search
Back to results

Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis and Intra-articular Steroid Injections

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Knee Pain

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
6% aqueous phenol
MethylPREDNISolone 40 MG
Intraarticular Knee Placebo
Genicular Nerve Placebo
Sponsored by
University of Manitoba
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee focused on measuring Phenol, Injections, Intra-Articular, Steroids, Nerve Block

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Severe knee pain for more than 6 months, defined as Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of 6 and greater, unresponsive to conservative medical treatment Radiological OA grade 2 to 4 (Kellgren-Lawrence scale) Exclusion Criteria: Previous total knee replacement on the index knee Prior knee radiofrequency ablation on the index knee Connective tissue diseases with knee involvement (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) Body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 Uncontrolled coagulopathy, defined as supratherapeutic dose of anticoagulation medication Allergy to local anesthetics Unstable opioid consumption, defined as an increase >10% in dosage during the last 3 months prior to recruitment.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis

    Ultrasound-guided Intraarticular Steroid Injection

    Arm Description

    One time injection of 1.5 mL of phenol 6% at 3 target locations: superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves

    Intraarticular knee injection of 40 mg of methylprednisolone acetate in a volume of 5 mL of saline

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale) at 3 months
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale) at baseline, 1 and 6 months
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)
    Proportion of patients experiencing a 50% or greater decrease in baseline knee pain scores (NRS)
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)
    Brief Pain Inventory Score (BPI)
    Functional activity measurement using the Brief Pain Inventory (short form)
    WOMAC index
    The WOMAC index consists of three subscales: pain, stiffness, and physical function (17 questions overall)
    Incidence of adverse events
    Determined by the presence of hypoesthesia, paresthesia, puncture site hematoma, and worsening pain or infection

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 14, 2023
    Last Updated
    October 7, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Manitoba
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06000709
    Brief Title
    Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis and Intra-articular Steroid Injections
    Official Title
    Randomized, Double-blinded, Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis and Intra-articular Steroid Injections
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 20, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    July 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Manitoba

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Genicular nerve neurolysis (GN) constitutes a relatively novel technique, whereby different chemical compounds (i.e. alcohol, phenol) are injected in close proximity to the genicular nerves of the knee joint, with the intention to exert a neurolytic effect by denaturing proteins resulting in Wallerian degeneration distal to the lesion. Based on the preliminary evidence and considering the potential benefits of the technique, we hypothesized that ultrasound-guided genicular chemical neurolysis with phenol is superior in terms of pain relief at 3 months, when compared to intra-articular steroid (IAS) injection.
    Detailed Description
    This study will allow us to determine if ultrasound-guided phenol genicular neurolys is superior to intra-articular steroid injection in terms of analgesia and functional outcomes, providing a more effective and long-lasting alternative for patients with chronic knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Knee Pain
    Keywords
    Phenol, Injections, Intra-Articular, Steroids, Nerve Block

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    40 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    One time injection of 1.5 mL of phenol 6% at 3 target locations: superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves
    Arm Title
    Ultrasound-guided Intraarticular Steroid Injection
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Intraarticular knee injection of 40 mg of methylprednisolone acetate in a volume of 5 mL of saline
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    6% aqueous phenol
    Intervention Description
    1.5 mL of aqueous phenol will be injected at each target genicular nerve under ultrasound guidance
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    MethylPREDNISolone 40 MG
    Intervention Description
    40 mg of methylprednisolone diluted in 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline will be injected inside the knee joint capsule under ultrasound guidance
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Intraarticular Knee Placebo
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    0.9% normal saline
    Intervention Description
    Single injection 1.5 mL of 0.9% normal saline outside the knee joint capsule under ultrasound guidance
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genicular Nerve Placebo
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    0.9% normal saline
    Intervention Description
    1.5 mL of 0.9% normal saline will be injected subcutaneously at each target genicular nerve under ultrasound guidance
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale) at 3 months
    Description
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale) at baseline, 1 and 6 months
    Description
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)
    Time Frame
    baseline, 1 month, 6 months
    Title
    Proportion of patients experiencing a 50% or greater decrease in baseline knee pain scores (NRS)
    Description
    Knee pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain)
    Time Frame
    1 months, 3 months, 6 months
    Title
    Brief Pain Inventory Score (BPI)
    Description
    Functional activity measurement using the Brief Pain Inventory (short form)
    Time Frame
    baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
    Title
    WOMAC index
    Description
    The WOMAC index consists of three subscales: pain, stiffness, and physical function (17 questions overall)
    Time Frame
    baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
    Title
    Incidence of adverse events
    Description
    Determined by the presence of hypoesthesia, paresthesia, puncture site hematoma, and worsening pain or infection
    Time Frame
    from injection up to 1 month after intervention

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    40 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    80 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Severe knee pain for more than 6 months, defined as Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of 6 and greater, unresponsive to conservative medical treatment Radiological OA grade 2 to 4 (Kellgren-Lawrence scale) Exclusion Criteria: Previous total knee replacement on the index knee Prior knee radiofrequency ablation on the index knee Connective tissue diseases with knee involvement (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) Body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 Uncontrolled coagulopathy, defined as supratherapeutic dose of anticoagulation medication Allergy to local anesthetics Unstable opioid consumption, defined as an increase >10% in dosage during the last 3 months prior to recruitment.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Javier Webar, MD
    Phone
    2047873018
    Email
    javier.webar@umanitoba.ca
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Sebastian Layera, MD
    Phone
    2047873018
    Email
    layerars@myumanitoba.ca
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Javier Webar, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Manitoba
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29514315
    Citation
    Walega DR, McCormick ZL. Chemical Neurolysis of the Genicular Nerves for Chronic Knee Pain: Reviving an Old Dog and an Old Trick. Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1882-1884. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny023. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33277760
    Citation
    Risso RC, Ferraro LHC, Nouer Frederico T, Peng PWH, Luzo MV, Debieux P, Sakata RK. Chemical Ablation of Genicular Nerve with Phenol for Pain Relief in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Pain Pract. 2021 Apr;21(4):438-444. doi: 10.1111/papr.12972. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22124002
    Citation
    Park Y, Lee SC, Nam HS, Lee J, Nam SH. Comparison of sonographically guided intra-articular injections at 3 different sites of the knee. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Dec;30(12):1669-76. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.12.1669.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29095245
    Citation
    Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, Hunter C, Lindley D, Patel N, Choi D, Soloman M, Gupta A, Desai M, Buvanendran A, Kapural L. Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation With Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jan;43(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000690.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis and Intra-articular Steroid Injections

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs