search
Back to results

Effect of Additional Treatment With NMES After Achilles Tendon Rupture

Primary Purpose

Achilles Tendon Rupture, Physical Disability

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Sponsored by
Vastra Gotaland Region
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Achilles Tendon Rupture focused on measuring Achilles Tendon Rupture, Rehabilitation, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Achilles Tendon rupture The injury should have been treated within two days from the trauma The rupture is located in the mid portion of the tendon Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Having a pace maker, intra cardiac defibrillator or other active implant Having had an Achilles Tendon rupture before, regardless of side Having an earlier injury that will have an impact on lower leg function, regardless of side Diabetes Neuro vascular disease Immunosuppressive treatment Difficulties to understand the language or difficulties in understand instructions. Unable to consent

Sites / Locations

  • Forskningsenhet Ortopedi, Sahlgrenska universitetssjukhuset, Mölndal

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Additional treatment with NMES after Achilles Tendon rupture

Control group

Arm Description

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation 2 times a day á 15 minutes during the week 3-8 after the Achilles Tendon rupture. Patients will also follow ordinary standard rehabilitation for Achilles Tendon rupture

Patients will follow ordinary standard rehabilitation for Achilles Tendon rupture

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) - injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test using. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Tendon length
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Tendon length
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Tendon length
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of medial and lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of medial and lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m medial and m lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Soleus cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Soleus cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Soleus cross-sectional area
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Biomechanical data; kinematic data will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
16 7+ cameras and 4 force plates will be used. 55 reflectors will be attached on the patients´body to be able to detect segmental movements. Kinematic data will be evaluated in degrees in ankle, knee and hip. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in degrees (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Biomechanical data; kinetic data will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
16 7+ cameras and 4 force plates will be used. 55 reflectors will be attached on the patients´body to be able to detect segmental movements. Kinetic data will be evaluated in power (watt) in ankle, knee and hip. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Electro Myography (EMG) will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
EMG electrodes on the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius, Soleus and Tibialis anterior, Quadriceps and trunk muscles will be attached on the patient in order to measure how the muscles are recruited during walking running and jumping. Both healthy and injured sides will be analyzed. The electrical activity in the muscles will be evaluated. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function. The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function.The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function.The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level. The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level.The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level.The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Drop Countermovement Jump
Drop Countermovement Jump: Evaluation of vertical jumping height after jumping from a 20 cm high box. The outcome will be measured as the height the patient can perform in jump height after landing in cm. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Drop Countermovement Jump
Drop Countermovement Jump: Evaluation of vertical jumping height after jumping from a 20 cm high box. The outcome will be measured as the height the patient can perform in jump height after landing in cm. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Hopping
Evaluation of series of jumps as in jumping ropes. The outcome measurement will be mean jumping height in cm and elasticity ratio in 20 jumps. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height and elasticity ratio will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Hopping
Evaluation of series of jumps as in jumping ropes. The outcome measurement will be mean jumping height in cm and elasticity ratio in 20 jumps. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height and elasticity ratio will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Calf muscle power
Evaluation of calf muscle power in a weight training machine expressed in watt (Newton x meter /seconds). Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Calf muscle power
Evaluation of calf muscle power in a weight training machine expressed in watt (Newton x meter /seconds). Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

Full Information

First Posted
July 10, 2023
Last Updated
August 18, 2023
Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Collaborators
Göteborg University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06009978
Brief Title
Effect of Additional Treatment With NMES After Achilles Tendon Rupture
Official Title
The Effect of Early Treatment With Neuromuscular, Electrical Stimulation (NMES) After Achilles Tendon Rupture
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Collaborators
Göteborg University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Increased knowledge is needed about new methods how to treat patients with Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR). A goal is to be able to individualize as well as improve treatment beyond the question about if surgery should be used or not. An overall aim of the project is to, in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), explore what impact a new treatment method with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) - attached on the patients ́ calf muscles on the injured leg - in the early stages after an ATR, may have on tendon length, functional performance, biomechanical variables and patient reported outcome, both in the short and long term after the injury. 70 patients are planned to be included in this RCT and will be evaluated 3,6 and 12 months after their injury. Primary outcome will be heel-rise height. Secondary outcome will be tendon length, jumping ability, patient- reported outcome and biomechanical loading pattern. There is also a need to explore if the patients ́ loading patterns improve after treatment with NMES. Therefore, biomechanical variables in lower leg during walking and jumping will also be evaluated one year after their injury. The planned studies include completely new ways of exploring how to optimize the rehabilitation after an ATR. Since there might be an increased risk for overuse injuries in the healthy limb, there will also be focus on how the non- injured limb may be affected of an ATR. Taken together, this new knowledge can be helpful in the clinical setting to individualize and optimize patients' treatment and rehabilitation with the goal to guide the patient return to the same, or higher level of, physical activity as before the injury.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge about how calf muscle performance and tendon elongation affect the patient's discomfort or ability to return to previous activity levels after an Achilles Tendon rupture. Tendon elongation can cause a changed recruitment pattern of the different parts of the muscle complex triceps surae. There is some evidence that treatment with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) can improve postural balance by stimulating the calf muscles in elderly people with impaired balance. A newly published study concluded that NMES treatment the first 12 weeks after an ATR, did not have any impact on calf circumference or patient-reported outcome the first 12 weeks after the injury. Studies have shown that only 20-40% of patients are able to return to the same level of physical activity as before the injury. Although patients return to full participation in sports, their level of performance is often adversely affected. Obviously, there can be different reasons for this. In a newly published study, it was concluded that joint power distribution during a drop countermovement jump was affected by fear of reinjury as long as 2 years after an ATR. However, there is still a lot to explore about if an improved physical function in the injured calf muscle may decrease the fear of re-injury and therefore positively affect the ability to return to previous physical activity level after an ATR. Therefore, new treatments with the goal to increase the possibility to return to the same physical level as before the injury are very much needed. An ATR can lead to reduced strength development in the ankle with simultaneous increased load development in the knee joint in the injured leg for as long as 6 years after the injury. Reduction in strength and endurance in the calf muscle has been shown to persist long after the injury. Exhaustion of the lower leg muscles affects the valgus moment in the knee as well as kinematic variables in athletes during vertical jumps, which may affect the risk of knee injury. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how lower leg function, biomechanics and muscle recruitment are affected in patients after an ATR. It is also unknown how this injury affects the healthy limb and perhaps increase the risk of overload injuries in other parts of the body. HYPOTHESIS: Additional treatment with NMES in early stages after an Achilles Tendon rupture have a positive impact on lower leg function both in the short and long term. PURPOSE AND SPECIFIC GOALS: An overall aim of the project is to, in a randomized controlled trial, explore what impact a new treatment method with NMES in the early stages after an ATR may have on calf muscle performance, tendon length, jumping ability, biomechanical variables and patient reported outcome both in the short and long term after the injury. There will also be focus on how the non-injured limb may be affected of an Achilles tendon rupture. This new knowledge can be helpful in the clinical setting to individualize and optimize patients' treatment and rehabilitation avoid overuse injuries, both in the injured and healthy limb The goal will be to guide the patient return to the same, or higher level of physical activity as before the injury. OBJECTIVES: To explore if additional treatment with NMES during the first 3-8 weeks after an ATR can improve calf muscle function, biomechanical variables, tendon lengthening and patient-reported outcome both in short an long term. The design of this study is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). To evaluate the biomechanics of the ankle, knee and hip during walking, running and jumping in both limbs in two groups of patients one year after an ATR. One group has been treated with NMES 3-8 weeks after the injury and the other group has not. METHOD The design of this study is a randomized controlled trial. A power calculation (p <0.05, power 80%) showed that 28 patients who receive and 28 who do not receive treatment with NMES are needed to be able to show a clinically important difference of 10% in heel-rise height. A total of 70 patients with ATR will be included and randomized to receive or to not receive additional therapy with NMES during the first 3-8 weeks after their ATR. Four electrodes connected with the NMES equipment will be attached on the patients ́ calf on the injured leg and they will use the equipment in their home two times a day á 15 minutes for six weeks, that is 3-8 weeks after the injury. Primary outcome will be the heel-rise height during the heel-rise work test. Standardized seated heel-rise as well as single-leg standing heel- rise will be evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after the injury in both the injured and the healthy limb. The heel-rise work test will be evaluated with a linear encoder connected to the software MuscleLab®. Tendon length will be evaluated with ultrasound 8 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after the injury. The measurement is found to be reliable and valid. The tendon length will be evaluated with ultrasonography with extended field of view using a wideband array linear probe (5.0- 13.0 MHz). The B- mode at 10 MHz and a depth of 3 cm will be used to record the images. One year after the injury, kinematic and kinetic variables together with EMG will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping. For collection of the biomechanical data, 16 7+ cameras and 4 force plates will be used. This new equipment is available in a new motional analysis lab at our research unit. Fifty-five reflectors will be attached on the patients´ body to be able to detect segmental movements. EMG electrodes on the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius, Soleus and Tibialis anterior muscles will also be attached on the patient in order to measure how the muscles are recruited in the different activities. Both healthy and injured sides will be analyzed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Achilles Tendon Rupture, Physical Disability
Keywords
Achilles Tendon Rupture, Rehabilitation, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Additional treatment with NMES after Achilles Tendon rupture
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation 2 times a day á 15 minutes during the week 3-8 after the Achilles Tendon rupture. Patients will also follow ordinary standard rehabilitation for Achilles Tendon rupture
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will follow ordinary standard rehabilitation for Achilles Tendon rupture
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Intervention Description
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) 2 times a day á 15 minutes from the third to the eight week after injury. The additional treatment will be perform in the patients home by themselves
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Description
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) - injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Description
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test
Description
Evaluation of heel-rise height during heel-rise work test using. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tendon length
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Tendon length
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Tendon length
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Length measured with ultrasound from insertion to myotendinous junction in both limbs.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of medial and lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of medial and lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Gastrocnemius Cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m medial and m lateral gastrocnemius in both limbs
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Soleus cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Soleus cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Soleus cross-sectional area
Description
Comparison between groups and limbs in Area of m soleus in both limbs
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Biomechanical data; kinematic data will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
Description
16 7+ cameras and 4 force plates will be used. 55 reflectors will be attached on the patients´body to be able to detect segmental movements. Kinematic data will be evaluated in degrees in ankle, knee and hip. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in degrees (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Biomechanical data; kinetic data will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
Description
16 7+ cameras and 4 force plates will be used. 55 reflectors will be attached on the patients´body to be able to detect segmental movements. Kinetic data will be evaluated in power (watt) in ankle, knee and hip. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Electro Myography (EMG) will be evaluated during walking, running and jumping.
Description
EMG electrodes on the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius, Soleus and Tibialis anterior, Quadriceps and trunk muscles will be attached on the patient in order to measure how the muscles are recruited during walking running and jumping. Both healthy and injured sides will be analyzed. The electrical activity in the muscles will be evaluated. Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
Description
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function. The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
Description
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function.The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)
Description
A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendon rupture with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function.The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
Description
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level. The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
Description
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level.The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Physical Activity Scale (PAS)
Description
A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level.The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Drop Countermovement Jump
Description
Drop Countermovement Jump: Evaluation of vertical jumping height after jumping from a 20 cm high box. The outcome will be measured as the height the patient can perform in jump height after landing in cm. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Drop Countermovement Jump
Description
Drop Countermovement Jump: Evaluation of vertical jumping height after jumping from a 20 cm high box. The outcome will be measured as the height the patient can perform in jump height after landing in cm. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Hopping
Description
Evaluation of series of jumps as in jumping ropes. The outcome measurement will be mean jumping height in cm and elasticity ratio in 20 jumps. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height and elasticity ratio will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Hopping
Description
Evaluation of series of jumps as in jumping ropes. The outcome measurement will be mean jumping height in cm and elasticity ratio in 20 jumps. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height and elasticity ratio will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Calf muscle power
Description
Evaluation of calf muscle power in a weight training machine expressed in watt (Newton x meter /seconds). Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Calf muscle power
Description
Evaluation of calf muscle power in a weight training machine expressed in watt (Newton x meter /seconds). Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Achilles Tendon rupture The injury should have been treated within two days from the trauma The rupture is located in the mid portion of the tendon Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Having a pace maker, intra cardiac defibrillator or other active implant Having had an Achilles Tendon rupture before, regardless of side Having an earlier injury that will have an impact on lower leg function, regardless of side Diabetes Neuro vascular disease Immunosuppressive treatment Difficulties to understand the language or difficulties in understand instructions. Unable to consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Katarina Nilsson Helander, Ass.prof.
Phone
+46 70-3218420
Email
katarina.nilsson.helander@vgregion.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Annelie Brorsson, PhD
Phone
+46 70-4005508
Email
annelie.brorsson@orthop.gu.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katarina Nilsson Helander, Ass.Prof
Organizational Affiliation
VGregion
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Forskningsenhet Ortopedi, Sahlgrenska universitetssjukhuset, Mölndal
City
Mölndal
State/Province
VGregion
ZIP/Postal Code
43180
Country
Sweden
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pernilla Eliasson, Ass.prof.
Phone
+46 73-9864982
Email
pernilla.eliasson@vgregion.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roy Tranberg, Ass.prof
Phone
+46 70-8105401
Email
roy.tranberg@vgregion.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katarina Nilsson Helander, Ass.prof.
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annelie Brorsson, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Additional Treatment With NMES After Achilles Tendon Rupture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs