search
Back to results

Cerebral Changes Following CTS Treated With Guided Plasticity

Primary Purpose

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EMLA® adjuvant
Sensory training
Sponsored by
Region Skane
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome focused on measuring Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Somatosensory Cortex, Anesthesia, Hand

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: symptoms of CTS for more than 3 months classic or probable CTS according to Katz' hand diagram (2, 27) clinical signs of unilateral CTS with a positive Tinel's and Phalen's test age between 18 and 70 years nerve conduction studies (NCS) with a fractionated sensory nerve conduction velocity for the median nerve across the wrist of 40 m/s or less on the affected side and of more than 43 m/s on the contralateral side no contraindications for MR examinations. Exclusion Criteria: bilateral symptoms having been operated for CTS previously prior wrist or carpal fracture diabetes thyroid disease rheumatoid arthritis neurological disease drug abuse complete conduction block on electroneurography or prior regular exposure to hand-held vibrating tools.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    EMLA®

    Skin cream

    Arm Description

    adjuvant forearm anesthesia cream (EMLA®) and sensibility training in a program involving 15 sessions (8 weeks) of guided plasticity

    skin cream and sensibility training in a program involving 15 sessions (8 weeks) of guided plasticity training

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score
    score between 1 and 5, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms or function
    functional MRI activation affected vs healthy side (more activation voxels means more active brain area)
    The difference in activation using interaction contrast between baseline vs 8 weeks in somatosensory cortex (affected vs healthy side)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    quick-DASH upper extremity symptom score
    score between 1-5, higher scores indicating less symptoms
    2 Point Discrimination (2PD)
    mean value of 3 measures indicating touch threshold
    Sensory conduction velocity
    Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity from nerve conduction studies
    Sensory conduction amplitude
    Sensory Nerve Conduction Amplitude from nerve conduction studies
    functional MRI dig 1+2
    comparison between activation using interaction contrast in S1sensory cortex of the
    functional MRI dig 5
    comparison between activation in the sensory cortex of the little finger (EMLA® vs placebo)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 11, 2023
    Last Updated
    August 24, 2023
    Sponsor
    Region Skane
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06016049
    Brief Title
    Cerebral Changes Following CTS Treated With Guided Plasticity
    Official Title
    Cerebral Changes Following Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated With Guided Brain Plasticity
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    July 1, 2009 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 1, 2015 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Region Skane

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    70 patients with mild to moderate Carpal tunnel Syndrome (CTS) including 24 patients with unilateral CTS were randomized to treatment with ipsilateral cutaneous forearm deafferentation with an anesthetic cream (EMLA®) or placebo during 8 weeks. Patient-rated outcomes was assessed using the symptom severity scale from the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) and the disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire(Quick-DASH). Clinically patients were assessed for tactile discrimination and dexterity and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cortical activation during sensory stimulation was evaluated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3T. Assessments were performed at baseline, after 90 min of initial treatment, and after 8 weeks.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    Keywords
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Somatosensory Cortex, Anesthesia, Hand

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Basic Science
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    70 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    EMLA®
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    adjuvant forearm anesthesia cream (EMLA®) and sensibility training in a program involving 15 sessions (8 weeks) of guided plasticity
    Arm Title
    Skin cream
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    skin cream and sensibility training in a program involving 15 sessions (8 weeks) of guided plasticity training
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    EMLA® adjuvant
    Intervention Description
    cutaneous forearm deafferentation
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sensory training
    Intervention Description
    Sensibility training of the median nerve
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score
    Description
    score between 1 and 5, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms or function
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    functional MRI activation affected vs healthy side (more activation voxels means more active brain area)
    Description
    The difference in activation using interaction contrast between baseline vs 8 weeks in somatosensory cortex (affected vs healthy side)
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    quick-DASH upper extremity symptom score
    Description
    score between 1-5, higher scores indicating less symptoms
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    2 Point Discrimination (2PD)
    Description
    mean value of 3 measures indicating touch threshold
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    Sensory conduction velocity
    Description
    Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity from nerve conduction studies
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    Sensory conduction amplitude
    Description
    Sensory Nerve Conduction Amplitude from nerve conduction studies
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    functional MRI dig 1+2
    Description
    comparison between activation using interaction contrast in S1sensory cortex of the
    Time Frame
    8 weeks
    Title
    functional MRI dig 5
    Description
    comparison between activation in the sensory cortex of the little finger (EMLA® vs placebo)
    Time Frame
    8 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: symptoms of CTS for more than 3 months classic or probable CTS according to Katz' hand diagram (2, 27) clinical signs of unilateral CTS with a positive Tinel's and Phalen's test age between 18 and 70 years nerve conduction studies (NCS) with a fractionated sensory nerve conduction velocity for the median nerve across the wrist of 40 m/s or less on the affected side and of more than 43 m/s on the contralateral side no contraindications for MR examinations. Exclusion Criteria: bilateral symptoms having been operated for CTS previously prior wrist or carpal fracture diabetes thyroid disease rheumatoid arthritis neurological disease drug abuse complete conduction block on electroneurography or prior regular exposure to hand-held vibrating tools.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Magnus Flondell, MD PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Institute of Translational Sciences Malmö, Lund University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Anders Björkman, MD, Prof.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    data can be shared upon reasonable demand after personal contact.

    Learn more about this trial

    Cerebral Changes Following CTS Treated With Guided Plasticity

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs