search
Back to results

Family Teams: A Study to Promote Team Collaboration in Family Medicine Clinics

Primary Purpose

Patient Care Team, Psychological Well-Being, Occupational Burnout

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Team-building processes
Sponsored by
University of Michigan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Patient Care Team focused on measuring family medicine, team function, burnout, compassion

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Staff in the roles of medical assistant, nurse, clerical staff, or clinician (physician, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant) Must work in one of five family medicine clinics at the University of Michigan. Exclusion Criteria: administrative clinic director at each site (managerial) Staff outside of the above roles such as a dietician, social worker, pharmacist

Sites / Locations

  • University of Michigan-Domino FarmsRecruiting
  • University of Michigan- BriarwoodRecruiting
  • Uniiversity of Michigan- ChelseaRecruiting
  • University of Michigan-DexterRecruiting
  • University of Michigan-YpsilantiRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Survey participants

Arm Description

All participants in the study will be in a single arm, divided by clinic.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Team Development measure
The Team Development Measure is a 31-item questionnaire designed to the domains of communication, roles and goals, cohesion, and team primacy. Each question has four response options (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree). Summary scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale to provide a score of team functioning and cohesiveness with a higher score indicating a better-functioning team. This measure has been validated in primary care settings and has strong psychometric properties.
Team Compassion Behavior survey
The Team Compassion Behavior survey is a 6-question instrument adapted for teams from a longer individual compassion instrument. It is scored on a 5-point scale (almost never, seldom, sometimes, often, almost always) and summed for a total range of 6-30 point, with a higher score indicating more compassionate team behavior.
Burnout
The study team will use the first 10 questions of the Mini Z 3.0 (the 11th question is open-ended) to measure burnout across staff in all roles. It has just minor changes from the earlier MiniZ versions and has good performance with two subscales for supportive work environment and electronic medical record (EMR) stress. Each question has a 5-scale response option. Subscale 1 (supportive work environment) sums the responses to questions 1-7 and has a range of 7-35 with a score of 28 or higher indicating a highly supportive workplace. Subscale 2 (EMR stress) sums responses to questions 8-10 and has a range of 3-15 with a score of 12 or higher indicating a workplace with manageable EMR stress.
Satisfaction with Intervention
There are several open-ended questions to assess what is working well with the project, what could be improved, and any other comments about the intervention. There is also a question asking how participants feel about the project (5-point scale ranging from extremely negative to extremely positive).
Participation Effort
This survey asks to report how much effort participants have made to help other groups in clinic and how much effort each of the other groups have made to help them. These questions have a 5-point scale (none at all, a little, a moderate amount, a lot, a great deal). These surveys also ask two open ended questions: problems with the intervention and what is not working in clinic with respect to the project and what is working well. This data will help the study team do continuous quality improvement within the clinics to ensure that the agreed-upon help is actually occurring.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 18, 2023
Last Updated
September 14, 2023
Sponsor
University of Michigan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06011239
Brief Title
Family Teams: A Study to Promote Team Collaboration in Family Medicine Clinics
Official Title
Family Teams: A Study to Promote Team Collaboration in Family Medicine Clinics
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 8, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This project includes an intervention in five Michigan Medicine family medicine clinics which is designed to improve staff collaboration across different job roles.
Detailed Description
The primary intervention asks staff to meet with others in the same role and to consider the following questions: The Ask: When staff are busy or overwhelmed by work, what tasks can others do (people in each of these groups) to help make your job better or easier? The Offer: When people in other groups are busy or overwhelmed, what tasks can your group do to help make staff jobs better or easier? After this information is collected, at an in-person meeting of all staff and faculty, the study team will divide everyone into groups by clinic and then by the four roles. The study team will hand out the idea list and ask participants to review the list, discuss whether there are new or additional ideas which should be added, and then prioritize staffs top five "asks" and top five "offers" for staff role. Negotiation of asks/offers: The study team will hold 1-4 subsequent brief meetings at each clinic where staff are again sub-divided into four groups by role. Each group will review the asks from people in other roles and decide whether these are actions that staff can help with or whether there are barriers. The clinic champions will work with the groups to address barriers (which could include lack of information, lack of training, disagreements about need, etc). The ultimate goal will be for groups to come to consensus agreement on at least three ways staff can assist people in other roles. In some clinics this may be straightforward and require just one meeting. In other clinics, it may take several meetings. Implementation: Once the asks and offers are finalized, it will be up to the physician champions to help promote these agreements at the clinic, follow up with staff and with the nursing, medical assistants, and clerical champions to ensure that people are following thru with commitments to help, and trouble shoot problems that come up. Coordination with Leadership: a department leader will serve as the liaison between the clinic champions and members of leadership that oversee clinical functions. This leader meets regularly with these leadership groups and will help troubleshoot challenges to implementing the asks and offers which need higher-level approval or input. Ongoing process improvement: Over time, the study team will send up to four brief, anonymous surveys to all staff asking whether the staff are indeed doing the things that staff committed to do and whether other role groups are following thru on the commitments. This provides an opportunity for people to identify and report problems. This data will be anonymously fed back to the physician champion that is tasked to troubleshoot and address the problems identified, working with the liaison as appropriate. This will likely require continuous process improvement and revisiting to ensure success. Evaluation: The study team proposes to measure burnout and team centeredness using anonymous on-line surveys. Brief surveys: At several points during the year, the investigators will send out brief surveys. These ask for the clinic and job role and then ask participant to rate how much effort they have made to help others, how much effort others have made to help them, and if there are open-ended comment about what is or is not working. This information will be used to improve the intervention at each clinic. This study is Institutional review board (IRB) exempt and will have a waiver of documentation of informed consent with survey completion representing consent.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patient Care Team, Psychological Well-Being, Occupational Burnout
Keywords
family medicine, team function, burnout, compassion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The study will recruit all staff except the clinic managers at each of five family medicine clinics within our academic family medicine department.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Survey participants
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants in the study will be in a single arm, divided by clinic.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Team-building processes
Intervention Description
All staff in one of the four role groups (medical assistants (MAs); clerical/administrative staff; nursing staff; and physicians/nurse practitioners/physician assistants) will be sent an anonymous survey. The survey will ask staff to consider what help participants wish to ask for and what help participants can offer to staff in the other three roles at times when people are busy or overwhelmed. These ideas will be combined into a typed "idea list" for each role and then staff in clinics will discuss. Once these are finalized the clinics will implement these. At several points during the year, the study team will send out brief surveys. These surveys will collect the clinic and job role and ask participant to rate how much effort has been made in different ways, and if there are open-ended comments about what is or is not working. This information will be used to improve the intervention at each clinic.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Team Development measure
Description
The Team Development Measure is a 31-item questionnaire designed to the domains of communication, roles and goals, cohesion, and team primacy. Each question has four response options (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree). Summary scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale to provide a score of team functioning and cohesiveness with a higher score indicating a better-functioning team. This measure has been validated in primary care settings and has strong psychometric properties.
Time Frame
Months 0, 6, 12
Title
Team Compassion Behavior survey
Description
The Team Compassion Behavior survey is a 6-question instrument adapted for teams from a longer individual compassion instrument. It is scored on a 5-point scale (almost never, seldom, sometimes, often, almost always) and summed for a total range of 6-30 point, with a higher score indicating more compassionate team behavior.
Time Frame
Months 0, 6, 12
Title
Burnout
Description
The study team will use the first 10 questions of the Mini Z 3.0 (the 11th question is open-ended) to measure burnout across staff in all roles. It has just minor changes from the earlier MiniZ versions and has good performance with two subscales for supportive work environment and electronic medical record (EMR) stress. Each question has a 5-scale response option. Subscale 1 (supportive work environment) sums the responses to questions 1-7 and has a range of 7-35 with a score of 28 or higher indicating a highly supportive workplace. Subscale 2 (EMR stress) sums responses to questions 8-10 and has a range of 3-15 with a score of 12 or higher indicating a workplace with manageable EMR stress.
Time Frame
Months 0, 6, 12
Title
Satisfaction with Intervention
Description
There are several open-ended questions to assess what is working well with the project, what could be improved, and any other comments about the intervention. There is also a question asking how participants feel about the project (5-point scale ranging from extremely negative to extremely positive).
Time Frame
Months 6, 12
Title
Participation Effort
Description
This survey asks to report how much effort participants have made to help other groups in clinic and how much effort each of the other groups have made to help them. These questions have a 5-point scale (none at all, a little, a moderate amount, a lot, a great deal). These surveys also ask two open ended questions: problems with the intervention and what is not working in clinic with respect to the project and what is working well. This data will help the study team do continuous quality improvement within the clinics to ensure that the agreed-upon help is actually occurring.
Time Frame
Months 3, 4, 8, 10

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Staff in the roles of medical assistant, nurse, clerical staff, or clinician (physician, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant) Must work in one of five family medicine clinics at the University of Michigan. Exclusion Criteria: administrative clinic director at each site (managerial) Staff outside of the above roles such as a dietician, social worker, pharmacist
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Katherine J Gold, MD
Phone
734-998-2449
Email
ktgold@umich.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Michigan-Domino Farms
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48106
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
Phone
734-998-2449
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sahoko Little, MD
Facility Name
University of Michigan- Briarwood
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48108
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
Phone
734-998-2449
Email
ktgold@umich.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sahoko Little, MD
Facility Name
Uniiversity of Michigan- Chelsea
City
Chelsea
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48118
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
Phone
734-998-2449
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sahoko Little, MD
Facility Name
University of Michigan-Dexter
City
Dexter
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48130
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
Phone
734-998-2449
Email
ktgold@umich.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kahterine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sahoko Little, MD
Facility Name
University of Michigan-Ypsilanti
City
Ypsilanti
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48198
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Gold, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sahoko Little, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24347186
Citation
Stock R, Mahoney E, Carney PA. Measuring team development in clinical care settings. Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(10):691-700.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34968091
Citation
Wee EXM, Fehr R. Compassion during difficult times: Team compassion behavior, suffering, supervisory dependence, and employee voice during COVID-19. J Appl Psychol. 2021 Dec;106(12):1805-1820. doi: 10.1037/apl0001001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31516024
Citation
Pommier E, Neff KD, Toth-Kiraly I. The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):21-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191119874108. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35048290
Citation
Linzer M, McLoughlin C, Poplau S, Goelz E, Brown R, Sinsky C; AMA-Hennepin Health System (HHS) burnout reduction writing team. The Mini Z Worklife and Burnout Reduction Instrument: Psychometrics and Clinical Implications. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(11):2876-2878. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07278-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Family Teams: A Study to Promote Team Collaboration in Family Medicine Clinics

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs