search
Back to results

Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction (STAY)

Primary Purpose

Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree, Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pacemaker implant
Sponsored by
Parc de Salut Mar
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria: Age of 18 years or more Preserved or mild deteriorated LVEF (Simpson >40%) assessed by a recent (<1 month before implantation) transthoracic echocardiography. Indication for pacing based on the presence of a high degree AVB, and consequently with an anticipated high burden of ventricular pacing (>50%). Live expectancy of more than 6 months and capability to understand the protocol, signing the informed consent form and accomplish the follow-up. Exclusion criteria: Indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator device. Patients with previous LVD and a recovered LVEF History of myocardial infarction/revascularization or cardiac surgery within 6 months before randomization Pregnancy, active cancer treatment, or participation in another clinical trial with active treatment.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital del Mar

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

CSP (Conduction system pacing)

RVAP (Right ventricular apical pacing)

Arm Description

Patients with pacemaker implanted with conduction system pacing.

Patients with pacemaker implanted with right ventricular apical pacing.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Delta-LVEF at 6 months
Change in LVEF in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEF

Secondary Outcome Measures

Delta-LVEDD at 6 months
Change in Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEDD
Delta-MLWHFQ (Minnesota score) at 6 months
Change in MLWHFQ score in each group at 6 months vs baseline MLWHFQ score. The MLWHFQ score is obtained by using a questionnaire of 21 aspects. It depicts how heart failure affected the daily life of the patients during the last month previous to the questionnaire. Each question can be scored from 0 ("No" effect) to 5 ("Very much" effect)
Delta-New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at 6 months
Change in NYHA class in each group at 6 months vs baseline NYHA class. NYHA class places patients in one of four categories based on limitations of physical activity: I: No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation or shortness of breath. II: Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. IV: Symptoms of heart failure at rest. Any physical activity causes further discomfort.
Delta-NTProBNP at 6 months
Change in NTProBNP levels in each group at 6 months vs baseline NTProBNP levels
Readmissions due to heart failure
Number of readmissions due to heart failure in each group during follow-up
New onset Atrial fibrillation
Number of new-onset atrial fibrillation episodes in each group during follow-up
Mortality
All-cause Mortality in each group during follow-up

Full Information

First Posted
August 28, 2023
Last Updated
September 7, 2023
Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06026683
Brief Title
Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction
Acronym
STAY
Official Title
Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 30, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to demonstrate that conduction system pacing (CSP) can preserve a normal ventricular function compared to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) in patients with pre-implant preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a high burden of expected ventricular pacing due to atrioventricular conduction block (AV block). After informed consent signature, patients with high degree AV block and normal LVEF will be randomized to permanent pacemaker stimulation with CSP vs RVAP. All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up.
Detailed Description
The STAY trial (Conduction System sTimulation to Avoid left ventricle dYsfunction) is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel, controlled study, comparing mid-term outcomes in a population undergoing pacemaker implantation due to a high degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB). The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients signed informed consent and were implanted between September 2019 until December 2022 in a 1:1 randomized fashion to conventional RVAP vs CSP (HBS or LBBS). Randomization was performed during the pre-procedural antibiotic infusion. All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up, including demographic and clinical characteristics, physical examination, twelve-lead ECG, Minnesota score (MLWHFQ), and blood test with NT-ProBNP determination. Patients also have a transthoracic echography before the procedure and at 6 months follow-up. At 6 months echocardiographic and clinical data will be compared.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree, Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomized into 2 groups according to pacing site: CSP vs RVAP.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The study is blinded for the patient and for the echocardiographers.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
75 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CSP (Conduction system pacing)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with pacemaker implanted with conduction system pacing.
Arm Title
RVAP (Right ventricular apical pacing)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with pacemaker implanted with right ventricular apical pacing.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Pacemaker implant
Intervention Description
Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Delta-LVEF at 6 months
Description
Change in LVEF in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEF
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Delta-LVEDD at 6 months
Description
Change in Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEDD
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Delta-MLWHFQ (Minnesota score) at 6 months
Description
Change in MLWHFQ score in each group at 6 months vs baseline MLWHFQ score. The MLWHFQ score is obtained by using a questionnaire of 21 aspects. It depicts how heart failure affected the daily life of the patients during the last month previous to the questionnaire. Each question can be scored from 0 ("No" effect) to 5 ("Very much" effect)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Delta-New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at 6 months
Description
Change in NYHA class in each group at 6 months vs baseline NYHA class. NYHA class places patients in one of four categories based on limitations of physical activity: I: No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation or shortness of breath. II: Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. IV: Symptoms of heart failure at rest. Any physical activity causes further discomfort.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Delta-NTProBNP at 6 months
Description
Change in NTProBNP levels in each group at 6 months vs baseline NTProBNP levels
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Readmissions due to heart failure
Description
Number of readmissions due to heart failure in each group during follow-up
Time Frame
6 months
Title
New onset Atrial fibrillation
Description
Number of new-onset atrial fibrillation episodes in each group during follow-up
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Mortality
Description
All-cause Mortality in each group during follow-up
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age of 18 years or more Preserved or mild deteriorated LVEF (Simpson >40%) assessed by a recent (<1 month before implantation) transthoracic echocardiography. Indication for pacing based on the presence of a high degree AVB, and consequently with an anticipated high burden of ventricular pacing (>50%). Live expectancy of more than 6 months and capability to understand the protocol, signing the informed consent form and accomplish the follow-up. Exclusion criteria: Indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator device. Patients with previous LVD and a recovered LVEF History of myocardial infarction/revascularization or cardiac surgery within 6 months before randomization Pregnancy, active cancer treatment, or participation in another clinical trial with active treatment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ermengol Vallès, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Parc de Salut Mar
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos González, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Parc de Salut Mar. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital del Mar
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data will only be available upon reasonable request.

Learn more about this trial

Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs