strategies (e.g., different types of exercise) to "offset" these detrimental losses of muscle is a focus for both researchers and clinicians. One situation where losses of muscle mass occur very quickly (i.e., within a few days) is after surgery. However, at this time, most people (especially if they have had major abdominal or lower-limb surgery) are not able to perform exercise and as such a different strategy to maintain muscle mass needs to be found. It has been shown that electrical stimulation of the leg muscles can maintain muscle mass and function in patients after surgery. It is not however yet known, what the optimal electrical stimulation regime is to preserve muscle mass during situations of disuse. This study aims to examine the impact of three different electrical stimulation protocols on muscle building processes in individuals age-matched to those most commonly presenting for major abdominal surgery. This information will then be used in a clinical trial of surgical patients to see if it can preserve their muscle mass and function in the post-operative period.
Detailed Description
The contraction of skeletal muscles depends on the regulation of the nervous system and the coordination of neuromuscular function. The smallest motor nervous system associated with muscle contraction is the motor unit (MU), which consists of an efferent motor neuron and all of the muscle fibres it innervates. Muscle tissue also undergoes adaptive alternations in response to external stimuli, such as the gradual decline in muscle mass and strength during ageing, and atrophy following muscle disuse. A number of studies have demonstrated that different types of voluntary movements, such as resistance exercise training (RET), can prevent or attenuate such alternations to a certain extent via increases in muscle protein synthesis (MPS). However, certain situations such as post-operative bed rest render RET interventions an unachievable option. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be applied as a surrogate; acting to evoke involuntary contraction of the target muscles via electrical current applied to the muscle belly. Although NMES stimulation has been widely tested in the intensive care environment, results have shown variable efficacy- perhaps due to the multi-organ failure and associated catabolic systemic environment encountered by the majority of these patients. It has recently shown that in post-operative abdominal surgery patients, 5-days of NMES, performed at frequency of 30 Hz in a 1 second "on", 1 second "off" contraction pattern, can mitigate losses in muscle mass and function. However, this study 'borrowed' a protocol from previous intensive care literature, and as such may not be optimal with regards to frequency or contraction pattern. Given that this protocol was highly tolerated by patients in a previous study (i.e., based on 30 min of daily NMES, patients in this study said they would tolerate it for 45 to 240 (mean 90) min), it is plausible that higher frequency NMES (~100 Hz), enabling greater force production may be both viable and result in further mitigation of muscle mass and function losses. It has also been demonstrated that the time muscle is under loaded tension during RET may be an important modulator of MPS and subsequent gains in muscle mass. Therefore, increasing the contraction relative to relaxation time during NMES (e.g., 3 seconds on, 1 second off) may be another feasible and perhaps more beneficial strategy to reduce muscle mass losses in populations where an increase in frequency may not be possible or tolerable. Knowing that muscle maintenance is based on a dynamic equilibrium between MPS and muscle protein breakdown, the impact of different NMES protocols on MPS, associated cell signalling, and nutrient delivery pathways needs to be explored so that an optimal intervention can be tested in clinical settings associated with disuse atrophy. To date, no previous studies have compared differing frequencies of NMES on the muscle metabolic responses in older adults, nor the effect of differing NMES-induced contraction patterns.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Skeletal Muscle Atrophy
Keywords
Muscle, Protein Synthesis, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Muscle blood flow

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
15 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
30Hz (low-intensity)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"
Arm Title
100Hz (higher-intensity)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 100Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"
Arm Title
30Hz (low-intensity, 3:1)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 3 seconds "on" and 1 second "off"
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0
Intervention Description
NMES will be applied for 30 min and will be delivered using an approved, CE-marked device (Premier Combo Plus, Med-Fit Ltd, UK) using two large (7.5 × 13 cm) electrodes placed proximally and distally over the lateral quadriceps. The set protocols will be pre-programmed into to the device and the amplitude value will match the setting that was determined during a familiarisation visit
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis
Description
A primed continuous infusion of a stable isotope tracer (1,2 13C2] leucine) will be initiated (Prime: 0.7 mg/kg; Constant: 1.0 mg/kg/h) at time 0h. After 60 min of stable isotope infusion, a single muscle biopsy will be taken from one leg. Another biopsy from the same leg will be taken 120 min later, and a third 240 min after the second to provide rates of muscle protein synthesis in the rested condition and in response to NMES, respectively. The fractional synthetic rate (FSR) of the myofibrillar fraction was calculated from the incorporation of [1,2 13C2] leucine, using venous plasma labelling between muscle biopsies to represent the immediate precursor for protein synthesis. This will give a rate (%/hour) of muscle protein synthesis.
Time Frame
4 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Signalling
Description
Total and phosphorylation of established anabolic proteins in human skeletal muscle will be quantified via Western Blotting.
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow
Description
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) measurements will be made 60 min before the NMES and 30 min after. To achieve this, a custom-made probe holder will be placed on the leg to be stimulated at the start of the study. For each measurement, Sonovue will be infused at 2ml/min for 1 minute and then 1ml/min for 30 sec to achieve systemic steady state, with a continued infusion at 1ml/min for the duration of the measurements. Each measurement will include three, 30-second capture-flash cycles which will form a Sonovue replenishment curve for the portion of vastus lateralis muscle (VL) under the probe. blood flow will be calculated by measuring the reperfusion rate of the microbubbles in the muscle microvasculature following destruction with a high mechanical index flash, given the infusion of contrast is continuous.
Time Frame
Baseline and 30 minutes post neuromuscular stimulation
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Perceived discomfort of Neuromuscular Electrical stimulation
Description
At the end of the NMES, participants will be asked to rate the perceived discomfort on a Likert scale of 1-10 and respond to the question of "that stimulation was 30-minutes, how much longer would you have been willing to have stimulation for if you were in bed recovering from an injury or illness i.e., it was not interfering with your ability to perform other activities?"
Time Frame
Immediately post neuromuscular stimulation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged 60-85 y Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study Exclusion Criteria: BMI <18.5 or >35kg/m2 Participation in any regular, structured RET within the past 6 months Musculoskeletal disorders Severe respiratory disease: COPD Pulmonary hypertension Neurological disorders: Cerebrovascular disease (cerebral haemorrhage; cerebral ischemic stroke) Intracranial space-occupying lesion Epilepsy Metabolic disease: Hyper and hypo parathyroidism Untreated hyper and hypothyroidism Cushing's disease Type 1 or 2 diabetes Active cardiovascular problems: Uncontrolled hypertension (BP>160/100mmHg) Recent cardiac event Heart failure (Class III/IV) Arrhythmia Angina Blood clotting disorders Active inflammatory bowel or renal disease Recent malignancy (in previous 3 years) Recent steroid treatment within 6 months or hormone replacement therapy Family history of early (<55yrs) death from cardiovascular disease Known sensitivity to Sonovue
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Bethan Phillips, PhD
Phone
01332 724676
Email
beth.phillips@nottingham.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mathew Piasecki, PhD
Phone
01332 724688
Email
Mathew.Piasecki@nottingham.ac.uk
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Nottingham
City
Nottingham
State/Province
Nottinghamshire
ZIP/Postal Code
NG7 2RD
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bethan Phillips, PhD
Phone
01332 724676
Email
beth.phillips@nottingham.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mathew Piasecki, PhD
Phone
01332 724688
Email
Mathew.Piasecki@nottingham.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip Atherton, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Smith, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Wilkinson, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jon Lund, M.D

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36315433
Citation
Hardy EJ, Hatt J, Doleman B, Smart TF, Piasecki M, Lund JN, Phillips BE. Post-operative electrical muscle stimulation attenuates loss of muscle mass and function following major abdominal surgery in older adults: a split body randomised control trial. Age Ageing. 2022 Oct 6;51(10):afac234. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac234.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
36104842
Citation
Hardy EJO, Inns TB, Hatt J, Doleman B, Bass JJ, Atherton PJ, Lund JN, Phillips BE. The time course of disuse muscle atrophy of the lower limb in health and disease. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Dec;13(6):2616-2629. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13067. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22739107
Citation
Wall BT, Dirks ML, Verdijk LB, Snijders T, Hansen D, Vranckx P, Burd NA, Dendale P, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation increases muscle protein synthesis in elderly type 2 diabetic men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Sep 1;303(5):E614-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00138.2012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31827446
Citation
Mancinelli R, Toniolo L, Di Filippo ES, Doria C, Marrone M, Maroni CR, Verratti V, Bondi D, Maccatrozzo L, Pietrangelo T, Fulle S. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Induces Skeletal Muscle Fiber Remodeling and Specific Gene Expression Profile in Healthy Elderly. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 27;10:1459. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01459. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22106173
Citation
Burd NA, Andrews RJ, West DW, Little JP, Cochran AJ, Hector AJ, Cashaback JG, Gibala MJ, Potvin JR, Baker SK, Phillips SM. Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub-fractional synthetic responses in men. J Physiol. 2012 Jan 15;590(2):351-62. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221200. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Post-operative Electrical Muscle Stimulation to Stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis in Humans

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs