search
Back to results

Dexmedetomidine-esketamine for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Liver Ablation

Primary Purpose

Liver Cancer, Radiofrequency Ablation, Esketamine

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination
Remifentanil
Oxycodone
Sponsored by
Peking University First Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Liver Cancer focused on measuring Liver cancer, Radiofrequency ablation, Esketamine, Dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Aged ≥18 years but ≤85 years. Scheduled for elective ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for primary or metastatic liver cancer. Exclusion Criteria: Refused to participate. Diagnosed schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, or myasthenia gravis before surgery. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%, or those with sick sinus syndrome, sinus bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats per minute), or atrioventricular block at grade II or above without pacemaker. Diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or judged to be at high-risk of moderate-to-severe OSA before surgery. Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C), severe renal dysfunction (dialysis before surgery), or classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade >III before surgery. Inability to communicate due to coma, severe dementia, or language barrier before surgery. Allergy to any drug used during the study, or other conditions that are considered unsuitable for study participation.

Sites / Locations

  • Peking University First Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combined with oxycodone

Remifentanil combined with oxycodone

Arm Description

Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination will be infused in addition to oxycodone; the target is to maintain a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale between -2 and -1 during surgery.

Remifentanil will be infused in addition to oxycodone; the target is to maintain a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale between -2 and -1 during surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Area under curve of Numerical Rating Scale of pain during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain will be assessed after percutaneous liver puncture, start of radiofrequency-ablation, every 2 minutes during radiofrequency-ablation, end of radiofrequency-ablation, and 10 minutes after needle removal during surgery, as well as at 0.5, 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The highest Numerical Rating Scale of pain during surgery.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain will be assessed after percutaneous liver puncture, start of radiofrequency-ablation, every 2 minutes during radiofrequency-ablation, end of radiofrequency-ablation, and 10 minutes after needle removal during surgery
Number of intraoperative adjustment of study drug infusion rate.
Number of adjustment of study drug infusion rate during surgery.
Number of additional oxycodone or other analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Number of additional oxycodone or other analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Dose of analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Dose of opioids (excluding remifentanil administered as study drugs) will be converted to intravenous morphine equivalent.
Pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) index during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Pain intensity will be calculated as area under curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain during and within 24 hours after surgery. Opioid consumption (OC) during and within 24 hours after surgery will be calculated after excluding remifentanil administered as study drugs. Pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) index will be calculated as: PIOC=[(AUCmean rank - AUCrank)/AUCmean rank] + [(OCmean rank - OCrank)/OCmean rank]. The range of the sum is -200% to +200%. Values above 0 indicate increased summed AUC and OC compared to the all patients.
Numeric Rating Scale of subjective sleep quality on the first and second nights after surgery.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=the best sleep and 10=the worst sleep) of sleep quality on the first and second nights after surgery.

Full Information

First Posted
August 12, 2023
Last Updated
August 19, 2023
Sponsor
Peking University First Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06003218
Brief Title
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Liver Ablation
Official Title
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combined With Oxycodone for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Liver Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
August 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Peking University First Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a commonly treatment for patients with liver cancer that cannot be surgically resected. During the procedure, patients need to keep awake and cooperate with the procedure, including deep breath and hold breath. However, intolerable pain generated during puncture and radiofrequency heating may cause body movements and interfere the procedure. Oxycodone is frequently used for analgesia but still insufficient. A recent study showed that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination improves analgesia without increasing adverse events. After stopping infusion, the analgesic/sleep-promoting effects of dexmedetomidine-esketamine seemed to last for up to 24 hours. The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination as a supplement to oxycodone will improve sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing radiofrequency liver ablation of the liver.
Detailed Description
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a new technique to treat liver cancer. Under ultrasound guidance, a radiofrequency electrode needle is inserted into the cancer through which local high temperature is generated to coagulate and necrose the cancer tissue. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is currently recognized as the best treatment for patients with liver cancer that cannot be surgically resected. During the procedure, patients need to keep awake and cooperate with the procedure, including deep breath and hold breath. However, intolerable pain generated during puncture and radiofrequency heating may cause body movements and interfere the procedure. Oxycodone is a widely used opioid. It activates the μ and κ receptors and relieves pain including visceral pain, which makes it suitable for analgesia during radiofrequency ablation. However, due to the strong stimulation of radiofrequency liver ablation, supplemental analgesics are often required to improve patient cooperation. As a commonly used supplement, remifentanil is also a μ receptor agonist that quickly reaches blood-brain balance in about 1 minute in and is rapidly hydrolyzed in tissues and blood. The problems with remifentanil are the ultra-short action and pain allergy after stopping infusion. The burning pain after percutaneous liver radiofrequency ablation may last for up to 24 hours. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that has sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic effects. Ketamine is a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that is widely used in pediatric anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Recent studies found that low-dose ketamine also has antidepressant and sleep promoting effects. Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine with a higher affinity for NMDA receptors and is approximately twice as potent as racemic ketamine in analgesia. A recent study showed that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination improves analgesia without increasing adverse events. After stopping infusion, the analgesic and sleep-promoting effects of dexmedetomidine-esketamine seemed to last for up to 24 hours. The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination as a supplement to oxycodone will improve sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing radiofrequency liver ablation of the liver.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Cancer, Radiofrequency Ablation, Esketamine, Dexmedetomidine
Keywords
Liver cancer, Radiofrequency ablation, Esketamine, Dexmedetomidine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
88 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combined with oxycodone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination will be infused in addition to oxycodone; the target is to maintain a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale between -2 and -1 during surgery.
Arm Title
Remifentanil combined with oxycodone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Remifentanil will be infused in addition to oxycodone; the target is to maintain a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale between -2 and -1 during surgery.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination
Intervention Description
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine mixture will be infused with doses adjusted to maintain a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale between -2 to -1 during surgery.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Remifentanil
Intervention Description
Remifentanil will be infused with doses adjusted to maintain a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale between -2 to -1 during surgery.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oxycodone
Intervention Description
Oxycodone will be injected intravenously 10-15 min before puncture.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Area under curve of Numerical Rating Scale of pain during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain will be assessed after percutaneous liver puncture, start of radiofrequency-ablation, every 2 minutes during radiofrequency-ablation, end of radiofrequency-ablation, and 10 minutes after needle removal during surgery, as well as at 0.5, 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
During and within 24 hours after surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The highest Numerical Rating Scale of pain during surgery.
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain will be assessed after percutaneous liver puncture, start of radiofrequency-ablation, every 2 minutes during radiofrequency-ablation, end of radiofrequency-ablation, and 10 minutes after needle removal during surgery
Time Frame
During surgery.
Title
Number of intraoperative adjustment of study drug infusion rate.
Description
Number of adjustment of study drug infusion rate during surgery.
Time Frame
During surgery.
Title
Number of additional oxycodone or other analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Description
Number of additional oxycodone or other analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
During and within 24 hours after surgery.
Title
Dose of analgesics during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Description
Dose of opioids (excluding remifentanil administered as study drugs) will be converted to intravenous morphine equivalent.
Time Frame
During and within 24 hours after surgery.
Title
Pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) index during and within 24 hours after surgery.
Description
Pain intensity will be calculated as area under curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain) of pain during and within 24 hours after surgery. Opioid consumption (OC) during and within 24 hours after surgery will be calculated after excluding remifentanil administered as study drugs. Pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) index will be calculated as: PIOC=[(AUCmean rank - AUCrank)/AUCmean rank] + [(OCmean rank - OCrank)/OCmean rank]. The range of the sum is -200% to +200%. Values above 0 indicate increased summed AUC and OC compared to the all patients.
Time Frame
During and within 24 hours after surgery.
Title
Numeric Rating Scale of subjective sleep quality on the first and second nights after surgery.
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0=the best sleep and 10=the worst sleep) of sleep quality on the first and second nights after surgery.
Time Frame
On the first and second nights after surgery.
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Patients' evaluation on anesthesia.
Description
Patients' evaluation will be performed using the Likert five-point scale: 1=very dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, and 5=very satisfied.
Time Frame
Within 30 minutes after surgery.
Title
Surgeons' evaluation on anesthesia.
Description
Surgeons' evaluation will be performed using the Likert five-point scale: 1=very dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, and 5=very satisfied.
Time Frame
Within 30 minutes after surgery.
Title
Postoperative recovery time.
Description
Time interval between end of surgery and arrival of general ward.
Time Frame
Up to 2 hours after surgery.
Title
Length of hospital stay after surgery.
Description
Length of hospital stay after surgery.
Time Frame
Up to 30 days after surgery.
Title
Incidence of postoperative complications during hospital stay.
Description
Postoperative complications are defined as new-onset conditions after surgery that have adverse effects on postoperative recovery and require therapeutic interventions.
Time Frame
Up to 30 days after surgery.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged ≥18 years but ≤85 years. Scheduled for elective ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for primary or metastatic liver cancer. Exclusion Criteria: Refused to participate. Diagnosed schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, or myasthenia gravis before surgery. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%, or those with sick sinus syndrome, sinus bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats per minute), or atrioventricular block at grade II or above without pacemaker. Diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or judged to be at high-risk of moderate-to-severe OSA before surgery. Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C), severe renal dysfunction (dialysis before surgery), or classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade >III before surgery. Inability to communicate due to coma, severe dementia, or language barrier before surgery. Allergy to any drug used during the study, or other conditions that are considered unsuitable for study participation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Phone
86(10) 83572784
Email
wangdongxin@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hong Hong, MD
Phone
+86 17810265121
Email
honghong920066@sina.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University First Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Peking University First Hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100034
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
Phone
+861083572784
Email
wangdongxin@hotmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
2185179
Citation
McGahan JP, Browning PD, Brock JM, Tesluk H. Hepatic ablation using radiofrequency electrocautery. Invest Radiol. 1990 Mar;25(3):267-70. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199003000-00011. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22424278
Citation
European Association for Study of Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(5):599-641. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.021. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(8):1255-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16880239
Citation
Higgins H, Berger DL. RFA for liver tumors: does it really work? Oncologist. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(7):801-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-7-801.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23212610
Citation
Olesen AE, Kristensen K, Staahl C, Kell S, Wong GY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Drewes AM. A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of a peripheral kappa-opioid receptor agonist CR665 and oxycodone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Feb;52(2):125-37. doi: 10.1007/s40262-012-0023-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15051626
Citation
Riviere PJ. Peripheral kappa-opioid agonists for visceral pain. Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;141(8):1331-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705763. Epub 2004 Mar 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32922181
Citation
Wang J, Yuan X, Guo W, Xiang X, Wu Q, Fang M, Zhang W, Ding Z, Xie K, Fang J, Zhou H, Fu S. Sedation and Analgesia for Liver Cancer Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: Fentanyl and Oxycodone Comparison. Int J Med Sci. 2020 Aug 12;17(14):2194-2199. doi: 10.7150/ijms.47067. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29740688
Citation
Wu WT, Jia ZY, Chen Y, Chen QF, Zu QQ, Yang ZQ, Liu S, Shi HB. The Safety and Efficacy of Oxycodone Versus Fentanyl in Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of a Liver Tumour Abutting the Capsule. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1980-6. Epub 2018 May 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30705584
Citation
Wu J, Lu Y, Cao X. Different effects of oxycodone and remifentanil in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic cancer: a randomized trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Jan 18;13:365-372. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S188728. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27734470
Citation
Yu EH, Tran DH, Lam SW, Irwin MG. Remifentanil tolerance and hyperalgesia: short-term gain, long-term pain? Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1347-1362. doi: 10.1111/anae.13602.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27501613
Citation
Ongiem A, Siriussawakul A, Aungsumat Wangdee BNS W, Homsud S, Jaiyen T. Assessment of Pain Severity after Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 May;99(5):572-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12552203
Citation
Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):428-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23910886
Citation
Xia ZQ, Chen SQ, Yao X, Xie CB, Wen SH, Liu KX. Clinical benefits of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in adult intensive care unit patients: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):833-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.062. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
36117973
Citation
Sun YM, Zhu SN, Zhang C, Li SL, Wang DX. Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine on sleep quality in postoperative patients with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: A pilot randomized trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 31;9:931084. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.931084. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32826629
Citation
Barrett W, Buxhoeveden M, Dhillon S. Ketamine: a versatile tool for anesthesia and analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;33(5):633-638. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000916.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31745646
Citation
Kaur U, Pathak BK, Singh A, Chakrabarti SS. Esketamine: a glimmer of hope in treatment-resistant depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr;271(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01084-z. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34992482
Citation
Song B, Zhu J. A Novel Application of Ketamine for Improving Perioperative Sleep Disturbances. Nat Sci Sleep. 2021 Dec 25;13:2251-2266. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S341161. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30041987
Citation
Bartova L, Papageorgiou K, Milenkovic I, Dold M, Weidenauer A, Willeit M, Winkler D, Kasper S. Rapid antidepressant effect of S-ketamine in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;28(8):980-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29736744
Citation
Molero P, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Martin-Santos R, Calvo-Sanchez E, Gutierrez-Rojas L, Meana JJ. Antidepressant Efficacy and Tolerability of Ketamine and Esketamine: A Critical Review. CNS Drugs. 2018 May;32(5):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0519-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29656663
Citation
Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Alphs L, Lane R, Lim P, Pinter C, Hough D, Sanacora G, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):620-630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23893490
Citation
Segmiller F, Ruther T, Linhardt A, Padberg F, Berger M, Pogarell O, Moller HJ, Kohler C, Schule C. Repeated S-ketamine infusions in therapy resistant depression: a case series. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;53(9):996-8. doi: 10.1002/jcph.122. Epub 2013 Jul 24. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11936706
Citation
Persson J, Hasselstrom J, Maurset A, Oye I, Svensson JO, Almqvist O, Scheinin H, Gustafsson LL, Almqvist O. Pharmacokinetics and non-analgesic effects of S- and R-ketamines in healthy volunteers with normal and reduced metabolic capacity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;57(12):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s002280100353.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27327855
Citation
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Wejbora M, Michaeli K, Edler A, Sandner-Kiesling A. The effects of minimal-dose versus low-dose S-ketamine on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, and postoperative delirium: a triple-blinded, randomized, active- and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Oct;82(10):1069-1076. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32594705
Citation
Hu ZC, Xu G, Zhang XW, Ma K, Jin JJ, Li PS. [Meta-analysis of the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine during dressing changes in burn patients]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 20;36(6):458-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190327-00145. Chinese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32443302
Citation
Lee KH, Lee SJ, Park JH, Kim SH, Lee H, Oh DS, Kim YH, Park YH, Kim H, Lee SE. Analgesia for spinal anesthesia positioning in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures: Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-fentanyl. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27898430
Citation
Nagappa M, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F. An update on the various practical applications of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):118-125. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000426.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28632527
Citation
Andersen LPK, Gogenur I, Torup H, Rosenberg J, Werner MU. Assessment of Postoperative Analgesic Drug Efficacy: Method of Data Analysis Is Critical. Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):1008-1013. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002007.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Dexmedetomidine-esketamine for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Liver Ablation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs