search
Back to results

A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients (BOOST)

Primary Purpose

Bladder Cancer, Cystectomy, Chemotherapy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dietary and Exercise Intervention
Sponsored by
University of Utah
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Bladder Cancer focused on measuring Surgery, Weight Loss, Urinary, Lifestyle, Cystectomy, Malnutrition, Chemotherapy, Diet, Exercise

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients 18 years or older. Newly diagnosed urinary bladder cancer patients indicated for cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant therapy; Treated with surgery at the Huntsman Cancer Institute Have reliable, consistence access to the internet for study procedures Inclusion of Individuals across the Lifespan: The proposed trial will enroll 20 adults who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer. The age range of participants to be recruited is 18 years or older. Bladder cancer is generally a disease of older age and is exceedingly rare in children. According to the American Cancer Society, average age at diagnosis is 73.1 Therefore, we are unable to include children in this trial. Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children: It is anticipated that 20% will be female; 80% male. Racial distribution is projected to be as follows: 97% white, 1% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; 1% American Indian/ Alaska Native; 1% Asian; <1% Black. Approximately 96% will be Non-Hispanic. Exclusion Criteria: Special dietary requirements (i.e., allergies and intolerances, or other clinically prescribed diet). Unable to provide informed consent or read, write, or fill in questionnaires in English

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    BOOST Box Intervention

    Usual Care

    Arm Description

    Baseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), exercise prescription, compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, at least 3-weeks and up to 6-weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), up to 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), 6 weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, weekly hunger check-in, ASA Food Record (x2), Dietitian consultation, compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline) : 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.

    Baseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline): 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Feasibility of BOOST Box Intervention
    Feasibility of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Feasibility metrics include: % consented/referred; attrition as a function of time; % questionnaires completed; % meals prepared and consumed. Feasibility criteria: >70% patients consented and retained; completed all questionnaires; prepared/consumed Boost Box meals ≥5/7 days/week; and adhered to resistance band exercise ≥2 days/week. Fidelity criteria: 90% protocol checklist items delivered as intended.
    Acceptability of BOOST Box Intervention
    Acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Acceptability of the intervention delivery and menus/recipes will be evaluated by administering an anonymous questionnaire incorporating both Likert scale questions and space for open-ended responses.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Malnutrition assessment
    Surveys and Questionnaires used will be the Modified Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (mPG-SGA), Functional Assessment of Anorexia and Cachexia Therapy (FAACT), U.S.Household Food Security Survey Module: Six Item Short Form (Short 2012), and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) food consumption log to calculate a Healthy Eating Index (HEI) which will define diet quality (a higher score indicates a healthier diet).
    Surgical complication rate
    The following information is to be abstracted from medical charts: 30- and 90-day post-surgery complication rates including wound infections; Urinary Tract Infection (UTI); infectious complications; blood clots; readmissions; failure to thrive; dehydration; re-operations.
    Body weight
    Participant weight measurements will be collected through participant self-reporting using a digital scale provided by the study and through medical record abstraction.
    Quality of Life (Physical, social, emotional, functional well-being, and a bladder cancer subscale)
    Questionnaire used will be the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder - Cystectomy (FACT-Bl-Cys).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 15, 2023
    Last Updated
    September 13, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Utah
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06002269
    Brief Title
    A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients
    Acronym
    BOOST
    Official Title
    A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients: the BOOST Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    October 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Utah

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to test a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity intervention designed to be simple and address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients. Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Aim 2 is to measure the feasibility of collecting data on the intervention effects on complication rate, nutritional status, weight loss, and quality of life post-surgery among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy ± neoadjuvant therapy. Secondarily, we will determine the magnitude of association between study group and outcomes to inform power calculations in a future, well-powered trial. Participants will: attend two dietetic consultations at baseline and post-surgical recovery where nutritional status will be evaluated with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) complete baseline questionnaires (TCC, FACT-BI-Cys, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin) receive weekly BOOST boxes complete pre-surgery weekly BOOST check ins complete post-surgery weekly BOOST check ins complete an ASA food recall pre and post-surgery complete an exercise familiarization consult record weekly resistance and aerobic exercise performed at home complete a 6 month follow-up questionnaire receive compensation Researchers will compare to a Usual Care group to determine differences that could be attributed to the BOOST Box intervention.
    Detailed Description
    Urinary bladder cancer is the fourth leading cancer in men in the US, leading to 18,000 deaths among men and women annually.1 The survival rate is 69% for localized disease, 36% for regional disease, and only 5% for metastatic disease.2 Bladder cancer patients often present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and are treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy delivered locally in the bladder. Patients with muscle- invasive bladder cancer or intravesical therapy-refractory disease undergo cystectomy. Weight loss, frailty, sarcopenia, and malnutrition are commonplace among urinary bladder cancer patients, all being associated with treatment-related complications including susceptibility to infection, poor prognosis and quality of life.3 Medical nutrition therapy is indicated in this population that generally has poor diet quality4-7 to achieve or maintain a healthy body weight, preserve lean body mass, minimize nutrition-related side effects, and maximize quality of life.8-10 Yet, only a handful of dietary interventions have been conducted among urinary bladder cancer patients, and no studies of diet intervention coupled with exercise prescription, with the goal of improving treatment outcomes in this population. Pre- and postoperative nutrition support has been linked to reduced hospital length of stay,11 and lower postoperative complications like infection. Immunonutrition interventions, which comprise of supplements or food/drinks high in vitamin A, fish oil or omega-3 fatty acids, and specific amino acids like arginine, have also been shown to lower postoperative complications in cystectomy patients and other cancer populations.12-15 In patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation, immunonutrition also appears to reduce mucositis and weight loss.16 Furthermore, resistance exercise promotes maintenance or increase in muscle mass, particularly among individuals with sarcopenia.17 Little is known about the trajectory of dietary intake after bladder cancer diagnosis, and the specific nutritional needs of this population in diverse settings where health disparities exist, such as among rural or socio- economically disadvantaged patients.18 There is also a critical need to develop and test interventions that are simple, scalable, durable, and cost-effective,4, 19 and that address food insecurity.20 Given these major research gaps, we will implement a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention rooted in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)21, 22 that uses food/ingredient, menu and recipe provision coupled with resistance exercise recommendations and tools provided in the "Boost Box", mailed to participants over 12-weeks. The intervention builds self-efficacy and behavioral capability in preparing meals to support nutrition goals and addresses social determinants of health in underserved populations by tackling food insecurity.23 Community partnerships will build the foundation for scaling up lifestyle intervention for cancer patients in Utah. Expanding the availability of evidence-based options for nutrition and physical activity counseling for cancer patients and survivors has been identified as a major need.24 Our proposed study is multidisciplinary and community-focused by partnering with the University of Utah Center for Community Nutrition and their established partners (e.g., Waste Less Solutions, Wasatch Community Gardens, Food Recovery Network, Utah Food Bank, Dairy West, and commercial grocers like Smiths and Harmons) to roll out the intervention in the community. Indeed, community and home-based lifestyle interventions improve physical functioning and clinical outcomes among cancer survivors and are cost-effective.25, 26 Delivering diet and physical activity education using a home-based 'Blue Apron' type approach in partnership with the community is highly novel. Urinary bladder cancer is the fourth leading cancer in men in the US and accounts for over 18,000 deaths among both men and women annually.1 About three quarters of bladder cancer patients present with non- muscle invasive bladder cancer and are treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy delivered locally in the bladder, or cystectomy alone in intravesical-refractory or extensive disease. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Cisplatin- ineligible patients proceed with cystectomy and those who are too sick or frail for cystectomy receive chemotherapy followed by local radiation. Weight loss is a common occurrence post-radical cystectomy, and is associated with malnutrition3 and poor overall survival.34 Moreover, up to 70% of bladder cancer patients, particularly those with frailty, present with sarcopenia, a condition of reduced skeletal muscle mass and function that is an independent poor prognostic factor35 linked to medical complications and quality of life.36 In all, this population has a 60% complication rate by 90-days,37 from urinary tract infections to bowel obstruction. Nutrition is a vital component of chemotherapy tolerability and preparation for and recovery after cystectomy38 to prevent or resolve nutrient deficiencies, achieve or maintain a healthy body weight, preserve lean body mass, minimize nutrition-related side effects, and maximize quality of life.4, 8-10, 39 Diet quality is generally poor among adult cancer survivors in the United States.4 Bladder cancer is especially prevalent in developed countries with Western style dietary patterns and high levels of obesity,2, 40 with significant socioeconomic and geographic disparities observed.18, 41 Indeed, rural compared with urban residence is associated with elevated cancer-specific and other cause mortality among bladder cancer survivors.41 In addition, improvement in diet quality among cancer survivors undergoing dietary intervention has been found to be smaller in rural than urban patients. Yet, despite the biologically plausible role of diet in the etiology of bladder cancer, and the potent effects of treatment on nutritional status and weight loss in this population, remarkably few studies have evaluated either pre- or post-diagnosis diet in association with outcomes after bladder cancer diagnosis, nor implemented dietary intervention among bladder cancer patients to optimize their treatment outcomes.42 We will address this immense research gap by testing a randomized, controlled diet and physical activity trial designed to address barriers to participation in lifestyle intervention among 16 urinary bladder cancer patients (50% rural; 50% no college education). Baseline and post-surgical recovery nutritional status will be evaluated with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA).43, 44 Diet will be assessed with 3-day food record during the first 6-months post-diagnosis. In the intervention arm, patients will be mailed a "Boost Box" weekly for 6-weeks before and 6-weeks after surgery, prepared by our community partners, containing food ingredients. We will work with the University of Utah Center for Community Nutrition to mail curriculum boxes with a menu and recipes for a high protein, immunonutrition-tailored diet (i.e., arginine, vitamin A, and omega-3 rich foods/beverages), and resistance bands (Theraband) with strength training guidelines.3,

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Bladder Cancer, Cystectomy, Chemotherapy
    Keywords
    Surgery, Weight Loss, Urinary, Lifestyle, Cystectomy, Malnutrition, Chemotherapy, Diet, Exercise

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    BOOST Box intervention compared with usual care.
    Masking
    Care Provider
    Masking Description
    Dietitians will be masked to study group.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    20 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    BOOST Box Intervention
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Baseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), exercise prescription, compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, at least 3-weeks and up to 6-weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), up to 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), 6 weeks of Boost Box deliveries and check-ins (nutritional intervention), 6 weeks of exercise intervention and logs, weekly hunger check-in, ASA Food Record (x2), Dietitian consultation, compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline) : 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.
    Arm Title
    Usual Care
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Baseline: Questionnaires (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, Short 2012, FAACT, Godin, TCC), compensation. Pre-Surgery: Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Post-Surgery: post-surgery surveys once (FACT-Bl-Cys, mPG-SGA, FAACT, Godin), Dietitian consultation, ASA Food Record (x2), compensation. Follow-up (estimated 6 months after baseline): 6-month questionnaire, compensation. Compensation total: up to $100 via electronic gift card.
    Intervention Type
    Combination Product
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dietary and Exercise Intervention
    Intervention Description
    Participants will receive food ingredients and recipes to be made and consumed for each meal, every day for a period of 3-6 weeks before surgery and 6-weeks after surgery. The menu is designed as a high protein, high calorie diet meeting targets for omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin A, and arginine (immunonutrition meal plan). In addition, participants will receive an individualized exercise prescription to be performed at home using theraband resistance bands.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Feasibility of BOOST Box Intervention
    Description
    Feasibility of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Feasibility metrics include: % consented/referred; attrition as a function of time; % questionnaires completed; % meals prepared and consumed. Feasibility criteria: >70% patients consented and retained; completed all questionnaires; prepared/consumed Boost Box meals ≥5/7 days/week; and adhered to resistance band exercise ≥2 days/week. Fidelity criteria: 90% protocol checklist items delivered as intended.
    Time Frame
    From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey
    Title
    Acceptability of BOOST Box Intervention
    Description
    Acceptability of a novel, peri-operative lifestyle intervention, "The Boost Box", among bladder cancer patients receiving cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Acceptability of the intervention delivery and menus/recipes will be evaluated by administering an anonymous questionnaire incorporating both Likert scale questions and space for open-ended responses.
    Time Frame
    From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Malnutrition assessment
    Description
    Surveys and Questionnaires used will be the Modified Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (mPG-SGA), Functional Assessment of Anorexia and Cachexia Therapy (FAACT), U.S.Household Food Security Survey Module: Six Item Short Form (Short 2012), and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) food consumption log to calculate a Healthy Eating Index (HEI) which will define diet quality (a higher score indicates a healthier diet).
    Time Frame
    mPG-SGA, FAACT, and Short 2012 at baseline and then mPG-SGA and FAACT again six weeks post-surgery. ASA24 during six weeks pre and post-surgery
    Title
    Surgical complication rate
    Description
    The following information is to be abstracted from medical charts: 30- and 90-day post-surgery complication rates including wound infections; Urinary Tract Infection (UTI); infectious complications; blood clots; readmissions; failure to thrive; dehydration; re-operations.
    Time Frame
    30 and 60 days post-surgery
    Title
    Body weight
    Description
    Participant weight measurements will be collected through participant self-reporting using a digital scale provided by the study and through medical record abstraction.
    Time Frame
    From enrollment to the 6-month follow-up survey
    Title
    Quality of Life (Physical, social, emotional, functional well-being, and a bladder cancer subscale)
    Description
    Questionnaire used will be the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder - Cystectomy (FACT-Bl-Cys).
    Time Frame
    FACT-BI-Cys used from baseline to the 6-month follow-up survey

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients 18 years or older. Newly diagnosed urinary bladder cancer patients indicated for cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant therapy; Treated with surgery at the Huntsman Cancer Institute Have reliable, consistence access to the internet for study procedures Inclusion of Individuals across the Lifespan: The proposed trial will enroll 20 adults who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer. The age range of participants to be recruited is 18 years or older. Bladder cancer is generally a disease of older age and is exceedingly rare in children. According to the American Cancer Society, average age at diagnosis is 73.1 Therefore, we are unable to include children in this trial. Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children: It is anticipated that 20% will be female; 80% male. Racial distribution is projected to be as follows: 97% white, 1% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; 1% American Indian/ Alaska Native; 1% Asian; <1% Black. Approximately 96% will be Non-Hispanic. Exclusion Criteria: Special dietary requirements (i.e., allergies and intolerances, or other clinically prescribed diet). Unable to provide informed consent or read, write, or fill in questionnaires in English
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Mary C Playdon, PhD, MPH
    Phone
    801-213-6264
    Email
    mary.playdon@hci.utah.edu
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mary C Playdon, PhD, MPH
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Utah NUIP Department and Huntsman Cancer Institute
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    31912902
    Citation
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28286066
    Citation
    Tobert CM, Hamilton-Reeves JM, Norian LA, Hung C, Brooks NA, Holzbeierlein JM, Downs TM, Robertson DP, Grossman R, Nepple KG. Emerging Impact of Malnutrition on Surgical Patients: Literature Review and Potential Implications for Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):511-519. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.087. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21074802
    Citation
    Gregg JR, Cookson MS, Phillips S, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Stimson CJ Jr, Aghazadeh M, Smith JA Jr, Barocas DA. Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.021. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33431235
    Citation
    Hansen TTD, Omland LH, von Heymann A, Johansen C, Clausen MB, Suetta C, Pappot H, Rafn BS. Development of Sarcopenia in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Feb;37(1):151108. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151108. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32451229
    Citation
    Grimberg DC, Shah A, Molinger J, Whittle J, Gupta RT, Wischmeyer PE, McDonald SR, Inman BA. Assessments of frailty in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2020 Sep;38(9):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 May 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33853799
    Citation
    Maibom SL, Joensen UN, Poulsen AM, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Roder MA. Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e043266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33117747
    Citation
    Jensen BT, Lauridsen SV, Jensen JB. Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Res Rep Urol. 2020 Oct 14;12:471-486. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S270240. eCollection 2020.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22539238
    Citation
    Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):243-74. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):215.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31916411
    Citation
    Prado CM, Purcell SA, Laviano A. Nutrition interventions to treat low muscle mass in cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):366-380. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12525. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27637832
    Citation
    Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Fearon K, Hutterer E, Isenring E, Kaasa S, Krznaric Z, Laird B, Larsson M, Laviano A, Muhlebach S, Muscaritoli M, Oldervoll L, Ravasco P, Solheim T, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Preiser JC. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):11-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34716363
    Citation
    Keaver L, Houlihan C, O'Callaghan N, LaVertu AE, Ding X, Zhang FF. Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors in Europe: a call for action. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun;76(6):819-826. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-01036-8. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25683894
    Citation
    Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, Thomson CA, Courneya KS, Meyerhardt JA, Stout NL, Kvale E, Ganzer H, Ligibel JA. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):167-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21265. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32183076
    Citation
    Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, Rawla P, Padala SA, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer. Med Sci (Basel). 2020 Mar 13;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010015.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29459359
    Citation
    Jochems SHJ, Van Osch FHM, Bryan RT, Wesselius A, van Schooten FJ, Cheng KK, Zeegers MP. Impact of dietary patterns and the main food groups on mortality and recurrence in cancer survivors: a systematic review of current epidemiological literature. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 19;8(2):e014530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014530.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33158797
    Citation
    Lee E, Zhu J, Velazquez J, Bernardo R, Garcia J, Rovito M, Hines RB. Evaluation of Diet Quality Among American Adult Cancer Survivors: Results From 2005-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb;121(2):217-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.086. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33230694
    Citation
    Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Colla Ruvolo C, Nocera L, Tian Z, Roos FC, Becker A, Kluth LA, Tilki D, Shariat SF, Saad F, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Bladder cancer stage and mortality: urban vs. rural residency. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Feb;32(2):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01366-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30338466
    Citation
    Oberle AD, West JM, Tobert CM, Conley GL, Nepple KG. Optimizing Nutrition Prior to Radical Cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Oct 18;19(12):99. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0854-4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25617581
    Citation
    Cunha Cde M, Sampaio Ede J, Varjao ML, Factum CS, Ramos LB, Barreto-Medeiros JM. Nutritional assessment in surgical oncology patients: a comparative analysis between methods. Nutr Hosp. 2014 Nov 1;31(2):916-21. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.2.7715.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12122555
    Citation
    Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M. Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Aug;56(8):779-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29518432
    Citation
    Hamilton-Reeves JM, Stanley A, Bechtel MD, Yankee TM, Chalise P, Hand LK, Lee EK, Smelser W, Mirza M, Wyre H, Hull H, Carlson SE, Holzbeierlein JM. Perioperative Immunonutrition Modulates Inflammatory Response after Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2018 Aug;200(2):292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26654125
    Citation
    Hamilton-Reeves JM, Bechtel MD, Hand LK, Schleper A, Yankee TM, Chalise P, Lee EK, Mirza M, Wyre H, Griffin J, Holzbeierlein JM. Effects of Immunonutrition for Cystectomy on Immune Response and Infection Rates: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18514630
    Citation
    Solerte SB, Gazzaruso C, Bonacasa R, Rondanelli M, Zamboni M, Basso C, Locatelli E, Schifino N, Giustina A, Fioravanti M. Nutritional supplements with oral amino acid mixtures increases whole-body lean mass and insulin sensitivity in elderly subjects with sarcopenia. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 2;101(11A):69E-77E. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.004.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30126776
    Citation
    Gopalakrishna A, Chang A, Longo TA, Fantony JJ, Harrison MR, Wischmeyer PE, Inman BA. Dietary patterns and health-related quality of life in bladder cancer survivors. Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;36(10):469.e21-469.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29235103
    Citation
    Westhoff E, Wu X, Kiemeney LA, Lerner SP, Ye Y, Huang M, Dinney CP, Vrieling A, Tu H. Dietary patterns and risk of recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018 May 1;142(9):1797-1804. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31214. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29430510
    Citation
    Westhoff E, Witjes JA, Fleshner NE, Lerner SP, Shariat SF, Steineck G, Kampman E, Kiemeney LA, Vrieling A. Body Mass Index, Diet-Related Factors, and Bladder Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bladder Cancer. 2018 Jan 20;4(1):91-112. doi: 10.3233/BLC-170147.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25666940
    Citation
    Declercq P, De Win G, Van der Aa F, Beels E, Van der Linden L, Van Poppel H, Willems L, Spriet I. Reduced length of stay in radical cystectomy patients with oral versus parenteral post-operative nutrition protocol. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Apr;37(2):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0072-9. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Erratum In: Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Jun;37(3):548. Elodie, Beels [corrected to Beels, Elodie]; Ludo, Willems [corrected to Willems, Ludo]; Isabel, Spriet [corrected to Spriet, Isabel].
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24362882
    Citation
    Bertrand J, Siegler N, Murez T, Poinas G, Segui B, Ayuso D, Gres P, Wagner L, Thuret R, Costa P, Droupy S. Impact of preoperative immunonutrition on morbidity following cystectomy for bladder cancer: a case-control pilot study. World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1229-6. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30468936
    Citation
    Kanekiyo S, Takeda S, Iida M, Nishiyama M, Kitahara M, Shindo Y, Tokumitsu Y, Tomochika S, Tsunedomi R, Suzuki N, Abe T, Yoshino S, Hazama S, Ueno T, Nagano H. Efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Nutrition. 2019 Mar;59:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31709584
    Citation
    Yu K, Zheng X, Wang G, Liu M, Li Y, Yu P, Yang M, Guo N, Ma X, Bu Y, Peng Y, Han C, Yu K, Wang C. Immunonutrition vs Standard Nutrition for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 1). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020 Jul;44(5):742-767. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1736. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32573977
    Citation
    Buzquurz F, Bojesen RD, Grube C, Madsen MT, Gogenur I. Impact of oral preoperative and perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative infection and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):764-775. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50314. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31709589
    Citation
    Zheng X, Yu K, Wang G, Liu M, Li Y, Yu P, Yang M, Guo N, Ma X, Bu Y, Peng Y, Han C, Yu K, Wang C. Effects of Immunonutrition on Chemoradiotherapy Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020 Jul;44(5):768-778. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1735. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34054070
    Citation
    Jang MK, Park C, Tussing-Humphreys L, Fernhall B, Phillips S, Doorenbos AZ. The Effectiveness of Sarcopenia Interventions for Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr 01;46(2):E81-E90. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000957.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15454357
    Citation
    Jones LW, Courneya KS, Fairey AS, Mackey JR. Effects of an oncologist's recommendation to exercise on self-reported exercise behavior in newly diagnosed breast cancer survivors: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2004 Oct;28(2):105-13. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2802_5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25981966
    Citation
    Feathers A, Aycinena AC, Lovasi GS, Rundle A, Gaffney AO, Richardson J, Hershman D, Koch P, Contento I, Greenlee H. Food environments are relevant to recruitment and adherence in dietary modification trials. Nutr Res. 2015 Jun;35(6):480-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33668596
    Citation
    Sremanakova J, Sowerbutts AM, Todd C, Cooke R, Burden S. Systematic Review of Behaviour Change Theories Implementation in Dietary Interventions for People Who Have Survived Cancer. Nutrients. 2021 Feb 13;13(2):612. doi: 10.3390/nu13020612.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31297721
    Citation
    Trego ML, Baba ZM, DiSantis KI, Longacre ML. Food insecurity among adult cancer survivors in the United States. J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):641-652. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00783-9. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29086526
    Citation
    Basen-Engquist K, Alfano CM, Maitin-Shepard M, Thomson CA, Schmitz KH, Pinto BM, Stein K, Zucker DS, Syrjala KL, Fallon E, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W. Agenda for Translating Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Weight Management Interventions for Cancer Survivors into Clinical and Community Practice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9-S22. doi: 10.1002/oby.22031.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28427925
    Citation
    Swartz MC, Lewis ZH, Lyons EJ, Jennings K, Middleton A, Deer RR, Arnold D, Dresser K, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS. Effect of Home- and Community-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Physical Function Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1652-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22614994
    Citation
    Demark-Wahnefried W, Morey MC, Sloane R, Snyder DC, Miller PE, Hartman TJ, Cohen HJ. Reach out to enhance wellness home-based diet-exercise intervention promotes reproducible and sustainable long-term improvements in health behaviors, body weight, and physical functioning in older, overweight/obese cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2354-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.0895. Epub 2012 May 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32751724
    Citation
    De Groot LM, Lee G, Ackerie A, van der Meij BS. Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in the Cancer Care Ambulatory Setting: Mortality Predictability and Validity of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short form (PG-SGA SF) and the GLIM Criteria. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):2287. doi: 10.3390/nu12082287.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28689670
    Citation
    Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP, Erickson N, Laviano A, Lisanti MP, Lobo DN, McMillan DC, Muscaritoli M, Ockenga J, Pirlich M, Strasser F, de van der Schueren M, Van Gossum A, Vaupel P, Weimann A. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30146071
    Citation
    Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, Wilson MM, Reedy J. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021. Erratum In: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Aug 20;:
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    A Home-based Lifestyle Intervention for Optimizing Surgical Outcomes Among Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs