search
Back to results

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Skinstylus Sterilock Microneedling System for the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles

Primary Purpose

Subjects Displaying Facial Ageing

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Skinstylus microneedling device
Sponsored by
Beauty Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Subjects Displaying Facial Ageing focused on measuring Wrinkles, Facial ageing, Micro needling

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Healthy male & females; 35 to 75 years of age with signs of facial aging. Fitzpatrick I-VI phototype skin types. Volunteers with wrinkle grading of 1 to 4 according to Lemperle (2001) wrinkle grading scale. Volunteers with a laxity grading of 1-3.5 according to Alexiandes Armenakas (2010) grading scale. Written informed consent is given. Females of childbearing potential (FOCBP) and females who are premenses must be willing to practice effective contraception for the duration of the study. (Effective contraception is defined as stabilized on oral contraceptive for at least 3 months, intrauterine device, condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, implant, NuvaRing, injection, transdermal patch or abstinence.) Females on birth control pills must have taken the same type of pill for at least 3 months prior to entering the study and must not change type during the study. Those who have used birth control pills in the past must have discontinued usage at least 3 months prior to the start of the study. Volunteers agree NOT to use any topical agents containing active ingredients such as retinol, glycolic acid in the treatment area, during the study period. Volunteers agree NOT to undergo any aesthetic treatments (such as Botox, fillers, microdermabrasion, laser surfacing etc.) in the treatment area, during the study period. Exclusion Criteria: Volunteers have used a topical anti-aging product containing active ingredients within 4 weeks of commencing the study. Volunteers suffer from Hemophilia or other clotting/bleeding disorders. Volunteers taking anticoagulant therapy, e.g., warfarin, heparin. Volunteers who have used aspirin continuously in the last 2 weeks. Volunteers with active acne vulgaris of the face. Volunteers who have stopped taking birth control pills within the last 3 months. Volunteers suffer from uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Volunteers with known malignancy and/or undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or high doses of corticosteroids. Volunteers suffer from keloid scars, Human Papilloma virus (HPV) or birth marks in the treatment area. Volunteers have a tendency for keloid scar formation. Volunteers suffer from eczema or skin rashes in the treatment area. Volunteers suffer from systemic infections such as hepatitis. Volunteers have known allergy to topical/local anesthetics. Volunteers have continuously used high dose NSAIDs for the last 2 weeks. Volunteers have undergone plastic surgery in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Volunteers have undergone filler injections in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Volunteers have received Botox or other neuromodulators injections in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding or who wish to become pregnant during the study period. Enrolled in another clinical trial during the same study period. Volunteer has a planned hospital admission and/or surgical procedure for an illness or disease which existed before enrolment into the clinical trial, and which may interfere with the course or outcome of the study. Volunteering has medical or psychological condition(s) associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance (e.g., alcoholism or drug abuse). Volunteer is undergoing or is likely to undergo other treatments.

Sites / Locations

  • Ablon Skin InstituteRecruiting
  • West Dermatology Research CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Microneedling

Arm Description

4 microneedling sessions at baseline and days 30, 60 and 90.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Wrinkle improvement
Mean improvement over baseline of one grade for wrinkles utilizing the Lemperle (2001) grading scale scores of the periorbital, cheek folds and glabellar lines 120 and 150 days after the first treatment. The Lemperle Wrinkle Grading Scale, is used to assess the severity of facial wrinkles. The scale divides the face into distinct facial areas (horizontal forehead lines, glabellar frown lines, periorbital lines, preauricular lines, cheek folds, nasolabial folds, upper lip lines, corner of mouth line, marionette lines and chin crease). Each area is classified 0-5, (0-No wrinkles, 5-Very deep wrinkles). Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1735-1750.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Texture and laxity
Mean improvement over baseline of one grade for skin laxity and texture 120 and 150 days after the first treatment using a scale developed by Alexiandes Armenakas This is a modified texture and laxity grading scale adapted from the complete grading scale developed by Alexiandes Armenakas (2010). The scale is an 8 point descriptive scale (0-4, with 0.4 increments). Where 0 is no visible evidence of skin laxity or texture and 4 is severe skin laxity and skin roughness (texture)

Full Information

First Posted
September 4, 2023
Last Updated
September 12, 2023
Sponsor
Beauty Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06032286
Brief Title
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Skinstylus Sterilock Microneedling System for the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles
Official Title
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Skinstylus Sterilock Microneedling System for the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 8, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Beauty Health

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy and safety of the Skin stylus Sterilock microneedling system in reducing the appearance of facial wrinkles.This study is intended to be a single arm study. Suitable subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and consented will undergo 4 microneedling sessions at baseline and days 30, 60 and 90. Subjects will be assessed at days 90, 120 and finally at day 150 by a physician utilizing the wrinkle grading scale developed by Lemperle (2001) and skin laxity and texture using a modified Alexiandes Armenakas (2010) grading scale.
Detailed Description
This study is intended to be a single arm study. Suitable subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and consented will undergo 4 microneedling sessions at baseline and days 30, 60 and 90. Subjects will be assessed at days 90, 120 and finally at day 150 by a physician utilizing the wrinkle grading scale developed by Lemperle (2001) and skin laxity and texture using a modified Alexiandes Armenakas (2010) grading scale. Physicians will grade treatment response on days, 90, 120 and finally on day 150 using a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Standard photography will be recorded at baseline and days 30, 60, 90, 120 and finally at day 150. Subjects will complete diaries including self-assessment of treatment response, side effects & downtime up to 7 days post treatment. Subjects will assess treatment response on days 90, 120 and finally on day 150 using a Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS). Subjects will assess treatment response and satisfaction at baseline and day 150 using the Facial Appearance, Health-Related Quality of Life and Adverse Effects (FACE-Q3) Patient reported outcome measure (PROM). The number, type and severity of adverse events will be recorded during the duration of the study period. At the end of the study period, photography will be assessed by three blinded physicians using the wrinkle grading scale developed by Lemperle (2001)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subjects Displaying Facial Ageing
Keywords
Wrinkles, Facial ageing, Micro needling

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Single group, all subjects will receive intervention.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
49 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Microneedling
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
4 microneedling sessions at baseline and days 30, 60 and 90.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Skinstylus microneedling device
Intervention Description
Microneedling, also known as percutaneous collagen induction (PCI), is a minimally invasive technique where small needles create microscopic wounds in the skin inducing collagen formation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wrinkle improvement
Description
Mean improvement over baseline of one grade for wrinkles utilizing the Lemperle (2001) grading scale scores of the periorbital, cheek folds and glabellar lines 120 and 150 days after the first treatment. The Lemperle Wrinkle Grading Scale, is used to assess the severity of facial wrinkles. The scale divides the face into distinct facial areas (horizontal forehead lines, glabellar frown lines, periorbital lines, preauricular lines, cheek folds, nasolabial folds, upper lip lines, corner of mouth line, marionette lines and chin crease). Each area is classified 0-5, (0-No wrinkles, 5-Very deep wrinkles). Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1735-1750.
Time Frame
120 and 150 days after the first treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Texture and laxity
Description
Mean improvement over baseline of one grade for skin laxity and texture 120 and 150 days after the first treatment using a scale developed by Alexiandes Armenakas This is a modified texture and laxity grading scale adapted from the complete grading scale developed by Alexiandes Armenakas (2010). The scale is an 8 point descriptive scale (0-4, with 0.4 increments). Where 0 is no visible evidence of skin laxity or texture and 4 is severe skin laxity and skin roughness (texture)
Time Frame
120 and 150 days after the first treatment
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Adverse events
Description
Incidence and degree of (adverse events) side effects
Time Frame
150 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy male & females; 35 to 75 years of age with signs of facial aging. Fitzpatrick I-VI phototype skin types. Volunteers with wrinkle grading of 1 to 4 according to Lemperle (2001) wrinkle grading scale. Volunteers with a laxity grading of 1-3.5 according to Alexiandes Armenakas (2010) grading scale. Written informed consent is given. Females of childbearing potential (FOCBP) and females who are premenses must be willing to practice effective contraception for the duration of the study. (Effective contraception is defined as stabilized on oral contraceptive for at least 3 months, intrauterine device, condom with spermicide, diaphragm with spermicide, implant, NuvaRing, injection, transdermal patch or abstinence.) Females on birth control pills must have taken the same type of pill for at least 3 months prior to entering the study and must not change type during the study. Those who have used birth control pills in the past must have discontinued usage at least 3 months prior to the start of the study. Volunteers agree NOT to use any topical agents containing active ingredients such as retinol, glycolic acid in the treatment area, during the study period. Volunteers agree NOT to undergo any aesthetic treatments (such as Botox, fillers, microdermabrasion, laser surfacing etc.) in the treatment area, during the study period. Exclusion Criteria: Volunteers have used a topical anti-aging product containing active ingredients within 4 weeks of commencing the study. Volunteers suffer from Hemophilia or other clotting/bleeding disorders. Volunteers taking anticoagulant therapy, e.g., warfarin, heparin. Volunteers who have used aspirin continuously in the last 2 weeks. Volunteers with active acne vulgaris of the face. Volunteers who have stopped taking birth control pills within the last 3 months. Volunteers suffer from uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Volunteers with known malignancy and/or undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or high doses of corticosteroids. Volunteers suffer from keloid scars, Human Papilloma virus (HPV) or birth marks in the treatment area. Volunteers have a tendency for keloid scar formation. Volunteers suffer from eczema or skin rashes in the treatment area. Volunteers suffer from systemic infections such as hepatitis. Volunteers have known allergy to topical/local anesthetics. Volunteers have continuously used high dose NSAIDs for the last 2 weeks. Volunteers have undergone plastic surgery in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Volunteers have undergone filler injections in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Volunteers have received Botox or other neuromodulators injections in the treatment area within the last 6 months. Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding or who wish to become pregnant during the study period. Enrolled in another clinical trial during the same study period. Volunteer has a planned hospital admission and/or surgical procedure for an illness or disease which existed before enrolment into the clinical trial, and which may interfere with the course or outcome of the study. Volunteering has medical or psychological condition(s) associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance (e.g., alcoholism or drug abuse). Volunteer is undergoing or is likely to undergo other treatments.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Juan Velasquez, phD
Phone
5624768861
Email
jvelasquez@hydrafacial.com
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ablon Skin Institute
City
Manhattan Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90266
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shelley Joyce
Phone
310-727-3376
Email
shelley@abloninstitute.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riham Farid
Phone
310 727-3376
Email
riham@abloninstitute.com
Facility Name
West Dermatology Research Center
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92121
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sabrina Fabi, MD, FAAD, FAACS
Phone
(858) 657-1004
Email
sgfabi@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Freia Canals
Phone
(858) 657-1004
Email
freia.canals@westderm.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Plan for data to be published in peer reviewed journal
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11711957
Citation
Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1735-50; discussion 1751-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16989197
Citation
Alexiades-Armenakas M. A quantitative and comprehensive grading scale for rhytides, laxity, and photoaging. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006 Sep;5(8):808-9. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23506765
Citation
Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients. Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;40(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7773602
Citation
Orentreich DS, Orentreich N. Subcutaneous incisionless (subcision) surgery for the correction of depressed scars and wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 1995 Jun;21(6):543-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00259.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28796657
Citation
Alster TS, Graham PM. Microneedling: A Review and Practical Guide. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Mar;44(3):397-404. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001248.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30214664
Citation
Ablon G. Safety and Effectiveness of an Automated Microneedling Device in Improving the Signs of Aging Skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018 Aug;11(8):29-34. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Skinstylus Sterilock Microneedling System for the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs