search
Back to results

Mentalization-based Treatment Versus Bona-fide Treatment for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder in Germany (MAGNET)

Primary Purpose

Borderline Personality Disorder

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)
Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)
Sponsored by
Heidelberg University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Borderline Personality Disorder

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Borderline Personality Disorder non-suicidal self injury or suicide attempts in the past two years as indicated by the IPDE item "repeated suicidal behaviours, gestures, threats or self-harm", one of which has occurred in the past six months Exclusion Criteria: acute substance use disorder (exception: cannabis dependency) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disorder bipolar I disorder (DSM-5) cognitive impairment (IQ<80) or evidence of organic brain disorder BMI<16.5 serious medical condition that will require hospitalization within the next year (e.g. cancer) no sufficient German language abilities

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)

    Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    change in crisis events assessed with Ecological Momentary Assessment with items based on the SHBQ (Gutierrez et al., 2001)
    composite score (non)suicidal self injury

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder assessed with the IPDE (Loranger et al., 1997) and BSL-23 (Wolf et al., 2009)
    Change in psychiatric symptom severity assessed with the DASS- 21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)
    Change in health and disability assessed with WHODAS 2.0 Short Form (Üstün et al., 2010)
    Change in personality funcitioning assessed with LPFS-BF (Hutsebaut et al., 2016)
    Change in personality traits assessed with PID5BF+M (Bach et al., 2020)
    Change in threat hypersensitivity assessed with emotion classification task (Honecker et al., 2021)
    Participants are presented with 160 faces, each unambiguously showing one of four emotional expressions (angry, fearful, happy, neutral). The goal of the task is to correctly classify these facial expressions. The task's collected behavioral data encompasses two key measurements: the ratio of accurate responses (specifically, correct emotion classification) and the time it takes to respond in trials where the emotion classification is correct.
    Change in quality of life assessed with EQ-5D-5L (Herdman et al., 2011; EuroQol Research Foundation, 2019)
    Change in trait anger assessed with STAXI-2 (Spielberger, 1999)
    Change in social adjustment assessed with WSAS (Marks, 1986)
    Change in emotional reactions to social exclusion, rejection and relational devaluation with SPQ (Stangier et al., 2021)
    Change in Interoceptive Body Awareness with MAIA-2 (Mehling et al., 2018)
    Changes in medication with self-report of medication prescription via adapted version of AD-SUS (Kuyken et al., 2015)
    Heath Care utilization with an adapted version of the AD-SUS (Kuyken et al., 2015)
    Change in acute dissociative symptoms with Dissociation-Tension Scale-4 (DSS-4; Stiglmayr et al., 2003)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 17, 2023
    Last Updated
    August 29, 2023
    Sponsor
    Heidelberg University
    Collaborators
    German Research Foundation, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Medical School Berlin
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06018272
    Brief Title
    Mentalization-based Treatment Versus Bona-fide Treatment for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder in Germany
    Acronym
    MAGNET
    Official Title
    Mentalisierungsbasierte Therapie Versus Bona-fide-Therapie für Patient:Innen Mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung in Deutschland (MaGnet): Eine Prospektive, Multizentrische Randomisiert-kontrollierte Studie Mentalization-based Treatment Versus Bona-fide Treatment for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder in Germany (MAGNET): a Prospective, Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 30, 2027 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 31, 2028 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Heidelberg University
    Collaborators
    German Research Foundation, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Medical School Berlin

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a serious mental disorder. Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is one evidence-based treatment for individuals with BPD. Specifically, MBT has been highlighted for its effectiveness in reduction of suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Yet, randomized-controlled trials (RCT) on MBT in outpatient settings compared with bona fide treatment (BFT) are still scarce and none has been conducted in Germany. The primary objective of this RCT is to investigate whether outpatient MBT is more effective in the reduction of crisis events (incidences of NSSI and suicide attempts) compared with BFT (namely psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy) in Germany. Secondary, MBT's efficacy will be investigated with regard to cost-effectiveness, general and interpersonal functioning, BPD and general symptom severity, social adjustment, quality of life, reduction in psychotropic medication and therapy retention. Additionally, moderator as well as common and treatment specific mediator variables will be investigated. Study Design/ Study Population/ Methods: Across 5 study sites in Germany, 304 individuals of all genders from age 18 to 65 with a BPD diagnosis and NSSI or suicide attempts in the past will be asked to participate in the study for two years. In the first year, patients will receive either MBT or BFT (psychodynamic or cognitive behavioural psychotherapy) and will take part in continuous scientific assessments. Scientific assessments will continue after therapy completion up to a 12-moth follow up. As primary outcome, crisis events will be assessed via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) four times a week once per month during the first year and once every three months in the second year. Number of crisis events up to 2 years post randomization will be compared between treatment arms using a log-linear regression model following an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary outcomes, such as borderline and general symptom severity, will be assessed at several timepoints. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted with a societal perspective. Clinical Trial Rationale: This study investigates efficacy of MBT as BPD specific treatment in an outpatient setting compared with BFT in Germany. Results of this study can address a treatment gap in the German healthcare system, and inform about health economic aspects of BPD treatment as well as mechanisms of psychotherapeutic change.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Borderline Personality Disorder

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    304 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)
    Intervention Description
    Patients in MBT will receive a maximum of 58 sessions in total. Of those, 30 are weekly individual sessions. 28 sessions are weekly group sessions conducted by two therapists, and consisting of 8 introductory sessions of group psychoeducation followed by 20 group therapy sessions. The duration of MBT is 12 months. MBT is manualized and relies on validating the emotional experience of patients that aims to promote mentalizing. The proposed mechanism of change in MBT is to stabilize mentalizing in certain focus areas in order to create a psychic buffer between affect and behaviour to foster affect regulation, reduce impulsivity and promote functional supportive relationships.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)
    Intervention Description
    Patients in BFT will receive one to two weekly sessions of Bona-Fide-Treatment (Psychodynamic Therapy, PT, or Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, CBT) conducted by community experts delivered as short-term psychotherapy (<24 sessions) or long-term psychotherapy (>24 sessions). BFT can be delivered as individual, group or a combination of individual and group treatment as stated in the German psychotherapy regulations.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    change in crisis events assessed with Ecological Momentary Assessment with items based on the SHBQ (Gutierrez et al., 2001)
    Description
    composite score (non)suicidal self injury
    Time Frame
    one week each month for 24 months OR every second day, one week per month in the first year and one week every three months in the second year
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder assessed with the IPDE (Loranger et al., 1997) and BSL-23 (Wolf et al., 2009)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24; IPDE only at Month 24
    Title
    Change in psychiatric symptom severity assessed with the DASS- 21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in health and disability assessed with WHODAS 2.0 Short Form (Üstün et al., 2010)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in personality funcitioning assessed with LPFS-BF (Hutsebaut et al., 2016)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in personality traits assessed with PID5BF+M (Bach et al., 2020)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in threat hypersensitivity assessed with emotion classification task (Honecker et al., 2021)
    Description
    Participants are presented with 160 faces, each unambiguously showing one of four emotional expressions (angry, fearful, happy, neutral). The goal of the task is to correctly classify these facial expressions. The task's collected behavioral data encompasses two key measurements: the ratio of accurate responses (specifically, correct emotion classification) and the time it takes to respond in trials where the emotion classification is correct.
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in quality of life assessed with EQ-5D-5L (Herdman et al., 2011; EuroQol Research Foundation, 2019)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in trait anger assessed with STAXI-2 (Spielberger, 1999)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in social adjustment assessed with WSAS (Marks, 1986)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in emotional reactions to social exclusion, rejection and relational devaluation with SPQ (Stangier et al., 2021)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in Interoceptive Body Awareness with MAIA-2 (Mehling et al., 2018)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Changes in medication with self-report of medication prescription via adapted version of AD-SUS (Kuyken et al., 2015)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Heath Care utilization with an adapted version of the AD-SUS (Kuyken et al., 2015)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Title
    Change in acute dissociative symptoms with Dissociation-Tension Scale-4 (DSS-4; Stiglmayr et al., 2003)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Mentalizing as mediator of change assessed with the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ; Müller et al., 2021)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Therapeutic Agency Inventory (TAI; Huber et al., 2019)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12
    Title
    Group Questionnaire - short (GQ; Jensen, 2016)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12
    Title
    Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ; Campbell et al., 2019)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Screening Version (ECR-RD8; Ehrenthal et al., 2021)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Mentalizing as mediator of change assessed with Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire (Kasper et al., submitted)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ; Rozental et al., 2016)
    Description
    Serious adverse events of therapy
    Time Frame
    Month 12
    Title
    Therapeutic Alliance as mediator of change assessed with Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR, Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12
    Title
    Symptoms of PTSD and complex PTSD and complex PTSD Trauma experiences with Internation Trauma Interview (ITI; Roberts et al., 2019)
    Description
    Moderator
    Time Frame
    Day 0
    Title
    Symptoms of PTSD and complex PTSD with International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ; Cloitre et al., 2018)
    Description
    Moderator
    Time Frame
    Day 0
    Title
    Level of personality functioning with Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP; Hutsebaut et al., 2017)
    Description
    Moderator
    Time Frame
    Day 0
    Title
    Change of pleasure, arousal and dominance with Self-Assessment Manikin (Bradley, 1994)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12
    Title
    Change of frequency of occurence of positive and negative automatic thoughts with Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - Revised (ATQ-R; Kendall, 1989)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Assessment of the frequency of alliance ruptures and resolution processes in therapy sessions with Rupture Resolution Rating System (Eubanks et al., 2015)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Assessment of the clients'attachment style with the Patient Attachment Coding System (Talia & Miller-Bottome, 2012)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Assessment of the therapists' attunement and attachment status with the Therapist Attunement Scales (Talia & Muzi, 2017)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Assessment of the therapists' activity and appropriateness in essential domains of MBT with the Mentalization-Based Treatment Adherence and Competence Scale (Bateman & Fonagy, 2016)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Assessment of the therapists' adherence to psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioural treatments with the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale (Hilsenroth et al., 2005)
    Description
    Mediator
    Time Frame
    Month 6, Month 12
    Title
    Interview for treatment and study evaluation
    Description
    Semi-structured interview developed based on Krause et al. 2016 will be used to assess how patients experienced the therapy and the study, what aspects they perceived as positive or negative, and what impact the therapy had on their symptoms and their life
    Time Frame
    Month 24

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Borderline Personality Disorder non-suicidal self injury or suicide attempts in the past two years as indicated by the IPDE item "repeated suicidal behaviours, gestures, threats or self-harm", one of which has occurred in the past six months Exclusion Criteria: acute substance use disorder (exception: cannabis dependency) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disorder bipolar I disorder (DSM-5) cognitive impairment (IQ<80) or evidence of organic brain disorder BMI<16.5 serious medical condition that will require hospitalization within the next year (e.g. cancer) no sufficient German language abilities
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Svenja Taubner, Prof.
    Phone
    +496221564701
    Email
    svenja.taubner@med.uni-heidelberg.de
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Sophie Hauschild, Dr.
    Email
    sophie.hauschild@med.uni-heidelberg.de
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Svenja Taubner
    Organizational Affiliation
    University Heidelberg
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    20148147
    Citation
    Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;9(1):11-5. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10518167
    Citation
    Bateman A, Fonagy P. Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;156(10):1563-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.10.1563.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19833787
    Citation
    Bateman A, Fonagy P. Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1355-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040539. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22897123
    Citation
    Jorgensen CR, Freund C, Boye R, Jordet H, Andersen D, Kjolbye M. Outcome of mentalization-based and supportive psychotherapy in patients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013 Apr;127(4):305-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01923.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29478425
    Citation
    Laurenssen EMP, Luyten P, Kikkert MJ, Westra D, Peen J, Soons MBJ, van Dam AM, van Broekhuyzen AJ, Blankers M, Busschbach JJV, Dekker JJM. Day hospital mentalization-based treatment v. specialist treatment as usual in patients with borderline personality disorder: randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2018 Nov;48(15):2522-2529. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000132. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23200287
    Citation
    Rossouw TI, Fonagy P. Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1304-1313.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.018.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32368793
    Citation
    Storebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Sales CP, Callesen HE, Lieb K, Simonsen E. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID I und SKID II). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1026//0084-5345.28.1.68.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Raven J. Raven´s Progressive Matrices 2, Clinical Edition. 1st ed. München: Pearson; 2019.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    11781034
    Citation
    Gutierrez PM, Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA. Development and initial validation of the Self-harm Behavior Questionnaire. J Pers Assess. 2001 Dec;77(3):475-90. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_08.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    19274605
    Citation
    Wolf M, Limberger MF, Kleindienst N, Stieglitz RD, Domsalla M, Philipsen A, Steil R, Bohus M. [Short version of the borderline symptom list (BSL-23): development and psychometric evaluation]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(8):321-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104598. Epub 2009 Mar 9. German.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21076562
    Citation
    Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, von Korff M, Pull C; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21479777
    Citation
    Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide Version 3.0: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Https://EuroqolOrg/Publications/User-Guides 2019.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    25907157
    Citation
    Kuyken W, Hayes R, Barrett B, Byng R, Dalgleish T, Kessler D, Lewis G, Watkins E, Brejcha C, Cardy J, Causley A, Cowderoy S, Evans A, Gradinger F, Kaur S, Lanham P, Morant N, Richards J, Shah P, Sutton H, Vicary R, Weaver A, Wilks J, Williams M, Taylor RS, Byford S. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with maintenance antidepressant treatment in the prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (PREVENT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):63-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62222-4. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    19752590
    Citation
    Stiglmayr C, Schmahl C, Bremner JD, Bohus M, Ebner-Priemer U. Development and psychometric characteristics of the DSS-4 as a short instrument to assess dissociative experience during neuropsychological experiments. Psychopathology. 2009;42(6):370-4. doi: 10.1159/000236908. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Marks IM. Behavioural psychotherapy: Maudsley pocket book of clinical management. Wright/IOP Publishing; 1986.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    26595344
    Citation
    Hutsebaut J, Feenstra DJ, Kamphuis JH. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF). Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000159. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). Professional Manual. Tampa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    33859226
    Citation
    Stangier U, Schuller J, Brahler E. Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87351-3.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34421676
    Citation
    Honecker H, Bertsch K, Spiess K, Krauch M, Kleindienst N, Herpertz SC, Neukel C. Impact of a Mechanism-Based Anti-Aggression Psychotherapy on Behavioral Mechanisms of Aggression in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 5;12:689267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689267. eCollection 2021.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    32369820
    Citation
    Bach B, Kerber A, Aluja A, Bastiaens T, Keeley JW, Claes L, Fossati A, Gutierrez F, Oliveira SES, Pires R, Riegel KD, Rolland JP, Roskam I, Sellbom M, Somma A, Spanemberg L, Strus W, Thimm JC, Wright AGC, Zimmermann J. International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):179-188. doi: 10.1159/000507589. Epub 2020 May 5.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    30513087
    Citation
    Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    30178492
    Citation
    Cloitre M, Shevlin M, Brewin CR, Bisson JI, Roberts NP, Maercker A, Karatzias T, Hyland P. The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Roberts NP, Cloitre M, Bisson J, Brewin CR. International trauma interview (ITI) for ICD- 11 PTSD and complex PTSD (Test Version 3.2). 2019.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    27845529
    Citation
    Hutsebaut J, Kamphuis JH, Feenstra DJ, Weekers LC, De Saeger H. Assessing DSM-5-oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):94-101. doi: 10.1037/per0000197. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    29863394
    Citation
    Jensen J, Burlingame G. An item reduction analysis of the Group Questionnaire. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):144-150. doi: 10.1037/pst0000145.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    7962581
    Citation
    Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Kasper L, Hauschild S, Berning A, Holl J, Taubner S. Development and Validation of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire: a Self- Report Measure of the Affective Component of Mentalizing submitted.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34521473
    Citation
    Ehrenthal JC, Zimmermann J, Brenk-Franz K, Dinger U, Schauenburg H, Brahler E, Strauss B. Evaluation of a short version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-RD8): results from a representative German sample. BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;9(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00637-z.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Kendall PC, Howard BL, Hays RC. Self-Referent Speech and Psychopathology: The Balance of Positive and Negative Thinking 1989;13:583-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176069.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization-Based Treatment for Personality Disorders: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Hilsenroth MJ, Blagys MD, Ackerman SJ, Bonge DR, Blais MA. Measuring Psychodynamic-Interpersonal and Cognitive-Behavioral Techniques: Development of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2005;42:340-56.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Talia A, Muzi L. Therapist Attunement Scales Coding System (Unpublished Manuscript). University of Heidelberg 2017.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Eubanks CF, Muran JC, Safran J. Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS): Manual. New York: Unpublished manuscript, Mount Sinai-Beth Israel Medical Center; 2015.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Talia A, Miller-Bottome M. Patient Attachment Coding System, 2.0 (Unpublished manuscript). Deparment of Psychology: University of Copenhagen 2012.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    30871650
    Citation
    Rozental A, Kottorp A, Forsstrom D, Mansson K, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Furmark T, Carlbring P. The Negative Effects Questionnaire: psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing negative effects in psychological treatments. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep;47(5):559-572. doi: 10.1017/S1352465819000018. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Krause Jacob M, Abarzúa M, Silva M, Navarro D, Altimir Colao C. Psychotherapie aus der Sicht von Klienten mit Schizophrenie. Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis 2016;47:63-76.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Loranger AW, Janca A, Sartorius N. Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 international personality disorder examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press; 1997.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Research. 2006; 16: 12-25.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    29557306
    Citation
    Huber J, Nikendei C, Ehrenthal JC, Schauenburg H, Mander J, Dinger U. Therapeutic Agency Inventory: Development and psychometric validation of a patient self-report. Psychother Res. 2019 Oct;29(7):919-934. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1447707. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    34905983
    Citation
    Muller S, Wendt LP, Zimmermann J. Development and Validation of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ): A Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing Oneself and Others. Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):651-674. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061280. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    33861805
    Citation
    Campbell C, Tanzer M, Saunders R, Booker T, Allison E, Li E, O'Dowda C, Luyten P, Fonagy P. Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. eCollection 2021.
    Results Reference
    result
    Citation
    Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004; 26: 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Mentalization-based Treatment Versus Bona-fide Treatment for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder in Germany

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs