search
Back to results

Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
No-touch vein graft
Radial artery graft
Sponsored by
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age more than 18 years old First time undergo isolated CABG surgery Severe three-vessel disease (Left anterior decending artery, Left circumflex artery, Right coronoary artery lesion with more than 75% stenosis) Exclusion Criteria: Urgent or Redo CABG surgery Concomitant cardiac or vascular procedures (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Morrow procedure) A positive Allen test, radial artery plaque on ultrasound or a history of vasculitis or Raynaud's syndrome Varicose great saphenous vein or venous tortuosity and judged as can not be used in operation by surgeons Known allergy to radiographic contrast media Planed endarterectomy of coronary artery before surgery Malignant tumor or other severe systemic diseases Combined with other irreversible organ failures Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer Participant of other ongoing clinical trials in 30 days.

Sites / Locations

  • Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

No-Touch vein

Radial artery

Arm Description

No-touch vein group has two No-touch saphenous vein grafts, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.

Radial artery group has one radial artery graft and one conventional saphenous vein graft, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system basing on surgeons' decision. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Prevalence of graft patency
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prevalence of graft patency
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.
Overall major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate
MACCE includes death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization
Cardiac death
Death from any heart disease
Documented non-lethal myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction is defined according to the most recent guideline
Stroke
An acute symptomatic episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction
Target lesion revascularization
CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention
Recurrence of Angina
Recurrence of Angina

Full Information

First Posted
August 23, 2023
Last Updated
October 15, 2023
Sponsor
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06014047
Brief Title
Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein
Official Title
Graft Patency Between the Radial Artery and the No-touch Saphenous Vein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Study (GRAFT-CAB Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2030 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluates the short-term and long-term patency of the radial artery and the No-touch vein in patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A total of at least 774 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG will be consecutively recruited from Fuwai Hospital and randomly assigned to receive radial artery or No-touch saphenous vein as their second graft. All participants will be invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively.
Detailed Description
CABG is still the treatment of choice for ischemic heart disease. However, restenosis or occlusion may occur to graft vessels, leading to postoperative myocardial ischemia and subsequent clinical events. Long-term angiographic follow-up demonstrated that vein graft restenosis and occlusion are common among those receiving CABG, with a vein graft patency of less than 50% at 15 years postoperatively. A novel approach to harvesting the vein is called "No-touch" technique (NT), which can avoid mechanical damage to the vein wall. Previous studies showed that No-touch saphenous vein grafts (NT-SVG) has a 96.3% postoperative graft patency rate at 12 months, compared to 93.5% of conventional saphenous vein grafts (con-SVGs). Thus, the No-touch technique can significantly reduce postoperative graft occlusion. Radial artery(RA) as an arterial material for CABG surgery has a better long-term patency than con-SVG, up to 83% at 10 years. Using radial artery as the second graft for CABG may provide additional clinical benefit. However, the risk of perioperative vasospasm and graft occlusion due to competitive blood flow limit the using of radial artery. Therefore, only the No-touch vein and the radial artery can improve the graft patency. Only one randomized clinical trial(RCT) compared the RA and NT-vein, and this study is limited by irregular post-operative management and small sample size from single center. This prospective single-center study aims to compare the short-term and long-term graft patency between the No-touch vein and the radial artery. This study will consecutively enroll at least 774 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG. After obtaining informed written consent, participants will be randomly allocated to either the No-touch or the radial artery group. At baseline, participants will be interviewed to collect detailed information about on demographics, socioeconomic status, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatments, in-hospital outcomes, general and disease-specific quality of life, function and mental status. During the follow-ups, the investigators will collect information about clinical outcomes events, long-term treatments, function, quality of life, symptoms, and medical care during the recovery period. All participants will be invited for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively for graft patency evaluation. The data adjudicators and computed tomography(CT) reviewers will be blinded to the study. Due to the nature of this study, the operating surgeons, anesthetists and other operative room staff will not be blind in this study. Owing to the use of radial artery need approved by the participant, so participants will also not be blind in this study, By comparing the short-term and long-term graft patency between the No-touch vein and radial artery groups, this study will contribute major evidence of the possible superiority between two different grafts, so as to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
774 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
No-Touch vein
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
No-touch vein group has two No-touch saphenous vein grafts, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Arm Title
Radial artery
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Radial artery group has one radial artery graft and one conventional saphenous vein graft, anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system basing on surgeons' decision. All patients also acquired LITA-LAD anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
No-touch vein graft
Intervention Description
Two No-touch saphenous vein grafts anastomose to the right coronary and left coronary system. All participants also acquired Left intrathoracic artery(LITA)-left anterior decending artery(LAD) anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radial artery graft
Intervention Description
One radial artery graft and one conventional saphenous vein graft anastomose to the right coronary or left coronary system basing on surgeons' decision. All participants also acquired Left intrathoracic artery(LITA)-left anterior decending artery(LAD) anastomosis to complete the revascularization.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prevalence of graft patency
Description
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.
Time Frame
12 months after procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prevalence of graft patency
Description
All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.
Time Frame
3 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Overall major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate
Description
MACCE includes death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Cardiac death
Description
Death from any heart disease
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Documented non-lethal myocardial infarction
Description
Myocardial infarction is defined according to the most recent guideline
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Stroke
Description
An acute symptomatic episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Target lesion revascularization
Description
CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure
Title
Recurrence of Angina
Description
Recurrence of Angina
Time Frame
3 months, 12 months, 3 years and 5 years after procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age more than 18 years old First time undergo isolated CABG surgery Severe three-vessel disease (Left anterior decending artery, Left circumflex artery, Right coronoary artery lesion with more than 75% stenosis) Exclusion Criteria: Urgent or Redo CABG surgery Concomitant cardiac or vascular procedures (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Morrow procedure) A positive Allen test, radial artery plaque on ultrasound or a history of vasculitis or Raynaud's syndrome Varicose great saphenous vein or venous tortuosity and judged as can not be used in operation by surgeons Known allergy to radiographic contrast media Planed endarterectomy of coronary artery before surgery Malignant tumor or other severe systemic diseases Combined with other irreversible organ failures Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer Participant of other ongoing clinical trials in 30 days.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Shengshou Hu, M.D.
Phone
+86-10-88398359
Email
shengshouhu@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Meice Tian, M.D.
Phone
+8613718863077
Email
tianmeice@fuwaihospital.org
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100037
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34510911
Citation
Tian M, Wang X, Sun H, Feng W, Song Y, Lu F, Wang L, Wang Y, Xu B, Wang H, Liu S, Liu Z, Chen Y, Miao Q, Su P, Yang Y, Guo S, Lu B, Sun Z, Liu K, Zhang C, Wu Y, Xu H, Zhao W, Han C, Zhou X, Wang E, Huo X, Hu S. No-Touch Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting Techniques at 12 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Oct 5;144(14):1120-1129. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055525. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33928147
Citation
Nappi F, Bellomo F, Nappi P, Chello C, Iervolino A, Chello M, Acar C. The Use of Radial Artery for CABG: An Update. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Apr 7;2021:5528006. doi: 10.1155/2021/5528006. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs