Laparoscopic Tubal Disconnection Versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy in Infertile Patients
Infertility, Female
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility, Female
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Infertile ( primary or secondary ). Age > 30 years . HSG with unilateral or bilateral hydrosaalpinx , confirmed laparoscopically. Scheduled for IVF/ICSI Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications for laparoscopy Cardiac disease. BMI > 40 kg/m² Previous midline incision . Past history of TB peritonitis . Proximal tubal block by HCG . Frozen pelvis proved by previous laparoscopy or laparotomy . Allergy to contrast media of HSG . Premature ovarian failure (Serum FSH >40 mIU/ml ) Prescence of Male factor contributing to the infertility proved by abnormal semen analysis Prescence of Ovarian factor contributing to the infertility proved by the prescence of features suggesting anovulation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Experimental
Active Comparator
Tubal disconnection
Salpingectomy
The tube is grasped in the isthmic portion of the tube at least 2cm from the cornua. Bipolar coagulation will provide a more localized area of tubal burn so requiring at least 3cm of the tube to be coagulated The electrosurgical generator should set to deliver a power of 25W in nonmodulated mode to desiccate tissue sufficiently The tube should be coagulated with 2 to 3 contiguous burns to provide an area of about 3cm of coagulation. Th endpoint of coagulation is cessation of the current flow Then, the tube is severed in the middle of the burn area with laparoscopic scissors Ensure adequate hemostasis
The tube will be removed from its anatomical attachements by progressive bipolar coagulation Progressive coagulation and cutting of the mesosalpinx begins at the proximal isthmus of the tube and progresses to the fimbriated end using bipolar coagulation and laparoscopic scissors Removal of the tube through one of the ancillary ports using artery forceps Ensure adequate hemostasis